Censorship on the Web: A discussion as to why LibDerp Nation Fully Supports it

[Rage Against the McKee]

I think that if Facebook should have to let the magas post whatever they want without censorship, then they should have to let people post pornography all over everyone's news feed, too.

[sonofdaxjones]

I think that if Facebook should have to let the magas post whatever they want without censorship, then they should have to let people post pornography all over everyone's news feed, too.

Vlad Putin pulls off a Triple Windmill on Facebook by spending $100K . . . meanwhile the Clinton campaign spent millions on FB ads.

 

[Matt Mckee]

Ever since dax showed me the error of my ways, I've been using askjeeves.com for my search engine needs.

Capitalism for the win!

[Rage Against the McKee]

Ever since dax showed me the error of my ways, I've been using askjeeves.com for my search engine needs.

Capitalism for the win!

Nope. Google has like 90% market share so there are no other options. The government needs to regulate Google since MAGAs aren't capable of using Bing.

[sonofdaxjones]

Ever since dax showed me the error of my ways, I've been using askjeeves.com for my search engine needs.

Capitalism for the win!

Nope. Google has like 90% market share so there are no other options. The government needs to regulate Google since MAGAs aren't capable of using Bing.

Yes, all the "cool kids" use the less capable search engines.  If you're using Bing are you using Yahoo, or whomever MS decided to partner with on that day?

Bing Aerial Shots:  For when you want to go retro!

[Rage Against the McKee]

It's almost as if the way Google operates makes them more popular or something. Very weird.

[sonofdaxjones]

It's almost as if the way Google operates makes them more popular or something. Very weird.

That's never been the point.

This isn't about anti-trust or monopoly status.

An amazing string of just awful takes by Resident LibDerp Nation.

Regroup guys

[steve dave]

It’s about a private company that doesn’t allow or doesn’t monetize MAGAs to be shitty bigots on its platform. They are enraged.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[8manpick]

It’s about a private company that doesn’t allow or doesn’t monetize MAGAs to be shitty bigots on its platform. They are enraged.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Oh, maybe you didn’t know, it’s actually a publicly traded company

[libstradamus]

Come now comrades, we must seize the means of searching!

[Matt Mckee]

Here you go, dax.

https://hackernoon.com/untraceable-search-engines-alternatives-to-google-811b09d5a873

You're welcome.

[Dugout DickStone]

It's almost as if the way Google operates makes them more popular or something. Very weird.

I don't like my markets free.  It enrages

[sonofdaxjones]

Lotta failing and flailing going on here.

Now you're getting into privacy, never said a word about it.

Poor regrouping by Resident LibDerp Nation . . . as usual.

[sonofdaxjones]

Don't they know about Bing?

https://news.yahoo.com/hong-kongers-alarmed-google-translation-gaffe-053829374.html

[sonofdaxjones]

Google is going to make everything okay in 2020 by employing/deploying "machine language fairness" to combat "algorithmic unfairness".

[DaBigTrain]

[sonofdaxjones]

The tap outs are nearly instantaneous with you these days The Big Tuck