Author Topic: Bryce  (Read 121904 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bigwillie20

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2772
  • #FYJC #burnitdown
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #375 on: September 28, 2011, 12:26:40 PM »
This thread is a shitload of eff...jfc people  :facepalm:

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #376 on: September 28, 2011, 12:29:18 PM »
This thread is a shitload of eff...jfc people  :facepalm:

 :sdeek:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #377 on: September 28, 2011, 12:32:56 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #378 on: September 28, 2011, 12:48:05 PM »
So, you're saying Bryce is like the runner up to the POY and Hubert is the POY?

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #379 on: September 28, 2011, 12:52:01 PM »
So, you're saying Bryce is like the runner up to the POY and Hubert is the POY?

No. I'm saying Hubert is just better than Bryce. So is every other starting running back in the big 12, though.

Offline Fldermaus

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 664
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #380 on: September 28, 2011, 12:53:30 PM »
what the eff is going on here?

Bryce is a reverse aging alien.  Others debating the running back credentials of Larry Johnson.  Still others hating LHC LHC Bill Snyder. 

This should be the first post on every page of this thread.

Offline Rams

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3384
  • Worst poster on this board by far
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #381 on: September 28, 2011, 01:34:40 PM »
This thread is a shitload of eff...jfc people  :facepalm:
:thumbs:
"Son. This is why we are wildcats. Hard work, pride, the heart of this country. And if that's not enough for you, you can just move to California with your punk friends."

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55963
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #382 on: September 28, 2011, 01:44:57 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

He was a very good defender, but he wasn't always working hard, and definitely wasn't as good as he could have been.

But Frank managed him beautifully.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #383 on: September 28, 2011, 01:49:44 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

He was a very good defender, but he wasn't always working hard, and definitely wasn't as good as he could have been.

But Frank managed him beautifully.

You have to work incredibly hard to make getting that many rebounds look that easy.

Offline Jackstraw

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 69
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #384 on: September 28, 2011, 01:52:03 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

He was a very good defender, but he wasn't always working hard, and definitely wasn't as good as he could have been.

But Frank managed him beautifully.

You have to work incredibly hard to make getting that many rebounds look that easy.

Or have really good instincts.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #385 on: September 28, 2011, 01:54:26 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

He was a very good defender, but he wasn't always working hard, and definitely wasn't as good as he could have been.

But Frank managed him beautifully.

You have to work incredibly hard to make getting that many rebounds look that easy.

Or have really good instincts.

Rebounding is not an instinct. It's an acquired skill. It's also the biggest "hustle stat" in basketball.

Online michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55963
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #386 on: September 28, 2011, 01:55:15 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

He was a very good defender, but he wasn't always working hard, and definitely wasn't as good as he could have been.

But Frank managed him beautifully.

You have to work incredibly hard to make getting that many rebounds look that easy.

I know. He was a great rebounder, which is a tremendous skill and requires a lot of work. But it's not just getting rebounds, it's everything he did. He rarely, if ever took charges for example. Granted, I think that was by design, but lets not kid ourselves and say Beasley was going balls-to-the-walls on every play.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #387 on: September 28, 2011, 01:57:27 PM »
Listen this is going to be tuckish but I don't give a eff anymore. This kid wanted to get paid out of high school. He was telling colleges that he'd go to Canada and play so he could get paid right away. His entourage has fed him bullshit. He's not as good as his rating, and if he actually worked hard he might be ok. I'm soo sick of our red rockets for this kid. I honestly think he has a little Ricky Williams in him where "he doesn't like football".

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16208
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #388 on: September 28, 2011, 02:00:29 PM »
I honestly think he has a little Ricky Williams in him where "he doesn't like football".
He loves pot?
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #389 on: September 28, 2011, 02:08:16 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

He was a very good defender, but he wasn't always working hard, and definitely wasn't as good as he could have been.

But Frank managed him beautifully.

You have to work incredibly hard to make getting that many rebounds look that easy.

I know. He was a great rebounder, which is a tremendous skill and requires a lot of work. But it's not just getting rebounds, it's everything he did. He rarely, if ever took charges for example. Granted, I think that was by design, but lets not kid ourselves and say Beasley was going balls-to-the-walls on every play.

Imagine you could merge Pullen's work ethic with Beasley's raw talent.


Offline Jackstraw

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 69
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #390 on: September 28, 2011, 02:08:20 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

He was a very good defender, but he wasn't always working hard, and definitely wasn't as good as he could have been.

But Frank managed him beautifully.

You have to work incredibly hard to make getting that many rebounds look that easy.

Or have really good instincts.

Rebounding is not an instinct. It's an acquired skill. It's also the biggest "hustle stat" in basketball.

Yeah instinct was probably the wrong word to use.  I was talking more about how to position yourself and how to read the ball off of the release.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #391 on: September 28, 2011, 02:09:58 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

He was a very good defender, but he wasn't always working hard, and definitely wasn't as good as he could have been.

But Frank managed him beautifully.

You have to work incredibly hard to make getting that many rebounds look that easy.

I know. He was a great rebounder, which is a tremendous skill and requires a lot of work. But it's not just getting rebounds, it's everything he did. He rarely, if ever took charges for example. Granted, I think that was by design, but lets not kid ourselves and say Beasley was going balls-to-the-walls on every play.

True, but going balls-to-the-wall and working hard aren't necessarily the same thing. Nine times out of ten, the better player is the harder worker, period.

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #392 on: September 28, 2011, 02:14:17 PM »
this whole "try hard" vs "not try hard" argument reminds of all the morons who voted for Tyler Hansbrough instead of Michael Beasley for POY  :facepalm:

Beasley tried very hard on the court, though. He was a much harder worker than Hansbrough.

He was a very good defender, but he wasn't always working hard, and definitely wasn't as good as he could have been.

But Frank managed him beautifully.

You have to work incredibly hard to make getting that many rebounds look that easy.

Or have really good instincts.

Rebounding is not an instinct. It's an acquired skill. It's also the biggest "hustle stat" in basketball.

Yeah instinct was probably the wrong word to use.  I was talking more about how to position yourself and how to read the ball off of the release.

i think the point here is that just because someone is incredibly gifted at something does not mean he/she does not work as hard as some other tard who is not equally gifted. and also beasley should have won POY.

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1666
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #393 on: September 28, 2011, 02:16:58 PM »

True, but going balls-to-the-wall and working hard aren't necessarily the same thing. Nine times out of ten, the better player is the harder worker, period.

Right, but this discussion is about the exception, not the rule.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88576
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #394 on: September 28, 2011, 02:18:14 PM »
If another rough ridin' person in this thread trys to claim that Michael Beasley didn't work or try hard I am going to kill them in the face

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #395 on: September 28, 2011, 02:20:11 PM »
so, who here thinks bryce is misunderstood?

Offline Harry Dunne

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 246
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #396 on: September 28, 2011, 02:25:34 PM »
If another rough ridin' person in this thread trys to claim that Michael Beasley didn't work or try hard I am going to kill them in the face
:sdeek:

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #397 on: September 28, 2011, 02:33:54 PM »
If another rough ridin' person in this thread trys to claim that Michael Beasley didn't work or try hard I am going to kill them in the face

where were you when the national media was slobbering all over themselves trying to jerk off Hansbrough's "hard-working" nuts instead of slobbering all over themselves trying to jerk off Beasley's "not hard-working" nuts ?????   :chainsaw:

Online mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 40534
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #398 on: September 28, 2011, 02:37:34 PM »
Remember that time when Hansbrough had to play without Ty Lawson for a couple games?  :ohno:

<<< still not over  :opcat: east coast media rough ridin' over our most beloved and most EMAW student-athlete OAT

Offline Fedor

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1613
    • View Profile
Re: Bryce
« Reply #399 on: September 28, 2011, 02:44:07 PM »
goEMAW staff researchers - what is the national success rate of DI transfers to another DI school becoming a starter/star?

We are at 4/5, and 4/5 ain't bad.
I was wrong and I apologize. - michigancat 8/22/14