Author Topic: Angel sucks  (Read 6870 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17876
    • View Profile
Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #50 on: March 22, 2013, 05:18:08 PM »
There's no way you think Rusty's standard for "great" is Lebron James.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #51 on: March 22, 2013, 05:20:28 PM »
There's no way you think Rusty's standard for "great" is Lebron James.
The problem is the scale of comparison. No logical person should even have them in the same breath.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Bloodfart

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5663
  • I don't run out of gas.
    • View Profile
Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #52 on: March 22, 2013, 05:27:24 PM »
So... Combo season.

Yes, very excited. I have all kinds of small talk topics I've been saving up for when there was nothing else to talk about.

The scrubs thread!  :love:

Offline Grogan14

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 80
  • Sock,also goes by BastardSonOfDaxJones & Cyclone42
    • View Profile
Angel sucks
« Reply #53 on: March 23, 2013, 11:53:26 AM »
KU has three bowl wins since K-State's last one, including a BCS Bowl.

Sad. You are a much better troll than this.
He's as good or better than our trolls. :dunno:

I agree. That's why it's sad that he's using a terrible talking point. Not to mention it's about football on a basketball board.
meh, our fans started using lame football crap on the bball board a long time ago.  we deserve every lame-ass troll we get.  it's basically all we do anyway

Now you're starting to make sense

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #54 on: March 23, 2013, 02:30:35 PM »
art has a torn ligament in his wrist as well as whatever his knee problem is.  he was 2nd team all big 12 in a year he wasn't really healthy all year.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59711
    • View Profile
Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #55 on: March 23, 2013, 02:31:57 PM »
art has a torn ligament in his wrist as well as whatever his knee problem is.  he was 2nd team all big 12 in a year he wasn't really healthy all year.

Only emphasizing the need to recruit quality guard depth and supplant Spradling out of the starting lineup and well down the bench.


Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #56 on: March 23, 2013, 02:42:15 PM »
emphasizing the need to recruit quality guard depth and supplant Spradling out of the starting lineup and well down the bench.

yes, pg depth was something of an issue this year, and next year with no irving, it is a definite concern. 
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline JKEYS

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 323
  • Winner of the 2013 Ed's NCAA Challenge (RESPECT!)
    • View Profile
Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #57 on: March 23, 2013, 08:37:19 PM »
well, agree to disagree.

Pullen was great.  Bease was great.  Angel is very good...most of the time.  That was an awful game for him yesterday.  Great requires consistency and he doesn't have it yet.  Also has a limited upside unless he finishes a better % of his takes at the rim.
Kansas City SEO consulting.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13336
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #58 on: March 23, 2013, 09:37:03 PM »
He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
All these posters, and only one with a rational reason.  Thx. Rusty.  :thumbsup:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #59 on: March 23, 2013, 09:47:55 PM »
He had his worst game of the season. Give him a break

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55976
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #60 on: March 23, 2013, 09:48:24 PM »
well, agree to disagree.

Pullen was great.  Bease was great.  Angel is very good...most of the time.  That was an awful game for him yesterday.  Great requires consistency and he doesn't have it yet.  Also has a limited upside unless he finishes a better % of his takes at the rim.

Sophomore Angel dominates sophomore Pullen statistically while being asked to do a lot more. I mean he's really better at everything but 2fg%. it's pretty impressive.

Offline JKEYS

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 323
  • Winner of the 2013 Ed's NCAA Challenge (RESPECT!)
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #61 on: March 23, 2013, 09:52:14 PM »
well, agree to disagree.

Pullen was great.  Bease was great.  Angel is very good...most of the time.  That was an awful game for him yesterday.  Great requires consistency and he doesn't have it yet.  Also has a limited upside unless he finishes a better % of his takes at the rim.


Sophomore Angel dominates sophomore Pullen statistically while being asked to do a lot more. I mean he's really better at everything but 2fg%. it's pretty impressive.


Nobody considered sophomore Pullen "great" though.  This is a terrible speaking point.  Not giving in though huh?  LOL
Kansas City SEO consulting.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55976
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: Angel sucks
« Reply #62 on: March 23, 2013, 10:03:14 PM »
well, agree to disagree.

Pullen was great.  Bease was great.  Angel is very good...most of the time.  That was an awful game for him yesterday.  Great requires consistency and he doesn't have it yet.  Also has a limited upside unless he finishes a better % of his takes at the rim.


Sophomore Angel dominates sophomore Pullen statistically while being asked to do a lot more. I mean he's really better at everything but 2fg%. it's pretty impressive.


Nobody considered sophomore Pullen "great" though.  This is a terrible speaking point.  Not giving in though huh?  LOL

like I said earlier, I'll accept it if someone thinks Angel is only "very good".