Author Topic: msnbc  (Read 13749 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67518
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #100 on: January 24, 2013, 08:14:01 PM »
Sheesh, I have a bad memory!
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #101 on: January 24, 2013, 08:34:55 PM »


I remember this graph. It would be misleading if you couldn't read numbers.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67518
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #102 on: January 24, 2013, 09:20:18 PM »


I remember this graph. It would be misleading if you couldn't read numbers.

t's & p's fox viewers.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88688
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #103 on: January 28, 2013, 12:44:40 PM »

Offline mortons toe

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 324
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #104 on: January 30, 2013, 05:37:13 PM »
I love the "msnbc" presents facts that are presented with a liberal slant statement, but Fox is just propaganda.

I mean, wtf is wrong with you ignorant morons?


Also, msnbc has repeatedly held the position that domestic energy independence not only unrealistic but impossible. They also hold the position that fracing damages drinking water.  Both of these positions are demonstratively false. Even the admin they pee down their leg over has reluctantly confirmed.  They simply don't even bother to check "facts" 99% of the time.

As for media matters, the things they state are false are 99% a matter of opinion. The fact that there's a well funded left winged mouthpiece charged with monitoring Fox 24/7 for "reporting" the items is beyond pathetic.
This is so not worth my time because your limited comprehension will prevent any meaningful dialogue.

MSNBC = liberal
Foxnews = Republican party talking points

There is no analysis other than what the Republican party specifically wants.  This doesn't mean conservative, it means they only spew corrosive Republican talking points.  Its okay to have your news source from a conservative or liberal point of view.  Its not okay to have a party run news corporation where users delude themselves into believing its fair and balanced.

This statement reminds me of GE owning NBC, and Jeff Immelt being appointed "Jobs Czar". It's kind of like Exxon owning Fox... er, nevermind.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67518
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #105 on: March 16, 2013, 08:02:09 PM »
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #106 on: March 16, 2013, 11:01:21 PM »

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67518
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #107 on: March 16, 2013, 11:21:44 PM »
i wish i knew.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20659
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #108 on: March 17, 2013, 10:48:06 PM »
news

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: msnbc
« Reply #109 on: March 17, 2013, 11:36:21 PM »


Apparently someone at the huffpost purchased half a tv. Dumbfucks
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: msnbc
« Reply #110 on: March 17, 2013, 11:53:56 PM »