Author Topic: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.  (Read 117342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44945
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #950 on: March 21, 2012, 11:08:59 AM »
Agreed, we don't have all the facts. Everyone is taking Frank's side because he appears to be more of the victim here (besides Jamar, of course) and that's fair. In the case that we have to choose between Frank and Currie... This board is probably 80% more likely to keep Frank. Maybe I'm wrong...

most are taking frank's side because he has given his. most are not taking currie's because he has not.

what part of currie's side hasn't been given?  LOL, you guys are hilarious. 

ncaa:  he's ineligible
currie:  he's ineligible
currie:  are you sure he's ineligible?
ncaa: he's ineligible
news people to frank:  why did you bench jamar?
frank:  i don't know, you need to ask the ksu ad
goEMAW:  :flush:

oh crap!  when did currie say this? page 28?
I thought as MIR said that if a player is suspended by the NCAA they can't have contact with the team, ie be on the bench, am I wrong here?

I guess when they call 20 minutes before tip off they can't ban you from the building if you're already there.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #951 on: March 21, 2012, 01:22:07 PM »
Agreed, we don't have all the facts. Everyone is taking Frank's side because he appears to be more of the victim here (besides Jamar, of course) and that's fair. In the case that we have to choose between Frank and Currie... This board is probably 80% more likely to keep Frank. Maybe I'm wrong...

most are taking frank's side because he has given his. most are not taking currie's because he has not.

what part of currie's side hasn't been given?  LOL, you guys are hilarious. 

ncaa:  he's ineligible
currie:  he's ineligible
currie:  are you sure he's ineligible?
ncaa: he's ineligible
news people to frank:  why did you bench jamar?
frank:  i don't know, you need to ask the ksu ad
goEMAW:  :flush:

oh crap!  when did currie say this? page 28?
I thought as MIR said that if a player is suspended by the NCAA they can't have contact with the team, ie be on the bench, am I wrong here?

I guess when they call 20 minutes before tip off they can't ban you from the building if you're already there.
Fair enough indeed.  I just figured if the NCAA was waving their disciplinarian finger at their petulant child they would say he couldn't be on the bench. 

Has it been confirmed that he was officially DQed by the NCAA at that his suspension wasn't just a part of the investigation or a protective measure by K-State to avoid NCAA sanctions?
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85424
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #952 on: March 21, 2012, 01:41:34 PM »
finally got through this thread.  the best posters in it are chum1 and michigancat.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #953 on: March 21, 2012, 01:49:42 PM »
finally got through this thread.  the best posters in it are chum1 and michigancat.

that's easy to say now as an outsider looking at it retrospectively. you weren't there man. the bullets were flying.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85424
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #954 on: March 21, 2012, 01:55:56 PM »
finally got through this thread.  the best posters in it are chum1 and michigancat.

that's easy to say now as an outsider looking at it retrospectively. you weren't there man. the bullets were flying.

Oh I know.  Travel has saved my ass in that regard more than once. 

Offline Fuktard

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1092
    • View Profile

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37140
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #956 on: March 21, 2012, 02:08:15 PM »
finally got through this thread.  the best posters in it are chum1 and michigancat.

I thought Pete was really good, too.

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #957 on: March 21, 2012, 02:09:22 PM »
I remember when emaws were melting down about Currie going to Tennessee. 

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85424
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #958 on: March 21, 2012, 02:10:50 PM »
finally got through this thread.  the best posters in it are chum1 and michigancat.

I thought Pete was really good, too.

pete was definitely great.  lots of good stuff actually.  I love having pete to keep me up to speed when crap like this goes down and I'm away from a computer. 

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19134
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #959 on: March 21, 2012, 02:21:19 PM »
http://www.thenation.com/blog/166886/more-march-madness-persecution-jamar-samuels

Has that been posted yet?  Don't care if it has.

SOLJ

This is the best post in this thread.  Great work 8man

I'm a little :dubious: about it being the best in the thread, but :cheers: anyway, Fuktard.
:adios:

Offline Fuktard

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1092
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #960 on: March 21, 2012, 02:59:32 PM »
http://www.thenation.com/blog/166886/more-march-madness-persecution-jamar-samuels

Has that been posted yet?  Don't care if it has.

SOLJ

This is the best post in this thread.  Great work 8man

I'm a little :dubious: about it being the best in the thread, but :cheers: anyway, Fuktard.
granted, the bar was very low, but it made me chuckle a little and then i smiled and kinda stayed smiling for a few minutes even though i had moved on to other, less funny thoughts...then my girlfriend came in and said "what's are you smiling about?" and i didn't even realize i was still smiling....it was nice.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21338
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #961 on: March 21, 2012, 03:17:11 PM »
is your girlfriend eastern european?

What is you are smiling about, baby?

Offline Fuktard

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1092
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #962 on: March 21, 2012, 03:32:12 PM »
is your girlfriend eastern european?

What is you are smiling about, baby?

she's a fuktard like me.  she don't speak good

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #963 on: March 21, 2012, 05:26:27 PM »
is your girlfriend eastern european?

What is you are smiling about, baby?

 :lol:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85424
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #964 on: March 21, 2012, 07:41:06 PM »
Good evening K-State Fans!
 
After the flight home Tuesday from Connecticut with our women’s basketball team I have been back in the office going through the usual accumulation that results from a week on the road!  Before I dig into the next stack, I do want to take a moment to offer my congratulations to both our basketball teams on another terrific season for each.  Not only did both programs reach the 20-win mark again, but K-State was one of only 10 schools in the nation this year to have both its men’s and women’s teams win games in the NCAA tournament.  I am very proud of the hard work of our student-athletes and coaches as we enjoy continued success both on the court and in the classroom.

As many of you are aware, we experienced a very unfortunate off-court issue last weekend involving our basketball student-athlete Jamar Samuels, and I want to take a minute to help our fans understand NCAA rules and processes related to situations like this.

First, as a member institution of the Big 12 Conference and the NCAA, we have an obligation to investigate potential rules violations.  When information is given to us about potential violations we are expected to immediately work to determine if indeed a violation has occurred and, if so, whether the eligibility of a student-athlete is in question.

There are serious repercussions for an institution that knowingly plays a student-athlete who is potentially ineligible.  These potential repercussions include forfeiture of contests, a "major" violation charge, and even charges of unethical conduct and failure to maintain an atmosphere of compliance, as well as institutional probation and other sanctions.

After working throughout Friday night and Saturday morning, and consulting with the NCAA staff, it was determined that a violation had occurred, thus rendering Jamar ineligible to compete.  During the first half we learned that Jamar would not be reinstated.  We would have continued the reinstatement effort had we won the game and proceeded to the next round.

I do appreciate the access and immediate attention that numerous NCAA staff members gave us Friday evening and Saturday.  I wish with all my heart that Jamar could have played Saturday.  I'm grateful for the way our team battled throughout the game, for the passion that Coach Martin has for our student-athletes and for the way Jamar visibly and vocally supported his teammates throughout the game.
 
We were one of 32 schools out of 338 NCAA Division I basketball-playing institutions to make the third round of the men's basketball tournament.  All 338 are expected to abide by the rules of membership.  And, the members can elect any year (and certainly have through the years) to change or modify rules.  However, we can't decide on our own which rules we want to follow and which ones we don't, nor would we want to participate in an organization where members have such latitude.

We'll continue to work towards our vision of a model intercollegiate program at K-State, and our five goals, including winning championships.  We'll do it with integrity and within the rules.  It’s the only way.

I appreciate our tremendous fans and the commitment to excellence of our coaches and student-athletes.
Go Cats!

John Currie

Offline slimz

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 2128
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #965 on: March 21, 2012, 07:42:08 PM »
[/ thread]

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #966 on: March 21, 2012, 08:02:48 PM »
[/ thread]

Di
d John Currie just tell goEMAW to go eff themselves? I THINK HE DID!
RIP Fatty

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #967 on: March 21, 2012, 08:09:14 PM »
why has no one pm'd me yet that currie has a rough ridin' answer?   :shakesfist:

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19439
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #968 on: March 21, 2012, 08:13:32 PM »
hey guys why don't we let players play coaches coach posters post and ads add? 

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #969 on: March 21, 2012, 08:14:28 PM »
hey guys why don't we let players play coaches coach posters post and ads add?

truth

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46631
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #970 on: March 21, 2012, 08:15:45 PM »
AT LEAST PETE GOT THE rough ridin' ANSWERS HE WAS rough ridin' LOOKING FOR.  /THREAD.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16765
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #971 on: March 21, 2012, 08:21:42 PM »
i feel like such a wishy washy bitch. but i'm starting to understand currie's point of view more than i did before.

it all comes down to eff the townie snitch.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53489
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #972 on: March 21, 2012, 09:42:15 PM »
Yeah, ADJC probably did the right thing . . . still want to cheat more though.



Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16701
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #973 on: March 21, 2012, 09:59:54 PM »
Still think we should've rolled the dice. 
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline TBL

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2093
    • View Profile
Re: You better have some rough ridin' answers, Currie.
« Reply #974 on: March 21, 2012, 10:12:02 PM »
Quote
However, we can't decide on our own which rules we want to follow and which ones we don't, nor would we want to participate in an organization where members have such latitude.

Guess he doesn't know who the sweet 16 teams are?     :derpderp: