Author Topic: Beasley ----  (Read 21982 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42622
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #75 on: October 27, 2011, 12:57:28 PM »
I wish I'd been trying to calm the Malone waters directly at CBE instead of wasting my time trying to get Nolan to handle it.

Offline thebigcatbowski

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #76 on: October 27, 2011, 12:59:31 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment.  

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #77 on: October 27, 2011, 01:01:59 PM »
How did Beasley get through the NCAA Clearinghouse?
 


:surprised:


Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #78 on: October 27, 2011, 01:03:21 PM »
How did Beasley get through the NCAA Clearinghouse?
 
:surprised:

His grades were never an issue

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #79 on: October 27, 2011, 01:07:07 PM »
How did Beasley get through the NCAA Clearinghouse?
 
:surprised:

His grades were never an issue

nor was his amateur status.

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #80 on: October 27, 2011, 01:12:46 PM »
sticking to my Mike would never hurt KSU theory.  no worries here.

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #81 on: October 27, 2011, 01:15:47 PM »
everyone already knew why it dried up.  interestingly, I tweeted like a year ago something to the effect of "Curtis, quit blaming K-State. It wasn't our fault" and Fatima RT'd me. 

grats sd.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #82 on: October 27, 2011, 01:16:59 PM »
How did Beasley get through the NCAA Clearinghouse?
 
:surprised:

His grades were never an issue




LOL.... he went to six different high schools.  Someone paid good money to make sure his grades weren't an issue.  What a joke.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #83 on: October 27, 2011, 01:17:30 PM »
HUR HUR HUR YA

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #84 on: October 27, 2011, 01:26:46 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment.  

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

yes.  if it was reasonable that ksu should have known.  which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". 

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #85 on: October 27, 2011, 01:28:44 PM »
The damage will come if the NCAA can reasonably say that KSU should have known.  

Offline bigwillie20

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2772
  • #FYJC #burnitdown
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #86 on: October 27, 2011, 01:30:12 PM »
We have arrived  :gocho:

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #87 on: October 27, 2011, 01:35:53 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment. 

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

yes.  if it was reasonable that ksu should have known.  which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". 

Yeah, Te is saying the right things:

Quote
"No, Fatima had a full-time job," Hill told the newspaper. "It was not like she moved to Kansas and stopped working. She continued to work. She had a family, so I never assumed. She didn't buy a house. She rented a house, which later some kids rented. So I didn't think it was extra. Normal living."


Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #88 on: October 27, 2011, 01:44:20 PM »
 :zzz:

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #89 on: October 27, 2011, 01:44:50 PM »
also good luck to Mike w/ his counter suit  :crossfingers:

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88551
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #90 on: October 27, 2011, 01:48:53 PM »
also good luck to Mike w/ his counter suit  :crossfingers:

YES!

Offline mcmwcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5313
  • trips: "MCMW"
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #91 on: October 27, 2011, 02:03:40 PM »
hopefully DC Assault will have to disband and Mike retires from the NBA and starts a new AAU club in DC and steers all top prospects to Manhattan, KS.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #92 on: October 27, 2011, 02:24:57 PM »
Trud =  :dubious:  :facepalm:  :curse:
Hill =  :surprised:  :confused:  :frown:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38077
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #93 on: October 27, 2011, 02:44:42 PM »
What started all this?  What is the orig suit and Mike's counter all about.  Someone pls summarize.

TIA

Offline thebigcatbowski

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 106
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #94 on: October 27, 2011, 02:46:27 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment.  

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

yes.  if it was reasonable that ksu should have known.  which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". 

I'm confused. If KU can directly pay Chalmers' dad and Manning's dad, then why is K-State supposed to investigate every dollar that its players' parents may get from sources completely unrelated to the university?

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38077
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #95 on: October 27, 2011, 02:48:24 PM »
Also, TRob's kid sis who got paid and lives with dad?

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #96 on: October 27, 2011, 02:49:24 PM »
Would love to get 'Pad's take on this situation.  

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #97 on: October 27, 2011, 02:53:53 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment.  

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

yes.  if it was reasonable that ksu should have known.  which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". 

I'm confused. If KU can directly pay Chalmers' dad and Manning's dad, then why is K-State supposed to investigate every dollar that its players' parents may get from sources completely unrelated to the university?



There was no NCAA rule against Chalmers/Manning coaching for KU.  There's an NCAA rule against parents collecting money from boosters.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38005
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #98 on: October 27, 2011, 02:55:14 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment.  

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

yes.  if it was reasonable that ksu should have known.  which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". 

I'm confused. If KU can directly pay Chalmers' dad and Manning's dad, then why is K-State supposed to investigate every dollar that its players' parents may get from sources completely unrelated to the university?



There was no NCAA rule against Chalmers/Manning coaching for KU.  There's an NCAA rule against parents collecting money from boosters.


Who is the booster in this situation?

Offline jmlynch1

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2781
  • stay together for the kids
    • View Profile
Re: Beasley ----
« Reply #99 on: October 27, 2011, 02:55:33 PM »
usc got in trouble for illegal recruitment.  

they got in trouble for not knowing when they should have known.  Which is essentially what the ncaa will say to ksu.  The ncaa has realized that the only way that it has any leverage at all with schools is through penalty and they've chosen to use this.

Is K-State really responsible for money changing hands between someone who isn't associated with the university and a family member?

yes.  if it was reasonable that ksu should have known.  which is why you hear 'te saying "hey, Fatima was living normal" and "I don't remember her being at aau tourneys when mike had to travel". 

I'm confused. If KU can directly pay Chalmers' dad and Manning's dad, then why is K-State supposed to investigate every dollar that its players' parents may get from sources completely unrelated to the university?



There was no NCAA rule against Chalmers/Manning coaching for KU.  There's an NCAA rule against parents collecting money from boosters.

good thing Bell isn't EMAW then