Ok. I mean, I'll go with this. It does not in any way seem compelling. No one has initiated any kind of discussion about the O-line post-embarassing FCS near loss except for Cole Manbeck. So, I guess I'd like people with some more knowledge to explain to me why the O-line is suddenly good enough to sustain the Offense that is completely inept as a passing offense.
No doubt the offensive line was terrible in game 1. I thought they were quite a bit better vs Kent State, against IMO a much better defensive front. I don't think the problem has been a complete lack of talent, but moreso inexperience. And while overblown, I think the "only 15% of the offense" comments do have some truth to them. As a unit I think the offensive line will continue to get better as the season goes along.
Now the other aspects that need to improve; namely a passing game and better performance from our backs. I will not try to sell that this can be a great passing team b/c that would be too much, but it can be better. The drops are correctable and I think Klein is capable of hitting some of the throws he is missing right now. If we can get closer to 200 YPG passing and 7-8 YPA then I think we can use QB run game, option/read, and some power and be a pretty productive offense.