Author Topic: Bracketology 1/8/13  (Read 102563 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #500 on: March 10, 2013, 04:26:41 PM »
Wasn't Wisky a higher seed each time they beat us?

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #501 on: March 10, 2013, 05:34:05 PM »
Alright.  Almost exactly 7 days away until Selection Sunday.   Here is Posse's latest projections =

     1  seed   ---   2  seed   ---   3  seed   ---   4  seed
______________________________________________
1. Duke           5. Gtown          9. Mich         13. Marq
2. Ind              6. KU             10. N Mex       14. KState
3. Gonz           7. Miami          11. Flor          15. Arizona
4. Lville           8. Mich St        12. Ohio St     16. OK St


We need to cheer against those 3 seeds and Marquette in the upcoming conf tourneys.   As long as we beat Texas, i feel completely safe we dont fall below a 4 seed. 

  5  seeds  --  6  seeds  --  7  seeds  --  8  seeds 
________________________________________
Syracuse         UNLV         Col St          Cal
St Louis         Butler         VCU             NC State
Pitt                UCLA          N Carolina    Creighton     
Wiscy             N Dame      Memphis      SD State 


I have OU and Iowa St both as 10 seeds. Horrible loss by OU yday.   Still think Baylor needs a win over OK St to sneak in.
Mr Bread, a bunch of 9-10 seed teams lost this week, so I still have your Illinois squad as a 9 seed.  Those strong wins vs Gonz Ind and Mich St  will get you in the dance.     

Offline MeatSauce

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1127
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #502 on: March 10, 2013, 05:43:04 PM »
where did you have New Mex and Syr before yday?

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #503 on: March 10, 2013, 05:50:03 PM »
Lutardi has ku as a 1 Bc they beat Belmont, cu, temple and Richmond at home.  He has kstate as a 4 Bc we beat 4 otherwise completely anonymous teams at home. Moral of the story, schedule lots of shifty teams who schedule good teams who also schedule good teams.  #rpi
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19148
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #504 on: March 10, 2013, 06:11:05 PM »
Lutardi has ku as a 1 Bc they beat Belmont, cu, temple and Richmond at home.  He has kstate as a 4 Bc we beat 4 otherwise completely anonymous teams at home. Moral of the story, schedule lots of shifty teams who schedule good teams who also schedule good teams.  #rpi

Other than head to head, why is KU going to be a higher seed than us?
:adios:

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #505 on: March 10, 2013, 06:19:08 PM »
Lutardi has ku as a 1 Bc they beat Belmont, cu, temple and Richmond at home.  He has kstate as a 4 Bc we beat 4 otherwise completely anonymous teams at home. Moral of the story, schedule lots of shifty teams who schedule good teams who also schedule good teams.  #rpi

Other than head to head, why is KU going to be a higher seed than us?

did you not just read his post? that s why. Play the RPI game.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #506 on: March 10, 2013, 06:20:40 PM »
Lutardi has ku as a 1 Bc they beat Belmont, cu, temple and Richmond at home.  He has kstate as a 4 Bc we beat 4 otherwise completely anonymous teams at home. Moral of the story, schedule lots of shifty teams who schedule good teams who also schedule good teams.  #rpi

Other than head to head, why is KU going to be a higher seed than us?

The above and apparently good road wins are more helpful than bad losses are hurtful.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #507 on: March 10, 2013, 07:27:08 PM »
I dont think KU is a 1 seed right now.   They have tons of top 50 wins.   Lville's worst loss is to rpi 51 Nova.    Lville's other 4 losses are to RPI top 50 teams by a combined 12 points.    They play in better conference, they went 14-4 just like KU.   Lville also has a top 10 SOS

Gtown also went 14-4 and had 5 total losses.  They are hotter than almost any team around winning 13 of 14 including sweeping Syracuse, beating Lville and Marquette.     I just feel these 2 teams are slightly ahead of KU in the pecking order right now.    I feel KU likely needs to win the P66 to be a 1 seed


Offline RickRampus

  • goEMAW.com Resident Ovine Specialist
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1255
  • don't tell me how to spell my name
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #508 on: March 11, 2013, 10:34:24 AM »
"Honestly, I'm not even sure who we are trolling anymore."   ksu_MBB, March 8, 2016

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #509 on: March 11, 2013, 10:36:49 AM »
LOL at Joey Brackets. He had KU as a 1 seed. Then less than 24 hrs later, he puts them as a 2 seed and Lville as a 1 seed.  Funny, I made my case why Lville should be the 4th 1 seed. I think that SOB Lunardi is reading goEMAW.  Hey Joey, if u are gonna steal info, give gE their credit.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16962
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #510 on: March 11, 2013, 10:38:03 AM »
Lunardi 3/11/2013

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

would take, i guess. making a big 12 run and moving up to a 3 seed would be great.

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #511 on: March 11, 2013, 10:39:34 AM »
we are a lock to play in KC after winning the ship right?

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #512 on: March 11, 2013, 10:42:52 AM »
Would rather be a 3 seed. 2 seeds lose a lot more to 7/10 seeds than 1 seeds lose to 8/9.

In fact, the 10 seed has an amazing record vs 2 seeds.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #513 on: March 11, 2013, 11:11:21 AM »
we are a lock to play in KC after winning the ship right?

Nope.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline HerrSonntag

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3443
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #514 on: March 11, 2013, 11:11:57 AM »
I don't know, i kinda want to stay a 4, if it means keeping the KC Draw... if KU chokes under pressure and doesn't get back to a 1 seed, they'd take up the 2/3 slot at the KC tournament and we'd get shipped out to San Jose or some place losery. 

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #515 on: March 11, 2013, 11:30:59 AM »
Lunardi 3/11/2013

http://espn.go.com/mens-college-basketball/bracketology

would take, i guess. making a big 12 run and moving up to a 3 seed would be great.
I love this bracket
                  -A Big East/Big 12 showdown on the second day in KC would be the most TSC thing ever
                  -Gonzaga is by far the 1 seed I want to share a bracket with and the rest of that region is pretty pud
     




Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #516 on: March 11, 2013, 11:32:33 AM »
At this point a 4 in Kansas City would be great. If we manage to win a couple in KC and end up as a 3 that would be gravy. IMHO

Offline CopperBowl

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 571
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #517 on: March 11, 2013, 11:33:25 AM »
I don't know, i kinda want to stay a 4, if it means keeping the KC Draw... if KU chokes under pressure and doesn't get back to a 1 seed, they'd take up the 2/3 slot at the KC tournament and we'd get shipped out to San Jose or some place losery.

Lexington  :pray:

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #518 on: March 11, 2013, 12:04:59 PM »
I don't know, i kinda want to stay a 4, if it means keeping the KC Draw... if KU chokes under pressure and doesn't get back to a 1 seed, they'd take up the 2/3 slot at the KC tournament and we'd get shipped out to San Jose or some place losery.

you don't understand how placement for the first 2 rounds works do you?

Offline EMAWesome

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1113
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #519 on: March 11, 2013, 12:07:36 PM »
I don't know, i kinda want to stay a 4, if it means keeping the KC Draw... if KU chokes under pressure and doesn't get back to a 1 seed, they'd take up the 2/3 slot at the KC tournament and we'd get shipped out to San Jose or some place losery.

you don't understand how placement for the first 2 rounds works do you?

You beat me to it...I can't believe people still don't understand the pod system...it isn't a new thing anymore.


Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #520 on: March 11, 2013, 12:07:40 PM »
Do not want to play Cuse in the 2nd round again. Ideal scenario would be a 3 seed in KC playing a pud 6 seed like UNLV in the 2nd round.

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #521 on: March 11, 2013, 12:15:38 PM »
Yeah holy crap how about we play someone not named Syracuse or Wisconsin in the 2nd round? So sick of this.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #522 on: March 11, 2013, 12:17:26 PM »
agreed but I think I would prefer to play Gonzaga over the other 1s? :confused:


but i REALLY want a 3 seed.

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #523 on: March 11, 2013, 12:21:29 PM »
Do not want to play Cuse in the 2nd round again.

Weber wouldn't let Boheim clownsuit him like Frank did.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Bracketology 1/8/13
« Reply #524 on: March 11, 2013, 01:00:15 PM »