Trim,
The rankings part is what caught my attention most...the rest of the stuff (Davis - how immature his reaction was; Goodman - how ridiculous some of his statements were) was all on the periphery, but something I still thought/think they should have been called out for since they're viewed by many as some of the best out there.
As far as the rankings go, I get your point. What I'm saying is that if these lists are truly about ranking talent, and the guys who put these lists together are honest about it, then I don't care if Billy Ray Cyrus, Don King or Nevin Shapiro is your media handler and a coach knows they are going to be around your program for years, it shouldn't affect where you show up on a talent rankings sheet. It's up to the coach to determine if they want to deal with that, not the talent evaluator.
If Rivals, Scout, ESPN, CBS and anybody else wants to make that part of their criteria, I don't have a problem with it. At that point, as you said, it should affect a ranking. But, just tell us that's what's going on because right now (well, prior to this stuff anyways) when I look at a sheet, I expect the evaluator believes the 5th-ranked guy is a better player than the 25th-ranked guy. I don't know why I should think differently.
As an outside observer, I was glad for Ellis that some of that crap didn't deter coaches, high-level ones obviously, from recruiting him.