Author Topic: The Official Bracketology Thread  (Read 380413 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline WildcatPower

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 666
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1700 on: March 05, 2017, 07:55:57 PM »
Vandy should be out too. Any team that loses to Missouri, should be an automatic disqualified.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29284
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1701 on: March 06, 2017, 03:37:03 PM »
Vandy should be out too. Any team that loses to Missouri, should be an automatic disqualified.

It's not like they lost to the last place team by 30.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1702 on: March 06, 2017, 03:41:48 PM »
Vandy should be out too. Any team that loses to Missouri, should be an automatic disqualified.

It's not like they lost to the last 9th place team by 30.
FYP :gocho:

Offline Bookcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2103
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1703 on: March 06, 2017, 07:27:12 PM »
Go Baylor on Thursday. It's our only hope

Sent from my SM-N920P using Tapatalk


Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1704 on: March 06, 2017, 07:55:06 PM »
Maybe bookcat can just make a thousand threads about Weber getting fired and he'll just leave instead

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1705 on: March 07, 2017, 03:04:51 PM »
Wake Forest only up 2 right now in the 2nd half vs BC. A BC win would be big for the cats.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1706 on: March 07, 2017, 03:44:50 PM »
Wake Forest up 12 with under 4 to play.  :Yuck:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1707 on: March 07, 2017, 03:48:17 PM »
Yeah, that didn't last long.  :frown:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46514
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1708 on: March 07, 2017, 03:55:08 PM »
Wake Forest up 12 with under 4 to play.  :Yuck:

you just knew danny manning would do everything he could to screw us


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1709 on: March 07, 2017, 03:57:06 PM »
 :ROFL: It was a good oppy for a terribly loss for a bubble team. I thought i'd entertain the thought to pass some time on this slow Tuesday. 

Offline #LIFE

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1792
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1710 on: March 07, 2017, 03:57:26 PM »
Wake Forest up 12 with under 4 to play.  :Yuck:

 :Woot:

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1711 on: March 07, 2017, 04:44:34 PM »
This is confusing because some of us are cheering for bubble teams to get in ahead of us. So did a bubble team do good for themselves or no?

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1712 on: March 07, 2017, 04:46:47 PM »
This is confusing because some of us are cheering for bubble teams to get in ahead of us. So did a bubble team do good for themselves or no?
They didn't blow themselves up yet, but they haven't helped themselves out yet either. They did what they needed to do for the time being. Beating the shittiest team in the ACC.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1713 on: March 08, 2017, 01:17:36 PM »
Few days ago I said 10 teams for 6 spots.
1) Syracuse lost to Mia. They are now 2-11 on road/nuetral with an RPI of 75.  Their 6 Top 50 wins likely won't be good enough.
2) Wake won a game they couldn't afford to lose last night. So they now stand at 19-12 with 10 ACC wins. RPI and SOS in top 35.  Only 3 top 50 wins but no bad L's. They look pretty decent to be in.

That would mean ACC gets 9, not 10 which some thought.  FYI, GA Tech who was just outside those 10 teams I talked about.... They are officially done now after a loss in the 11 vs 14 game last night

So, could be 5 spots left and 8 teams now competing for them.

Online BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1409
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1714 on: March 08, 2017, 01:30:01 PM »
Go Duke!  Go Virginia Tech!!

 :ksu:

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1715 on: March 08, 2017, 01:55:35 PM »
ILL St is the only team of the 8 that is done. The bubble is weaker this year than last year, but the last 2-3 teams that got into "Play in games" were kinda weak last year.
1) Vandy got in with 13 losses, RPI 60, only 2 Top 50 wins
2) Michigan got in with a 4-12 record vs Top 100(17-0 vs 101+) and RPI of 58
3) Tulsa had 11 losses (12-6 in AAC, the SMU/Cincy league) RPI/SOS was 61/62


For comparison... last year St Mary's did not get in.
** 16' St Mary's -- 26-5, RPI 40 SOS 163. 6 top 100 wins, 2 top 50. Went 2-1 vs 11 seed Gonzaga.
** 17' ILL St -- 26-6, RPI 36 SOS 157. 2 top 100 wins, 1 top 50. Won 19 of 21 MVC games, but only 1 win vs top 150 non con team.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1716 on: March 08, 2017, 02:09:36 PM »
Rhode Island will be someone to watch in the A10 tourney. We need them to be outed early.

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1717 on: March 08, 2017, 05:29:06 PM »
5 spots, 8 teams....So these are teams we may be able to beat out even if we lost close to Baylor.....

1) Illinois St- mentioned their lack of good wins, SOS
2) USC - If they lost to UCLA in the qtrs, they would be 1-8 vs the 3 stud teams plus 4&5 seeded Utah/Cal. 9 of their 11 wins in P12 would be to teams "not in the top 100". And their 10th win would be over Stanford who will have an RPI in the 90s.  Their top 100 non con wins -- beat tourney bound SMU, non tourney bound Texas A&M, Omaha. Could end with 24-9 record and not too many impressive wins

3) Xavier- If they lose to Butler in Qtrs, they will be 2-7 last 9 games. 2 wins vs RPI 228 DePaul and 0-7 vs the 1 thru 6 seeds in Big East. They lost their 2nd leading scorer for the year 10 games ago and have struggled.  They would finish 10-10 vs B.E. teams, 3-10 vs top 6 seeds.
4) Illinois - a loss to Michigan and they would be 8-11 just like Us.  And have 14 L's
* Their good/decent wins- Mich, Sparty, NWestern twice, Iowa twice, Vcu & BYU on nuetral court. We would have 3 fewer (WV, At Baylor/OSU/TCU, Colo St in Denver)
* But we have 2 wins vs top 3 in Conference, they have 0
* They would have 3 losses to 13/14 seed Penn St/Rutgers. Ou and Tech for Us
*They lost road/nuetral to 4 Top 8 seeded NCAA teams by 32,25,23,11. Our games away from home vs Top 8 seeded teams were 2,8 point wins. Losses by 19,5,2,1


« Last Edit: March 08, 2017, 05:56:29 PM by Powercat Posse »

Online BostonPancake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1409
  • I'm all about the T in TSC.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1718 on: March 08, 2017, 08:25:22 PM »
Virginia Tech!!

 :ksu:

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1719 on: March 08, 2017, 08:30:32 PM »
 :billdance:

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1720 on: March 08, 2017, 09:12:08 PM »
I think Wake still has a good shot of getting in, but beating Tech would have gotten them in for sure, but they lost.

Good RPI, good SOS, no bad losses. 10-10 in #1 rated Conf.
However they are only 4-10 vs ACC top 100. Only 1 of those is a big time Win (Lville). 3 Top 100 wins in Non con, but none Top 50 and none of those 3 is an NCAA Tourney team. 

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1721 on: March 08, 2017, 09:57:02 PM »
Everyone needs to focus on Xavier to lose tonight vs DePaul if you care about march madness and your alumni.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1722 on: March 08, 2017, 09:59:12 PM »
Jerry Palm was on after the Pat League final and he said if Syracuse was selected they'd
-have the fewest road wins
-have the worst RPI
-have the worst non conference sos
Of any at large team in tournament history, they're done PP, you don't have to mention them again

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1723 on: March 08, 2017, 10:01:09 PM »
 :thumbs: 18-14. Woof!

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13574
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #1724 on: March 08, 2017, 10:02:27 PM »
Cuse baby