Author Topic: did anyone think the refs were screwing colorado? (Read 6470 times)

gatoveintisiete · « **on:** February 12, 2011, 10:55:27 PM »

I did.

KSU176 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 12, 2011, 10:56:37 PM »

The refs were effing everyone over equally.

ednksu · « **Reply #2 on:** February 12, 2011, 10:57:05 PM »

refs suck ass.

PowercatPat · « **Reply #3 on:** February 12, 2011, 10:57:23 PM »

Ya that technical foul against CK really screwed CU, tard. 6 point swing against us from that call.

sys · « **Reply #4 on:** February 12, 2011, 10:57:30 PM »

squawk.

the KHAN! · « **Reply #5 on:** February 12, 2011, 10:57:54 PM »

They gave us a Technical for an elbow...so eff no. They didn't screw Colorado

MakeItRain · « **Reply #6 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:00:18 PM »

Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 12, 2011, 10:55:27 PM

I did.

How in the world could you think that? How about the Curtis Kelly T, Burks does the same thing and it's an intentional

I think what happened is they made a couple of horrendous calls that screwed KSU, like the CK technical and then went too far with the makeup calls.

Cartierfor3 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:02:04 PM »

Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 12, 2011, 10:55:27 PM

I did.

then you are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).

gatoveintisiete · « **Reply #8 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:03:08 PM »

Jamar and the refs got together early in the 2nd half and gang raped that poor buffalo frosh for like 4 fouls in 9 seconds

kso_FAN · « **Reply #9 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:03:43 PM »

The refs were terrible and lost control of the game. Let them play in the 1st half, then the 2nd half they not only start calling everything, they make up stuff. We were just more agressive than CU, so we got more calls.

gatoveintisiete · « **Reply #10 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:04:55 PM »

Quote from: sys on February 12, 2011, 10:57:30 PM

squawk.

squawks complain about refs screwing their team after the loss........hmmmmmmmm

0.42 · « **Reply #11 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:06:45 PM »

Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 12, 2011, 11:03:43 PM

The refs were terrible and lost control of the game. Let them play in the 1st half, then the 2nd half they not only start calling everything, they make up stuff. We were just more agressive than CU, so we got more calls.

Yeah, it was blatantly obvious that the refs were more incompetent than biased. Our style of play is naturally conducive to getting more fouls called against us by an unbiased crew.

gatoveintisiete · « **Reply #12 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:07:44 PM »

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 12, 2011, 11:00:18 PM

Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 12, 2011, 10:55:27 PM
I did.

How in the world could you think that? How about the Curtis Kelly T, Burks does the same thing and it's an intentional

I think what happened is they made a couple of horrendous calls that screwed KSU, like the CK technical and then went too far with the makeup calls.

is that the burks call where our dude pokes him and then he wards off the poke with an elbow?

PowercatPat · « **Reply #13 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:10:00 PM »

Someone go back and check to see if there should have been more than 1.1 seconds left, and to see if the clock started early before Macgruder got the ball. tia

MakeItRain · « **Reply #14 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:20:02 PM »

Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 12, 2011, 11:07:44 PM

Quote from: MakeItRain on February 12, 2011, 11:00:18 PM
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 12, 2011, 10:55:27 PM
I did.

How in the world could you think that? How about the Curtis Kelly T, Burks does the same thing and it's an intentional

I think what happened is they made a couple of horrendous calls that screwed KSU, like the CK technical and then went too far with the makeup calls.
is that the burks call where our dude pokes him and then he wards off the poke with an elbow?

Yeah. Not sure how the call against Kelly could have been a T but the Burks call was an intentional. Tom O'neil is awful, always has been. I know people hate Higgins but O'neil has been the WITB for years.

PowercatPat · « **Reply #15 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:26:06 PM »

Rumblings that there should have been 1.3 seconds left when we inbounded the ball.

the KHAN! · « **Reply #16 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:29:13 PM »

Quote

Rumblings that there should have been 1.3 seconds left when we inbounded the ball.

Doesn't surprise me.

Just more proof that there is indeed a God and he is vengeful against us for some reason or another.

Probably because Bill Sold his soul to Satan for 10 good years.

Trim · « **Reply #17 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:39:32 PM »

Quote from: PowercatPat on February 12, 2011, 11:26:06 PM

Rumblings that there should have been 1.3 seconds left when we inbounded the ball.

Yeah, you should def "hang" out and follow this guy's lead:

Quote

berk54 Just checked dvr. There should have been at the very least 1.3sec left. They ran off the extra .2sec that would have made the difference.FML

berk54 Interesting that the clock on the TV is different than the one on the court. http://twitpic.com/3z8412

berk54 I wish Frank would have asked the refs to look at the previous play to see if time should have been added before rodneys 3.

sys · « **Reply #18 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:43:20 PM »

i'm rewatching the entire game now and adding up the tenths that come off the clock on dead balls. i already have 1.6 seconds and i've still got more than 3/4 of the game to go. look for a giant exposé post in an hour or two. someone tweet a link to the big 12 office.

Trim · « **Reply #19 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:49:26 PM »

Quote from: sys on February 12, 2011, 11:43:20 PM

look for a giant exposé post in an hour or two. someone tweet a link to the big 12 office.

MELTDOWN COMING!!!!

michigancat · « **Reply #20 on:** February 12, 2011, 11:58:45 PM »

does this gato guy intentionally suck at every idea he ever has or what?

WillieWatanabe · « **Reply #21 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:13:53 AM »

Quote from: sys on February 12, 2011, 11:43:20 PM

i'm rewatching the entire game now and adding up the tenths that come off the clock on dead balls. i already have 1.6 seconds and i've still got more than 3/4 of the game to go. look for a giant exposé post in an hour or two. someone tweet a link to the big 12 office.

goddamnit, this is why i love you sys. no homo.

WillieWatanabe · « **Reply #22 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:15:35 AM »

Not sure who was getting mumped over the most. But it's irrelevant. It was however, just a poorly officiated game. Between the official reviews and the clusterfuck substitutions and the ticky tack "take control of the game" fouls. Horrible. When the announcers comment on it, you know its bad.

0.42 · « **Reply #23 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:31:46 AM »

Quote from: WillieWannabe on February 13, 2011, 12:15:35 AM

When the announcers comment on it, you know its bad.

Yeah, can confirm as a former radioer. A neutral crew goes out of its way to refrain from criticizing the refs unless they directly impact the outcome of the game.

PowercatPat · « **Reply #24 on:** February 13, 2011, 12:44:38 AM »

Quote from: Trim on February 12, 2011, 11:39:32 PM

Quote from: PowercatPat on February 12, 2011, 11:26:06 PM
Rumblings that there should have been 1.3 seconds left when we inbounded the ball.

Yeah, you should def "hang" out and follow this guy's lead:

Quote
berk54 Just checked dvr. There should have been at the very least 1.3sec left. They ran off the extra .2sec that would have made the difference.FML

berk54 Interesting that the clock on the TV is different than the one on the court. http://twitpic.com/3z8412

berk54 I wish Frank would have asked the refs to look at the previous play to see if time should have been added before rodneys 3.

So should they go by the red light behind the backboard or the actual clock?