He was second team all league as a sophomore for a reason, you guys. He had a bad game.
No, this is just a magnification of what people have been fretting about all season.
He might win games, but he also loses games. Which has a bigger impact, right now, today?
What? Who has been fretting about what? You called Jacob Pullen a pussy, I'm not discussing this with you any more. It's just not the kind of thing you can talk about with anything that resembles rational though.
How rational is callling ArT "Great"?
It's very rational. I mean if you want to call him "very good" I could go with that. He is one of the ten best players in the league and is a sophomore.
Good, he's pretty good, but I won't call a guy who is a combined 3 for 18 in the Big 12 Championship game, and the 1st round of the NCAA tourney, with 6 turnovers very good, and certainly not great.
hey man even LeBron has bad games.
LOL . . . okay there cRusty, I'll entertain this absurdity. How many times in a collective "bad game" for LeBron does he, at some point have a major positive impact for his team? While I am not the biggest NBA fan, it seems that most of the time actual GREAT players like Lebron have a significant postive impact during the course of the game, even in the midst of an overall "bad" game by their standards. There was really nothing positive about ArT in the last 2 games of significance for K-State.
He's pretty good, he's got a long way to go before he's great.