Author Topic: California manhunt  (Read 14747 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #175 on: February 14, 2013, 08:36:32 AM »
Even if they did light the place on fire, I think that's completely understandable, given the circumstances.

Then they are no better than what Dorner was, a murderer

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #176 on: February 14, 2013, 08:37:23 AM »
Even if they did light the place on fire, I think that's completely understandable, given the circumstances.

Then they are no better than what Dorner was, a murderer

They weren't going to take him alive, and they are just not good enough to have taken him by force without at least 2-3 of them dying.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #177 on: February 14, 2013, 08:55:31 AM »
Since when does the government have the rough ridin' right to destroy someone's home?

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #178 on: February 14, 2013, 08:58:15 AM »
There's a lot of weird stuff that happens under the government's watch. Sometimes I think conspiracy theories aren't too far fetched. But I smoked a lot of pot in high school.

 :lol: You could get away with saying just about anything if you added this to the end.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #179 on: February 14, 2013, 09:07:19 AM »
It's funny that they've found his wallet w/ ID in 3 different places now too

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #180 on: February 14, 2013, 09:07:47 AM »
It's funny that they've found his wallet w/ ID in 3 different places now too

Oh man that's true.  Puds.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #181 on: February 14, 2013, 09:10:17 AM »
Since when does the government have the rough ridin' right to destroy someone's home?

since always

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #182 on: February 14, 2013, 09:10:26 AM »
Even if they did light the place on fire, I think that's completely understandable, given the circumstances.

Uh this isn't China. The guy was a deplorable crap stain but he is still allowed due process. They also had the capability to wait him out. You mean to tell me that the crap kicking hillbillies in Alabama had the capability to better handle a situation when a fugitive is surrounded better than multiple LEO agencies in the nation's richest and most populous state?

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #183 on: February 14, 2013, 09:11:18 AM »
Since when does the government have the rough ridin' right to destroy someone's home?

since always

Oh well carry on then (but I still think it's bullshit).

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40528
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #184 on: February 14, 2013, 09:13:32 AM »
the crap kicking hillbillies in Alabama had the capability to better handle a situation when a fugitive is surrounded better than multiple LEO agencies in the nation's richest and most populous state?

california le verge on the incompetent, and that's in comparison to other le.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Paul Moscow

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1843
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #185 on: February 14, 2013, 09:14:46 AM »
Did you guys talk about how they said that the fire wasn't deliberately set but they have audio of someone authorizing to "go forward with the plan with the burn?"



1 minute in on the first video. 1:30 in "burners deployed and we have fire"

burners are a slang term that law enforcement uses for the tear gas canisters used.


This thread can end now.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #186 on: February 14, 2013, 09:15:55 AM »
Even if they did light the place on fire, I think that's completely understandable, given the circumstances.

Uh this isn't China. The guy was a deplorable crap stain but he is still allowed due process. They also had the capability to wait him out. You mean to tell me that the crap kicking hillbillies in Alabama had the capability to better handle a situation when a fugitive is surrounded better than multiple LEO agencies in the nation's richest and most populous state?

How many times did the hillbillies in Alabama let the guy get away and open fire on innocent civilians just because they were driving a blue truck? Obviously they are more capable than the LAPD.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #187 on: February 14, 2013, 09:16:43 AM »
Since when does the government have the rough ridin' right to destroy someone's home?

since always

Oh well carry on then (but I still think it's bullshit).

If the police were to ever actually burn a place down, they should pay for the damages, obviously.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #188 on: February 14, 2013, 09:17:29 AM »
Since when does the government have the rough ridin' right to destroy someone's home?

since always

Oh well carry on then (but I still think it's bullshit).

If the police were to ever actually burn a place down, they should pay for the damages, obviously.

What about photographs and memories lost?  I'd have to think that kind of pain and suffering is measured in the millions, amirite?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #189 on: February 14, 2013, 09:18:02 AM »
Since when does the government have the rough ridin' right to destroy someone's home?

since always

Oh well carry on then (but I still think it's bullshit).

If the police were to ever actually burn a place down, they should pay for the damages, obviously.

What about photographs and memories lost?  I'd have to think that kind of pain and suffering is measured in the millions, amirite?

LOL, no doubt.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #190 on: February 14, 2013, 09:20:13 AM »
Since when does the government have the rough ridin' right to destroy someone's home?

since always

Oh well carry on then (but I still think it's bullshit).

If the police were to ever actually burn a place down, they should pay for the damages, obviously.

What about photographs and memories lost?  I'd have to think that kind of pain and suffering is measured in the millions, amirite?

LOL, no doubt.

Also glad they didn't shoot him, because of the huge additional cost to society.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #191 on: February 14, 2013, 10:24:42 AM »
Did you guys talk about how they said that the fire wasn't deliberately set but they have audio of someone authorizing to "go forward with the plan with the burn?"



1 minute in on the first video. 1:30 in "burners deployed and we have fire"

burners are a slang term that law enforcement uses for the tear gas canisters used.


This thread can end now.

Yes so that one post 7 pages into an 8 page thread that garnered two responses wraps up all that is strange, sad, and corrupt with this story. MODS, LOCK IT UP!

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #192 on: February 14, 2013, 10:26:43 AM »
Pretty sure the Alabama crew was run by federal agents of some sort

Offline XocolateThundarr

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5224
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #193 on: February 14, 2013, 10:27:20 AM »
Since when does the government have the rough ridin' right to destroy someone's home?

since always

Oh well carry on then (but I still think it's bullshit).

If the police were to ever actually burn a place down, they should pay for the damages, obviously.

What about photographs and memories lost?  I'd have to think that kind of pain and suffering is measured in the millions, amirite?

Cali is broke dude.
@mikec2w

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #194 on: February 14, 2013, 10:51:56 AM »
Pretty sure the Alabama crew was run by federal agents of some sort

multi agency like this was

Offline The1BigWillie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3172
  • Known to be a horrible person... (BORN 7/4/75)
    • View Profile
"That's what you get when you let some dude from Los Angles/Texas with the alias Mookfu raw dog it.  Willesgirl can back me up here.  There's a lesson in this.  You only get HIV once; make it count." - Mr. Bread

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #196 on: February 14, 2013, 02:20:00 PM »
[Skipped about 4 pages of this thread]

I don't get the expectation to "wait him out."  He was known as armed and for having a vendetta against police officers.  I don't expect the police force to continually risk their lives for one of someone who is trying to kill them.   

Even if you believe Dorner was the victim of a corrupt department, instead of killing people responsible, he killed the innocent children of a person responsible.  When you run the tally of his revenge, he seems to have killed only innocent people and not anybody responsible for his firing.

Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #197 on: February 14, 2013, 02:20:56 PM »
I guess the police were certain he was in there by himself?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #198 on: February 14, 2013, 02:22:20 PM »
I guess the police were certain he was in there by himself?

I would certainly hope so. If they burned that place down and killed somebody other than Dorner, those responsible should fry.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: California manhunt
« Reply #199 on: February 14, 2013, 02:28:36 PM »
I guess the police were certain he was in there by himself?

From what I heard they were, but I might be a day or so behind in this