Bryce Brown against LHC Bill Snyder in steal cage death match of heaven versus hell!

[doom]

eff you LHC LHC Bill Snyder

eff you, Rusty.  You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner.  You must be leading a very miserable life.

I think you are really refering to _33.

I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.

59-7 really had to hurt last year, didn't it?  I bet you were more torn up about it than Beems.  Was that worse than 39-14 in the CTR?  Serious question.

It was worse, because losers like you only care about beating KU. Your dumb ass would be fine going 1-11 every year as long as we beat KU and Snyder is at the helm. Snyder needs to go, and if losing to KU speeds that process along, I will cheer the eff out of him against KU.

You are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU.  Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder).  In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason.  Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08?  If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment.  Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time.  Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years?  And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals?  We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses.  We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him? 

But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year.  Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.

If we fire snyder and hire his idiot son, or some Offensive Coordinator from Rutgers or some other no name crap candidate (which wouldn't surprise anyone) then yeah, huge risk, but Leach or Rodriguez would come in a heartbeat.  Not a huge risk.

[michigancat]

you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU.  Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder).  In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason.  Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08?  If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment.  Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time.  Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years?  And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals?  We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses.  We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him? 

But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year.  Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.

We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.

[Stevesie60]

eff you LHC LHC Bill Snyder

eff you, Rusty.  You are the moron who wants K-State to lose every single game including at KU last year just so that LHC LHC Bill Snyder will retire / get fired sooner.  You must be leading a very miserable life.

I think you are really refering to _33.

I want Snyder to lose every game, too. The sooner he's gone, the better.

59-7 really had to hurt last year, didn't it?  I bet you were more torn up about it than Beems.  Was that worse than 39-14 in the CTR?  Serious question.

It was worse, because losers like you only care about beating KU. Your dumb ass would be fine going 1-11 every year as long as we beat KU and Snyder is at the helm. Snyder needs to go, and if losing to KU speeds that process along, I will cheer the eff out of him against KU.

You are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU.  Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder).  In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason.  Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08?  If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment.  Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time.  Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years?  And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals?  We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses.  We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him? 

But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year.  Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.

If we fire snyder and hire his idiot son, or some Offensive Coordinator from Rutgers or some other no name crap candidate (which wouldn't surprise anyone) then yeah, huge risk, but Leach or Rodriguez would come in a heartbeat.  Not a huge risk.

Would love TCU to get left out of the 64 teams (assuming we get in) just for another shot at Patterson.

[WillieWatanabe]

you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU.  Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder).  In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason.  Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08?  If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment.  Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time.  Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years?  And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals?  We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses.  We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him? 

But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year.  Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.

We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.

so you should be happy Snyder isn't playing BB.

[michigancat]

you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU.  Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder).  In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason.  Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08?  If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment.  Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time.  Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years?  And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals?  We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses.  We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him? 

But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year.  Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.

We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.

so you should be happy Snyder isn't playing BB.

touche.

[slimz]

Our RBs are better than they've looked so far.

I'm really surprised our first 2 opponents seemingly have not accounted for Klein/QB run game in their defensive scheme.

Brown will be fine. I think he has the most explosiveness of any of our guys, but if he's dinged he loses that.

If we run power out of 2 back sets, then Brown and Pease fit well. But the 1 back read option stuff fits Hubert better.

It would seem Wilson is a bit in the doghouse, we seemed to use TEs quite a bit at the H back spot instead of a FB, even in gun formations.

Klein has to make throws like the one he missed to BSmith off of play action next week. We can't miss those and win in Miami. That and we can't have the 4-5 drops we had yesterday from our WRs.

Seems Klein should put a little more air under the ball on those long throws, huh?  Give those big receivers a chance to get up and make the play? Somewhere between his current throws and Denard?

And hey everybody, how 'bout those Sean Snyder special teams again this week?   

[Rage Against the McKee]

We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.

I think the team has looked much better than last year. It's hard to say whether any improvement has or has not taken place before they start playing real teams.

[kso_FAN]

And hey everybody, how 'bout those Sean Snyder special teams again this week?   

They were actually solid. It helped that they finally quit messing around and put Thompson back their to return punts.

[kst8cat]

you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU.  Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder).  In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason.  Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08?  If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment.  Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time.  Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years?  And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals?  We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses.  We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him? 

But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year.  Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.

We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.

2008:  5-7
2009:  6-6
2010:  7-6
2011:  2-0 w/ better defense

 

[michigancat]

you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU.  Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder).  In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason.  Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08?  If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment.  Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time.  Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years?  And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals?  We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses.  We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him? 

But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year.  Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.

We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.

2008:  5-7
2009:  6-6
2010:  7-6
2011:  2-0 w/ better defense

 

that's not improvement. That's scheduling quirks, dumbass.

[wes mantooth]

And hey everybody, how 'bout those Sean Snyder special teams again this week?   

They were actually solid. It helped that they finally quit messing around and put Thompson back their to return punts.

didn't we drop another punt?

[Trim]

you are wrong because people don't just care about beating KU.  Maybe in 1988 that would have been acceptable but not today (thanks to Snyder).  In case you missed it, K-State had a winning record last year and despite that there was plenty of grumbling about the defense from everyone, and for good reason.  Are you simply angry that we didn't hire Patterson in '08?  If so, firing Snyder right now is not going to help because Patterson is not exactly foaming at the mouth to come here at the moment.  Everybody but dumbass Wefald wanted Patterson at the time.  Aside from that, why be pissed at Snyder when all he has done is improve the team's record each of the last two years?  And why not enjoy the wins, especially over rivals?  We want more wins, and your course of action would be a huge gamble that likely would result in more losses.  We will have a coaching search and get a new coach soon enough, but as long as Snyder is coaching winning football, why the hell fire him? 

But yeah, maybe you are right that I'm a big loser for being happy we beat KU last year.  Meanwhile you were probably too depressed to go to work for a week.

We are not improving. Snyder blows. Hard.

2008:  5-7
2009:  6-6
2010:  7-6
2011:  2-0 w/ better defense

 

This would've won you the argument if you'd just mentioned how we were one win away from the CCG.

[OregonSmock]

You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's  tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.

Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc

obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively.  Especially with Nix and their nose.  They were both active vs. Tide's OL.  But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.

KU has better running backs than K-State. 

[wes mantooth]

You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's  tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.

Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc

obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively.  Especially with Nix and their nose.  They were both active vs. Tide's OL.  But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.

KU has better running backs than K-State. 

um, no

[doom]

You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's  tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.

Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc

obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively.  Especially with Nix and their nose.  They were both active vs. Tide's OL.  But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.

 
KU has better running backs than K-State. 

[Dugout DickStone]

You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's  tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.

Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc

obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively.  Especially with Nix and their nose.  They were both active vs. Tide's OL.  But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.

KU has better running backs than K-State. 

Could be.  Guess we will find out.

[OregonSmock]

You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's  tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.

Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc

obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively.  Especially with Nix and their nose.  They were both active vs. Tide's OL.  But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.

KU has better running backs than K-State. 

um, no

KU's leading running backs:


RUSHING   CAR   YDS   AVG   TD
J. Sims   56   254   4.5   3
D. Miller   34   173   5.1   3


K-State's leading running backs:


J. Hubert   26   120   4.6   0
Robert Rose   5   29   5.8   11   0


 

[Emo EMAW]

You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's  tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.

Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc

obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively.  Especially with Nix and their nose.  They were both active vs. Tide's OL.  But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.

KU has better running backs than K-State. 

um, no

KU's leading running backs:


RUSHING   CAR   YDS   AVG   TD
J. Sims   56   254   4.5   3
D. Miller   34   173   5.1   3


K-State's leading running backs:


J. Hubert   26   120   4.6   0
Robert Rose   5   29   5.8   11   0


 

How do you define "leading" ?

[jtksu]

All those stats show is that your backs carry the ball more than ours.  Dumbass.

[OregonSmock]

You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's  tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.

Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc

obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively.  Especially with Nix and their nose.  They were both active vs. Tide's OL.  But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.

KU has better running backs than K-State. 

um, no

KU's leading running backs:


RUSHING   CAR   YDS   AVG   TD
J. Sims   56   254   4.5   3
D. Miller   34   173   5.1   3


K-State's leading running backs:


J. Hubert   26   120   4.6   0
Robert Rose   5   29   5.8   11   0


 

How do you define "leading" ?

Statistical leaders.

[Emo EMAW]

You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's  tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.

Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc

obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively.  Especially with Nix and their nose.  They were both active vs. Tide's OL.  But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.

KU has better running backs than K-State. 

um, no

KU's leading running backs:


RUSHING   CAR   YDS   AVG   TD
J. Sims   56   254   4.5   3
D. Miller   34   173   5.1   3


K-State's leading running backs:


J. Hubert   26   120   4.6   0
Robert Rose   5   29   5.8   11   0


 

How do you define "leading" ?

Statistical leaders.

What stats are you looking at?

[OregonSmock]

All those stats show is that your backs carry the ball more than ours.  Dumbass.

Why can't you just accept the reality that KU has better running backs than K-State?  


 

[sonofdaxjones]

Sadly for ku, they look pretty good on offense against decent defenses . . . for awhile, and then Chuck Long Syndrome strikes and that's all she wrote.

[OregonSmock]

You have to admit our running backs are extremely explosive without him . . . the non Bryce's  tore off long runs of 9, 11 and 9.

Heisman candidate Trent Richardson for Bama vs. Kent - 13 carries, 37 yards, longest run of 10, 2.8 ypc

obviously not comparing our "back-ups" to Richardson but Kent does have some players and can do some things defensively.  Especially with Nix and their nose.  They were both active vs. Tide's OL.  But we do need BB out there with Klein for the heavy hitters.

KU has better running backs than K-State. 

um, no

KU's leading running backs:


RUSHING   CAR   YDS   AVG   TD
J. Sims   56   254   4.5   3
D. Miller   34   173   5.1   3


K-State's leading running backs:


J. Hubert   26   120   4.6   0
Robert Rose   5   29   5.8   11   0


 

How do you define "leading" ?

Statistical leaders.

What stats are you looking at?

Are you blind?  

[jtksu]

When you guys get a better running back that Bryce, I'll admit that your backs are better.  Also, if you guys are able to reverse 59-7, I will admit that Ron Grill is building a monster.  I would have given you guys more credit this week but then you got 768'd.