Author Topic: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking  (Read 35441 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47918
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #300 on: February 05, 2013, 10:19:09 AM »
what sales tax do you guys currently pay?


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18044
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #301 on: February 05, 2013, 10:24:48 AM »
Lodging tax is currently over 13% which is on par with or more than most resort areas.  I don't think increasing that to pay for everything in Manhattan is going to be an option forever.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45920
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #302 on: February 05, 2013, 10:26:04 AM »
Damn, actually pretty expensive

http://www.ci.manhattan.ks.us/faq.aspx?TID=0&searchTerms=pottawatomie

What is the sales tax rate paid by citizens?
    State of Kansas sales tax = 6.3%
    Both Riley County/Pottawatomie retail sales tax = 1.0%
    (NOTE: For January, February, and March, the Riley County sales tax will decrease to .50% decreasing the total sales tax rate to 8.05% and 8.55% in the Downtown Redevelopment area. Sales tax rates will increase back to the original percentage on April 1, 2013.)
    City of Manhattan sales tax = 1.0%
    Quality of life sales tax = .25%
    Total sales tax rate = 8.55%

    Limey Pointe Transportation Development District sales tax = .50%
    Quality of life sales tax = .25%
    Total sales tax rate for Limey Pointe shoppers = 9.05%

    Downtown Redevelopment Transportation Development District sales tax = .50%
    Quality of life sales tax = .25%
    Total sales tax for Downtown Redevelopment shoppers = 9.05%

    You can click the link below for a map of the sales tax districts.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47918
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #303 on: February 05, 2013, 10:30:05 AM »
that is pretty high, i'd guess that's probably the ceiling for a town like MHK.  my neighborhood is ~10.5% in KC which seems ridiculous. 


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45920
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #304 on: February 05, 2013, 10:32:07 AM »
my neighborhood is ~10.5% in KC which seems ridiculous.

:sdeek: Christ, its KC not Palm Springs. Damn

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16747
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #305 on: February 05, 2013, 10:34:59 AM »
Total waste of money.  Name one benefit of a bigger airport in a town of 50,000.

Chili's Too???   :excited:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #306 on: February 05, 2013, 10:45:17 AM »

By the way, I'm 100% in support of expanding the airport and paying for it through a sales tax by the townies and students.  It's absolutely a community asset that will positively impact the city as a whole and university (even though 99% of the students will never use it on a daily basis). 

taxes are already pretty high in mhk. i'd try to tax all the losers that don't live in mhk but come to mhk a lot and benefit from everything that mhk has to offer while driving on our roads and using our services while they are here. maybe a special game day tax where taxes are 1% higher on game days or a hotel tax or rental car tax or something. leave the townies and students alone. they already do enough.

I agree, but I don't know how much could conceivably be raised through hotel or rental car taxes.  The real problem is that there's no regional tax for a regional asset.  This airport is used by residents of all the surrounding communities, Salina, Junction City, Wamego, etc., but they aren't contributing.  The only way to capture their dollars is to tax them when they come to Manhattan and buy crap.  Unfortunately, this affects local residents too.  I'm not sure what the solution is. 


Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #307 on: February 05, 2013, 10:47:11 AM »

By the way, I'm 100% in support of expanding the airport and paying for it through a sales tax by the townies and students.  It's absolutely a community asset that will positively impact the city as a whole and university (even though 99% of the students will never use it on a daily basis). 

taxes are already pretty high in mhk. i'd try to tax all the losers that don't live in mhk but come to mhk a lot and benefit from everything that mhk has to offer while driving on our roads and using our services while they are here. maybe a special game day tax where taxes are 1% higher on game days or a hotel tax or rental car tax or something. leave the townies and students alone. they already do enough.

I agree, but I don't know how much could conceivably be raised through hotel or rental car taxes.  The real problem is that there's no regional tax for a regional asset.  This airport is used by residents of all the surrounding communities, Salina, Junction City, Wamego, etc., but they aren't contributing.  The only way to capture their dollars is to tax them when they come to Manhattan and buy crap.  Unfortunately, this affects local residents too.  I'm not sure what the solution is.

junction city and wamego taxes are already really high as well. higher than mhk i think. i want to tax people from out of the area. really stick it to them.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #308 on: February 05, 2013, 10:49:50 AM »
someone told me sales tax at village west in KC is 11%  :sdeek:
emaw

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #309 on: February 05, 2013, 10:56:52 AM »

By the way, I'm 100% in support of expanding the airport and paying for it through a sales tax by the townies and students.  It's absolutely a community asset that will positively impact the city as a whole and university (even though 99% of the students will never use it on a daily basis). 

taxes are already pretty high in mhk. i'd try to tax all the losers that don't live in mhk but come to mhk a lot and benefit from everything that mhk has to offer while driving on our roads and using our services while they are here. maybe a special game day tax where taxes are 1% higher on game days or a hotel tax or rental car tax or something. leave the townies and students alone. they already do enough.

I agree, but I don't know how much could conceivably be raised through hotel or rental car taxes.  The real problem is that there's no regional tax for a regional asset.  This airport is used by residents of all the surrounding communities, Salina, Junction City, Wamego, etc., but they aren't contributing.  The only way to capture their dollars is to tax them when they come to Manhattan and buy crap.  Unfortunately, this affects local residents too.  I'm not sure what the solution is.

junction city and wamego taxes are already really high as well. higher than mhk i think. i want to tax people from out of the area. really stick it to them.

Have we thought about guns?


Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18044
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #310 on: February 05, 2013, 11:00:17 AM »

By the way, I'm 100% in support of expanding the airport and paying for it through a sales tax by the townies and students.  It's absolutely a community asset that will positively impact the city as a whole and university (even though 99% of the students will never use it on a daily basis). 

taxes are already pretty high in mhk. i'd try to tax all the losers that don't live in mhk but come to mhk a lot and benefit from everything that mhk has to offer while driving on our roads and using our services while they are here. maybe a special game day tax where taxes are 1% higher on game days or a hotel tax or rental car tax or something. leave the townies and students alone. they already do enough.

I agree, but I don't know how much could conceivably be raised through hotel or rental car taxes.  The real problem is that there's no regional tax for a regional asset.  This airport is used by residents of all the surrounding communities, Salina, Junction City, Wamego, etc., but they aren't contributing.  The only way to capture their dollars is to tax them when they come to Manhattan and buy crap.  Unfortunately, this affects local residents too.  I'm not sure what the solution is.

junction city and wamego taxes are already really high as well. higher than mhk i think. i want to tax people from out of the area. really stick it to them.

5% lodging tax (13% total on a hotel room) is sticking it to them

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #311 on: February 05, 2013, 11:01:24 AM »

By the way, I'm 100% in support of expanding the airport and paying for it through a sales tax by the townies and students.  It's absolutely a community asset that will positively impact the city as a whole and university (even though 99% of the students will never use it on a daily basis). 

taxes are already pretty high in mhk. i'd try to tax all the losers that don't live in mhk but come to mhk a lot and benefit from everything that mhk has to offer while driving on our roads and using our services while they are here. maybe a special game day tax where taxes are 1% higher on game days or a hotel tax or rental car tax or something. leave the townies and students alone. they already do enough.

I agree, but I don't know how much could conceivably be raised through hotel or rental car taxes.  The real problem is that there's no regional tax for a regional asset.  This airport is used by residents of all the surrounding communities, Salina, Junction City, Wamego, etc., but they aren't contributing.  The only way to capture their dollars is to tax them when they come to Manhattan and buy crap.  Unfortunately, this affects local residents too.  I'm not sure what the solution is.

junction city and wamego taxes are already really high as well. higher than mhk i think. i want to tax people from out of the area. really stick it to them.

13% lodging tax is sticking it to them

yes. certainly a start.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22430
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #312 on: February 05, 2013, 11:02:10 AM »
Yeah, but everyone will be happy to pay more taxes when they hear that Manhattan can have big timey buses!

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18044
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #313 on: February 05, 2013, 11:05:20 AM »
If manhattan starts getting direct flights from Denver again, they can stick it to me on taxes for those.

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #314 on: February 05, 2013, 11:28:01 AM »
If we can have big timey buses they can stick it square in my ass.


Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline Gooch

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9491
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #315 on: February 05, 2013, 11:39:24 AM »

By the way, I'm 100% in support of expanding the airport and paying for it through a sales tax by the townies and students.  It's absolutely a community asset that will positively impact the city as a whole and university (even though 99% of the students will never use it on a daily basis). 

taxes are already pretty high in mhk. i'd try to tax all the losers that don't live in mhk but come to mhk a lot and benefit from everything that mhk has to offer while driving on our roads and using our services while they are here. maybe a special game day tax where taxes are 1% higher on game days or a hotel tax or rental car tax or something. leave the townies and students alone. they already do enough.
Hey Daris stay the eff out of Wichita then. :shakesfist:

Offline PoetWarrior

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2353
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #316 on: February 05, 2013, 02:49:10 PM »
It's time to rename this section of Manhattan to something more joyous and innocent.

Offline eastcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2502
  • Labeled by children.
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #317 on: February 05, 2013, 02:50:28 PM »
How about we tax shi in Lawrence to pay for MHK?? Anyone thought of that yet??  :fatty:

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17807
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #318 on: February 05, 2013, 05:27:22 PM »
$1 to enter Manhattan. Put a toll booth on all highways into town. Boom, airport paid for.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21355
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #319 on: February 05, 2013, 07:46:39 PM »
10% extra special tax on all Texas Roadhouse purchases. That should do it.

Offline Shacks

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1829
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #320 on: February 05, 2013, 07:59:29 PM »
12% sales tax in Manhattan unless you can present a K-State student ID or proof of residency in Riley County

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #321 on: February 05, 2013, 08:07:30 PM »

By the way, I'm 100% in support of expanding the airport and paying for it through a sales tax by the townies and students.  It's absolutely a community asset that will positively impact the city as a whole and university (even though 99% of the students will never use it on a daily basis). 

taxes are already pretty high in mhk. i'd try to tax all the losers that don't live in mhk but come to mhk a lot and benefit from everything that mhk has to offer while driving on our roads and using our services while they are here. maybe a special game day tax where taxes are 1% higher on game days or a hotel tax or rental car tax or something. leave the townies and students alone. they already do enough.

I agree, but I don't know how much could conceivably be raised through hotel or rental car taxes.  The real problem is that there's no regional tax for a regional asset.  This airport is used by residents of all the surrounding communities, Salina, Junction City, Wamego, etc., but they aren't contributing.  The only way to capture their dollars is to tax them when they come to Manhattan and buy crap.  Unfortunately, this affects local residents too.  I'm not sure what the solution is.

Geary and Pottawatomie counties are going to share the cost of the Metropolitan Planning Organization needed in Manhattan now and in the past both stepped up with tax money to guarantee a base revenue for the American Eagle flights.


Offline Mikeyis4dcats

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5040
  • pogonophobia: n. a fear of beards
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #322 on: February 05, 2013, 09:40:49 PM »
If manhattan starts getting direct flights from Denver again, they can stick it to me on taxes for those.

whats the latest on this?

Offline Asteriskhead

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 9371
  • giving new meaning to the term "anger juice"
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #323 on: February 05, 2013, 10:22:25 PM »
So, have we figured out how to get rid of Cozy Inn yet?

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32453
    • View Profile
Re: Manhattan Development & Aggieville Parking
« Reply #324 on: February 05, 2013, 10:26:54 PM »
So, have we figured out how to get rid of Cozy Inn yet?

Disrupt their onion supplier.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best