Author Topic: RANKINGS...  (Read 129172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cas4ksu

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2463
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #50 on: July 31, 2014, 11:18:53 AM »
except steve dave, he gets it

yeah. I tweeted the same thing just a bit ago. Pretty tongue in cheek though.

Predictions for the rankings leading into the Auburn game?

Auburn: 4
KSU: 16

Online kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13551
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #51 on: July 31, 2014, 11:19:16 AM »
No way that #21 can beat #5

Offline cas4ksu

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2463
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #52 on: July 31, 2014, 11:20:30 AM »
Pretty interesting that Alabama didn't receive a single 1st place vote.

The only SEC team to get a 1st place vote?

South Carolina.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #53 on: July 31, 2014, 11:26:14 AM »
When did Amway start sponsoring the coaches' poll?

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16725
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #54 on: July 31, 2014, 11:29:54 AM »
When did Amway start sponsoring the coaches' poll?

today, probably

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #55 on: July 31, 2014, 11:33:39 AM »
Texas really shouldn't be ranked. That's just not fair to Charlie.

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7072
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #56 on: July 31, 2014, 11:45:36 AM »
When did Amway start sponsoring the coaches' poll?

today, probably

Lol, I noticed that too.....happened back in February per wikipedia.  Stupid Coaches Poll had nothing better to do on a cold winter evening and went to a meeting about an exciting business opportunity, then BAM!!!! Hello, new sponsor.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #57 on: July 31, 2014, 11:46:33 AM »
When did Amway start sponsoring the coaches' poll?

today, probably

Lol, I noticed that too.....happened back in February per wikipedia.  Stupid Coaches Poll had nothing better to do on a cold winter evening and went to a meeting about an exciting business opportunity, then BAM!!!! Hello, new sponsor.

 :thumbs:

Offline i poo crabs

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 961
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #58 on: July 31, 2014, 12:08:01 PM »
LOL at the nubber board

"K-State at 21 is a bone thrown to Auburn by the SEC coaches (Gus: Well we did beat a top 25 team on the road in the north)"

"ksu in the top 25 is laughable"


Offline EMAWforever

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 284
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #59 on: July 31, 2014, 12:22:20 PM »
LOL at the nubber board

"K-State at 21 is a bone thrown to Auburn by the SEC coaches (Gus: Well we did beat a top 25 team on the road in the north)"

"ksu in the top 25 is laughable"
Don't those Husker losers know that they wouldn't even be ranked if they were still in the Big 12 because everyone would know that that they would only win 5-6 games in a good league.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22226
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #60 on: July 31, 2014, 12:48:29 PM »
I think what the Nebraska fans are having a hard time grasping is that voters are going to give a program like k-state the benefit of the doubt.


Sent


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27058
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #61 on: July 31, 2014, 12:52:18 PM »
I want to absolutely destroy Iowa State. Like murder them by 100 so Auburn at KSU is a matchup of top 15 teams

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17072
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #62 on: July 31, 2014, 01:15:56 PM »
I want to absolutely destroy Iowa State. Like murder them by 100 so Auburn at KSU is a matchup of top 15 teams

Who the hell do you think would put stock in us because we beat floodaggie, even if it was by 100?

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9215
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #63 on: July 31, 2014, 01:22:36 PM »
I want to absolutely destroy Iowa State. Like murder them by 100 so Auburn at KSU is a matchup of top 15 teams

Who the hell do you think would put stock in us because we beat floodaggie, even if it was by 100?

They wouldn't but we could talk up early conference roadie against those guys that ruined OSU's chances in 2011 a lot and it might help

except steve dave, he gets it

yeah. I tweeted the same thing just a bit ago. Pretty tongue in cheek though.

Predictions for the rankings leading into the Auburn game?

Auburn: 4
KSU: 16

I think Auburn with be #4 but we'll be #18.
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #64 on: July 31, 2014, 01:25:08 PM »
I want to absolutely destroy Iowa State. Like murder them by 100 so Auburn at KSU is a matchup of top 15 teams

Who the hell do you think would put stock in us because we beat floodaggie, even if it was by 100?
Some teams could stub their toes by the time that games rolls around.  :dunno: Also, espn.

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85178
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #65 on: July 31, 2014, 01:26:23 PM »
I hope we just spend the entire ISU week preparing for whoever we play after them and sleepwalk through a less than 2 TD victory. that strategy has worked pretty much every year that I've been alive so why mix it up.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #66 on: July 31, 2014, 01:28:28 PM »
Honestly, we should just run straight QB draws that game with our back ups and walk out of there 24-10. Never look back. Act like that game never happened.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #67 on: July 31, 2014, 01:31:35 PM »
Honestly, we should just run straight QB draws that game with our back ups and walk out of there 24-10. Never look back. Act like that game never happened.

Ertz would absolutely destroy those guys.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27058
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #68 on: July 31, 2014, 01:38:01 PM »
I hope we just spend the entire ISU week preparing for whoever we play after them and sleepwalk through a less than 2 TD victory. that strategy has worked pretty much every year that I've been alive so why mix it up.

no I wanna win by 100

Online kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13551
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #69 on: July 31, 2014, 01:39:25 PM »
Honestly, we should just run straight QB draws that game with our back ups and walk out of there 24-10. Never look back. Act like that game never happened.

Ertz would absolutely destroy those guys.

Ertz sucks

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #70 on: July 31, 2014, 01:41:32 PM »

Ertz sucks

It's cute how people pretend he's good.

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17072
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #71 on: July 31, 2014, 01:42:29 PM »

Ertz sucks

It's cute how people pretend he's good.

"He's a smart, hard working kid from the Midwest. What's not to like!?!?"

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17072
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #72 on: July 31, 2014, 01:42:53 PM »
"Sure, he's not the most athletic guy. But was Collin Klein?!?!"

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #73 on: July 31, 2014, 01:46:37 PM »
Honestly, nobody really knows anything about Ertz, but i'm optimistic. Just cause he's white and from Iowa isn't why I like him, dork stores.  :dubious:

Online steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85178
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: RANKINGS...
« Reply #74 on: July 31, 2014, 01:47:44 PM »
Honestly, nobody really knows anything about Ertz, but i'm optimistic.

I actually know a lot about him. because I'm steve dave. and steve dave knows a lot of unspeakable things (unless we're talking in person then I have diarrhea mouth).