Author Topic: Not about the Quarterback play.  (Read 35113 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HeinBallz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2868
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #200 on: September 03, 2013, 06:44:44 PM »
I think I've isolated the problem between people in this thread.

 "Sam's would have won"
does not equal
"waters lost the game"

Yes, the defense sucks and oline/rb run game sucked balls. Waters was reasonably good and one of the only bright spots, but Sams could have won. 
Good is better than Evil because it's nicer.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55954
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #201 on: September 03, 2013, 08:47:28 PM »
The QB play may have been good enough to win, but it was also bad enough to lose. Think about it.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37995
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #202 on: September 03, 2013, 08:49:45 PM »
The QB play may have been good enough to win, but it was also bad enough to lose. Think about it.

That is ridiculous, michigancat. It was not good enough to win. It was almost good enough to win. That is why we lost.

Offline Rams

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3384
  • Worst poster on this board by far
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #203 on: September 03, 2013, 09:02:24 PM »
The QB play may have been good enough to win, but it was also bad enough to lose. Think about it.
actually the qb play and available personnel were good enough to win, but the play calling and substitution (or lack thereof) was bad enough to lose.  and it did.
"Son. This is why we are wildcats. Hard work, pride, the heart of this country. And if that's not enough for you, you can just move to California with your punk friends."

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #204 on: September 03, 2013, 09:09:52 PM »
The QB play may have been good enough to win, but it was also bad enough to lose. Think about it.

That is ridiculous, michigancat. It was not good enough to win. It was almost good enough to win. That is why we lost.

guys come on now....the QB did a fine job. he went 21-29 for 280 yards, averaged 9.7 yds per completion with 2 TD and 2 INT. the last INT was at the end so that one we can live with. who's to say Sams plays and maybe throws for 150 and rushes for 80 and they still lose? would you be saying Snyder shoulda played Waters more? you guys jumped out to a big lead by THROWING the ball. honestly the blame should be on the defense, not the QB. NDSU drove down the field their final possession an 18 play, 8:30 min long drive. your D simply couldnt stop them. look at the TD they scored....#44 for KSU got destroyed and #15 looked like he was scared to hit someone. 
everyone is jealous

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55954
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #205 on: September 03, 2013, 09:31:40 PM »
The QB play may have been good enough to win, but it was also bad enough to lose. Think about it.

That is ridiculous, michigancat. It was not good enough to win. It was almost good enough to win. That is why we lost.

guys come on now....the QB did a fine job. he went 21-29 for 280 yards, averaged 9.7 yds per completion with 2 TD and 2 INT. the last INT was at the end so that one we can live with.

BAD. ENOUGH. TO. LOSE.

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #206 on: September 03, 2013, 10:06:18 PM »
The QB play may have been good enough to win, but it was also bad enough to lose. Think about it.

That is ridiculous, michigancat. It was not good enough to win. It was almost good enough to win. That is why we lost.

guys come on now....the QB did a fine job. he went 21-29 for 280 yards, averaged 9.7 yds per completion with 2 TD and 2 INT. the last INT was at the end so that one we can live with.

BAD. ENOUGH. TO. LOSE.

Hubert says hi
everyone is jealous

Offline wiley

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2191
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #207 on: September 03, 2013, 10:14:48 PM »
Im not sure dthomas or sproles couldve done much with the crap fest that was our oline.  However with sproles they at least wouldve had to respect his speed to the outside.  With hubert, not so much.
it's easy to be emaw when EMAW is at your doorstep - FFF

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #208 on: September 03, 2013, 10:15:48 PM »
Im not sure dthomas or sproles couldve done much with the crap fest that was our oline.  However with sproles they at least wouldve had to respect his speed to the outside.  With hubert, not so much.

1st team big 12 tho
everyone is jealous

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #209 on: September 03, 2013, 10:34:07 PM »
80% of it was play calling.

Offline KSUBrian

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 815
  • Weird Robert is #1
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #210 on: September 04, 2013, 01:34:51 AM »
The QB play may have been good enough to win, but it was also bad enough to lose. Think about it.

That is ridiculous, michigancat. It was not good enough to win. It was almost good enough to win. That is why we lost.

guys come on now....the QB did a fine job. he went 21-29 for 280 yards, averaged 9.7 yds per completion with 2 TD and 2 INT. the last INT was at the end so that one we can live with. who's to say Sams plays and maybe throws for 150 and rushes for 80 and they still lose? would you be saying Snyder shoulda played Waters more? you guys jumped out to a big lead by THROWING the ball. honestly the blame should be on the defense, not the QB. NDSU drove down the field their final possession an 18 play, 8:30 min long drive. your D simply couldnt stop them. look at the TD they scored....#44 for KSU got destroyed and #15 looked like he was scared to hit someone.

No way anybody with any FBIQ lives with the int at the end.  That was not a hail mary.  They had 28 seconds to get into FG range to try to tie the score. So 50-55 yards on 2-3 plays in 28 seconds in CFB is a reasonable expectation.  Throwing an Int on the 1st attempt is unacceptable.

Offline KSUBrian

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 815
  • Weird Robert is #1
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #211 on: September 04, 2013, 01:44:02 AM »
QB run game dilemma:  On the zone read, Waters always seems to hand-off to the RB, Sams always seems to keep the ball. If I can see this with very little game action, opposing D coordinators can too.  Until either can learn to make the right read or Sams becomes a threat in the passing game, it will be easyfor the D  to know what to key on for whichever QB is in the game.

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #212 on: September 04, 2013, 02:09:58 AM »
Guys, it was one game. Sometimes things just don't click in the first game for whatever reason. Let's see what happens against Loozyanna before we all look back at this thread and realize that we're idiots. I'm positive that Waters and Hubert will run better behind a more motivated line this weekend. Whether that's good enough to win some ball games in the Big XII should be apparent at the end of the non-con, if it isn't good enough then it's time to make a change. In the meantime I am sure Bill is going to get #Life some more snaps to make sure that he's ready to go if a change is needed.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline felix rex

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8967
  • Knows what Brent did
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #213 on: September 04, 2013, 04:21:55 AM »
The KU meltdown over Hubert/Sims has been a rare bright spot this week.
"How will I recruit to Manhattan? Well, distance. And the proud state of basketball. It start there, and then daily flights to Dallas, because I'm really good at going out. Like top five good. Ask my wife. She wants me to be happy."

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38069
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #214 on: September 04, 2013, 10:11:07 AM »
Simply amazing how many ppl automatically assume Sams can't pass just because Waters can't run. 

Don't get this.  Like at all.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #215 on: September 04, 2013, 10:29:09 AM »
Guys, it was one game. Sometimes things just don't click in the first game for whatever reason. Let's see what happens against Loozyanna before we all look back at this thread and realize that we're idiots. I'm positive that Waters and Hubert will run better behind a more motivated line this weekend. Whether that's good enough to win some ball games in the Big XII should be apparent at the end of the non-con, if it isn't good enough then it's time to make a change. In the meantime I am sure Bill is going to get #Life some more snaps to make sure that he's ready to go if a change is needed.

Take it to the optimism thread, loser
:adios:

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13505
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #216 on: September 04, 2013, 10:32:02 AM »
what if waters is like mike tyson.. hear me out.. just like iron mike was use to knocking fools out in nanoseconds and then when it came to a long bout wasn't always the best, what if that is the case with waters?

he has become accustomed to getting a huge lead, coasting and then letting his reserve come in.. can waters play a full game?  :Ughhh:

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #217 on: September 04, 2013, 10:40:10 AM »
what if waters is like mike tyson.. hear me out.. just like iron mike was use to knocking fools out in nanoseconds and then when it came to a long bout wasn't always the best, what if that is the case with waters?

he has become accustomed to getting a huge lead, coasting and then letting his reserve come in.. can waters play a full game?  :Ughhh:

Like if he played the two snaps that were given to Sams? :dunno:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37995
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #218 on: September 04, 2013, 11:18:31 AM »
what if waters is like mike tyson.. hear me out.. just like iron mike was use to knocking fools out in nanoseconds and then when it came to a long bout wasn't always the best, what if that is the case with waters?

he has become accustomed to getting a huge lead, coasting and then letting his reserve come in.. can waters play a full game?  :Ughhh:

I think you are on to something here and the solution is simple. Waters should start every game and play until we either have a turnover, punt, or field goal. Let him stay in the game as long as he gets touchdowns, then as soon as he starts to wear down, let Sams finish the game.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #219 on: September 04, 2013, 11:24:04 AM »
what if waters is like mike tyson.. hear me out.. just like iron mike was use to knocking fools out in nanoseconds and then when it came to a long bout wasn't always the best, what if that is the case with waters?

he has become accustomed to getting a huge lead, coasting and then letting his reserve come in.. can waters play a full game?  :Ughhh:

I think you are on to something here and the solution is simple. Waters should start every game and play until we either have a turnover, punt, or field goal. Let him stay in the game as long as he gets touchdowns, then as soon as he starts to wear down, let Sams finish the game.
Would you switch back and forth if both continued to fail at getting touchdowns?  At which point do you bring in HSC?

Offline ksupamplemousse

  • Elevate
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4530
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #220 on: September 04, 2013, 11:37:17 AM »
Guys, it was one game. Sometimes things just don't click in the first game for whatever reason. Let's see what happens against Loozyanna before we all look back at this thread and realize that we're idiots. I'm positive that Waters and Hubert will run better behind a more motivated line this weekend. Whether that's good enough to win some ball games in the Big XII should be apparent at the end of the non-con, if it isn't good enough then it's time to make a change. In the meantime I am sure Bill is going to get #Life some more snaps to make sure that he's ready to go if a change is needed.

Take it to the optimism thread, loser

I contemplated posting it there, loser.
This is who I am...I have no problem crying. - Jerome Tang

Offline Demo158

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 673
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #221 on: September 04, 2013, 11:38:31 AM »
Does anyone have footage of Sams' 17-yard td run?

Offline wiley

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2191
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #222 on: September 04, 2013, 11:44:38 AM »
Im not sure dthomas or sproles couldve done much with the crap fest that was our oline.  However with sproles they at least wouldve had to respect his speed to the outside.  With hubert, not so much.

1st team big 12 tho

Yeah, last year, right?
it's easy to be emaw when EMAW is at your doorstep - FFF

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37995
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #223 on: September 04, 2013, 11:50:05 AM »
what if waters is like mike tyson.. hear me out.. just like iron mike was use to knocking fools out in nanoseconds and then when it came to a long bout wasn't always the best, what if that is the case with waters?

he has become accustomed to getting a huge lead, coasting and then letting his reserve come in.. can waters play a full game?  :Ughhh:

I think you are on to something here and the solution is simple. Waters should start every game and play until we either have a turnover, punt, or field goal. Let him stay in the game as long as he gets touchdowns, then as soon as he starts to wear down, let Sams finish the game.
Would you switch back and forth if both continued to fail at getting touchdowns?  At which point do you bring in HSC?

No. Waters is Mike Tyson. He is built for the early knockout. If you don't get it, you go to the guy who is built to grind it out on the ground and win close games.

Offline Unruly

  • Oh so Unruly.
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2703
    • View Profile
Re: Not about the Quarterback play.
« Reply #224 on: September 04, 2013, 11:52:02 AM »
I mean really, the sole reason that we lost this game was because the mask didn't make a production quality video.

It has to be the only reason why.
:dance: