0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: mcmwcat on October 27, 2011, 09:33:29 AMusc got in trouble for illegal recruitment. they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known. Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu. The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment.
How did Beasley get through the NCAA Clearinghouse?
Quote from: OregonHawk on October 27, 2011, 01:01:59 PMHow did Beasley get through the NCAA Clearinghouse? His grades were never an issue
everyone already knew why it dried up. interestingly, I tweeted like a year ago something to the effect of "Curtis, quit blaming K-State. It wasn't our fault" and Fatima RT'd me.
Quote from: catzacker on October 27, 2011, 12:49:51 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on October 27, 2011, 09:33:29 AMusc got in trouble for illegal recruitment. they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known. Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu. The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?
Quote from: thebigcatbowski on October 27, 2011, 12:59:31 PMQuote from: catzacker on October 27, 2011, 12:49:51 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on October 27, 2011, 09:33:29 AMusc got in trouble for illegal recruitment. they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known. Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu. The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?yes. if it was reasonable that ksu should have known. which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel".
"No, Fatima had a full-time job," Hill told the newspaper. "It was not like she moved to Kansas and stopped working. She continued to work. She had a family, so I never assumed. She didn't buy a house. She rented a house, which later some kids rented. So I didn't think it was extra. Normal living."
also good luck to Mike w/ his counter suit
Quote from: catzacker on October 27, 2011, 01:26:46 PMQuote from: thebigcatbowski on October 27, 2011, 12:59:31 PMQuote from: catzacker on October 27, 2011, 12:49:51 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on October 27, 2011, 09:33:29 AMusc got in trouble for illegal recruitment. they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known. Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu. The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?yes. if it was reasonable that ksu should have known. which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". I'm confused. If KU can directly pay Chalmers' dad and Manning's dad, then why is K-State supposed to investigate every dollar that its players' parents may get from sources completely unrelated to the university?
Quote from: thebigcatbowski on October 27, 2011, 02:46:27 PMQuote from: catzacker on October 27, 2011, 01:26:46 PMQuote from: thebigcatbowski on October 27, 2011, 12:59:31 PMQuote from: catzacker on October 27, 2011, 12:49:51 PMQuote from: mcmwcat on October 27, 2011, 09:33:29 AMusc got in trouble for illegal recruitment. they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known. Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu. The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?yes. if it was reasonable that ksu should have known. which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". I'm confused. If KU can directly pay Chalmers' dad and Manning's dad, then why is K-State supposed to investigate every dollar that its players' parents may get from sources completely unrelated to the university?There was no NCAA rule against Chalmers/Manning coaching for KU. There's an NCAA rule against parents collecting money from boosters.