0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 09:38:44 AMQuote from: steve dave on April 23, 2013, 09:36:17 AMalso, cap, you are the closest thing to a phone to the AD this site has. some of the posters will choose to lash out at your for it. I appreciate your input very much.Yes, I agree. Same thing happens any time something bad happens. I get it, people are upset. I will try to give info when I can.How is this player revolt different than the threatened (not confirmed) defections Frank faced at the end of last season?
Quote from: steve dave on April 23, 2013, 09:36:17 AMalso, cap, you are the closest thing to a phone to the AD this site has. some of the posters will choose to lash out at your for it. I appreciate your input very much.Yes, I agree. Same thing happens any time something bad happens. I get it, people are upset. I will try to give info when I can.
also, cap, you are the closest thing to a phone to the AD this site has. some of the posters will choose to lash out at your for it. I appreciate your input very much.
Quote from: Limestone on April 23, 2013, 11:51:48 AMQuote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 09:38:44 AMQuote from: steve dave on April 23, 2013, 09:36:17 AMalso, cap, you are the closest thing to a phone to the AD this site has. some of the posters will choose to lash out at your for it. I appreciate your input very much.Yes, I agree. Same thing happens any time something bad happens. I get it, people are upset. I will try to give info when I can.How is this player revolt different than the threatened (not confirmed) defections Frank faced at the end of last season? because, there is/was no player revolt.
Quote from: pissclams on April 23, 2013, 12:01:34 PMQuote from: Limestone on April 23, 2013, 11:51:48 AMQuote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 09:38:44 AMQuote from: steve dave on April 23, 2013, 09:36:17 AMalso, cap, you are the closest thing to a phone to the AD this site has. some of the posters will choose to lash out at your for it. I appreciate your input very much.Yes, I agree. Same thing happens any time something bad happens. I get it, people are upset. I will try to give info when I can.How is this player revolt different than the threatened (not confirmed) defections Frank faced at the end of last season? because, there is/was no player revolt.Now or at the end of last season?
you pick
Quote from: pissclams on April 23, 2013, 12:04:55 PMyou pickAs I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.
Quote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 12:11:25 PMQuote from: pissclams on April 23, 2013, 12:04:55 PMyou pickAs I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.phew! good thing we got that worked out.
Quote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 12:11:25 PMQuote from: pissclams on April 23, 2013, 12:04:55 PMyou pickAs I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.How is it not an issue this year? Seems like a pretty inconsistent position.
b: there was no revolt last year, i'm not sure why CC keeps referring to one.
I believe there would have been players leave because of Frank. I know Spradling would have. Guessing Nino would have been another. Would like to know who the others were.
Players leaving was part of Frank's SOP.
Quote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 12:24:02 PMPlayers leaving was part of Frank's SOP.but never the good one, ya know? I guess Judge maybe.
Quote from: michigancat on April 23, 2013, 12:24:41 PMQuote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 12:24:02 PMPlayers leaving was part of Frank's SOP.but never the good one, ya know? I guess Judge maybe.Sutton was a starter, not the best starter obv.
Quote from: Limestone on April 23, 2013, 12:14:54 PMQuote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 12:11:25 PMQuote from: pissclams on April 23, 2013, 12:04:55 PMyou pickAs I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.How is it not an issue this year? Seems like a pretty inconsistent position. Not sure what you mean. 3 players have indicated transfer plans this spring, 2 for family reasons and 1 for PT. 2 of the players rarely saw action.Last spring many more than 3 had indicated transfer plans, each for the same reason, and it wasn't location or PT. The two situations are not at all similar.
Quote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 12:18:16 PMQuote from: Limestone on April 23, 2013, 12:14:54 PMQuote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 12:11:25 PMQuote from: pissclams on April 23, 2013, 12:04:55 PMyou pickAs I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.How is it not an issue this year? Seems like a pretty inconsistent position. Not sure what you mean. 3 players have indicated transfer plans this spring, 2 for family reasons and 1 for PT. 2 of the players rarely saw action.Last spring many more than 3 had indicated transfer plans, each for the same reason, and it wasn't location or PT. The two situations are not at all similar.I agree that the situations are different. last year was some extremely marginal players who can be replaced only threatening to leave if they had to play for the coach who recruited them and this year is the actual loss of a All Big 2nd PG. So the difference is kind of not relevant except it illustrates a textbook example of the opposite way to handle a situation. What can we do to stop the talented players hemmoraging from our program right now?
Quote from: Limestone on April 23, 2013, 12:28:11 PMQuote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 12:18:16 PMQuote from: Limestone on April 23, 2013, 12:14:54 PMQuote from: captaincrap on April 23, 2013, 12:11:25 PMQuote from: pissclams on April 23, 2013, 12:04:55 PMyou pickAs I have said before, there very much was an issue last spring with many players indicating they were not coming back due to the head coach.How is it not an issue this year? Seems like a pretty inconsistent position. Not sure what you mean. 3 players have indicated transfer plans this spring, 2 for family reasons and 1 for PT. 2 of the players rarely saw action.Last spring many more than 3 had indicated transfer plans, each for the same reason, and it wasn't location or PT. The two situations are not at all similar.I agree that the situations are different. last year was some extremely marginal players who can be replaced only threatening to leave if they had to play for the coach who recruited them and this year is the actual loss of a All Big 2nd PG. So the difference is kind of not relevant except it illustrates a textbook example of the opposite way to handle a situation. What can we do to stop the talented players hemmoraging from our program right now?Run out of talented players.
Someone should refer Orris and Diaz to this thread. I'm sure they'd like to read all the nice things being said about them.
Quote from: Ghost of Stan Parrish on April 23, 2013, 12:38:20 PMSomeone should refer Orris and Diaz to this thread. I'm sure they'd like to read all the nice things being said about them.did you see Orris' "LOL" tweet yesterday when the Angel meltdown hit twitter?