Damaging or Climate Protecting
It's quite obvious the left, who are incapable of understanding 1) basic arithmetic, and 2) the concept that the government takes, it doesn't permit you to keep, have no idea what actual oil subsidies are. As pointed out, most are available to all u.s. corps, not just oil. Denying oil corps that tax benefit just because they are profitable would, of course, be unfair and bad policy. The remainder being how oil reserves are taxed and exploration expensed/depreciated, neither of which are unreasonable given the recognition realization principles the IRS uses in setting such schedules. In any event, they actually pay about 1/5 of all Corp tax collected, while so-called green energy pays ZERO, NONE, NIL, and is actually a burden on the potemkin coffers of the us treasury, as the government gives them money regardless of whether the ever make a product worth purchasing (thereby destroying any real incentive, but that's another argument) .
As for the highways argument, I cant address it, because I do not know what it is.
Most importantly however, the chevy's dolt is an asinine, poorly thought out boondoggle that would not exist but for the delusions of our faux academic administration. It's like they sit around saying "you know what would be groovy. . .[a bridge to the moon]".