Author Topic: Penn St's AD Tim Curley charge with perjury: sex abuse (Read 251156 times)

Pete · « **Reply #1551 on:** July 22, 2012, 01:42:09 PM »

Emmert is going to crush them tomorrow.

http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf--sources--ncaa-president-to-hit-penn-state-with--staggering--penalties-from-sandusky-scandal.html

Trim · « **Reply #1552 on:** July 22, 2012, 01:51:25 PM »

Penn State has already agreed to whatever the sanctions are going to be. There's not going to be any appeal or fight over whether the NCAA has the authority to impose them.

steve dave · « **Reply #1553 on:** July 22, 2012, 01:54:07 PM »

@slmandel: If PSU gets bowl ban, 1/3 of the Big Ten's Leaders Division will be ineligible this yr due to leadership failures.

Pete · « **Reply #1554 on:** July 22, 2012, 01:59:55 PM »

I am hoping for a 4 year bowl ban and a loss of 15 scholarships per year for 4 years.

sys · « **Reply #1555 on:** July 22, 2012, 02:05:23 PM »

i hope they rape penn state's children.

Pete · « **Reply #1556 on:** July 22, 2012, 02:14:33 PM »

Quote from: sys on July 22, 2012, 02:05:23 PM

i hope they rape penn state's children.

Joe's kids first.

Panjandrum · « **Reply #1557 on:** July 22, 2012, 02:21:59 PM »

Quote from: Trim on July 22, 2012, 12:55:07 PM

Quote from: michigancat on July 22, 2012, 12:52:50 PM
Quote from: Trim on July 22, 2012, 12:47:37 PM
Quote from: steve dave on July 22, 2012, 10:46:54 AM
I don't get the connection. I understand the lawsuits that will come from the victims. I don't understand taking away scholarships or punishing a team that has no connection to the tragedy. Now that joe's dead who are you punishing? The fans? The alumni? The current players?

I don't know that I agree with it, but the idea is probably that the culture at Penn State of football taking priority over everything (academics, ass rape, etc.) is the root of why this wasn't reported long ago, so destroy the culture.

Exactly. And I agree with it 100%. Innocent people get "punished" by being associated with organizations and cultures doing bad things all the time. Not playing football for a year or two in a random town in Pennsylvania isn't exactly a serious "punishment" when you really think about what happened.

I think 2 weeks ago I was against it, but the righteous indignation expressed by everyone and anyone associated with Penn State especially since the Report came out is quickly swaying me in favor.

Nail on head.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #1558 on:** July 22, 2012, 02:38:50 PM »

Yup. No contrition, just attacked Freeh and claimed everyone was lying except their guys.

Some of them (I think Paterno family) went as far as to claim "lots of people have seen Jerry shower and saw nothing" as if he would forcibly sodomize a 10 year old boy in front of them were he actually.

The NCAA will have plenty of support here. The anti-NCAA types won't have a platform.

Pete · « **Reply #1559 on:** July 22, 2012, 02:45:55 PM »

Quote from: Limestone on July 22, 2012, 02:38:50 PM

Yup. No contrition, just attacked Freeh and claimed everyone was lying except their guys.

Some of them (I think Paterno family) went as far as to claim "lots of people have seen Jerry shower and saw nothing" as if he would forcibly sodomize a 10 year old boy in front of them were he actually.

The NCAA will have plenty of support here. The anti-NCAA types won't have a platform.

The amusing part will be when Emmert grants the players the ability to transfer without penalty....thinking they'll all leave....and those brainwashed fuckers all stay. I predict this happening.

Dr Rick Daris · « **Reply #1560 on:** July 22, 2012, 02:47:20 PM »

yeah. i mean boys were getting butt raped in the football teams showers. the football coaches new about it and didn't do anything and allowed it to keep happening. i'm pretty ok punishing the penn state football program so maybe the next time some guy is rough ridin' little kids on their property they know that there will be repercussions for allowing it.

Trim · « **Reply #1561 on:** July 22, 2012, 02:48:16 PM »

Quote from: Pete on July 22, 2012, 02:45:55 PM

Quote from: Limestone on July 22, 2012, 02:38:50 PM
Yup. No contrition, just attacked Freeh and claimed everyone was lying except their guys.

Some of them (I think Paterno family) went as far as to claim "lots of people have seen Jerry shower and saw nothing" as if he would forcibly sodomize a 10 year old boy in front of them were he actually.

The NCAA will have plenty of support here. The anti-NCAA types won't have a platform.

The amusing part will be when Emmert grants the players the ability to transfer without penalty....thinking they'll all leave....and those brainwashed fuckers all stay. I predict this happening.

Yeah, I see anything other than NO FOOTBALL having the opposite effect than intended. The program, school and town will rally together to win games for Joe.

AbeFroman · « **Reply #1562 on:** July 22, 2012, 03:52:34 PM »

They should still play, but ban fans and tv. Total blackout

Pete · « **Reply #1563 on:** July 22, 2012, 03:54:38 PM »

Quote from: AbeFroman on July 22, 2012, 03:52:34 PM

They should still play, but ban fans and tv. Total blackout

That would shut the mouths of all of those bitching store owners in State College. If your fans are so rough ridin' great, they'll still show up and by foam fingers and crap.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #1564 on:** July 22, 2012, 03:57:39 PM »

Every win would be pretty disgusting.

I think the statue coming down is a bit of foreshadowing by PSU brass. They know the hammer is coming.

Pete · « **Reply #1565 on:** July 22, 2012, 03:59:18 PM »

Quote from: Limestone on July 22, 2012, 03:57:39 PM

Every win would be pretty disgusting.

I think the statue coming down is a bit of foreshadowing by PSU brass. They know the hammer is coming.

That, or they foolishly thought that it would lesson the severity of the penalties. I wonder if they knew Emmert had it all ironed out already?

AbeFroman · « **Reply #1566 on:** July 22, 2012, 04:02:14 PM »

What if they make joe pa vacate wins? No longer the winningist coach

Pete · « **Reply #1567 on:** July 22, 2012, 04:07:07 PM »

Quote from: AbeFroman on July 22, 2012, 04:02:14 PM

What if they make joe pa vacate wins? No longer the winningist coach

I kinda hope that they don't. I want everyone to remember Joe Paterno for a long, long time.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #1568 on:** July 22, 2012, 04:34:00 PM »

Start calling anyone good there immediately and get them to K-State.

If the NCAA feels like it, burn them down.

scottwildcat · « **Reply #1569 on:** July 22, 2012, 04:35:33 PM »

when you lose "10 scholarships a year" does that mean you only have 15 to give out per year? or just playing with 75 scholarship players instead of 85?

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/22/report-psu-sanctions-include-multi-year-bowl-ban-crippling-scholarship-losses/

WillieWatanabe · « **Reply #1570 on:** July 22, 2012, 04:43:49 PM »

might as well just blow up State College. I mean, everyone is culpable. T's and P's Pennsylvania.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #1571 on:** July 22, 2012, 04:46:25 PM »

Quote from: Pete on July 22, 2012, 04:07:07 PM

Quote from: AbeFroman on July 22, 2012, 04:02:14 PM
What if they make joe pa vacate wins? No longer the winningist coach

I kinda hope that they don't. I want everyone to remember Joe Paterno for a long, long time.

I don't get vacating wins at all. Is that PSU's idea to placate people. Sounds like something they'd offer, it only hurts a dead guy and keeps them in business.

Pete · « **Reply #1572 on:** July 22, 2012, 04:48:10 PM »

Quote from: scottwildcat on July 22, 2012, 04:35:33 PM

when you lose "10 scholarships a year" does that mean you only have 15 to give out per year? or just playing with 75 scholarship players instead of 85?

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/22/report-psu-sanctions-include-multi-year-bowl-ban-crippling-scholarship-losses/

I believe that they mean that instead of 25 per year to give to new players, you only have 10 per year to give to new players. Does not involve taking current players scholarships away.

Pete · « **Reply #1573 on:** July 22, 2012, 04:50:16 PM »

Stroll over to this hell hole and take a look around.. http://bwi.rivals.com/forum.asp?fid=36

If you can read more than a handful of threads and still remain unwilling to burn their entire program to the ground, you are not like me.

TheHamburglar · « **Reply #1574 on:** July 22, 2012, 04:55:33 PM »

Quote from: Pete on July 22, 2012, 04:48:10 PM

Quote from: scottwildcat on July 22, 2012, 04:35:33 PM
when you lose "10 scholarships a year" does that mean you only have 15 to give out per year? or just playing with 75 scholarship players instead of 85?

http://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/07/22/report-psu-sanctions-include-multi-year-bowl-ban-crippling-scholarship-losses/

I believe that they mean that instead of 25 per year to give to new players, you only have 10 per year to give to new players. Does not involve taking current players scholarships away.

The USC official report stated that for 3 years they were limited to issuing 15 new scholarships and 75 total scholarships for 3 years. So if they were at 85 in the prior year and lost 25, they could only give out 15. If they were at 85 the previous year and only lost 20, then they could only add 10.

To answer the original question, losing X number of scholarships in a given year means both.