Author Topic: msnbc  (Read 13784 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bubbles4ksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5488
  • Son of Pete
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #50 on: January 16, 2013, 03:35:37 PM »
Stossell is on the business channel, but its not a business or economics show.

Whatever, neo-con. I don't give a damn about Stossell, I just wanted to make sure everyone was aware that I read a fancy magazine.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27694
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #51 on: January 16, 2013, 03:40:58 PM »
Stossell is on the business channel, but its not a business or economics show.

Whatever, neo-con. I don't give a damn about Stossell, I just wanted to make sure everyone was aware that I read a fancy magazine.

Magazines......  pffffftttttttt.  Hey Bubbles why don't you get your typewriter out and send me a telegraph on the pony express. 

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38025
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #52 on: January 16, 2013, 07:39:38 PM »
I have always found it interesting how much libs hate Fox.  I mean, I get that they don't like it, but they freaking hate it and bring it up in every argument.  "You must be watching too much Faux News maaaaaaaaaaaaan". 

Why don't they just not watch it???

I honestly love both MSNBC and Fox, but I love internet trolls like Kim Carnes, too.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67518
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #53 on: January 16, 2013, 11:37:54 PM »
i used to love watching fox/listening to rush, etc because it's hilarious how much spin they put on things. hannity and combs was one of my favorite shows when i was in high school (old balls, clinton was in office and it was VERY heated). since obama got elected though, it's just too much for me to handle.  the racism from rush is pretty unbearable.

msnbc is boring because they agree with me, although i think maddow is the best commentator on the network and i love that little paper folding sound they do between clips.

i turn to fox during "breaking" news stories because they are the most talented and entertaining, but that doesn't mean as an organization they aren't generally the propaganda wing of the republican party, something that neo-cons won't even admit.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #54 on: January 16, 2013, 11:43:02 PM »
i used to love watching fox/listening to rush, etc because it's hilarious how much spin they put on things. hannity and combs was one of my favorite shows when i was in high school (old balls, clinton was in office and it was VERY heated). since obama got elected though, it's just too much for me to handle.  the racism from rush is pretty unbearable.

msnbc is boring because they agree with me, although i think maddow is the best commentator on the network and i love that little paper folding sound they do between clips.

i turn to fox during "breaking" news stories because they are the most talented and entertaining, but that doesn't mean as an organization they aren't generally the propaganda wing of the republican party, something that neo-cons won't even admit.

Of course they do.  Republicans have fox, and the libs have every other media outlet.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #55 on: January 17, 2013, 01:39:23 AM »
i like morning joe, at least when there is something happening in pop culture that can retain my interest for five minutes (or more).
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #56 on: January 17, 2013, 01:56:49 AM »
i used to love watching fox/listening to rush, etc because it's hilarious how much spin they put on things. hannity and combs was one of my favorite shows when i was in high school (old balls, clinton was in office and it was VERY heated). since obama got elected though, it's just too much for me to handle.  the racism from rush is pretty unbearable.

msnbc is boring because they agree with me, although i think maddow is the best commentator on the network and i love that little paper folding sound they do between clips.

i turn to fox during "breaking" news stories because they are the most talented and entertaining, but that doesn't mean as an organization they aren't generally the propaganda wing of the republican party, something that neo-cons won't even admit.

Of course they do.  Republicans have fox, and the libs have every other media outlet.
Here is what you can't understand.  I'll try to make this very basic for you.  MSNBC might have liberals who talk about liberally things in liberally ways.  Foxnews flatout spews direct Republican party talking points and analysis.  It isn't a conservative slant, its a Republican vision. 
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88689
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
msnbc
« Reply #57 on: January 17, 2013, 06:07:50 AM »
BBC World Business Report at 6:30AM ERR'DAY!

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20659
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #58 on: January 17, 2013, 06:17:59 AM »
Msnbc is excruciating.

Offline TheHamburglar

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5976
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #59 on: January 17, 2013, 09:17:46 AM »
i used to love watching fox/listening to rush, etc because it's hilarious how much spin they put on things. hannity and combs was one of my favorite shows when i was in high school (old balls, clinton was in office and it was VERY heated). since obama got elected though, it's just too much for me to handle.  the racism from rush is pretty unbearable.

msnbc is boring because they agree with me, although i think maddow is the best commentator on the network and i love that little paper folding sound they do between clips.

i turn to fox during "breaking" news stories because they are the most talented and entertaining, but that doesn't mean as an organization they aren't generally the propaganda wing of the republican party, something that neo-cons won't even admit.

Of course they do.  Republicans have fox, and the libs have every other media outlet.
Here is what you can't understand.  I'll try to make this very basic for you.  MSNBC might have liberals who talk about liberally things in liberally ways.  Foxnews flatout spews direct Republican party talking points and analysis.  It isn't a conservative slant, its a Republican vision.

So you are saying MSNBC is a terrible news source, but since FoxNews is a slightly more terrible news source that makes MSNBC OK?

Both are terrible sources for news because unless it's something that happened 8 seconds ago, they are editorializing the story.  The only difference is do you get it with the view point you agree with with Hannity's smugness or Maddow's smugness.
« Last Edit: January 17, 2013, 09:23:25 AM by TheHamburglar »
I got a guy on the other line about some white walls

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15588
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #60 on: January 17, 2013, 10:37:57 AM »
I don't watch any of the news networks for news. Unless it's breaking news or election results. Even then, I switch around to whoever is the most entertaining at the moment.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: msnbc
« Reply #61 on: January 17, 2013, 12:26:45 PM »
I enjoy the 6-8 PM Erin Burnett/Anderson Cooper combo on CNN.  I'll then occupy my time until Stewart/Colbert come on.

Occasionally, I'll watch Rachel Maddow because I find her to be entertaining.  The rest of the dudes on msnbc are pretty awful except for Morning Joe.

Lawrence O'Donnell is insufferable, and I always feel like Ed Schultz is like some drunk guy at a Milwaukee bar telling me why the rich guy done screwed me good.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55978
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #62 on: January 17, 2013, 12:30:11 PM »
I love the crap out of the PBS News Hour.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #63 on: January 17, 2013, 01:42:48 PM »
i used to love watching fox/listening to rush, etc because it's hilarious how much spin they put on things. hannity and combs was one of my favorite shows when i was in high school (old balls, clinton was in office and it was VERY heated). since obama got elected though, it's just too much for me to handle.  the racism from rush is pretty unbearable.

msnbc is boring because they agree with me, although i think maddow is the best commentator on the network and i love that little paper folding sound they do between clips.

i turn to fox during "breaking" news stories because they are the most talented and entertaining, but that doesn't mean as an organization they aren't generally the propaganda wing of the republican party, something that neo-cons won't even admit.

Of course they do.  Republicans have fox, and the libs have every other media outlet.
Here is what you can't understand.  I'll try to make this very basic for you.  MSNBC might have liberals who talk about liberally things in liberally ways.  Foxnews flatout spews direct Republican party talking points and analysis.  It isn't a conservative slant, its a Republican vision.

If you want to know what is going to be the top story on any national TV news outlet other than Fox, all you need to do is go to Media Matters, which has direct access to the White House. There is no integrity left in the media.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #64 on: January 17, 2013, 01:44:41 PM »
I enjoy the 6-8 PM Erin Burnett/Anderson Cooper combo on CNN.  I'll then occupy my time until Stewart/Colbert come on.

Occasionally, I'll watch Rachel Maddow because I find her to be entertaining.  The rest of the dudes on msnbc are pretty awful except for Morning Joe.

Lawrence O'Donnell is insufferable, and I always feel like Ed Schultz is like some drunk guy at a Milwaukee bar telling me why the rich guy done screwed me good.

I'm an Erin Burnett fan. She's about the only one besides Jake Tapper willing to ask a tough question of a democrat.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: msnbc
« Reply #65 on: January 17, 2013, 06:51:42 PM »
I love the "msnbc" presents facts that are presented with a liberal slant statement, but Fox is just propaganda.

I mean, wtf is wrong with you ignorant morons?


Also, msnbc has repeatedly held the position that domestic energy independence not only unrealistic but impossible. They also hold the position that fracing damages drinking water.  Both of these positions are demonstratively false. Even the admin they pee down their leg over has reluctantly confirmed.  They simply don't even bother to check "facts" 99% of the time.

As for media matters, the things they state are false are 99% a matter of opinion. The fact that there's a well funded left winged mouthpiece charged with monitoring Fox 24/7 for "reporting" the items is beyond pathetic.

goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67518
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #66 on: January 17, 2013, 07:11:56 PM »
FSD strikes me more as a infowars.com kind of guy.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38025
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #67 on: January 17, 2013, 07:21:19 PM »
I love the "msnbc" presents facts that are presented with a liberal slant statement, but Fox is just propaganda.

I mean, wtf is wrong with you ignorant morons?


Also, msnbc has repeatedly held the position that domestic energy independence not only unrealistic but impossible. They also hold the position that fracing damages drinking water.  Both of these positions are demonstratively false. Even the admin they pee down their leg over has reluctantly confirmed.  They simply don't even bother to check "facts" 99% of the time.

As for media matters, the things they state are false are 99% a matter of opinion. The fact that there's a well funded left winged mouthpiece charged with monitoring Fox 24/7 for "reporting" the items is beyond pathetic.

Energy independence might be the biggest scam in Washington. Every side uses it to try to sell their point, whether it's green energy or increased exploration, but the reality is that if we used nothing but US energy, our gas prices would be much higher than they are now. Sure, it makes sense to have the ability to use alternate oil supplies in case we ever get cut off, but the idea that importing oil from the Middle East is bad is just ludicrous.

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88689
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
msnbc
« Reply #68 on: January 17, 2013, 07:28:24 PM »
Watching all of you dumbasses debate this makes an elite moderate like me feel so far above you. omg the air up here is fresh!

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38025
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #69 on: January 17, 2013, 10:17:37 PM »
Watching all of you dumbasses debate this makes an elite moderate like me feel so far above you. omg the air up here is fresh!

Which do you like more, though? For me, it goes

1. O'Reilly. Papa bear really bullies people around and then gives them the last word, only to get his last word in after the interview. He's great entertainment.

2. Maddow. She is probably the smartest out of the biased news media hosts, but she doesn't get the quality of guests than O'Reilly pulls in.

3. Hannity. He was much better when Allan Colmes co-hosted his show. Now he's just an bad person that parrots the republican party line and bullies guests. He can be entertaining, but he's usually not.

The rest of the shows (other than Lockup and To Catch a Predator of course) on those channels are awful.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15588
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #70 on: January 18, 2013, 08:28:19 AM »
I enjoy laughing at Chris Matthews and the dumb crap he says from time to time. I don't like Ed Schultz. He's too over the top and seems to be trying too hard. Like a Rush Limbaugh but with a lot less people who listen to him.

It seems almost most of the liberal friends I have seldom watch/listen to political talk. While almost all of my conservative friends listen/watch political talk daily.  But I think it might have been reversed when Bush was president.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67518
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #71 on: January 18, 2013, 08:42:41 AM »
schutlz is unwatchable.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline TheHamburglar

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5976
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #72 on: January 18, 2013, 09:12:57 AM »
Allan Colmes

Pretty sure this guy is a conservative stooge.  No one is that dumb/bad at debating.  Hannity would just softball up contradictions for Colmes to swat out of the park and Colmes never jumped on the opportunity.  He always just stuck to whatever his original talking point was or serve up a bigger contradiction for Hannity to kill him on.  Pretty sure Colmes was told anytime Hannity says something stupid just ignore it or say something more stupid.
I got a guy on the other line about some white walls

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #73 on: January 18, 2013, 08:50:30 PM »
I love the "msnbc" presents facts that are presented with a liberal slant statement, but Fox is just propaganda.

I mean, wtf is wrong with you ignorant morons?


Also, msnbc has repeatedly held the position that domestic energy independence not only unrealistic but impossible. They also hold the position that fracing damages drinking water.  Both of these positions are demonstratively false. Even the admin they pee down their leg over has reluctantly confirmed.  They simply don't even bother to check "facts" 99% of the time.

As for media matters, the things they state are false are 99% a matter of opinion. The fact that there's a well funded left winged mouthpiece charged with monitoring Fox 24/7 for "reporting" the items is beyond pathetic.
This is so not worth my time because your limited comprehension will prevent any meaningful dialogue.

MSNBC = liberal
Foxnews = Republican party talking points

There is no analysis other than what the Republican party specifically wants.  This doesn't mean conservative, it means they only spew corrosive Republican talking points.  Its okay to have your news source from a conservative or liberal point of view.  Its not okay to have a party run news corporation where users delude themselves into believing its fair and balanced.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38025
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #74 on: January 18, 2013, 10:50:47 PM »
Allan Colmes

Pretty sure this guy is a conservative stooge.  No one is that dumb/bad at debating.  Hannity would just softball up contradictions for Colmes to swat out of the park and Colmes never jumped on the opportunity.  He always just stuck to whatever his original talking point was or serve up a bigger contradiction for Hannity to kill him on.  Pretty sure Colmes was told anytime Hannity says something stupid just ignore it or say something more stupid.

Yeah, the show was much better when Hannity had somebody who could make him look like an intellectual. Now he just acts like an bad person for a 1 hour segment and throws a nerf football before every commercial break.