Author Topic: Conference Games Thread!  (Read 95422 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OKclone

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 864
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #800 on: February 18, 2014, 09:09:43 PM »
Why is it legal for Embiid to body slam someone without ever touching the ball and then call it a jump ball?

Kansas.
RIP Coach Orr 1927-2013

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67468
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #801 on: February 18, 2014, 09:10:55 PM »
weak call on JoJo imo.

yeah.  called it just so ku would have a chance.  disgraceful
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29368
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #802 on: February 18, 2014, 09:11:10 PM »
let's see if our guy can close this one out for us

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #803 on: February 18, 2014, 09:11:33 PM »
airball then dunk by the hawks to win?

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #804 on: February 18, 2014, 09:11:55 PM »
What if Orr was there

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67468
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #805 on: February 18, 2014, 09:12:24 PM »
lol, wow
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29368
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #806 on: February 18, 2014, 09:12:34 PM »
let's see if our guy can close this one out for us

:tsc:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47955
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #807 on: February 18, 2014, 09:12:46 PM »
box the eff out


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #808 on: February 18, 2014, 09:13:32 PM »
wiggins gets half his points on uncontested rebound put backs

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #809 on: February 18, 2014, 09:14:04 PM »
Little bit of a hook by Embiid

Offline OKclone

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 864
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #810 on: February 18, 2014, 09:15:39 PM »
Those two "jump balls" were the game.
RIP Coach Orr 1927-2013

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #811 on: February 18, 2014, 09:15:52 PM »
the will to win 10str8 is too strong. :tsc:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #812 on: February 18, 2014, 09:29:27 PM »
Doug Goutlieb made a racist comment about JoJo killing a lion and a raider in one possession. Patiently waiting MIR's response.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #813 on: February 18, 2014, 09:38:49 PM »
I'm so jelly at the calls they get on the road
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22871
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #814 on: February 18, 2014, 11:00:21 PM »
We didn't deserve to win, but on a less serious note:

Did you see that foul disparity? I wonder how much we paid those refs.  I mean, that amount of food stamps is sure to raise some eyebrows in a state like Texas.
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #815 on: February 19, 2014, 12:31:21 AM »
We didn't deserve to win, but on a less serious note:

Did you see that foul disparity? I wonder how much we paid those refs.  I mean, that amount of food stamps is sure to raise some eyebrows in a state like Texas.

KU had 16 fouls Tech had 21.  I am not surprised KU had fewer fouls but 21-16 is not a drastic difference.   The 2 jump ball calls were pretty bad calls.   Even the announcers made a comment about that a foul should have been called.  But, what do you expect, the Big 12 refs in general are just not very good. 

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #816 on: February 19, 2014, 01:18:22 AM »
We didn't deserve to win, but on a less serious note:

Did you see that foul disparity? I wonder how much we paid those refs.  I mean, that amount of food stamps is sure to raise some eyebrows in a state like Texas.

KU had 16 fouls Tech had 21.  I am not surprised KU had fewer fouls but 21-16 is not a drastic difference.   The 2 jump ball calls were pretty bad calls.   Even the announcers made a comment about that a foul should have been called.  But, what do you expect, the Big 12 refs in general are just not very good.

This has been going on long enough that the refs know to balance out the fouls.  It's not the fouls that tell the story so much as it's the FT disparity.  One team shot 30 FTs and the other just 14... You can probably guess which is which.

 :dubious:
bears are fast...

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #817 on: February 19, 2014, 02:20:18 AM »
We didn't deserve to win, but on a less serious note:

Did you see that foul disparity? I wonder how much we paid those refs.  I mean, that amount of food stamps is sure to raise some eyebrows in a state like Texas.

KU had 16 fouls Tech had 21.  I am not surprised KU had fewer fouls but 21-16 is not a drastic difference.   The 2 jump ball calls were pretty bad calls.   Even the announcers made a comment about that a foul should have been called.  But, what do you expect, the Big 12 refs in general are just not very good.

This has been going on long enough that the refs know to balance out the fouls.  It's not the fouls that tell the story so much as it's the FT disparity.  One team shot 30 FTs and the other just 14... You can probably guess which is which.

 :dubious:

It could have something to do with KU having really great athletes that can get to the rim and the other team has to foul them to prevent the player from scoring.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59606
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #818 on: February 19, 2014, 02:32:58 AM »
It's not foul disparity, it's what is and isn't called, and when things are or are not called.


Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #819 on: February 19, 2014, 01:55:01 PM »
KU-Tech is another great example of the value in using tempo free stats.

With a score of 64-63, most people would think that this was a defensive battle, however the opposite was true because the game only had 54 possessions. Both teams shot the ball really well (both over 50% eFG%) and both teams really hit the offensive glass (both 46% OR%). As a result KU won the efficiency battle 1.19 to 1.17 points per possession. Scoring at that rate is extremely rare against a Bill Self coached team, they give up 1.15 or more ppp 2-3 times per season at the most.

Offline OKclone

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 864
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #820 on: February 19, 2014, 05:29:20 PM »
It's not foul disparity, it's what is and isn't called, and when things are or are not called.

This, and stupid J-hawks cannot fathom this because their brains are too tiny.
RIP Coach Orr 1927-2013

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22871
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #821 on: February 19, 2014, 05:58:28 PM »
It's not foul disparity, it's what is and isn't called, and when things are or are not called.

This, and stupid J-hawks cannot fathom this because their brains are too tiny.

Shut up, Cy.  You're a birdbrain too.
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

The Big Train

  • Guest
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #822 on: February 19, 2014, 06:03:43 PM »
 :popcorn:

Offline OKclone

  • Taco Walk'r
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 864
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #823 on: February 20, 2014, 12:13:32 PM »
It's not foul disparity, it's what is and isn't called, and when things are or are not called.

This, and stupid J-hawks cannot fathom this because their brains are too tiny.

Shut up, Cy.  You're a birdbrain too.

Eff you Jayhawk.
RIP Coach Orr 1927-2013

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22871
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Re: Conference Games Thread!
« Reply #824 on: February 20, 2014, 12:31:49 PM »
It's not foul disparity, it's what is and isn't called, and when things are or are not called.

This, and stupid J-hawks cannot fathom this because their brains are too tiny.

Shut up, Cy.  You're a birdbrain too.

Eff you Jayhawk.

I bet you'd like that, wouldn't you, cyclone? (lower-case on purpose)
My winning smile and can-do attitude.