Sorry Michael Hastings . . .

[sonofdaxjones]

I don't have a link it's just general observation. 

You seem to be kind of upset about this though Felix.   Sorry bro

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

Oh man

[Paul Moscow]

I don't have a link it's just general observation. 

You seem to be kind of upset about this though Felix.   Sorry bro

So your claim that progressives/left-leaners are relieved and/or working in unison to discredit Michael Hastings, his work, and activist journalism wholly with an end goal of protecting Obama from being linked to a car-assassination plot is all based on a "general observation"?

[steve dave]

I don't have a link it's just general observation. 

You seem to be kind of upset about this though Felix.   Sorry bro

So your claim that progressives/left-leaners are relieved and/or working in unison to discredit Michael Hastings, his work, and activist journalism wholly with an end goal of protecting Obama from being linked to a car-assassination plot is all based on a "general observation"?

makes sense?

[sonofdaxjones]

I don't have a link it's just general observation. 

You seem to be kind of upset about this though Felix.   Sorry bro

So your claim that progressives/left-leaners are relieved and/or working in unison to discredit Michael Hastings, his work, and activist journalism wholly with an end goal of protecting Obama from being linked to a car-assassination plot is all based on a "general observation"?

When you have an immediate, seemingly lockstep response from them MSM to discredit, pooh-pooh, and tamp down all thought and inquiry by non MSM types into the events that led to Hastings death, it's a reasonable response for any observer . . . 'a whew, I can jump on this and nip this in the bud right now and move on' mindset. 

[OregonSmock]

Yeah, only the real independent thinkers out there believe that the POTUS is sitting around at night, plotting ways to assassinate rogue journalists.

[sonofdaxjones]

Yeah, only the real independent thinkers out there believe that the POTUS is sitting around at night, plotting ways to assassinate rogue journalists.

The POTUS was directly involved in picking out which families to kill with Drone Strikes.

[OregonSmock]

Yeah, only the real independent thinkers out there believe that the POTUS is sitting around at night, plotting ways to assassinate rogue journalists.

The POTUS was directly involved in picking out which families to kill with Drone Strikes.

Yep, all those poor, innocent families out there who were droned in the middle of the night, right after they got done watching "Dancing with the Stars."

[felix rex]

Now worries, Dax. I know links are hard to find. Me and you, we're still cool though.

[sonofdaxjones]

Yeah, only the real independent thinkers out there believe that the POTUS is sitting around at night, plotting ways to assassinate rogue journalists.

The POTUS was directly involved in picking out which families to kill with Drone Strikes.

Yep, all those poor, innocent families out there who were droned in the middle of the night, right after they got done watching "Dancing with the Stars."

Nice post Neo-Con

[sonofdaxjones]

Now worries, Dax. I know links are hard to find. Me and you, we're still cool though.

Hey, if it's not on the Internet it doesn't exist.

[OregonSmock]

Yeah, only the real independent thinkers out there believe that the POTUS is sitting around at night, plotting ways to assassinate rogue journalists.

The POTUS was directly involved in picking out which families to kill with Drone Strikes.

Yep, all those poor, innocent families out there who were droned in the middle of the night, right after they got done watching "Dancing with the Stars."

Nice post Neo-Con

I'm sure the intent of each drone strike was to murder as many innocent families as possible.


 
 

[sonofdaxjones]

Yeah, only the real independent thinkers out there believe that the POTUS is sitting around at night, plotting ways to assassinate rogue journalists.

The POTUS was directly involved in picking out which families to kill with Drone Strikes.

Yep, all those poor, innocent families out there who were droned in the middle of the night, right after they got done watching "Dancing with the Stars."

Nice post Neo-Con

I'm sure the intent of each drone strike was to murder as many innocent families as possible.


 

It's hard to have this discussion with a neo-con, throw the lead and count the dead right Beems??

The definition of a Terrorist that was being used at one point, if not still by JSOC et. al. was extremely loose. 

[OregonSmock]

Yeah, only the real independent thinkers out there believe that the POTUS is sitting around at night, plotting ways to assassinate rogue journalists.

The POTUS was directly involved in picking out which families to kill with Drone Strikes.

Yep, all those poor, innocent families out there who were droned in the middle of the night, right after they got done watching "Dancing with the Stars."

Nice post Neo-Con

I'm sure the intent of each drone strike was to murder as many innocent families as possible.


 

It's hard to have this discussion with a neo-con, throw the lead and count the dead right Beems??

The definition of a Terrorist that was being used at one point, if not still by JSOC et. al. was extremely loose.

Could you at least stop pretending like these drone strikes are aimed at the homes of random, innocent families?

[sonofdaxjones]

Yeah, only the real independent thinkers out there believe that the POTUS is sitting around at night, plotting ways to assassinate rogue journalists.

The POTUS was directly involved in picking out which families to kill with Drone Strikes.

Yep, all those poor, innocent families out there who were droned in the middle of the night, right after they got done watching "Dancing with the Stars."

Nice post Neo-Con

I'm sure the intent of each drone strike was to murder as many innocent families as possible.


 

It's hard to have this discussion with a neo-con, throw the lead and count the dead right Beems??

The definition of a Terrorist that was being used at one point, if not still by JSOC et. al. was extremely loose.

Could you at least stop pretending like these drone strikes are aimed at the homes of random, innocent families?

The neo-con will always accept Coleteral Damage as he prosecutes his secret war.

[OregonSmock]

LOL at 'Pad calling me a neo-con when he most likely voted for George W. Bush twice.

[sonofdaxjones]

LOL at 'Pad calling me a neo-con when he most likely voted for George W. Bush twice.

The only thing that seperates the current administration from the previous is the unilaterial or near unilaterial conventional force invasion of a soverign nation . . . in  nearly every other facet of what supposedly caused so called Progressive Liberals to hate the previous administration . . . has been expanded and accelerated under the current administration including the use of non-conventional asymetric warfare to topple the government of a soverign nation (backed by US/NATO cruise missile and F-15's, not to mention Western Intelligence capital assets and conventional military transportation mechanisms).    Patriot Act, FISA, state sanctioned assassanation etc. etc. and et. al . . . all expanded by the current administration.   This is what the closeted Liberal Neo-Con supports.   Encroachment on civil liberties . . . accelerated by the current administration.

Stay tuned on the conventional force/boots on the ground aspect that was mentioned in the previous paragraph as it pertains to Syria.   

[CNS]

Dax, you totally missed a fantastic opportunity to drop a "link?" and totally burn him.

[sonofdaxjones]

Dax, you totally missed a fantastic opportunity to drop a "link?" and totally burn him.

If it's not on the Internet, no one thought it, saw it, or heard it.

[Paul Moscow]

I don't have a link it's just general observation. 

You seem to be kind of upset about this though Felix.   Sorry bro

So your claim that progressives/left-leaners are relieved and/or working in unison to discredit Michael Hastings, his work, and activist journalism wholly with an end goal of protecting Obama from being linked to a car-assassination plot is all based on a "general observation"?

When you have an immediate, seemingly lockstep response from them MSM to discredit, pooh-pooh, and tamp down all thought and inquiry by non MSM types into the events that led to Hastings death, it's a reasonable response for any observer . . . 'a whew, I can jump on this and nip this in the bud right now and move on' mindset.

So a a progressive, liberal-leaning MSM working in lockstop to "pooh pooh" down inquiry and thought into Hastings death would certainly never do a piece on Hastings conspiracy theories - especially not one would actually hint that a conspiracy is possible because that would be to go against orders.

“Even at this make-shift memorial, there are questions about Hastings’ death,”

CNN:

Megan Kelley at Fox News

“Some are asking if there is more to his death than meets the eye"

[EllRobersonisInnocent]

Can't wait for the made up toxicology report w/ his ".20 BAC"

[john "teach me how to" dougie]

I don't have a link it's just general observation. 

You seem to be kind of upset about this though Felix.   Sorry bro

So your claim that progressives/left-leaners are relieved and/or working in unison to discredit Michael Hastings, his work, and activist journalism wholly with an end goal of protecting Obama from being linked to a car-assassination plot is all based on a "general observation"?

When you have an immediate, seemingly lockstep response from them MSM to discredit, pooh-pooh, and tamp down all thought and inquiry by non MSM types into the events that led to Hastings death, it's a reasonable response for any observer . . . 'a whew, I can jump on this and nip this in the bud right now and move on' mindset.

So a a progressive, liberal-leaning MSM working in lockstop to "pooh pooh" down inquiry and thought into Hastings death would certainly never do a piece on Hastings conspiracy theories - especially not one would actually hint that a conspiracy is possible because that would be to go against orders.

“Even at this make-shift memorial, there are questions about Hastings’ death,”

CNN:

Megan Kelley at Fox News

“Some are asking if there is more to his death than meets the eye"

FOX NEWS!? 

[sonofdaxjones]

I don't have a link it's just general observation. 

You seem to be kind of upset about this though Felix.   Sorry bro

So your claim that progressives/left-leaners are relieved and/or working in unison to discredit Michael Hastings, his work, and activist journalism wholly with an end goal of protecting Obama from being linked to a car-assassination plot is all based on a "general observation"?

When you have an immediate, seemingly lockstep response from them MSM to discredit, pooh-pooh, and tamp down all thought and inquiry by non MSM types into the events that led to Hastings death, it's a reasonable response for any observer . . . 'a whew, I can jump on this and nip this in the bud right now and move on' mindset.

So a a progressive, liberal-leaning MSM working in lockstop to "pooh pooh" down inquiry and thought into Hastings death would certainly never do a piece on Hastings conspiracy theories - especially not one would actually hint that a conspiracy is possible because that would be to go against orders.

“Even at this make-shift memorial, there are questions about Hastings’ death,”

CNN:

Megan Kelley at Fox News

“Some are asking if there is more to his death than meets the eye"

The only thing I watch on CNN is Anthony Bourdain, and my combined weekly viewing of Fox News is about 5 minutes.

[felix rex]

Now worries, Dax. I know links are hard to find. Me and you, we're still cool though.

Hey, if it's not on the Internet it doesn't exist.

So basically you're asking me to just trust you on this one? To clarify, that's not a problem. I just wanted to be sure (you know how flaky we g-men are).

[kim carnes]

Now worries, Dax. I know links are hard to find. Me and you, we're still cool though.

Hey, if it's not on the Internet it doesn't exist.

So basically you're asking me to just trust you on this one? To clarify, that's not a problem. I just wanted to be sure (you know how flaky we g-men are).

so his car just exploded?  ok...