Similar to what Dax said, if we could just be competitive in half of our sports, I would take that at this point (competitive to me being defined as making a sport's version of the NCAA tourney most years and occasionally competing for a Big 12 title). That's really not too much to ask and we have peer programs that accomplish this regularly.
Right now, we're clearly in the bottom half of the league in soccer (Dib just needs 4-5 more years), volleyball, baseball, women's golf, tennis and rowing. Track has also been slipping from Rovelto's typical output.
I still don't understand why 5 years isn't enough to determine that a coach can't meet the aforementioned competitive baseline and then move on if they can't. Coaches are proving in virtually every sport that you can take a doormat and turn them into a contender in 2-3 years.
