0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Now we have ruled out the following as the cause for losing two long time AC's, who were alumns and regarded "key" coaches:1. Pay2. Threat of Sean being the coach3. Conflict between Bill and CurrieNow that we've ruled those reasons out, let's focus on why these two long time AC's simultaneously left.Here are some possibilities:1. Bill is leaving2. They hate working for Bill3. Things are going to go bad in future for the team for whatever reason4. Pure coincidence that two long time coaches leave for lateral positions, where money wasn't an issue, before signing day.That's what we are left with, right?
this may not be over...
Quote from: Limestone on January 18, 2013, 09:56:06 AMQuote from: TheHamburglar on January 18, 2013, 09:26:12 AMQuote from: "storm"nut on January 18, 2013, 09:16:04 AMWhy does this feel like the part in the movie when we learn something honorable about the hero's past that makes him look like an bad person, and everyone turns on him.We all know the past already. Bill works his assistants into the ground and he/his boss pays them less than others offer for working fewer hours and not micromanaging every minute of their day. Bill's system works for the program in the long run. It doesn't work well for the assistants in the long run. At least will Bill you think he's doing what's best for the program, even if he loses some people. The problem now is on top of the micromanaging, they also have Bill's boss trying to be the best junior detective he can be to fix his image after he got Pearl'd. There are now two public pieces of data for this. Currie's not worried about what's best for the program, but for his resume for the SEC. There doesn't need to be somethign we need to learn to explain the two defections. We already know enough. Junior detective/pissing off super star head coaches is not a good resume for the SEC.JFC, Bill is not pissed at Currie.
Quote from: TheHamburglar on January 18, 2013, 09:26:12 AMQuote from: "storm"nut on January 18, 2013, 09:16:04 AMWhy does this feel like the part in the movie when we learn something honorable about the hero's past that makes him look like an bad person, and everyone turns on him.We all know the past already. Bill works his assistants into the ground and he/his boss pays them less than others offer for working fewer hours and not micromanaging every minute of their day. Bill's system works for the program in the long run. It doesn't work well for the assistants in the long run. At least will Bill you think he's doing what's best for the program, even if he loses some people. The problem now is on top of the micromanaging, they also have Bill's boss trying to be the best junior detective he can be to fix his image after he got Pearl'd. There are now two public pieces of data for this. Currie's not worried about what's best for the program, but for his resume for the SEC. There doesn't need to be somethign we need to learn to explain the two defections. We already know enough. Junior detective/pissing off super star head coaches is not a good resume for the SEC.
Quote from: "storm"nut on January 18, 2013, 09:16:04 AMWhy does this feel like the part in the movie when we learn something honorable about the hero's past that makes him look like an bad person, and everyone turns on him.We all know the past already. Bill works his assistants into the ground and he/his boss pays them less than others offer for working fewer hours and not micromanaging every minute of their day. Bill's system works for the program in the long run. It doesn't work well for the assistants in the long run. At least will Bill you think he's doing what's best for the program, even if he loses some people. The problem now is on top of the micromanaging, they also have Bill's boss trying to be the best junior detective he can be to fix his image after he got Pearl'd. There are now two public pieces of data for this. Currie's not worried about what's best for the program, but for his resume for the SEC. There doesn't need to be somethign we need to learn to explain the two defections. We already know enough.
Why does this feel like the part in the movie when we learn something honorable about the hero's past that makes him look like an bad person, and everyone turns on him.
Quote from: captaincrap on January 18, 2013, 10:01:09 AMQuote from: Limestone on January 18, 2013, 09:56:06 AMQuote from: TheHamburglar on January 18, 2013, 09:26:12 AMQuote from: "storm"nut on January 18, 2013, 09:16:04 AMWhy does this feel like the part in the movie when we learn something honorable about the hero's past that makes him look like an bad person, and everyone turns on him.We all know the past already. Bill works his assistants into the ground and he/his boss pays them less than others offer for working fewer hours and not micromanaging every minute of their day. Bill's system works for the program in the long run. It doesn't work well for the assistants in the long run. At least will Bill you think he's doing what's best for the program, even if he loses some people. The problem now is on top of the micromanaging, they also have Bill's boss trying to be the best junior detective he can be to fix his image after he got Pearl'd. There are now two public pieces of data for this. Currie's not worried about what's best for the program, but for his resume for the SEC. There doesn't need to be somethign we need to learn to explain the two defections. We already know enough. Junior detective/pissing off super star head coaches is not a good resume for the SEC.JFC, Bill is not pissed at Currie.in the nicest way that i can possibly ask this... do you think bill likes working for currie? if not, do you think he's even neutral to the fact? if not, do you think that a day goes by where bill doesn't think that he'd rather be working for the previous regime? i already know the answer and will await yours in order to either deem you to be a mouthpiece or not.
God dammit...The fact that GE's two biggest sources have posted in this thread is not good.
Quote from: BigShotAttorneyCat on January 18, 2013, 10:20:35 AMthis may not be over...Good bye Bill, hope you don't eff this up Currie.
Quote from: "storm"nut on January 18, 2013, 10:24:34 AMQuote from: BigShotAttorneyCat on January 18, 2013, 10:20:35 AMthis may not be over...Good bye Bill, hope you don't eff this up Currie.No.
Will the Leavitt break soon?
Quote from: WildcatNkilt on January 18, 2013, 10:32:58 AMWill the Leavitt break soon?I am what they call a layperson on this, but I believe this would happen over Currie's dead body being killed to death.
Remember that one time when Frank had to go because there was a mutiny on his hands?
