I've Noticed goEMAW Is Almost 100% Boozehounds

[bubbles4ksu]

i don't think he went crazy all of a sudden. he is racist and it comes out in his work.

[bubbles4ksu]

but the science behind why intelligent people are the best drinkers is rock solid.

[Mr Bread]

but the science behind why intelligent people are the best drinkers is solid.

[bubbles4ksu]

but the science behind why intelligent people are the best drinkers is solid.

god damnit bread.

[DQ12]

is it that the best thinkers are drunks?  or does drinking make them smarter?

hmm..better get loaded on booze tonight and figure out this conundrum.

[Tobias]

there's lots of answers and lots of bottoms of bottles IYAM

[lopakman]

is it that the best thinkers are drunks?  or does drinking make them smarter?

hmm..better get loaded on booze tonight and figure out this conundrum.

That's an excellent question Dlew.  I'm hoping to get real smart over the course of the next few hours.  Go Chiefs and Cats.

[star seed 7]

I'm boozing!

[lopakman]

I'm boozing!

   Do you feel any smarter? 

[star seed 7]

I'm boozing!

   Do you feel any smarter?

Maybe, but I'm kinda dumb by gE standards.

[lopakman]

I'm boozing!

   Do you feel any smarter?

Maybe, but I'm kinda dumb by gE standards.

Yeah, I know.

[sys]

was not fired (from his day job), and good for the london school of economics for not doing so.

[star seed 7]

I'm boozing!

   Do you feel any smarter?

Maybe, but I'm kinda dumb by gE standards.

Yeah, I know.

  to think, I had turned the corner on you being a bad poster 

[Bloodfart]

but the science behind why intelligent people are the best drinkers is solid.

"Yes, I Am Drunk, But Tomorrow I Will Be Sober, And You Will Still Be a Fool."

[lopakman]

I'm boozing!

   Do you feel any smarter?

Maybe, but I'm kinda dumb by gE standards.

Yeah, I know.

  to think, I had turned the corner on you being a bad poster 

That one was too easy, I had to take it.  I was just joking.

And yes, I was a bad poster, thanks for reminding me.   

[Fedor]

Started with a Johnny walker red and ended up with who knows what.  Boy was I smarter than every one of those motherfuckers at the bar.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

[star seed 7]

Started with a Johnny walker red and ended up with who knows what.  Boy was I smarter than every one of those motherfuckers at the bar.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

Last time I drank J dub, I ended up sleeping through a party in a male friends bed.  Woke up to his face 8 inches from mine.

[Bloodfart]

 

[Mr Bread]

was not fired (from his day job), and good for the london school of economics for not doing so.

Yeah, Psychology Today dropped him, LSE just barred him from publishing anything in non-peer reviewed outlets for a year.  Would have been interesting to see what they would have done had he not agreed to that prohibition and been oh so very contrite.   

[steve dave]

I haven't read or heard about these papers/pieces/whatever but was the science bad? did he just racist out all over them or did he have data that a scientist would normally have and stuff?

[CNS]

Gonna get super smart tonight and tomorrow, guys.

[sys]

I haven't read or heard about these papers/pieces/whatever but was the science bad? did he just racist out all over them or did he have data that a scientist would normally have and stuff?

from some of the critics, it does sound like there were significant problems with his inferences, if not his data.  but as far as i can see, the blog post was pulled, so we aren't being trusted to evaluate his research for ourselves.  if someone knows where a copy of the original is, i'd be interested to see it.

['taterblast]

will be researching my ass off tomorrow in austin. i expect to release my findings within the next week.

[Tobias]

will be researching my ass off tomorrow in austin. i expect to release my findings within the next week.

gonna peer review the crap out of your study mister

[Mr Bread]

I haven't read or heard about these papers/pieces/whatever but was the science bad? did he just racist out all over them or did he have data that a scientist would normally have and stuff?

from some of the critics, it does sound like there were significant problems with his inferences, if not his data.  but as far as i can see, the blog post was pulled, so we aren't being trusted to evaluate his research for ourselves.  if someone knows where a copy of the original is, i'd be interested to see it.

Not the original, but:

In a letter to Judith Rees, director of the LSE, Dr Kanazawa says he "deeply regrets" the "unintended consequences" of the blog and accepts it was an "error" to publish it.

"In retrospect, I should have been more careful in selecting the title and the language that I used to express my ideas," he writes.

"In the aftermath of its publication, and from all the criticisms that I have received, I have learned that some of my arguments may have been flawed and not supported by the available evidence."

http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/417449.article

The LSE itself said:

It found that "some of the arguments used...were flawed and not supported by evidence, that an error was made in publishing the blog post" and that Dr Kanazawa had not given "due consideration to his approach or audience".

Also:

In addition to the 12-month ban, he will not teach any compulsory courses this academic year.