0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
May be an update typo, but that says it was NCAA's Decision - So, Currie might have known about this prior to Thu, & let Jamar play, then it was taken out of our hands?The thing that nobody has brought up...with a 'Minor' violation like this, doesn't the player just have to repay any 'improper' benefits received, and after that, is eligible? Surely the guys on the roster could have come up w/ $200 to cover this on the spot, we self report that we found out about it, he paid back the $$, and he plays, and this is a non-story
Quote from: EMAWesome on March 17, 2012, 07:28:22 PMMay be an update typo, but that says it was NCAA's Decision - So, Currie might have known about this prior to Thu, & let Jamar play, then it was taken out of our hands?The thing that nobody has brought up...with a 'Minor' violation like this, doesn't the player just have to repay any 'improper' benefits received, and after that, is eligible? Surely the guys on the roster could have come up w/ $200 to cover this on the spot, we self report that we found out about it, he paid back the $$, and he plays, and this is a non-storywe just did this a year ago, do you seriously not remember the rule and process?
eff you sys and Michigancat. "Fanning doesn't know crap. He's a respect". Please die.
Quote from: sys on March 17, 2012, 07:36:35 PMQuote from: EMAWesome on March 17, 2012, 07:28:22 PMMay be an update typo, but that says it was NCAA's Decision - So, Currie might have known about this prior to Thu, & let Jamar play, then it was taken out of our hands?The thing that nobody has brought up...with a 'Minor' violation like this, doesn't the player just have to repay any 'improper' benefits received, and after that, is eligible? Surely the guys on the roster could have come up w/ $200 to cover this on the spot, we self report that we found out about it, he paid back the $$, and he plays, and this is a non-storyEnlighten me, but call me an idiot first. I just wouldn't feel right if I didn't get called an idiot for having too many other things on my mind over the last 12 months than some rough ridin' NCAA rule that I didn't think any 'Cat would be stupid enough to break again.we just did this a year ago, do you seriously not remember the rule and process?
Quote from: EMAWesome on March 17, 2012, 07:28:22 PMMay be an update typo, but that says it was NCAA's Decision - So, Currie might have known about this prior to Thu, & let Jamar play, then it was taken out of our hands?The thing that nobody has brought up...with a 'Minor' violation like this, doesn't the player just have to repay any 'improper' benefits received, and after that, is eligible? Surely the guys on the roster could have come up w/ $200 to cover this on the spot, we self report that we found out about it, he paid back the $$, and he plays, and this is a non-storyEnlighten me, but call me an idiot first. I just wouldn't feel right if I didn't get called an idiot for having too many other things on my mind over the last 12 months than some rough ridin' NCAA rule that I didn't think any 'Cat would be stupid enough to break again.we just did this a year ago, do you seriously not remember the rule and process?
Quote from: EMAWesome on March 17, 2012, 07:45:03 PMQuote from: sys on March 17, 2012, 07:36:35 PMQuote from: EMAWesome on March 17, 2012, 07:28:22 PMMay be an update typo, but that says it was NCAA's Decision - So, Currie might have known about this prior to Thu, & let Jamar play, then it was taken out of our hands?The thing that nobody has brought up...with a 'Minor' violation like this, doesn't the player just have to repay any 'improper' benefits received, and after that, is eligible? Surely the guys on the roster could have come up w/ $200 to cover this on the spot, we self report that we found out about it, he paid back the $$, and he plays, and this is a non-storyEnlighten me, but call me an idiot first. I just wouldn't feel right if I didn't get called an idiot for having too many other things on my mind over the last 12 months than some rough ridin' NCAA rule that I didn't think any 'Cat would be stupid enough to break again.we just did this a year ago, do you seriously not remember the rule and process?If the NCAA suspends you they do not let you attend NCAA sanctioned events. Jamar's presence on the bench is a glaring indicator that he was sat by Currie and the compliance cuntfaces.
Enlighten me, but call me an idiot first. I just wouldn't feel right if I didn't get called an idiot for having too many other things on my mind over the last 12 months than some rough ridin' NCAA rule that I didn't think any 'Cat would be stupid enough to break again.
Feel bad for Jamar . . . damn.Is K-State on Spring Break?
Quote from: sonofdaxjones on March 17, 2012, 07:59:09 PMFeel bad for Jamar . . . damn.Is K-State on Spring Break?yes
Quote from: EMAWesome on March 17, 2012, 07:45:03 PMEnlighten me, but call me an idiot first. I just wouldn't feel right if I didn't get called an idiot for having too many other things on my mind over the last 12 months than some rough ridin' NCAA rule that I didn't think any 'Cat would be stupid enough to break again.idiot. under $100 in impermissable benes is no penalty. under $300 is 3 games (for bball). when the school's compliance office finds out about a potential violation, they sit the player, investigate and self report. the ncaa examines the school's findings and rules whenever they get around to it.
what's the penalty if we know about it and ignore it until after the game? lack of institutional control?
I understand the anger, i'm pissed too, but Currie and Frank got it right. The anger should be directed at townie-narc-eff. I wish we could sweep this crap under the rug, but crap like that will come back to bite you in the ass.
in the end, EMAW will always win.
Quote from: sys on March 17, 2012, 08:01:07 PMQuote from: EMAWesome on March 17, 2012, 07:45:03 PMEnlighten me, but call me an idiot first. I just wouldn't feel right if I didn't get called an idiot for having too many other things on my mind over the last 12 months than some rough ridin' NCAA rule that I didn't think any 'Cat would be stupid enough to break again.idiot. under $100 in impermissable benes is no penalty. under $300 is 3 games (for bball). when the school's compliance office finds out about a potential violation, they sit the player, investigate and self report. the ncaa examines the school's findings and rules whenever they get around to it.what's the penalty if we know about it and ignore it until after the game? lack of institutional control?
Quote from: Pete on March 17, 2012, 08:29:59 PMQuote from: Fuktard on March 17, 2012, 08:19:53 PMI understand the anger, i'm pissed too, but Currie and Frank got it right. The anger should be directed at townie-narc-eff. I wish we could sweep this crap under the rug, but crap like that will come back to bite you in the ass.What "bite" could be worse than the mere shot at a sweet sixteen? Vacating it? No one on here would disapprove of Currie if that happened.....but Currie's future employers might, and that is what this was about.Problem is a majority of our fanbase would. That's why we will never have nice things.
Quote from: Fuktard on March 17, 2012, 08:19:53 PMI understand the anger, i'm pissed too, but Currie and Frank got it right. The anger should be directed at townie-narc-eff. I wish we could sweep this crap under the rug, but crap like that will come back to bite you in the ass.What "bite" could be worse than the mere shot at a sweet sixteen? Vacating it? No one on here would disapprove of Currie if that happened.....but Currie's future employers might, and that is what this was about.
Quote from: michigancat on March 17, 2012, 08:08:34 PMQuote from: sys on March 17, 2012, 08:01:07 PMQuote from: EMAWesome on March 17, 2012, 07:45:03 PMEnlighten me, but call me an idiot first. I just wouldn't feel right if I didn't get called an idiot for having too many other things on my mind over the last 12 months than some rough ridin' NCAA rule that I didn't think any 'Cat would be stupid enough to break again.idiot. under $100 in impermissable benes is no penalty. under $300 is 3 games (for bball). when the school's compliance office finds out about a potential violation, they sit the player, investigate and self report. the ncaa examines the school's findings and rules whenever they get around to it.what's the penalty if we know about it and ignore it until after the game? lack of institutional control?In this specific case they could have reported it but played him pending a NCAA ruling using the prior relationship exception. If the NCAA ruled after the fact that he should have been ineligible I think the worst case scenario would have been to vacate the game and each succeeding game. Possibly a fine, no way would an isolated incident like that would have constituted any probation of any type.
