Author Topic: Weber On Wichita Radio (Read 13624 times)

pissclams · « **Reply #25 on:** April 10, 2012, 10:22:40 AM »

chicken nuggets for the pros

funerals for the antis

steve dave · « **Reply #26 on:** April 10, 2012, 10:23:53 AM »

Quote from: pissclams on April 10, 2012, 10:22:40 AM

chicken nuggets for the pros

funerals for the antis

that's a good one. like, little ice cream cone or casket under your name.

Stevesie60 · « **Reply #27 on:** April 10, 2012, 10:35:18 AM »

Is this based on how you think things will go, or how you hope they will go?

ednksu · « **Reply #28 on:** April 10, 2012, 10:37:00 AM »

orange santa hats on people's avatars

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #29 on:** April 10, 2012, 10:40:13 AM »

Dang, the Too Cool for Schoolers can really flip their faux edginess quickly.

Grats

catzacker · « **Reply #30 on:** April 10, 2012, 10:43:12 AM »

can we get a disassociated tag so Dax can feel better about himself?

ice cream cones for pro
casket for anti
two towers for disassociated

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #31 on:** April 10, 2012, 10:43:42 AM »

Quote from: Stevesie60 on April 10, 2012, 10:35:18 AM

Is this based on how you think things will go, or how you hope they will go?

How I know they will go.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #32 on:** April 10, 2012, 10:44:36 AM »

Quote from: catzacker on April 10, 2012, 10:43:12 AM

can we get a disassociated tag so Dax can feel better about himself?

ice cream cones for pro
casket for anti
two towers for disassociated

Only if the Towers have Kathead Laser Beam eyes

0.42 · « **Reply #33 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:07:01 AM »

get your horns up

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #34 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:08:09 AM »

hook 'em

Ira Hayes · « **Reply #35 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:19:26 AM »

That p in the middle of Gibson's name is going to cause loads of problems.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #36 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:22:41 AM »

Quote from: Ira Hayes on April 10, 2012, 11:19:26 AM

That p in the middle of Gibson's name is going to cause loads of problems.

obviously

kso_FAN · « **Reply #37 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:38:44 AM »

There are plenty of legitimate talking points against both Weber and Lowry, namely the losses and offensive issues.

The talking points from "bad" radio interviews from either are ridiculous though. Both guys are selling what they are bringing to the program and that should be expected. Weber's interview was okay, I thought Lowry's was pretty good. He's made the best points I've heard yet in the necessity for next year's team to get to the FT line and the importance of the next recruiting class.

But I get that people want them gone now, and that's not likely going to change. It is what it is.

Cire · « **Reply #38 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:39:59 AM »

Fan, are you going to cling to weber like you did wooly or have you learned your lesson?

slimz · « **Reply #39 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:42:18 AM »

kso_FAN · « **Reply #40 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:46:04 AM »

Quote from: Cire on April 10, 2012, 11:39:59 AM

Fan, are you going to cling to weber like you did wooly or have you learned your lesson?

I've already said the lesson is learned, plus my knowledge of the game now is much higher.

The cautions that Rusty has thrown out there (over and over) and his point about mediocre coaches I get. I hear them. I listened.

All I am doing is giving Weber a shot. I will break down his games and his seasons just as I did for Frank. The stuff that is not good can't and won't hide and I'll call him and his staff on it. If his offense continues to truck along at 1.05 ppp or something mediocre like that and he proves he learned nothing from Illinois and the issues he had there especially offensively, I will be calling it out.

I get why many aren't going to give him any chance, but I won't do that.

puniraptor · « **Reply #41 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:48:46 AM »

#team_FAN

*can we still fire john currie though?

kso_FAN · « **Reply #42 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:49:58 AM »

Quote from: puniraptor on April 10, 2012, 11:48:46 AM

#team_FAN

*can we still fire john currie though?

I'm certain that Currie will get what he has earned in the long run.

KSU176 · « **Reply #43 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:52:17 AM »

Quote from: rick daris on April 10, 2012, 10:13:14 AM

i really want something added under avatars that clearly state what side you're on and there are only two, pro and anti. no middle ground.

Must have.

EllToPay · « **Reply #44 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:52:43 AM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on April 10, 2012, 11:49:58 AM

Quote from: puniraptor on April 10, 2012, 11:48:46 AM
#team_FAN

*can we still fire john currie though?

I'm certain that Currie will get what he has earned in the long run.

Ira Hayes · « **Reply #45 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:53:52 AM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on April 10, 2012, 11:49:58 AM

Quote from: puniraptor on April 10, 2012, 11:48:46 AM
#team_FAN

*can we still fire john currie though?

I'm certain that Currie will get what he has earned in the long run.

A motorcycle and a hooker?

threadkiller · « **Reply #46 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:55:14 AM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on April 10, 2012, 11:38:44 AM

But I get that people want them gone now, and that's not likely going to change. It is what it is.

If Weber leads KSU to the NCAA tournament the next 3 years I'm betting it will change dramatically. Agree though that is not likely.

catzacker · « **Reply #47 on:** April 10, 2012, 11:57:26 AM »

Quote from: Ira Hayes on April 10, 2012, 11:53:52 AM

Quote from: ksu_FAN on April 10, 2012, 11:49:58 AM
Quote from: puniraptor on April 10, 2012, 11:48:46 AM
#team_FAN

*can we still fire john currie though?

I'm certain that Currie will get what he has earned in the long run.

A motorcycle and a hooker?

a cabela's gift card and clemson's next AD.

Dr Rick Daris · « **Reply #48 on:** April 10, 2012, 12:01:39 PM »

Quote from: threadkiller on April 10, 2012, 11:55:14 AM

Quote from: ksu_FAN on April 10, 2012, 11:38:44 AM
But I get that people want them gone now, and that's not likely going to change. It is what it is.

If Weber leads KSU to the NCAA tournament the next 3 years I'm betting it will change dramatically. Agree though that is not likely.

if he couldn't lead a team with 9 top 100's ,included a seven foot soon to be first round draft pick, to the tournament during his last year at illinois, then why would anyone think that he'll lead a single team after next years team back to the tournament. also next year is in limbo when someone announces that angel rodriguez is not coming back, or as oscar likes to call him, angel hernandez.

114Hickory · « **Reply #49 on:** April 10, 2012, 01:50:43 PM »

Quote from: rick daris on April 10, 2012, 12:01:39 PM

Quote from: threadkiller on April 10, 2012, 11:55:14 AM
Quote from: ksu_FAN on April 10, 2012, 11:38:44 AM
But I get that people want them gone now, and that's not likely going to change. It is what it is.

If Weber leads KSU to the NCAA tournament the next 3 years I'm betting it will change dramatically. Agree though that is not likely.

if he couldn't lead a team with 9 top 100's ,included a seven foot soon to be first round draft pick, to the tournament during his last year at illinois, then why would anyone think that he'll lead a single team after next years team back to the tournament. also next year is in limbo when someone announces that angel rodriguez is not coming back, or as oscar likes to call him, angel hernandez.

Angel Rodriguez-Roberts