0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Alrighty then. Agree it will come down to turnovers. If we have 1 or less I think we win. Two or more I don't know. Regarding our losses, check the box scores and stats. We dominated Tech who barely managed 300 yards in regulation while we had 450+. Three turnovers and allowing a 1st half onside kick was the equalizer. ISU the same thing. Two TOs inside their 5 and another freaky on returned for a score. Both should have been easy wins. I wonder how KSU vs ISU would have ended up if Sams found out 2 days prior to the game he was the starter? ISU had their chances as it was. OSU I have no answer. They were pretty good and we were terrible. That happens with a young team on the road. yet we were still in it in the 4th. Boykin was way off with his accuracy in that game. We got several very good players back last week which helped with pass rush, OL and WR.If Boykin plays like punting can be ok, as GMFP preaches (how many coaches in the conf think that way?), you guys are in for a major tilt. If he wants to show the media how big his arm is then we could see another OSU experience. Frogs 31 Catz 23 Lets get it on!
Lots of teams have good defensive stats before they play us. TCU hasn't played us yet. Simple really.Cats by 21
Quote from: Bookie Pimp on November 07, 2012, 12:23:08 PMQuote from: American Standard on November 07, 2012, 12:16:24 PMQuote from: Bookie Pimp on November 07, 2012, 11:37:37 AMQuote from: American Standard on November 07, 2012, 11:13:48 AMAlrighty then. Agree it will come down to turnovers. If we have 1 or less I think we win. Two or more I don't know. Regarding our losses, check the box scores and stats. We dominated Tech who barely managed 300 yards in regulation while we had 450+. Three turnovers and allowing a 1st half onside kick was the equalizer. ISU the same thing. Two TOs inside their 5 and another freaky on returned for a score. Both should have been easy wins. I wonder how KSU vs ISU would have ended up if Sams found out 2 days prior to the game he was the starter? ISU had their chances as it was. OSU I have no answer. They were pretty good and we were terrible. That happens with a young team on the road. yet we were still in it in the 4th. Boykin was way off with his accuracy in that game. We got several very good players back last week which helped with pass rush, OL and WR.If Boykin plays like punting can be ok, as GMFP preaches (how many coaches in the conf think that way?), you guys are in for a major tilt. If he wants to show the media how big his arm is then we could see another OSU experience. Frogs 31 Catz 23 Lets get it on!Not sure if serious....Thus far, you've beaten the bottom feeders of the Big 12 and a big east team and lost to the three middle of the pack teams. Now, it's time to play "big boy football" and this isn't the MWC anymore.Your team is not only young, but also beat up. We don't turn the ball over, and y'all do. If Patterson wants to punt, let him. We don't punt. We score.It won't be all that close. A nice two year run = "Big boy"? Lulz. While we were beating Wiscy in the Rose Bowl two years ago you and CatFancy Nation were crapping your pants wondering which Conference might take you. Now you have us and WVU to thank for keeping the Conference together. The television partners wanted us pure and simple. We'll have a good time. The post game tailgate can double as the Wake for your NC dreams Sounds to me like you're still a little bitter about getting passed over for Baylor back in '96... Haha! We've put them in their place since that happened. I think we are 4-1 outscoring them 196-67 or some such. All that matters is we are here now. BTW, might be a good idea if you guys wear black for the pending Wake. Just a friendly Frog fan trying to help.
Quote from: American Standard on November 07, 2012, 12:16:24 PMQuote from: Bookie Pimp on November 07, 2012, 11:37:37 AMQuote from: American Standard on November 07, 2012, 11:13:48 AMAlrighty then. Agree it will come down to turnovers. If we have 1 or less I think we win. Two or more I don't know. Regarding our losses, check the box scores and stats. We dominated Tech who barely managed 300 yards in regulation while we had 450+. Three turnovers and allowing a 1st half onside kick was the equalizer. ISU the same thing. Two TOs inside their 5 and another freaky on returned for a score. Both should have been easy wins. I wonder how KSU vs ISU would have ended up if Sams found out 2 days prior to the game he was the starter? ISU had their chances as it was. OSU I have no answer. They were pretty good and we were terrible. That happens with a young team on the road. yet we were still in it in the 4th. Boykin was way off with his accuracy in that game. We got several very good players back last week which helped with pass rush, OL and WR.If Boykin plays like punting can be ok, as GMFP preaches (how many coaches in the conf think that way?), you guys are in for a major tilt. If he wants to show the media how big his arm is then we could see another OSU experience. Frogs 31 Catz 23 Lets get it on!Not sure if serious....Thus far, you've beaten the bottom feeders of the Big 12 and a big east team and lost to the three middle of the pack teams. Now, it's time to play "big boy football" and this isn't the MWC anymore.Your team is not only young, but also beat up. We don't turn the ball over, and y'all do. If Patterson wants to punt, let him. We don't punt. We score.It won't be all that close. A nice two year run = "Big boy"? Lulz. While we were beating Wiscy in the Rose Bowl two years ago you and CatFancy Nation were crapping your pants wondering which Conference might take you. Now you have us and WVU to thank for keeping the Conference together. The television partners wanted us pure and simple. We'll have a good time. The post game tailgate can double as the Wake for your NC dreams Sounds to me like you're still a little bitter about getting passed over for Baylor back in '96...
Quote from: Bookie Pimp on November 07, 2012, 11:37:37 AMQuote from: American Standard on November 07, 2012, 11:13:48 AMAlrighty then. Agree it will come down to turnovers. If we have 1 or less I think we win. Two or more I don't know. Regarding our losses, check the box scores and stats. We dominated Tech who barely managed 300 yards in regulation while we had 450+. Three turnovers and allowing a 1st half onside kick was the equalizer. ISU the same thing. Two TOs inside their 5 and another freaky on returned for a score. Both should have been easy wins. I wonder how KSU vs ISU would have ended up if Sams found out 2 days prior to the game he was the starter? ISU had their chances as it was. OSU I have no answer. They were pretty good and we were terrible. That happens with a young team on the road. yet we were still in it in the 4th. Boykin was way off with his accuracy in that game. We got several very good players back last week which helped with pass rush, OL and WR.If Boykin plays like punting can be ok, as GMFP preaches (how many coaches in the conf think that way?), you guys are in for a major tilt. If he wants to show the media how big his arm is then we could see another OSU experience. Frogs 31 Catz 23 Lets get it on!Not sure if serious....Thus far, you've beaten the bottom feeders of the Big 12 and a big east team and lost to the three middle of the pack teams. Now, it's time to play "big boy football" and this isn't the MWC anymore.Your team is not only young, but also beat up. We don't turn the ball over, and y'all do. If Patterson wants to punt, let him. We don't punt. We score.It won't be all that close. A nice two year run = "Big boy"? Lulz. While we were beating Wiscy in the Rose Bowl two years ago you and CatFancy Nation were crapping your pants wondering which Conference might take you. Now you have us and WVU to thank for keeping the Conference together. The television partners wanted us pure and simple. We'll have a good time. The post game tailgate can double as the Wake for your NC dreams
Quote from: American Standard on November 07, 2012, 11:13:48 AMAlrighty then. Agree it will come down to turnovers. If we have 1 or less I think we win. Two or more I don't know. Regarding our losses, check the box scores and stats. We dominated Tech who barely managed 300 yards in regulation while we had 450+. Three turnovers and allowing a 1st half onside kick was the equalizer. ISU the same thing. Two TOs inside their 5 and another freaky on returned for a score. Both should have been easy wins. I wonder how KSU vs ISU would have ended up if Sams found out 2 days prior to the game he was the starter? ISU had their chances as it was. OSU I have no answer. They were pretty good and we were terrible. That happens with a young team on the road. yet we were still in it in the 4th. Boykin was way off with his accuracy in that game. We got several very good players back last week which helped with pass rush, OL and WR.If Boykin plays like punting can be ok, as GMFP preaches (how many coaches in the conf think that way?), you guys are in for a major tilt. If he wants to show the media how big his arm is then we could see another OSU experience. Frogs 31 Catz 23 Lets get it on!Not sure if serious....Thus far, you've beaten the bottom feeders of the Big 12 and a big east team and lost to the three middle of the pack teams. Now, it's time to play "big boy football" and this isn't the MWC anymore.Your team is not only young, but also beat up. We don't turn the ball over, and y'all do. If Patterson wants to punt, let him. We don't punt. We score.It won't be all that close.
Quote from: p1k3 on November 07, 2012, 12:34:16 PMlol any schmuck could beat Wisconsin in the rose bowlLOL! Getting there is the hard part.
lol any schmuck could beat Wisconsin in the rose bowl
Quote from: American Standard on November 07, 2012, 11:13:48 AMAlrighty then. Agree it will come down to turnovers. If we have 1 or less I think we win. Two or more I don't know. Regarding our losses, check the box scores and stats. We dominated Tech who barely managed 300 yards in regulation while we had 450+. Three turnovers and allowing a 1st half onside kick was the equalizer. ISU the same thing. Two TOs inside their 5 and another freaky on returned for a score. Both should have been easy wins. I wonder how KSU vs ISU would have ended up if Sams found out 2 days prior to the game he was the starter? ISU had their chances as it was. OSU I have no answer. They were pretty good and we were terrible. That happens with a young team on the road. yet we were still in it in the 4th. Boykin was way off with his accuracy in that game. We got several very good players back last week which helped with pass rush, OL and WR.If Boykin plays like punting can be ok, as GMFP preaches (how many coaches in the conf think that way?), you guys are in for a major tilt. If he wants to show the media how big his arm is then we could see another OSU experience. Frogs 31 Catz 23 Lets get it on!Gary.Mother.rough ridin'.Patterson?
Quote from: p1k3 on November 07, 2012, 12:34:16 PMlol any schmuck could beat Wisconsin in the rose bowlLOL! Getting there is the hard part.*
Quote from: American Standard on November 07, 2012, 12:38:57 PMQuote from: p1k3 on November 07, 2012, 12:34:16 PMlol any schmuck could beat Wisconsin in the rose bowlLOL! Getting there is the hard part.You can't be serious. Who did you beat to get there? Colorado State?
Quote from: wes mantooth on November 07, 2012, 12:50:18 PMQuote from: American Standard on November 07, 2012, 12:38:57 PMQuote from: p1k3 on November 07, 2012, 12:34:16 PMlol any schmuck could beat Wisconsin in the rose bowlLOL! Getting there is the hard part.You can't be serious. Who did you beat to get there? Colorado State?Apparently the Voters and Computers thought enough of us to rank us 3rd prior to the bowls. We were also favored vs 4th ranked Wiscy. One loss by UO or AU from the NC game. No need to be all butthurt about it.
Quote from: CartierFor3 on November 07, 2012, 12:06:18 PMLots of teams have good defensive stats before they play us. TCU hasn't played us yet. Simple really.Cats by 21You guys gained 364 yds vs ISU. We had 450+ with our Freshman QB starting his first game. He was listed at RB that Wednesday.
Here's the "murderers row" they played to get to the Rose Bowl...Oregon State Tennessee Tech Baylor SMU Colorado State Wyoming BYU Air Force UNLV Utah San Diego State New Mexico
little worried about their qb running around, is he the most dynamic we've faced?
Quote from: Bookie Pimp on November 07, 2012, 01:29:34 PMHere's the "murderers row" they played to get to the Rose Bowl...Oregon State Tennessee Tech Baylor SMU Colorado State Wyoming BYU Air Force UNLV Utah San Diego State New Mexico i figured there was a good reason he dodged the question. WOOF!
