Author Topic: Tech: Worst Ever?  (Read 8992 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #25 on: February 07, 2012, 08:38:58 PM »
They did just go 12 minutes without a field goal....

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32531
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #26 on: February 07, 2012, 08:50:33 PM »
Worst year ever for mens sports at TTU? Hocutt really building a monster.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27691
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #27 on: February 07, 2012, 10:26:20 PM »
Worst year ever for mens sports at TTU? Hocutt really building a monster.

They beat Oklahoma  :dunno:

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16971
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #28 on: February 07, 2012, 10:36:28 PM »
Worst year ever for mens sports at TTU? Hocutt really building a monster.

They beat Oklahoma  :dunno:

yeah isn't that the last conference win they have in the major sports? bizarre.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #29 on: February 07, 2012, 10:44:17 PM »
I thought Tolbert was very good and the most athletic guy on the court when we played them.

don't really get all the tolbert love.  in the land of retards the half-Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) is king, i guess.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #30 on: February 07, 2012, 10:47:31 PM »
I thought Tolbert was very good and the most athletic guy on the court when we played them.

don't really get all the tolbert love.  in the land of retards the half-respect is king, i guess.

Yeah, not even sure if he'll make the league all freshman team. He's pretty much the Cortez Groves of Tech, so he's got that I guess.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55967
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #31 on: February 07, 2012, 11:18:41 PM »
He's pretty much the Cortez Groves of Tech, so he's got that I guess.

What a delightful reference.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #32 on: February 07, 2012, 11:20:54 PM »
He's pretty much the Cortez Groves of Tech, so he's got that I guess.

What a delightful reference.

Indeed.

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #33 on: February 08, 2012, 08:32:06 AM »
I thought Tolbert was very good and the most athletic guy on the court when we played them.

don't really get all the tolbert love.  in the land of retards the half-respect is king, i guess.

I'm not saying he is THE piece but I do believe he is A B12 caliber piece from at least to get started from. Strong and athletic, not remarkably skilled, but makes his FT's.

And get this, Sunvold just said he thinks he can be a beast  :ohno:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #34 on: February 08, 2012, 10:19:22 PM »
I'm not saying he is THE piece but I do believe he is A B12 caliber piece from at least to get started from.

yeah, i agree.  legit big 12 player, but nothing more than that.  if he's still their best player in 3 years, they'll still suck.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #35 on: February 08, 2012, 10:38:06 PM »
I remember starting a thread like this and getting bashed pretty hard.
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17856
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #36 on: February 08, 2012, 10:39:14 PM »
I remember starting a thread like this and getting bashed pretty hard.

Right about now would be a good time for you to start another one.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20645
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #37 on: February 08, 2012, 10:44:15 PM »
didn't wooly beat bcg two times?

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #38 on: February 09, 2012, 02:41:40 AM »
didn't wooly beat bcg two times?

Yes Wooly lost to BCG the first time they met in College Station, Wooly won later that year in the Phillips 66 and then beat BCG in Bramlage the next season.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45942
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #39 on: February 09, 2012, 03:16:06 AM »
Talent wise obviously the 03-04 A&M team had a giant edge, and statistically the numbers bear that out.  This Tech team looks to be undoubtedly the worst in Big 12 history.  So not only was the 03-04 A&M team the worst, it probably wasn't even the second worst.  I'll enter 04-05 Baylor into evidence.  Scott Drew's second year.  They may have been the worst defensive team in conference history and the fact that they won 1 game against CU shouldn't exclude them from the worst ever category.

I don't think A&M would have went winless if there was a true round robin.  Not sure if a true round robin would have helped Baylor much, they were truly awful.
http://statsheet.com/mcb/teams/compare?t1-season=2011-2012&t1-type=2&t1=texas-tech&t2-season=2003-2004&t2-type=2&t2=texas-am&t3-season=2004-2005&t3-type=2&t3=baylor&t4-season=2011-2012&t4-type=4&t4=texas-tech&t5-season=2003-2004&t5-type=4&t5=texas-am&t6-season=2004-2005&t6-type=4&t6=baylor

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38095
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #40 on: February 09, 2012, 10:10:38 AM »
I thought Tolbert was very good and the most athletic guy on the court when we played them.

don't really get all the tolbert love.  in the land of retards the half-Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) is king, i guess.

He is intriguing to me.  Hope we get to see him with a better team around him. 

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #41 on: February 09, 2012, 10:24:42 AM »
didn't wooly beat bcg two times?

Yes Wooly lost to BCG the first time they met in College Station, Wooly won later that year in the Phillips 66 and then beat BCG in Bramlage the next season.

probably my most favorite win in the wooly era.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #42 on: February 09, 2012, 10:27:08 AM »
didn't wooly beat bcg two times?

Yes Wooly lost to BCG the first time they met in College Station, Wooly won later that year in the Phillips 66 and then beat BCG in Bramlage the next season.

probably my most favorite win in the wooly era.

It was amazing being there. Tough to decide between that and the Sky/Dramane show in Lawrence. Top 10 UT is a close third.

Offline Underdog Wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2479
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #43 on: February 09, 2012, 10:36:46 AM »
didn't wooly beat bcg two times?

Yes Wooly lost to BCG the first time they met in College Station, Wooly won later that year in the Phillips 66 and then beat BCG in Bramlage the next season.

probably my most favorite win in the wooly era.

It was amazing being there. Tough to decide between that and the Sky/Dramane show in Lawrence. Top 10 UT is a close third.

Massey doin work in the paint :love:

I really thought we were NIT bound after that one  :frown:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #44 on: February 09, 2012, 10:41:42 AM »
Massey doin work in the paint :love:

I really thought we were NIT bound after that one  :frown:

There is nothing quite like having your NIT bubble burst...  :blindfold:

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #45 on: February 09, 2012, 11:01:25 AM »
didn't wooly beat bcg two times?

Yes Wooly lost to BCG the first time they met in College Station, Wooly won later that year in the Phillips 66 and then beat BCG in Bramlage the next season.

probably my most favorite win in the wooly era.

It was amazing being there. Tough to decide between that and the Sky/Dramane show in Lawrence. Top 10 UT is a close third.


yes, it was amazing.  I got a high 5 from Weefs in the concourse after the game.  From a nostalgic perspective, I suppose the sky/dramane ku game is 1 (I wanted to punch cartier for dribbling that ball off his leg), but like 1b would be that A&M game…for me it was the first time in the entire wooly era that I thought that they looked like a basketball team.  I dunno.  I actually thought we were going to beat ku…not kidding…thought we were…until Massey got like 5 fouls in the first 5 minutes of the game.   

Offline Deez Nutz

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1192
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #46 on: February 09, 2012, 11:08:26 AM »
It makes me feel good knowing there have been Big 12 teams worse than our 2-14 team in 2000. 


Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #48 on: February 09, 2012, 01:07:28 PM »
didn't wooly beat bcg two times?

Yes Wooly lost to BCG the first time they met in College Station, Wooly won later that year in the Phillips 66 and then beat BCG in Bramlage the next season.

probably my most favorite win in the wooly era.

It was amazing being there. Tough to decide between that and the Sky/Dramane show in Lawrence. Top 10 UT is a close third.


yes, it was amazing.  I got a high 5 from Weefs in the concourse after the game.  From a nostalgic perspective, I suppose the sky/dramane ku game is 1 (I wanted to punch cartier for dribbling that ball off his leg), but like 1b would be that A&M game…for me it was the first time in the entire wooly era that I thought that they looked like a basketball team.  I dunno.  I actually thought we were going to beat ku…not kidding…thought we were…until Massey got like 5 fouls in the first 5 minutes of the game.   

Attended both games and I would put the ATM win above the win in Allen.  The win in AFH was such a WTF?\ game that had a lot to do with KU refusing to win it as much as we won it.  Conversely, the ATM game in the P66 was huge for both teams and the cats went out and took it to them in a way Wooly's  had not never done in a must win in the previous 4 years.  

Add in a competitive showing against KU the following day and that NIT snub stung almost as bad as Hugg's NCAA snub.  

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Tech: Worst Ever?
« Reply #49 on: February 09, 2012, 04:31:42 PM »
didn't wooly beat bcg two times?

Yes Wooly lost to BCG the first time they met in College Station, Wooly won later that year in the Phillips 66 and then beat BCG in Bramlage the next season.

probably my most favorite win in the wooly era.

It was amazing being there. Tough to decide between that and the Sky/Dramane show in Lawrence. Top 10 UT is a close third.

Yeah, but Kemper was such a dump.