0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:57:14 PMQuote from: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on May 13, 2014, 01:52:27 PMQuote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:49:52 PM3. All of our defense is new. ("Hey Stevesie, it was all new before Sams left") Oh right, but it got me thinking. What about when #H30 either goes 3 and out a few times in a row, or scores on the first of second play of scrimmage a few times in a row, or turns it right over as soon as he touches it a few times in a row? We can't run some time off the clock to give our defense a break by giving Sams a go. We can't hand it off to a trusted back a for a sustained drive. We can't do anything at all, really. So Bill had better be conditioning the hell out of all of our defensive players.crap. completely forgot how bad were going to be if we score in 30 seconds every time we get the ball. If I remember the OU game correctly, and it's very possible I don't, it was always one or the other. And we lost by 2 scores.http://espn.go.com/ncf/playbyplay?gameId=333272306&period=1jake had 1 3 and out against OU on the road, as many as sams did. he scored on 3 drives in a row and our defense only gave up 10 points on the drives after. we didnt score to start the 3rd quarter and their offense had a couple of long drives that resulted in a FG and then a bad punt from our 3 that ended up in our end zone right after. we were playing in norman, and we lost the momentum after failing to score and they had an awesome special teams play on our mistake. really had nothing to do with trading 21 points for 10 in the second quarter...if you wanna say our defense was too tired from the 2nd quarter thats one thing, but they gave up 3 points on 2 drives in the second half, imo. gave up a TD from our 3 and they scored on an INT return. the INT is on jake for sure, but the defense didnt struggle in the second half and definitely not because waters scored too fast. thats just dumb.
Quote from: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on May 13, 2014, 01:52:27 PMQuote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:49:52 PM3. All of our defense is new. ("Hey Stevesie, it was all new before Sams left") Oh right, but it got me thinking. What about when #H30 either goes 3 and out a few times in a row, or scores on the first of second play of scrimmage a few times in a row, or turns it right over as soon as he touches it a few times in a row? We can't run some time off the clock to give our defense a break by giving Sams a go. We can't hand it off to a trusted back a for a sustained drive. We can't do anything at all, really. So Bill had better be conditioning the hell out of all of our defensive players.crap. completely forgot how bad were going to be if we score in 30 seconds every time we get the ball. If I remember the OU game correctly, and it's very possible I don't, it was always one or the other. And we lost by 2 scores.
Quote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:49:52 PM3. All of our defense is new. ("Hey Stevesie, it was all new before Sams left") Oh right, but it got me thinking. What about when #H30 either goes 3 and out a few times in a row, or scores on the first of second play of scrimmage a few times in a row, or turns it right over as soon as he touches it a few times in a row? We can't run some time off the clock to give our defense a break by giving Sams a go. We can't hand it off to a trusted back a for a sustained drive. We can't do anything at all, really. So Bill had better be conditioning the hell out of all of our defensive players.crap. completely forgot how bad were going to be if we score in 30 seconds every time we get the ball.
3. All of our defense is new. ("Hey Stevesie, it was all new before Sams left") Oh right, but it got me thinking. What about when #H30 either goes 3 and out a few times in a row, or scores on the first of second play of scrimmage a few times in a row, or turns it right over as soon as he touches it a few times in a row? We can't run some time off the clock to give our defense a break by giving Sams a go. We can't hand it off to a trusted back a for a sustained drive. We can't do anything at all, really. So Bill had better be conditioning the hell out of all of our defensive players.
Quote from: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on May 13, 2014, 02:20:37 PMQuote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:57:14 PMQuote from: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on May 13, 2014, 01:52:27 PMQuote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:49:52 PM3. All of our defense is new. ("Hey Stevesie, it was all new before Sams left") Oh right, but it got me thinking. What about when #H30 either goes 3 and out a few times in a row, or scores on the first of second play of scrimmage a few times in a row, or turns it right over as soon as he touches it a few times in a row? We can't run some time off the clock to give our defense a break by giving Sams a go. We can't hand it off to a trusted back a for a sustained drive. We can't do anything at all, really. So Bill had better be conditioning the hell out of all of our defensive players.crap. completely forgot how bad were going to be if we score in 30 seconds every time we get the ball. If I remember the OU game correctly, and it's very possible I don't, it was always one or the other. And we lost by 2 scores.http://espn.go.com/ncf/playbyplay?gameId=333272306&period=1jake had 1 3 and out against OU on the road, as many as sams did. he scored on 3 drives in a row and our defense only gave up 10 points on the drives after. we didnt score to start the 3rd quarter and their offense had a couple of long drives that resulted in a FG and then a bad punt from our 3 that ended up in our end zone right after. we were playing in norman, and we lost the momentum after failing to score and they had an awesome special teams play on our mistake. really had nothing to do with trading 21 points for 10 in the second quarter...if you wanna say our defense was too tired from the 2nd quarter thats one thing, but they gave up 3 points on 2 drives in the second half, imo. gave up a TD from our 3 and they scored on an INT return. the INT is on jake for sure, but the defense didnt struggle in the second half and definitely not because waters scored too fast. thats just dumb.Well I obviously can't believe a word you say since you don't even know where the game was played.
Is Stephen F. Austin any good? It would be pretty cool if he were in Manhattan to kick off the 2014 season, and he could hang out with Brad during the offseason.
Quote from: Bookie Pimp on May 13, 2014, 02:03:02 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on May 13, 2014, 01:35:24 PMHe should go to McNeese St.. Their starting QB graduated this past season and they finished the season ranked in the FCS Top 10. They also open the 2014 season in Lincoln.Trying to find a depth chart from 2013, but Sam Houston State could also be a good option. They just hired K.C. Keeler who led Delaware to an FCS championship in '03 and runners up in '07 & '10. He's 11-3 in FCS playoffs. I know they were also a top 10 team for most of last year and lose their SR QB along with Flanders. Not sure what they have coming back on defense or on the OL though.Is Stephen F. Austin any good? It would be pretty cool if he were in Manhattan to kick off the 2014 season, and he could hang out with Brad during the offseason.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on May 13, 2014, 01:35:24 PMHe should go to McNeese St.. Their starting QB graduated this past season and they finished the season ranked in the FCS Top 10. They also open the 2014 season in Lincoln.Trying to find a depth chart from 2013, but Sam Houston State could also be a good option. They just hired K.C. Keeler who led Delaware to an FCS championship in '03 and runners up in '07 & '10. He's 11-3 in FCS playoffs. I know they were also a top 10 team for most of last year and lose their SR QB along with Flanders. Not sure what they have coming back on defense or on the OL though.
He should go to McNeese St.. Their starting QB graduated this past season and they finished the season ranked in the FCS Top 10. They also open the 2014 season in Lincoln.
eff. mods, please ban me from this board.
Quote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:57:14 PMQuote from: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on May 13, 2014, 01:52:27 PMQuote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:49:52 PM3. All of our defense is new. ("Hey Stevesie, it was all new before Sams left") Oh right, but it got me thinking. What about when #H30 either goes 3 and out a few times in a row, or scores on the first of second play of scrimmage a few times in a row, or turns it right over as soon as he touches it a few times in a row? We can't run some time off the clock to give our defense a break by giving Sams a go. We can't hand it off to a trusted back a for a sustained drive. We can't do anything at all, really. So Bill had better be conditioning the hell out of all of our defensive players.crap. completely forgot how bad were going to be if we score in 30 seconds every time we get the ball. If I remember the OU game correctly, and it's very possible I don't, it was always one or the other. And we lost by 2 scores.We gave up really long runs to a team that ended up handing it to Bama at the end of the year. Losing to OU by two scores totally means we suck and Waters is a piss poor QB!
Quote from: SPEmaw on May 13, 2014, 02:02:07 PMQuote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:57:14 PMQuote from: The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep on May 13, 2014, 01:52:27 PMQuote from: Stevesie60 on May 13, 2014, 01:49:52 PM3. All of our defense is new. ("Hey Stevesie, it was all new before Sams left") Oh right, but it got me thinking. What about when #H30 either goes 3 and out a few times in a row, or scores on the first of second play of scrimmage a few times in a row, or turns it right over as soon as he touches it a few times in a row? We can't run some time off the clock to give our defense a break by giving Sams a go. We can't hand it off to a trusted back a for a sustained drive. We can't do anything at all, really. So Bill had better be conditioning the hell out of all of our defensive players.crap. completely forgot how bad were going to be if we score in 30 seconds every time we get the ball. If I remember the OU game correctly, and it's very possible I don't, it was always one or the other. And we lost by 2 scores.We gave up really long runs to a team that ended up handing it to Bama at the end of the year. Losing to OU by two scores totally means we suck and Waters is a piss poor QB! People seem to forget that Waters long bombs to Lockett were blown coverage/bad ass routes where he had to wait on the ball.. if covered half ass good all of them are INT's. just saying.
his stats are accurate. The problem wasn't quick scores, it was our inability to move the ball once OU took away the deep ball.
Quote from: michigancat on May 13, 2014, 02:44:34 PMhis stats are accurate. The problem wasn't quick scores, it was our inability to move the ball once OU took away the deep ball.We didn't even really try to run the ball (22 attempts) and the running game we did have (1.1 YPC) was pathetic. Of course if we don't find a little more balance in the offense we will be in big trouble.And our defense forgot how to defend zone read against OU.
Quote from: michigancat on May 13, 2014, 02:44:34 PMhis stats are accurate. The problem wasn't quick scores, it was our inability to move the ball once OU took away the deep ball.We didn't even really try to run the ball (22 attempts) and the running game we did have (1.1 YPC) was pathetic. Of course if we don't find a little more balance in the offense we will be in big trouble.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on May 13, 2014, 02:50:55 PMQuote from: michigancat on May 13, 2014, 02:44:34 PMhis stats are accurate. The problem wasn't quick scores, it was our inability to move the ball once OU took away the deep ball.We didn't even really try to run the ball (22 attempts) and the running game we did have (1.1 YPC) was pathetic. Of course if we don't find a little more balance in the offense we will be in big trouble.Should we expect to find more balance in the offense next year? Should we expect an improved running game?