Political Facebook Posts/Tweets From People

[michigancat]

[Institutional Control]

[Institutional Control]

[Institutional Control]

[CNS]

The "Nuh Uh, you are" defense is pretty much a guarantee winner.  Like, every time.

[Institutional Control]

I've been using "I know you are but what am I" for decades and never lost an argument.

[steve dave]

this is amazing

[Dugout DickStone]

Flip the script

[420seriouscat69]

.

[attachment deleted by admin]

[michigancat]

I believe this Supreme Court decision is a grave mistake. Five unelected judges have taken it upon themselves to redefine the institution of marriage, an institution that the author of this decision acknowledges ‘has been with us for millennia.’ In 2006 I, like millions of Americans, voted to amend our state constitution to protect the institution of marriage from exactly this type of judicial activism. The states are the proper place for these decisions to be made, and as we have seen repeatedly over the last few days, we will need a conservative president who will appoint men and women to the Court who will faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws of our land without injecting their own political agendas. As a result of this decision, the only alternative left for the American people is to support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to reaffirm the ability of the states to continue to define marriage.

Recognizing that our Founders made our Constitution difficult to amend, I am reminded that it was first amended to protect our ‘First Freedom’ - the free exercise of religion. The First Amendment does not simply protect a narrow ‘right to worship,’ but provides broad protection to individuals and institutions to worship and act in accordance with their religious beliefs. In fact, the Wisconsin constitution explicitly protects the rights of conscience of our citizens. I can assure all Wisconsinites concerned about the impact of today’s decision that your conscience rights will be protected, and the government will not coerce you to act against your religious beliefs.

I call on the president and all governors to join me in reassuring millions of Americans that the government will not force them to participate in activities that violate their deeply held religious beliefs. No one wants to live in a country where the government coerces people to act in opposition to their conscience. We will continue to fight for the freedoms of all Americans.

[Institutional Control]

[Mrs. Gooch]

[Mr Bread]

I believe this Supreme Court decision is a grave mistake. Five unelected judges have taken it upon themselves to redefine the institution of marriage, an institution that the author of this decision acknowledges ‘has been with us for millennia.’ In 2006 I, like millions of Americans, voted to amend our state constitution to protect the institution of marriage from exactly this type of judicial activism. The states are the proper place for these decisions to be made, and as we have seen repeatedly over the last few days, we will need a conservative president who will appoint men and women to the Court who will faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws of our land without injecting their own political agendas. As a result of this decision, the only alternative left for the American people is to support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to reaffirm the ability of the states to continue to define marriage.

Recognizing that our Founders made our Constitution difficult to amend, I am reminded that it was first amended to protect our ‘First Freedom’ - the free exercise of religion. The First Amendment does not simply protect a narrow ‘right to worship,’ but provides broad protection to individuals and institutions to worship and act in accordance with their religious beliefs. In fact, the Wisconsin constitution explicitly protects the rights of conscience of our citizens. I can assure all Wisconsinites concerned about the impact of today’s decision that your conscience rights will be protected, and the government will not coerce you to act against your religious beliefs.

I call on the president and all governors to join me in reassuring millions of Americans that the government will not force them to participate in activities that violate their deeply held religious beliefs. No one wants to live in a country where the government coerces people to act in opposition to their conscience. We will continue to fight for the freedoms of all Americans.

They make a good point though.

[Mr Bread]

people should definitely not be forced to get gay married against their religious beliefs. 

i'm willing to go so far as to say people shouldn't be forced to get married period.  not in my america anyway. 

[Spracne]

Mr Bread and these liberal judges need to pick up a copy of the Constitution.  I always keep mine near. Unfortunately there are no pictures, but I read it for the articles, anyway.

[slobber]

Mr Bread and these liberal judges need to pick up a copy of the Constitution.  I always keep mine near. Unfortunately there are no pictures, but I read it for the articles, anyway.

Do you have a goto list where you pull your puns from? Serious question. They are not always complicated, but the efficiency with which you deliver is pretty amazing.

[Spracne]

I use the method of loci to organize and store various puns in their thematically-determined rooms in my mind palace.  I need only visit the appropriate room, consider the options with patience and prescribe the ones best suited for topical application.

[slobber]

I use the method of loci to organize and store various puns in their thematically-determined rooms in my mind palace.  I need only visit the appropriate room, consider the options with patience and prescribe the ones best suited for topical application.

I am going to guess there is a pun in your post, but I think this is a more complicated one.
Still, interesting method!

[Spracne]

I use the method of loci to organize and store various puns in their thematically-determined rooms in my mind palace.  I need only visit the appropriate room, consider the options with patience and prescribe the ones best suited for topical application.

I am going to guess there is a pun in your post, but I think this is a more complicated one.
Still, interesting method!

I may have doctored it up a bit

Also, that was complete BS.  I just make them up, or something causes me to remember them.  The Constitution/articles thing came from a podcast called Your Weekly Constitutional, which should be a good listen next week.

[michigancat]

I believe this Supreme Court decision is a grave mistake. Five unelected judges have taken it upon themselves to redefine the institution of marriage, an institution that the author of this decision acknowledges ‘has been with us for millennia.’ In 2006 I, like millions of Americans, voted to amend our state constitution to protect the institution of marriage from exactly this type of judicial activism. The states are the proper place for these decisions to be made, and as we have seen repeatedly over the last few days, we will need a conservative president who will appoint men and women to the Court who will faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws of our land without injecting their own political agendas. As a result of this decision, the only alternative left for the American people is to support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to reaffirm the ability of the states to continue to define marriage.

Recognizing that our Founders made our Constitution difficult to amend, I am reminded that it was first amended to protect our ‘First Freedom’ - the free exercise of religion. The First Amendment does not simply protect a narrow ‘right to worship,’ but provides broad protection to individuals and institutions to worship and act in accordance with their religious beliefs. In fact, the Wisconsin constitution explicitly protects the rights of conscience of our citizens. I can assure all Wisconsinites concerned about the impact of today’s decision that your conscience rights will be protected, and the government will not coerce you to act against your religious beliefs.

I call on the president and all governors to join me in reassuring millions of Americans that the government will not force them to participate in activities that violate their deeply held religious beliefs. No one wants to live in a country where the government coerces people to act in opposition to their conscience. We will continue to fight for the freedoms of all Americans.

oh, this was from Scott Walker, potential maybe presidential candidate

[Rage Against the McKee]

I believe this Supreme Court decision is a grave mistake. Five unelected judges have taken it upon themselves to redefine the institution of marriage, an institution that the author of this decision acknowledges ‘has been with us for millennia.’ In 2006 I, like millions of Americans, voted to amend our state constitution to protect the institution of marriage from exactly this type of judicial activism. The states are the proper place for these decisions to be made, and as we have seen repeatedly over the last few days, we will need a conservative president who will appoint men and women to the Court who will faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws of our land without injecting their own political agendas. As a result of this decision, the only alternative left for the American people is to support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to reaffirm the ability of the states to continue to define marriage.

Recognizing that our Founders made our Constitution difficult to amend, I am reminded that it was first amended to protect our ‘First Freedom’ - the free exercise of religion. The First Amendment does not simply protect a narrow ‘right to worship,’ but provides broad protection to individuals and institutions to worship and act in accordance with their religious beliefs. In fact, the Wisconsin constitution explicitly protects the rights of conscience of our citizens. I can assure all Wisconsinites concerned about the impact of today’s decision that your conscience rights will be protected, and the government will not coerce you to act against your religious beliefs.

I call on the president and all governors to join me in reassuring millions of Americans that the government will not force them to participate in activities that violate their deeply held religious beliefs. No one wants to live in a country where the government coerces people to act in opposition to their conscience. We will continue to fight for the freedoms of all Americans.

oh, this was from Scott Walker, potential maybe presidential candidate

Well, he doesn't even believe in evolution.

[michigancat]

I believe this Supreme Court decision is a grave mistake. Five unelected judges have taken it upon themselves to redefine the institution of marriage, an institution that the author of this decision acknowledges ‘has been with us for millennia.’ In 2006 I, like millions of Americans, voted to amend our state constitution to protect the institution of marriage from exactly this type of judicial activism. The states are the proper place for these decisions to be made, and as we have seen repeatedly over the last few days, we will need a conservative president who will appoint men and women to the Court who will faithfully interpret the Constitution and laws of our land without injecting their own political agendas. As a result of this decision, the only alternative left for the American people is to support an amendment to the U.S. Constitution to reaffirm the ability of the states to continue to define marriage.

Recognizing that our Founders made our Constitution difficult to amend, I am reminded that it was first amended to protect our ‘First Freedom’ - the free exercise of religion. The First Amendment does not simply protect a narrow ‘right to worship,’ but provides broad protection to individuals and institutions to worship and act in accordance with their religious beliefs. In fact, the Wisconsin constitution explicitly protects the rights of conscience of our citizens. I can assure all Wisconsinites concerned about the impact of today’s decision that your conscience rights will be protected, and the government will not coerce you to act against your religious beliefs.

I call on the president and all governors to join me in reassuring millions of Americans that the government will not force them to participate in activities that violate their deeply held religious beliefs. No one wants to live in a country where the government coerces people to act in opposition to their conscience. We will continue to fight for the freedoms of all Americans.

oh, this was from Scott Walker, potential maybe presidential candidate

Well, he doesn't even believe in evolution.

HE DID NOT SPEAK ABOUT THAT BECAUSE IT'S A WASTE OF TIME

[puniraptor]

Sounds like he doesn't understand the founding Fathers' intent for the Constitutionally prescribed purpose of the Supreme Court.

[dmartin]

I use the method of loci to organize and store various puns in their thematically-determined rooms in my mind palace.  I need only visit the appropriate room, consider the options with patience and prescribe the ones best suited for topical application.

I picture Spracne's mind like a mall food court.  Each eatery is a different type of situation, and all the available puns are on the menu board. Pick your situation, pick your pun, and presto!

[Mr Bread]

yeah and there are a bunch of gross fat people in it.  omg