Well they are. Thing is all of Paul's votes are probably real. Most of the others probably had their tickets paid for by the campaigns.
I agree. I was just pointing out Sean Hannity is a douche bag.
Does anybody actually believe Iran would not use a nuclear device, at least by proxy?
Who's to say that they would? Iran hasn't attacked anyone in like 500 years. Plus, as I said above, they hate us because we mumped over their democracy to replace it with a dictator that terrorized it's people for 25 years. Maybe they wouldn't hate us so much if we would just stop rough ridin' around all over the world and mind our own business. Let Israel deal with them.
It would go directly into the hands of Hamas and al Qeada, who will use it.
According to what/who? Were any of the 9/11 hijackers even from Iran? Does Iran not understand that if they do give a nuke to someone, it would cost the lives of pretty much their entire nation? They have no means of defending themselves.
Nukes are pretty serious crap, and I doubt Iran would just "give" one to a terrorist.
Hannity is very reluctant to give Paul much more than "Oh his followers are very passionate...blah blah blah"
To his credit though he had Rand Paul on at the beginning and has been focusing a lot on the big losers of the day.
EDIT: Hannity's cronies come right back and say he's "Left of Obama" on Iran...which is completely not the case
Well, actually it completely is the case. He is as left as you can get when it comes to the military and civil liberties.
I wasn't aware that adhering to the constitution is a "left" point of view. The Patriot Act is a direct assault on our civil liberties, as is the out of control TSA
Nor was I aware that acknowledging the fact that we created Iran's hatred for us by overthrowing their first democratically elected government in history in 1953. Paul isn't afraid to call a spade a spade, while everyone else says "How dare you question US foreign policy in the past!" and "Why admit we made mistakes!! We are the USA!!!"
Call it what ever you want i guess, but he's right
It's certainly not a "right" point of view.
It's not a neo-conservative point of view. I'll give you that. That link fails to mention why we were attacked in the first place....and believe it or not, it's because we've been meddling in mid east issues for 60 years so we can control their oil, not because we're "free" like the neo-cons would like you to think.