Author Topic: RANKINGS...  (Read 131915 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #200 on: October 12, 2014, 02:59:01 PM »

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64239
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #201 on: October 12, 2014, 05:28:59 PM »
1 win away from the top 10.

Also, it's pretty God damn impressive that half of the Big 12 is in the top 15.

Polls are a sham
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Frankenklein

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1815
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #202 on: October 12, 2014, 05:35:39 PM »
1 win away from the top 10.

Also, it's pretty God damn impressive that half of the Big 12 is in the top 15.

Polls are a sham
we should vote on this

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #203 on: October 12, 2014, 05:51:59 PM »
1 win away from the top 10.

Also, it's pretty God damn impressive that half of the Big 12 is in the top 15.

Polls are a sham

Cool story, Negative Nancy.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline bshea85

  • B.S. Esq.
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 451
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #204 on: October 12, 2014, 06:55:45 PM »
1 win away from the top 10.

Also, it's pretty God damn impressive that half of the Big 12 is in the top 15.

Polls are a sham
we should vote on this

I totally agree, but we should release a pre-poll poll and use our media influence to guide the discussion.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13768
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #205 on: October 12, 2014, 08:00:10 PM »
gE.c should make fun of polls until everyone removes them.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16769
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #206 on: October 18, 2014, 04:38:06 PM »
what will we be?

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16769
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #207 on: October 18, 2014, 04:38:19 PM »
i say 10

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36755
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #208 on: October 18, 2014, 05:04:54 PM »
7.  We beat a national beloved at their house.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36755
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #209 on: October 18, 2014, 05:05:24 PM »
Legitimacy,  and all

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16769
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #210 on: October 18, 2014, 05:07:23 PM »
Quote
1   Mississippi State (45)   6-0   1480
2   Florida State (12)   6-0   1415
3   Ole Miss (3)   6-0   1413
4   Baylor   6-0   1317
5   Notre Dame   6-0   1228
6   Auburn   5-1   1144
7   Alabama   5-1   1068
8   Michigan State   5-1   1015
9   Oregon   5-1   1014
10   Georgia   5-1   981
11   Oklahoma   5-1   935
12   TCU   4-1   917
13   Ohio State   4-1   648
14   Kansas State   4-1   626

i can see us jumping OU and Ohio State but other than that who?

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16769
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #211 on: October 18, 2014, 05:11:35 PM »
maybe Notre Dame if they get embarrassed

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17634
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #212 on: October 18, 2014, 05:13:02 PM »
Quote
1   Mississippi State (45)   6-0   1480
2   Florida State (12)   6-0   1415
3   Ole Miss (3)   6-0   1413
4   Baylor   6-0   1317
5   Notre Dame   6-0   1228
6   Auburn   5-1   1144
7   Alabama   5-1   1068
8   Michigan State   5-1   1015
9   Oregon   5-1   1014
10   Georgia   5-1   981
11   Oklahoma   5-1   935
12   TCU   4-1   917
13   Ohio State   4-1   648
14   Kansas State   4-1   626

i can see us jumping OU and Ohio State but other than that who?

OU, Ohio St, and maybe Baylor

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #213 on: October 18, 2014, 05:13:17 PM »
Baylor probably.  Two touchdown loss to an unranked team.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13591
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #214 on: October 18, 2014, 05:19:16 PM »
i doubt we jump ohio state

Offline Bookcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #215 on: October 18, 2014, 05:28:16 PM »
With two pup games vs. UT and Ostate....doesn't matter. Top 6 or 7 when they head to Ft. Worth.

TCU is pretty good...  :surprised:

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16769
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #216 on: October 18, 2014, 05:29:11 PM »
yeah maybe osu's defense is just garbage, but TCU's offense looks very good

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #217 on: October 18, 2014, 05:30:56 PM »
TCU reminds me of Auburn with a shittier defense.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64239
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #218 on: October 18, 2014, 05:31:25 PM »
atm at 24 or 25? Interesting to see how this shakes out
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #219 on: October 18, 2014, 05:32:37 PM »
yeah maybe osu's defense is just garbage, but TCU's offense looks very good

Tech put oil up 35 on them so I'd say their defense is fairly shitty.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #220 on: October 18, 2014, 05:34:08 PM »
atm at 24 or 25? Interesting to see how this shakes out

Which SEC team do they put in to replace the Aggies? Probably LSU.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #221 on: October 18, 2014, 05:46:54 PM »
We should be the highest ranked 1 loss team.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline jmlynch1

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2781
  • stay together for the kids
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #222 on: October 18, 2014, 06:04:16 PM »
Mark May said top 6 so yeah

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13591
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #223 on: October 18, 2014, 06:04:59 PM »
the rankings will work themselves out

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #224 on: October 18, 2014, 06:05:59 PM »
Yeah, not worried at all about ranking right now since we still have Baylor, WVU and TCU on the road.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.