0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Trim on May 22, 2014, 11:23:03 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 22, 2014, 10:28:36 AMQuote from: Trim on May 22, 2014, 09:57:59 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 22, 2014, 09:20:06 AMHence the need for clarification. The mods here are just awful awful.Someone thought Leticia would have a successful legal claim against the university, I've yet to see anyone articulate whyYou posted your stupid question while I was typing my post about how all Leticia needs to do is file a new transfer request that would be decided on by John Currie and John Currie only. I got the little pop-up that you'd posted, read it, lol'd, and went ahead with posting what I'd typed. You can keep asking your dumb question, and maybe other people will talk to you about it and maybe they won't. So, nobody ever implied Leti could sue kstate? Yeah, her attorney did, but I'm not one of the people who's going to talk about it with you.Thanks for answering my "stupid" question, jerkoff.
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 22, 2014, 10:28:36 AMQuote from: Trim on May 22, 2014, 09:57:59 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 22, 2014, 09:20:06 AMHence the need for clarification. The mods here are just awful awful.Someone thought Leticia would have a successful legal claim against the university, I've yet to see anyone articulate whyYou posted your stupid question while I was typing my post about how all Leticia needs to do is file a new transfer request that would be decided on by John Currie and John Currie only. I got the little pop-up that you'd posted, read it, lol'd, and went ahead with posting what I'd typed. You can keep asking your dumb question, and maybe other people will talk to you about it and maybe they won't. So, nobody ever implied Leti could sue kstate? Yeah, her attorney did, but I'm not one of the people who's going to talk about it with you.
Quote from: Trim on May 22, 2014, 09:57:59 AMQuote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 22, 2014, 09:20:06 AMHence the need for clarification. The mods here are just awful awful.Someone thought Leticia would have a successful legal claim against the university, I've yet to see anyone articulate whyYou posted your stupid question while I was typing my post about how all Leticia needs to do is file a new transfer request that would be decided on by John Currie and John Currie only. I got the little pop-up that you'd posted, read it, lol'd, and went ahead with posting what I'd typed. You can keep asking your dumb question, and maybe other people will talk to you about it and maybe they won't. So, nobody ever implied Leti could sue kstate?
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on May 22, 2014, 09:20:06 AMHence the need for clarification. The mods here are just awful awful.Someone thought Leticia would have a successful legal claim against the university, I've yet to see anyone articulate whyYou posted your stupid question while I was typing my post about how all Leticia needs to do is file a new transfer request that would be decided on by John Currie and John Currie only. I got the little pop-up that you'd posted, read it, lol'd, and went ahead with posting what I'd typed. You can keep asking your dumb question, and maybe other people will talk to you about it and maybe they won't.
Hence the need for clarification. The mods here are just awful awful.Someone thought Leticia would have a successful legal claim against the university, I've yet to see anyone articulate why
too lazy to read. anyone feel like cliff noting this?
QuoteKansas State has asked The Mercury to take down a photo of a confidential letter concerning Leticia Romero from its website.University attorney Pete Paukstelis on Thursday asked for the removal and destruction of the photo it obtained Wednesday showing a confidential communication from KSU athletic director John Currie to appeals committee leader and vice president of student life Pat Bosco.In the letter, Currie asked Bosco to reconsider Romero’s denial for a release and for the committee to reconvene.Paukstelis also requested the photo be removed from this reporter’s Twitter account, writing that K-State believes “this letter is a confidential student record subject to protection under the Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act.”The request went on to say, “We believe that this letter was obtained through criminal means, and have reported the incident to KSU Police.”After consulting with The Mercury’s legal counsel, however, the newspaper decided not to remove the photo from its website, nor from the Twitter account, as the photo was obtained legally from Romero’s attorney, Donald Jackson of the Sports Group in Montgomery, Ala.hmmm.
Kansas State has asked The Mercury to take down a photo of a confidential letter concerning Leticia Romero from its website.University attorney Pete Paukstelis on Thursday asked for the removal and destruction of the photo it obtained Wednesday showing a confidential communication from KSU athletic director John Currie to appeals committee leader and vice president of student life Pat Bosco.In the letter, Currie asked Bosco to reconsider Romero’s denial for a release and for the committee to reconvene.Paukstelis also requested the photo be removed from this reporter’s Twitter account, writing that K-State believes “this letter is a confidential student record subject to protection under the Federal Educational Rights and Privacy Act.”The request went on to say, “We believe that this letter was obtained through criminal means, and have reported the incident to KSU Police.”After consulting with The Mercury’s legal counsel, however, the newspaper decided not to remove the photo from its website, nor from the Twitter account, as the photo was obtained legally from Romero’s attorney, Donald Jackson of the Sports Group in Montgomery, Ala.
Quote from: Cartierfor3 on May 22, 2014, 01:26:04 PMtoo lazy to read. anyone feel like cliff noting this? they already did it for us
Quote from: Tobias on May 22, 2014, 01:28:14 PMQuote from: Cartierfor3 on May 22, 2014, 01:26:04 PMtoo lazy to read. anyone feel like cliff noting this? they already did it for usI hope this being on gE leads to Paul calling the cops on us.
Jackson questioned why Currie wrote the letter."This athletic director’s actions, this athletic department’s actions and now this university’s actions are unlike anything I have ever seen in college sports," Jackson said. "What they are attempting to do is deflect responsibility here from the athletic director and put it back on the committee. It’s not a committee decision. The finality of its decision is final only as it relates to a student-athlete’s ability to appeal it further. There is nothing to prevent this athletic director today from releasing her to transfer wherever she wants to go."Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2014/05/22/3469265/leticia-romero-will-continue-fight.html#storylink=cpy
QuoteJackson questioned why Currie wrote the letter."This athletic director’s actions, this athletic department’s actions and now this university’s actions are unlike anything I have ever seen in college sports," Jackson said. "What they are attempting to do is deflect responsibility here from the athletic director and put it back on the committee. It’s not a committee decision. The finality of its decision is final only as it relates to a student-athlete’s ability to appeal it further. There is nothing to prevent this athletic director today from releasing her to transfer wherever she wants to go."Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2014/05/22/3469265/leticia-romero-will-continue-fight.html#storylink=cpyLet's attorney reads gE.
K-State should do a restructuring where Currie is in charge of construction projects and somebody else is in charge of any contact with human beings.
it's too bad we're actually rough ridin' with someone's life, because the rest of the details are enough to make me lol by myself randomly throughout the day
Quote from: Trim on May 22, 2014, 02:16:10 PMK-State should do a restructuring where Currie is in charge of construction projects and somebody else is in charge of any contact with human beings.At some point (possibly in this thread) I suggested gE handle all personnel and public relations activities. We'd work free of charge of course (outside of expenses) and we can guarantee spectacular improvements over whoever is currently handling these things.
Quote from: steve dave on May 22, 2014, 02:18:09 PMQuote from: Trim on May 22, 2014, 02:16:10 PMK-State should do a restructuring where Currie is in charge of construction projects and somebody else is in charge of any contact with human beings.At some point (possibly in this thread) I suggested gE handle all personnel and public relations activities. We'd work free of charge of course (outside of expenses) and we can guarantee spectacular improvements over whoever is currently handling these things.Even though some aspects of this might seem to fall under the construction projects department's realm, we should probably handle keeping documents private (letters, renderings) and the response to any leaks of the same.
