Poll

Will the "cool" Pinstripe Bowl K-State be on the new field at BSFS?

Yes . . . it's cool.  Currie Prevails.
NO . . . OB Wins again.

Author Topic: BSFS Expansion Thread  (Read 4639272 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1650 on: September 25, 2011, 01:32:03 AM »
Keep in mind that my dream is to have BSFS expanded to a 70,000 hulking monstrosity that is like one of the Top 10 loudest stadiums in the country (and the acoustics of the place could definitely make that work). So I might be off-base in saying that 55,000 would be appropriate if we were winning like 9-11 games a year again.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1651 on: September 25, 2011, 01:45:20 AM »
Wasn't it ranked really high (in loudness) back in DoD?  Wanna say top 20?  And that was back when it sat like 42k? 

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1652 on: September 25, 2011, 01:47:35 AM »
If K-State and Manhattan continue to grow like they are then surely 55k or 60k isn't out of the question. Obviously we'd have to maintain success to make it worth while.

Wishful thinking I guess.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1653 on: September 25, 2011, 01:48:13 AM »
Keep in mind that my dream is to have BSFS expanded to a 70,000 hulking monstrosity that is like one of the Top 10 loudest stadiums in the country (and the acoustics of the place could definitely make that work). So I might be off-base in saying that 55,000 would be appropriate if we were winning like 9-11 games a year again.

I think that 60,000 is reasonable as soon as we have some success post-Snyder.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1654 on: September 25, 2011, 01:49:08 AM »
Kinda hard not to be thinking like that after a win over the U.  Reminds me of the good ol' days of the DoD.

Offline EMAWmeister

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 8957
  • Livin' it up
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1655 on: September 25, 2011, 03:09:55 AM »
If we can get 51,000+ in the stands against rough ridin' eastern kentucky, we can get 55,000 against conference opponents.  Granted, we would sell out maybe half of our games every year, but still, the extra revenue you can make from 5k seats would be pretty substantial. 

Online nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 17054
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1656 on: September 25, 2011, 04:11:55 AM »
60k.

ksu 2025

100k
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55963
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1657 on: September 25, 2011, 07:12:35 AM »
With the growth of Manhattan, we could add a few thousand seats in the next 10 years or so and be able to fill them (assuming we're fielding a decent product).

yes, as long as every seat we add is a premium seat I have no issues with adding
And assuming agro-defense scientists give a crap about local college football.

a lot of them will probably be K-State grads.   :dunno:

Offline Legit Elite

  • Resident Vanier Barber
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 589
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1658 on: September 25, 2011, 09:23:04 AM »
We do need to remove some seats....the temporary bleachers need to be burned like an A&M bonfire.  Too soon?
Free edge up to defensive starters when opponents held under 10.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30948
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1659 on: September 25, 2011, 09:33:38 AM »
KSU should never have a stadium with more than 50K seats.

Agreed.

I don't care if MHK grows to 150K.  Keep that crap a hot ticket, and upgrade seats to premium...turn the top 10 rows of the upper deck to "loge" seating with booze, tv's and waitresses or something.

Offline KCFDcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2436
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1660 on: September 25, 2011, 11:24:42 AM »
KSU should never have a stadium with more than 50K seats.

Agreed.

I don't care if MHK grows to 150K.  Keep that crap a hot ticket, and upgrade seats to premium...turn the top 10 rows of the upper deck to "loge" seating with booze, tv's and waitresses or something.

didn't somebody project manhattan's population to grow to around 100K in the future? anyone have a link to that?

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1661 on: September 25, 2011, 01:55:17 PM »
With the growth of Manhattan, we could add a few thousand seats in the next 10 years or so and be able to fill them (assuming we're fielding a decent product).

yes, as long as every seat we add is a premium seat I have no issues with adding
And assuming agro-defense scientists give a crap about local college football.

a lot of them will probably be K-State grads.   :dunno:

pffft  :lol:

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1662 on: September 25, 2011, 02:03:53 PM »
KSU should never have a stadium with more than 50K seats.

Agreed.

I don't care if MHK grows to 150K.  Keep that crap a hot ticket, and upgrade seats to premium...turn the top 10 rows of the upper deck to "loge" seating with booze, tv's and waitresses or something.

agree about upgrading/etc. disagree about "hot ticket". i don't care if we are selling tix for ten bucks like we did the first two games, i just want to get as many people in the stadium possible while providing a better upgraded "premium" experience for those that can afford it and want it. no reason you can't do both.

just have enough different price points/options and work the ever loving hell out of them. somebody doesn't care where they sit and just wants a single game tik to get into the game? no prob. here is your cheap ass single game ticket to the game with the worst view in the house. somebody different wants to be able to drink beer during the game? no prob-here you go. somebody wants the best seat possible seat and doesn't care about beer-here is your seat. right here. you def want as many people there as possible though. they have done a great job at that over the past few years with this. whoever is in charge or plans/ticket prices/etc is light years ahead of whoever was doing it ten years ago. kudos to them.
« Last Edit: September 25, 2011, 02:08:57 PM by Rick Daris »

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1663 on: September 25, 2011, 02:04:03 PM »
KSU should never have a stadium with more than 50K seats.

Agreed.

I don't care if MHK grows to 150K.  Keep that crap a hot ticket, and upgrade seats to premium...turn the top 10 rows of the upper deck to "loge" seating with booze, tv's and waitresses or something.

didn't somebody project manhattan's population to grow to around 100K in the future? anyone have a link to that?

Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1664 on: September 25, 2011, 02:06:03 PM »
KSU should never have a stadium with more than 50K seats.

Agreed.

I don't care if MHK grows to 150K.  Keep that crap a hot ticket, and upgrade seats to premium...turn the top 10 rows of the upper deck to "loge" seating with booze, tv's and waitresses or something.

didn't somebody project manhattan's population to grow to around 100K in the future? anyone have a link to that?



 :lol:

Offline raquetcat

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Katpak'r
  • *******
  • Posts: 1957
  • ^ I let us down
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1665 on: September 25, 2011, 08:25:49 PM »
KSU should never have a stadium with more than 50K seats.

Agreed.

I don't care if MHK grows to 150K.  Keep that crap a hot ticket, and upgrade seats to premium...turn the top 10 rows of the upper deck to "loge" seating with booze, tv's and waitresses or something.

agree about upgrading/etc. disagree about "hot ticket". i don't care if we are selling tix for ten bucks like we did the first two games, i just want to get as many people in the stadium possible while providing a better upgraded "premium" experience for those that can afford it and want it. no reason you can't do both.

just have enough different price points/options and work the ever loving hell out of them. somebody doesn't care where they sit and just wants a single game tik to get into the game? no prob. here is your cheap ass single game ticket to the game with the worst view in the house. somebody different wants to be able to drink beer during the game? no prob-here you go. somebody wants the best seat possible seat and doesn't care about beer-here is your seat. right here. you def want as many people there as possible though. they have done a great job at that over the past few years with this. whoever is in charge or plans/ticket prices/etc is light years ahead of whoever was doing it ten years ago. kudos to them.

the ticket office comes up with the plans/prices but Currie gets final approval and pushes to get people in the seats no matter what they sell the ticket for, also no matter how "sold out" a game is currie wants fans to be able to walk up to the ticket office before the game and purchase a ticket
I'm purple down

Offline Barry McCockner

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 719
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1666 on: September 25, 2011, 08:39:35 PM »
Wasn't it ranked really high (in loudness) back in DoD?  Wanna say top 20?  And that was back when it sat like 42k? 

The first time Stoops et all returned, you know, the game with the "Loyalty" and "Traitor" banners hanging from the east side, was mother rough ridin' loud...as was the NU '98 and NU in the snow.
"WELL BARYY YOU GOTTA DO WHAT YOU DO BECUZ IF YOU DONT DO IT, THEN WHO WILL - YOU GOTTA HAVE HART AND DATERMANASHIN AND FLOURIDE IN YOUR SYSTEM TO BE A TRUE CHAMPION" - The Ed

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1667 on: September 30, 2011, 04:43:08 PM »
Schulz' powerpoint today had the following image:


Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7833
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1668 on: September 30, 2011, 04:49:37 PM »
Schulz' powerpoint today had the following image:



 :ksu: :driving:

Offline username

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 150
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1669 on: September 30, 2011, 04:53:19 PM »
is that different than the previous designs? looks the same.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1670 on: September 30, 2011, 04:55:36 PM »
Schulz' powerpoint today had the following image:



would take

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22786
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1671 on: September 30, 2011, 05:04:57 PM »
WHAT ABOUT THE INSIDE


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13890
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1672 on: September 30, 2011, 05:06:38 PM »
WHAT ABOUT THE INSIDE

He didn't show that part on kstatehd.tv

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1673 on: September 30, 2011, 05:08:18 PM »
why does it look so thin? 

Offline Lemonrock

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 150
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1674 on: September 30, 2011, 05:11:21 PM »
because it is so tall
S.outhern ignorance +
E.astern arrogance =
C.onfernce hatred