Author Topic: Phil Steele says 'Cats will be bowling. (Read 11823 times)

fatty fat fat · « **Reply #25 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:28:56 AM »

Quote from: Dlew12 on July 19, 2011, 01:39:19 AM

Quote from: _33 on July 19, 2011, 12:51:10 AM
Sucks that people are already using the "schedule is super hard" talking point to justify a lack of wins this season. 'Grats Snyds.
But the schedule is super hard. I know we all hate Snyder, but pretending that this season's schedule is just as easy as last's is ridiculous.

A&M, OU, @UT, @OSU, @Miami

Even with a potential let down year from UT, collectively, that may be the most difficult 5 games we've seen in the Snyder/Prince Era. Compared to last season (which, in retrospect, was a ridiculously easy schedule) 6 wins looks like a decent season. I'd bet we're about 14 point dogs in each of those games, with the exception maybe being Miami, simply due to the question marks surrounding them.

if we go 0-5 in that stretch...heads need to but cut off their necks. at least one win, two would be nice. aTm is a should win.

DQ12 · « **Reply #26 on:** July 19, 2011, 04:13:51 AM »

Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 19, 2011, 02:28:56 AM

Quote from: Dlew12 on July 19, 2011, 01:39:19 AM
Quote from: _33 on July 19, 2011, 12:51:10 AM
Sucks that people are already using the "schedule is super hard" talking point to justify a lack of wins this season. 'Grats Snyds.
But the schedule is super hard. I know we all hate Snyder, but pretending that this season's schedule is just as easy as last's is ridiculous.

A&M, OU, @UT, @OSU, @Miami

Even with a potential let down year from UT, collectively, that may be the most difficult 5 games we've seen in the Snyder/Prince Era. Compared to last season (which, in retrospect, was a ridiculously easy schedule) 6 wins looks like a decent season. I'd bet we're about 14 point dogs in each of those games, with the exception maybe being Miami, simply due to the question marks surrounding them.

if we go 0-5 in that stretch...heads need to but cut off their necks. at least one win, two would be nice. aTm is a should win.

Easiest to hardest in descending order: CTR, @Miami, A&M, @OSU, OU

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #27 on:** July 19, 2011, 10:22:49 AM »

Quote from: Dlew12 on July 19, 2011, 04:13:51 AM

Quote from: fatty fat fat on July 19, 2011, 02:28:56 AM
Quote from: Dlew12 on July 19, 2011, 01:39:19 AM
Quote from: _33 on July 19, 2011, 12:51:10 AM
Sucks that people are already using the "schedule is super hard" talking point to justify a lack of wins this season. 'Grats Snyds.
But the schedule is super hard. I know we all hate Snyder, but pretending that this season's schedule is just as easy as last's is ridiculous.

A&M, OU, @UT, @OSU, @Miami

Even with a potential let down year from UT, collectively, that may be the most difficult 5 games we've seen in the Snyder/Prince Era. Compared to last season (which, in retrospect, was a ridiculously easy schedule) 6 wins looks like a decent season. I'd bet we're about 14 point dogs in each of those games, with the exception maybe being Miami, simply due to the question marks surrounding them.

if we go 0-5 in that stretch...heads need to but cut off their necks. at least one win, two would be nice. aTm is a should win.
Easiest to hardest in descending order: CTR, @Miami, A&M, @OSU, OU

I would say A&M, @Miami, CTR, OU, @OSU

We are adding some hard teams this year, but keep in mind that we are replacing 2 teams that beat us last year. So in reality, we are replacing 2 losses with probably 3 losses. This is why 6 wins shows no improvement from last season.

jtksu · « **Reply #28 on:** July 19, 2011, 12:41:00 PM »

Replacing 2 losses with 3 losses? Doesn't that kinda reinforce the point that this yrs sched is tougher than lasts?

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #29 on:** July 19, 2011, 12:42:42 PM »

Quote from: jtksu on July 19, 2011, 12:41:00 PM

Replacing 2 losses with 3 losses? Doesn't that kinda reinforce the point that this yrs sched is tougher than lasts?

Yeah, that's why winning 6 games would be stagnation when last year's team won 7.

EMAWmeister · « **Reply #30 on:** July 19, 2011, 01:39:41 PM »

Why are we acting like a&m won't be an extremely tough game? Every poll I've seen so far has them top 10 preseason...

Kat Kid · « **Reply #31 on:** July 19, 2011, 01:49:46 PM »

Quote from: EMAWmeister on July 19, 2011, 01:39:41 PM

Why are we acting like a&m won't be an extremely tough game? Every poll I've seen so far has them top 10 preseason...

People here are morons.

pike · « **Reply #32 on:** July 19, 2011, 01:52:31 PM »

Have not seen those polls, but still won't be a cakewalk. This is BIG 12 FOOTBALL!!!!!

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #33 on:** July 19, 2011, 01:53:14 PM »

Quote from: EMAWmeister on July 19, 2011, 01:39:41 PM

Why are we acting like a&m won't be an extremely tough game? Every poll I've seen so far has them top 10 preseason...

Who said it won't be tough?

Kat Kid · « **Reply #34 on:** July 19, 2011, 01:55:02 PM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 19, 2011, 01:53:14 PM

Quote from: EMAWmeister on July 19, 2011, 01:39:41 PM
Why are we acting like a&m won't be an extremely tough game? Every poll I've seen so far has them top 10 preseason...

Who said it won't be tough?

Dumbasses.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #35 on:** July 19, 2011, 01:56:51 PM »

Quote from: Tortuga on July 19, 2011, 01:55:02 PM

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 19, 2011, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: EMAWmeister on July 19, 2011, 01:39:41 PM
Why are we acting like a&m won't be an extremely tough game? Every poll I've seen so far has them top 10 preseason...

Who said it won't be tough?

Dumbasses.

I only see fatty fat fat, and I'd like to see you say that to his face.

pike · « **Reply #36 on:** July 19, 2011, 01:57:14 PM »

I just looked at UKans' schedule. They may not win 3 games

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #37 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:00:20 PM »

The way I see it:

Should win:
Eastern Kentucky
Kent State
Baylor
@Kansas
Iowa State

Could Win (we will get 1 of these):
Missouri
@Tech
aTm
@Texas

Won't Win:
@Miami
OU
@OSU

wetwillie · « **Reply #38 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:01:51 PM »

Quote from: pike on July 19, 2011, 01:57:14 PM

I just looked at UKans' schedule. They may not win 3 games

I can't see them going 0-for in conference. Man if they went 2-10 the lawrence chapter of the KKK would be warming up the nooses.

Kat Kid · « **Reply #39 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:08:12 PM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 19, 2011, 01:56:51 PM

Quote from: Tortuga on July 19, 2011, 01:55:02 PM
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 19, 2011, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: EMAWmeister on July 19, 2011, 01:39:41 PM
Why are we acting like a&m won't be an extremely tough game? Every poll I've seen so far has them top 10 preseason...

Who said it won't be tough?

Dumbasses.

I only see fatty fat fat, and I'd like to see you say that to his face.

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=13633.25
Chings ranked them in the same category with us, Nuts Kicked, jtksu chimed in saying they were mediocre. dlew fights the good fight.

No idea where the fatty quote is. He thinks we should beat Mizzou. Hatter thinks Tech/OSU/Mizzou.

Either way, fatty and hatter don't speak about Kansas State as it is. They speak about Kansas State as they wish it were. I have moved past this step

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #40 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:09:36 PM »

Quote from: Tortuga on July 19, 2011, 02:08:12 PM

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 19, 2011, 01:56:51 PM
Quote from: Tortuga on July 19, 2011, 01:55:02 PM
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 19, 2011, 01:53:14 PM
Quote from: EMAWmeister on July 19, 2011, 01:39:41 PM
Why are we acting like a&m won't be an extremely tough game? Every poll I've seen so far has them top 10 preseason...

Who said it won't be tough?

Dumbasses.

I only see fatty fat fat, and I'd like to see you say that to his face.

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=13633.25
Chings ranked them in the same category with us, Nuts Kicked, jtksu chimed in saying they were mediocre. dlew fights the good fight.

No idea where the fatty quote is. He thinks we should beat Mizzou. Hatter thinks Tech/OSU/Mizzou.

Either way, fatty and hatter don't speak about Kansas State as it is. They speak about Kansas State as they wish it were. I have moved past this step

That was talking about a&m as a program, not their 2011 football squad.

Also, I'm going to need to look at the preseason CPI before I go ahead and agree with the media that they are in fact a top 10 team. Right now, I have them pegged as "pretty good."

Kat Kid · « **Reply #41 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:27:37 PM »

The chingdex? Good idea. Also, it is completey fair to say you rank program/team differenty. That said I am very down on our program ad indifferent on the team so don't think I'll care too much about your dstinction.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #42 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:29:56 PM »

Quote from: Tortuga on July 19, 2011, 02:27:37 PM

The chingdex? Good idea. Also, it is completey fair to say you rank program/team differenty. That said I am very down on our program ad indifferent on the team so don't think I'll care too much about your dstinction.

You think they belong with OU, OSU, and Texas?

felix rex · « **Reply #43 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:31:39 PM »

Quote from: EMAWmeister on July 19, 2011, 01:39:41 PM

Why are we acting like a&m won't be an extremely tough game? Every poll I've seen so far has them top 10 preseason...

I guarantee it's because we beat them the last two times (I had almost forgotten that ludicrous beatdown in 09. How rough ridin' absurd was that?)

cas4ksu · « **Reply #44 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:37:24 PM »

I wouldn't count on beating Baylor.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #45 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:40:29 PM »

Quote from: cas4ksu on July 19, 2011, 02:37:24 PM

I wouldn't count on beating Baylor.

Count on it.

fatty fat fat · « **Reply #46 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:40:55 PM »

Quote

Either way, fatty and hatter don't speak about Kansas State as it is. They speak about Kansas State as they wish it were. I have moved past this step

this is something you should not be posting under any circumstances.

jtksu · « **Reply #47 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:46:45 PM »

Lotta butthurrrrt dudes posting on this board lately. "OMG guise, we totally weren't good for a few years and our coach is totally old so there's no way we will ever be good again and I totally just had my first period but that's okay cause I totally have one of those new tampons stuck in my vag so we can soooo still go to the mall and shop for shoes!!!!"

cas4ksu · « **Reply #48 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:51:24 PM »

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 19, 2011, 02:40:29 PM

Quote from: cas4ksu on July 19, 2011, 02:37:24 PM
I wouldn't count on beating Baylor.

Count on it.

RGIII and (insert about any running back's name) is enough to worry me.

Rage Against the McKee · « **Reply #49 on:** July 19, 2011, 02:53:41 PM »

Quote from: cas4ksu on July 19, 2011, 02:51:24 PM

Quote from: Nuts Kicked on July 19, 2011, 02:40:29 PM
Quote from: cas4ksu on July 19, 2011, 02:37:24 PM
I wouldn't count on beating Baylor.

Count on it.

RGIII and (insert about any running back's name) is enough to worry me.

Has Baylor ever won a football game in Manhattan, KS?

Baylor and K-State are pretty evenly matched, and I'll take the home team.