Author Topic: one year delayed, eh cap'n?  (Read 221370 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46631
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #75 on: April 23, 2013, 12:01:34 PM »
also, cap, you are the closest thing to a phone to the AD this site has. some of the posters will choose to lash out at your for it. I appreciate your input very much.

Yes, I agree. Same thing happens any time something bad happens. I get it, people are upset. I will try to give info when I can.

How is this player revolt different than the threatened (not confirmed) defections Frank faced at the end of last season? 

because, there is/was no player revolt.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51648
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #76 on: April 23, 2013, 12:04:25 PM »
also, cap, you are the closest thing to a phone to the AD this site has. some of the posters will choose to lash out at your for it. I appreciate your input very much.

Yes, I agree. Same thing happens any time something bad happens. I get it, people are upset. I will try to give info when I can.

How is this player revolt different than the threatened (not confirmed) defections Frank faced at the end of last season? 

because, there is/was no player revolt.

Now or at the end of last season?

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46631
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #77 on: April 23, 2013, 12:04:55 PM »
you pick


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #78 on: April 23, 2013, 12:05:48 PM »
also, cap, you are the closest thing to a phone to the AD this site has. some of the posters will choose to lash out at your for it. I appreciate your input very much.

Yes, I agree. Same thing happens any time something bad happens. I get it, people are upset. I will try to give info when I can.

How is this player revolt different than the threatened (not confirmed) defections Frank faced at the end of last season? 

because, there is/was no player revolt.

Now or at the end of last season?

As far as we know, Angel/Diaz/Orris or their parents weren't whining to the AD. Or they weren't likely whining as loudly.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21937
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #79 on: April 23, 2013, 12:08:28 PM »
The whole point of this thread is dumb because the question posed is:  given that defections were supposed to be very bad last year, how can they be a good thing this year?  To which, one can simply answer that they aren't good this year either.

Offline captaincrap

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 759
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #80 on: April 23, 2013, 12:11:25 PM »
you pick

As I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16214
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #81 on: April 23, 2013, 12:13:23 PM »
you pick

As I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.

phew!  good thing we got that worked out.

Offline Stupid Fitz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4826
  • Go Cats
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #82 on: April 23, 2013, 12:14:41 PM »
you pick

As I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.

phew!  good thing we got that worked out.

Yes, exactly as planned.  Now we have a shitty coach and shitty players. 

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51648
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #83 on: April 23, 2013, 12:14:54 PM »
you pick

As I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.

How is it not an issue this year?  Seems like a pretty inconsistent position. 


Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46631
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #84 on: April 23, 2013, 12:15:37 PM »
you pick

As I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.

a:  there was no revolt this year, i'm not sure why lsoc keeps referring to one. 
b:  there was no revolt last year, i'm not sure why CC keeps referring to one.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline captaincrap

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 759
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #85 on: April 23, 2013, 12:18:16 PM »
you pick

As I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.

How is it not an issue this year?  Seems like a pretty inconsistent position.

Not sure what you mean. 3 players have indicated transfer plans this spring, 2 for family reasons and 1 for PT. 2 of the players rarely saw action.

Last spring many more than 3 had indicated transfer plans, each for the same reason, and it wasn't location or PT.

The two situations are not at all similar.

Offline captaincrap

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 759
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #86 on: April 23, 2013, 12:19:04 PM »
b:  there was no revolt last year, i'm not sure why CC keeps referring to one.

Because it's reality

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85424
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #87 on: April 23, 2013, 12:20:29 PM »
I believe there would have been players leave because of Frank. I know Spradling would have. Guessing Nino would have been another. Would like to know who the others were.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51648
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #88 on: April 23, 2013, 12:22:17 PM »
I believe there would have been players leave because of Frank. I know Spradling would have. Guessing Nino would have been another. Would like to know who the others were.

Not Angel

Offline slucat

  • GIRL ALERT, GIRL ALERT
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 706
  • This SLU, not the city
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #89 on: April 23, 2013, 12:23:37 PM »
I believe there would have been players leave because of Frank. I know Spradling would have. Guessing Nino would have been another. Would like to know who the others were.

Rod, JO?  :dunno:

Can we get three more?

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21937
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #90 on: April 23, 2013, 12:24:02 PM »
Players leaving was part of Frank's SOP.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53865
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #91 on: April 23, 2013, 12:24:41 PM »
Players leaving was part of Frank's SOP.

but never the good one, ya know? I guess Judge maybe.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85424
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #92 on: April 23, 2013, 12:25:25 PM »
Players leaving was part of Frank's SOP.

but never the good one, ya know? I guess Judge maybe.

Sutton was a starter, not the best starter obv.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53865
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #93 on: April 23, 2013, 12:26:52 PM »
Players leaving was part of Frank's SOP.

but never the good one, ya know? I guess Judge maybe.

Sutton was a starter, not the best starter obv.

oh yeah. forgot about him.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51648
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #94 on: April 23, 2013, 12:28:11 PM »
you pick

As I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.

How is it not an issue this year?  Seems like a pretty inconsistent position.

Not sure what you mean. 3 players have indicated transfer plans this spring, 2 for family reasons and 1 for PT. 2 of the players rarely saw action.

Last spring many more than 3 had indicated transfer plans, each for the same reason, and it wasn't location or PT.

The two situations are not at all similar.

I agree that the situations are different.  last year was some extremely marginal players who can be replaced only threatening to leave if they had to play for the coach who recruited them and this year is the actual loss of a All Big 2nd PG.  So the difference is kind of not relevant except it illustrates a textbook example of the opposite way to handle a situation.

 
What can we do to stop the talented players hemmoraging from our program right now?


Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #95 on: April 23, 2013, 12:31:06 PM »
you pick

As I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.

How is it not an issue this year?  Seems like a pretty inconsistent position.

Not sure what you mean. 3 players have indicated transfer plans this spring, 2 for family reasons and 1 for PT. 2 of the players rarely saw action.

Last spring many more than 3 had indicated transfer plans, each for the same reason, and it wasn't location or PT.

The two situations are not at all similar.

I agree that the situations are different.  last year was some extremely marginal players who can be replaced only threatening to leave if they had to play for the coach who recruited them and this year is the actual loss of a All Big 2nd PG.  So the difference is kind of not relevant except it illustrates a textbook example of the opposite way to handle a situation.

 
What can we do to stop the talented players hemmoraging from our program right now?

Run out of talented players. 
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51648
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #96 on: April 23, 2013, 12:35:43 PM »
you pick

As I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.

How is it not an issue this year?  Seems like a pretty inconsistent position.

Not sure what you mean. 3 players have indicated transfer plans this spring, 2 for family reasons and 1 for PT. 2 of the players rarely saw action.

Last spring many more than 3 had indicated transfer plans, each for the same reason, and it wasn't location or PT.

The two situations are not at all similar.

I agree that the situations are different.  last year was some extremely marginal players who can be replaced only threatening to leave if they had to play for the coach who recruited them and this year is the actual loss of a All Big 2nd PG.  So the difference is kind of not relevant except it illustrates a textbook example of the opposite way to handle a situation.

 
What can we do to stop the talented players hemmoraging from our program right now?

Run out of talented players.

Or just run out of fans who give a eff

Offline Ghost of Stan Parrish

  • I found my password
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1816
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #97 on: April 23, 2013, 12:38:20 PM »
Someone should refer Orris and Diaz to this thread.  I'm sure they'd like to read all the nice things being said about them.
"I'm thankful our MHK forefathers had the foresight to lynch white dudes so that we might be able to throw up the mob with a clear conscience."

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85424
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #98 on: April 23, 2013, 12:39:46 PM »
Someone should refer Orris and Diaz to this thread.  I'm sure they'd like to read all the nice things being said about them.

did you see Orris' "LOL" tweet yesterday when the Angel meltdown hit twitter?  :D

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51648
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: one year delayed, eh cap'n?
« Reply #99 on: April 23, 2013, 12:44:26 PM »
Someone should refer Orris and Diaz to this thread.  I'm sure they'd like to read all the nice things being said about them.

did you see Orris' "LOL" tweet yesterday when the Angel meltdown hit twitter?  :D

spunky tweet