Author Topic: Beasley ----  (Read 21983 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #100 on: October 27, 2011, 02:57:44 PM »
What started all this?  What is the orig suit and Mike's counter all about.  Someone pls summarize.

TIA

Mike fired Bell almost immediately (which led to the DC Assault pipeline being ruptured spilling it's oil into the ogalala aquifer).  Bell sued Mike for whatever contract breach or some stupid crap.  I really have no idea what Mike is counter suing Bell for. 

Offline doom

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3622
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #101 on: October 27, 2011, 03:01:00 PM »
What started all this?  What is the orig suit and Mike's counter all about.  Someone pls summarize.

TIA

Mike fired Bell almost immediately (which led to the DC Assault pipeline being ruptured spilling it's oil into the ogalala aquifer).  Bell sued Mike for whatever contract breach or some stupid crap. I really have no idea what Mike is counter suing Bell for. 

basically saying he exploited a child and is using the negative press to curb bell's suit and force a settlement, seems to me.

“They said something along the lines of ‘it kind of sounds like you’d be interested in it.’ And I said ‘hell yeah I am. Why not?’” -Doug Gottlieb

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #102 on: October 27, 2011, 03:02:22 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment.  

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

yes.  if it was reasonable that ksu should have known.  which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". 

I'm confused. If KU can directly pay Chalmers' dad and Manning's dad, then why is K-State supposed to investigate every dollar that its players' parents may get from sources completely unrelated to the university?



There was no NCAA rule against Chalmers/Manning coaching for KU.  There's an NCAA rule against parents collecting money from boosters.


Who is the booster in this situation?



The NCAA also prohibits agents from paying players and their parents (while in school).

Offline kstater

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2325
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #103 on: October 27, 2011, 03:03:48 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment. 

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

yes.  if it was reasonable that ksu should have known.  which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". 

I'm confused. If KU can directly pay Chalmers' dad and Manning's dad, then why is K-State supposed to investigate every dollar that its players' parents may get from sources completely unrelated to the university?



There was no NCAA rule against Chalmers/Manning coaching for KU.  There's an NCAA rule against parents collecting money from boosters.


Who is the booster in this situation?



The NCAA also prohibits agents from paying players and their parents (while in school).

So we just have to show the payment was before he enrolled?  That should be easy enough.  I doubt she moved to Manhattan after he enrolled.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38005
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #104 on: October 27, 2011, 03:05:22 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment.  

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

yes.  if it was reasonable that ksu should have known.  which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". 

I'm confused. If KU can directly pay Chalmers' dad and Manning's dad, then why is K-State supposed to investigate every dollar that its players' parents may get from sources completely unrelated to the university?



There was no NCAA rule against Chalmers/Manning coaching for KU.  There's an NCAA rule against parents collecting money from boosters.


Who is the booster in this situation?



The NCAA also prohibits agents from paying players and their parents (while in school).

Yeah. I'm sure K-State will have to forfeit wins. Unless it can be proven that K-State should have known about the payments, I don't think anything more will come of this.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #105 on: October 27, 2011, 03:08:30 PM »
DK dunking on Mayo will be erased from both team's record books  :frown:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #106 on: October 27, 2011, 03:09:06 PM »
DK dunking on Mayo will be erased from both team's record books  :frown:

IT WILL LIVE ON IN MY HEART!  THEY CAN'T TAKE THAT!

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55957
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #107 on: October 27, 2011, 03:10:11 PM »
What started all this?  What is the orig suit and Mike's counter all about.  Someone pls summarize.

TIA

Mike fired Bell almost immediately (which led to the DC Assault pipeline being ruptured spilling it's oil into the ogalala aquifer).  Bell sued Mike for whatever contract breach or some stupid crap.  I really have no idea what Mike is counter suing Bell for.  

http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/259645-bell-beasley-counter-claim.html

^actually a pretty interesting read.

Beasley wanted a Nike contract. Bell basically did nothing to get him any contract. Then Beasley found out about all the Bell giving his mom money crap. He fired Bell. Bell and Malone said Beasley owed Bell a shitload of money, some of which were for expenses incurred before Beasley signed with Bell. Mike just payed it for some reason, and I think he's suing him for that and for being a shitty agent for his merchandising contract.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22447
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #108 on: October 27, 2011, 03:11:54 PM »
this is all just so shocking

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #109 on: October 27, 2011, 03:12:01 PM »
Sounds good to me!  GO GET'EM MIKE!  :excited:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #110 on: October 27, 2011, 03:12:12 PM »

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38077
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #111 on: October 27, 2011, 03:13:50 PM »
What started all this?  What is the orig suit and Mike's counter all about.  Someone pls summarize.

TIA

Mike fired Bell almost immediately (which led to the DC Assault pipeline being ruptured spilling it's oil into the ogalala aquifer).  Bell sued Mike for whatever contract breach or some stupid crap.  I really have no idea what Mike is counter suing Bell for.  

http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/259645-bell-beasley-counter-claim.html

^actually a pretty interesting read.

Beasley wanted a Nike contract. Bell basically did nothing to get him any contract. Then Beasley found out about all the Bell giving his mom money crap. He fired Bell. Bell and Malone said Beasley owed Bell a shitload of money, some of which were for expenses incurred before Beasley signed with Bell. Mike just payed it for some reason, and I think he's suing him for that and for being a shitty agent for his merchandising contract.

Knew the bell/DCA stuff, but didn't realize that there was actually a law suit from it.

Offline thebigcatbowski

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #112 on: October 27, 2011, 03:17:54 PM »
What started all this?  What is the orig suit and Mike's counter all about.  Someone pls summarize.

TIA

Mike fired Bell almost immediately (which led to the DC Assault pipeline being ruptured spilling it's oil into the ogalala aquifer).  Bell sued Mike for whatever contract breach or some stupid crap.  I really have no idea what Mike is counter suing Bell for.  

http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/259645-bell-beasley-counter-claim.html

^actually a pretty interesting read.

Beasley wanted a Nike contract. Bell basically did nothing to get him any contract. Then Beasley found out about all the Bell giving his mom money crap. He fired Bell. Bell and Malone said Beasley owed Bell a shitload of money, some of which were for expenses incurred before Beasley signed with Bell. Mike just payed it for some reason, and I think he's suing him for that and for being a shitty agent for his merchandising contract.

Beasley didn't know about the money that got paid to Fatima until September 2008 and K-State was supposed to know about it?

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #113 on: October 27, 2011, 03:24:25 PM »
http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/259645-bell-beasley-counter-claim.html

^actually a pretty interesting read.

Beasley wanted a Nike contract. Bell basically did nothing to get him any contract. Then Beasley found out about all the Bell giving his mom money crap. He fired Bell. Bell and Malone said Beasley owed Bell a shitload of money, some of which were for expenses incurred before Beasley signed with Bell. Mike just payed it for some reason, and I think he's suing him for that and for being a shitty agent for his merchandising contract.

Quote
From the time he was thirteen (13) years old, Beasley was envisioned as a strong NBA prospect … he was over 6 feet tall and had a level of skill and intensity on the court that adumbrated success at every level of basketball.
so intense
« Last Edit: October 27, 2011, 03:55:21 PM by mcmwcat »

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #114 on: October 27, 2011, 03:27:46 PM »
Quote
… but one thing became clear: he was a prodigious basketball talent.  By the time he was ready to go to college, he was one of the best teenage basketball players in America

yes.  yes he was.

Offline bakerman

  • Big Salt Spokesperson
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1698
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #115 on: October 27, 2011, 03:30:10 PM »
Andy Katz misleading people? Odd tweet.

Quote
Michael Beasley alleges improper benefits at Kansas State Wildcats in lawsuit against ex-agent http://es.pn/s7CStd

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #116 on: October 27, 2011, 03:46:35 PM »
http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/259645-bell-beasley-counter-claim.html

^actually a pretty interesting read.

Beasley wanted a Nike contract. Bell basically did nothing to get him any contract. Then Beasley found out about all the Bell giving his mom money crap. He fired Bell. Bell and Malone said Beasley owed Bell a shitload of money, some of which were for expenses incurred before Beasley signed with Bell. Mike just payed it for some reason, and I think he's suing him for that and for being a shitty agent for his merchandising contract.


Quote
53. In or around September 2008, Beasley learned, through a third party, that Malone and Bell had been making payments to his mother without his knowledge or consent for years.  He felt betrayed by the men in whom he had placed his trust and immediately terminated the Agent Contract and the Merchandising Agreement with Bell and dramatically shifted his relationship with Malone at the same time.

betrayal is a bitter pill to swallow.  explains a lot about the falling out between DCA and Hill
« Last Edit: October 27, 2011, 03:56:14 PM by mcmwcat »

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #117 on: October 27, 2011, 03:50:07 PM »
and could have lead to his crushing depression during his first couple years in the league.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #118 on: October 27, 2011, 03:53:29 PM »
seems like they tried to cover KSU's asses as much as possible. Pretty nasty stuff going on here im sure.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline FP TC etc.

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2301
  • USA! USA! USA!
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #119 on: October 27, 2011, 04:10:44 PM »
Quote
Beasley wanted a Nike contract.

Good. Adidas is awful.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #120 on: October 27, 2011, 04:13:55 PM »
sticking to my Mike-would-never-hurt-KSU theory.  no worries here.

theory confirmed.  love you Mike.

Offline jmlynch1

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2781
  • stay together for the kids
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #121 on: October 27, 2011, 04:39:12 PM »
sticking to my Mike-would-never-hurt-KSU theory.  no worries here.

theory confirmed.  love you Mike.
There is no doubt he waited on the Cam Newton results so he didn't hurt EMAW.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2011, 04:56:16 PM by jmlynch1 »

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #122 on: October 27, 2011, 04:40:35 PM »
sticking to my Mike-would-never-hurt-KSU theory.  no worries here.

theory confirmed.  love you Mike.
There he is not doubt he waited on the Cam Newton results so he didn't hurt EMAW.

We are so rough ridin' blessed

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #123 on: October 27, 2011, 05:30:16 PM »
i take it all back

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #124 on: October 27, 2011, 05:30:40 PM »
i take it all back

I knew you didn't mean it.  I knew.