0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
95 looks to be the only guy on the roster next year that can regularly make a play on his own
Quote from: Skipper44 on March 19, 2011, 11:21:11 PM95 looks to be the only guy on the roster next year that can regularly make a play on his ownby hammering the ball into the floor while staring at his shoes
Quote from: MakeItRain on March 19, 2011, 11:31:10 PMQuote from: Skipper44 on March 19, 2011, 11:21:11 PM95 looks to be the only guy on the roster next year that can regularly make a play on his ownby hammering the ball into the floor while staring at his shoes If we keep running Undy's O, who do you want running the high ball screen at the end of possessions?
Quote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:12:32 PMkstate'll be fine next year. i'll save my pointless meltdowns for coaching searches. maybe apportion a little to recruiting as well.Please define 'fine.' While I don't think we'll be garbage, I don't see us being an NCAA tourney team. I think we'll be okay, but its gonna be some time until we can make a run of any significance.
kstate'll be fine next year. i'll save my pointless meltdowns for coaching searches. maybe apportion a little to recruiting as well.
Quote from: Skipper44 on March 19, 2011, 11:33:11 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on March 19, 2011, 11:31:10 PMQuote from: Skipper44 on March 19, 2011, 11:21:11 PM95 looks to be the only guy on the roster next year that can regularly make a play on his ownby hammering the ball into the floor while staring at his shoes If we keep running Undy's O, who do you want running the high ball screen at the end of possessions?someone elseI don't think we will run the same offense, the personnel will be completely different, square peg round hole.
Quote from: ZmoneyKSU on March 19, 2011, 11:24:33 PMQuote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:12:32 PMkstate'll be fine next year. i'll save my pointless meltdowns for coaching searches. maybe apportion a little to recruiting as well.Please define 'fine.' While I don't think we'll be garbage, I don't see us being an NCAA tourney team. I think we'll be okay, but its gonna be some time until we can make a run of any significance.there are too many unknowns to predict well, but i'd guess 50/50ish on the tourney. teams don't have to have a guy that takes 30% of its shots in order to be good. pullen & kelly were incredibly important to the team, but their combined season long efficiency was pretty pedestrian. and i have confidence (perhaps unreasonable confidence) that the staff can get just about any group of moderately talented players to defend pretty damn well.
Quote from: Skipper44 on March 19, 2011, 11:33:11 PMIf we keep running Undy's O, who do you want running the high ball screen at the end of possessions?someone elseI don't think we will run the same offense, the personnel will be completely different, square peg round hole.
If we keep running Undy's O, who do you want running the high ball screen at the end of possessions?
Quote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:38:02 PMQuote from: ZmoneyKSU on March 19, 2011, 11:24:33 PMQuote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:12:32 PMkstate'll be fine next year. i'll save my pointless meltdowns for coaching searches. maybe apportion a little to recruiting as well.Please define 'fine.' While I don't think we'll be garbage, I don't see us being an NCAA tourney team. I think we'll be okay, but its gonna be some time until we can make a run of any significance.there are too many unknowns to predict well, but i'd guess 50/50ish on the tourney. teams don't have to have a guy that takes 30% of its shots in order to be good. pullen & kelly were incredibly important to the team, but their combined season long efficiency was pretty pedestrian. and i have confidence (perhaps unreasonable confidence) that the staff can get just about any group of moderately talented players to defend pretty damn well.Good post. The situation following the last time we lost to Wisconsin was much more dire.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on March 19, 2011, 11:45:24 PMQuote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:38:02 PMQuote from: ZmoneyKSU on March 19, 2011, 11:24:33 PMQuote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:12:32 PMkstate'll be fine next year. i'll save my pointless meltdowns for coaching searches. maybe apportion a little to recruiting as well.Please define 'fine.' While I don't think we'll be garbage, I don't see us being an NCAA tourney team. I think we'll be okay, but its gonna be some time until we can make a run of any significance.there are too many unknowns to predict well, but i'd guess 50/50ish on the tourney. teams don't have to have a guy that takes 30% of its shots in order to be good. pullen & kelly were incredibly important to the team, but their combined season long efficiency was pretty pedestrian. and i have confidence (perhaps unreasonable confidence) that the staff can get just about any group of moderately talented players to defend pretty damn well.Good post. The situation following the last time we lost to Wisconsin was much more dire.so who is going to be this next generation's 3-star diamond in the rough?
Quote from: kougar24 on March 19, 2011, 11:47:40 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on March 19, 2011, 11:45:24 PMQuote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:38:02 PMQuote from: ZmoneyKSU on March 19, 2011, 11:24:33 PMQuote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:12:32 PMkstate'll be fine next year. i'll save my pointless meltdowns for coaching searches. maybe apportion a little to recruiting as well.Please define 'fine.' While I don't think we'll be garbage, I don't see us being an NCAA tourney team. I think we'll be okay, but its gonna be some time until we can make a run of any significance.there are too many unknowns to predict well, but i'd guess 50/50ish on the tourney. teams don't have to have a guy that takes 30% of its shots in order to be good. pullen & kelly were incredibly important to the team, but their combined season long efficiency was pretty pedestrian. and i have confidence (perhaps unreasonable confidence) that the staff can get just about any group of moderately talented players to defend pretty damn well.Good post. The situation following the last time we lost to Wisconsin was much more dire.so who is going to be this next generation's 3-star diamond in the rough?Will, but none will ever polish up as well as jake.
Quote from: CNS Casey on March 20, 2011, 12:07:35 AMQuote from: kougar24 on March 19, 2011, 11:47:40 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on March 19, 2011, 11:45:24 PMQuote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:38:02 PMQuote from: ZmoneyKSU on March 19, 2011, 11:24:33 PMQuote from: sys on March 19, 2011, 11:12:32 PMkstate'll be fine next year. i'll save my pointless meltdowns for coaching searches. maybe apportion a little to recruiting as well.Please define 'fine.' While I don't think we'll be garbage, I don't see us being an NCAA tourney team. I think we'll be okay, but its gonna be some time until we can make a run of any significance.there are too many unknowns to predict well, but i'd guess 50/50ish on the tourney. teams don't have to have a guy that takes 30% of its shots in order to be good. pullen & kelly were incredibly important to the team, but their combined season long efficiency was pretty pedestrian. and i have confidence (perhaps unreasonable confidence) that the staff can get just about any group of moderately talented players to defend pretty damn well.Good post. The situation following the last time we lost to Wisconsin was much more dire.so who is going to be this next generation's 3-star diamond in the rough?Will, but none will ever polish up as well as jake.I don't/won't expect Will to be another Jake, but I think Will has a chance to be pretty good.http://statsheet.com/mcb/players/compare?add=jacob-pullen&jacob-pullen=2007-2008&p1=will-spradling
Sophomore guard Nick Russell lamented the loss to the Badgers as being the last time this K-State team would all be together as a team."We've spent so much time together, this group, that it hurts to know that this is the last time that we'll all be together as a whole," Russell said. "You lose and you have to look those seniors in the eye and know that that's it for them. You know that your time with them is done and it's something you never wanted to feel."The people that are left in here, the people that are coming back have to get back to work for next year. We have to work even harder now."
Nick implies he'll be back:QuoteSophomore guard Nick Russell lamented the loss to the Badgers as being the last time this K-State team would all be together as a team."We've spent so much time together, this group, that it hurts to know that this is the last time that we'll all be together as a whole," Russell said. "You lose and you have to look those seniors in the eye and know that that's it for them. You know that your time with them is done and it's something you never wanted to feel."The people that are left in here, the people that are coming back have to get back to work for next year. We have to work even harder now."
Looks like a team full of complementary players.
I think Nino will be pretty good.
Quote from: W.Churchill on March 20, 2011, 11:01:56 AMLooks like a team full of complementary players. Agreed, but I think Will, Jamar, or even Nick could step up. Will and Jamar obviously won't be as good as CK and Pullen, but they can be "fine".