Author Topic: Mainstream Economics Thread  (Read 92758 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1140
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #525 on: January 27, 2025, 07:19:09 PM »
Another crap sandwich left behind by the sock puppet president




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dax, I agree with you that our national debt is something that is concerning and the interest that is going to be due on it in the near future is going to constrain the federal budget and/or the economy.

However, discussing the national debt in terms of total public debt outstanding really hampers your ability to be taken seriously or credibly. You should be discussing it in terms of the national debt held by the public. This figure is still quite high at nearly $29 trillion and is roughly 100% of GDP.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30932
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #526 on: January 29, 2025, 06:16:03 PM »
Potentially some more lower cost engineering disruption to the defense industry.

https://apnews.com/article/supersonic-flight-california-boom-sound-barrier-5a38f602ad6453939885af682827a69e

Quote

“XB-1’s supersonic flight demonstrates that the technology for passenger supersonic flight has arrived,” Boom founder and CEO Blake Scholl said in a statement. “A small band of talented and dedicated engineers has accomplished what previously took governments and billions of dollars.”


Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55903
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #527 on: January 29, 2025, 06:33:20 PM »
Potentially some more lower cost engineering disruption to the defense industry.

https://apnews.com/article/supersonic-flight-california-boom-sound-barrier-5a38f602ad6453939885af682827a69e

Quote

“XB-1’s supersonic flight demonstrates that the technology for passenger supersonic flight has arrived,” Boom founder and CEO Blake Scholl said in a statement. “A small band of talented and dedicated engineers has accomplished what previously took governments and billions of dollars.”


The technology for supersonic passenger flights has arrived?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #528 on: January 29, 2025, 06:35:42 PM »
Another crap sandwich left behind by the sock puppet president




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dax, I agree with you that our national debt is something that is concerning and the interest that is going to be due on it in the near future is going to constrain the federal budget and/or the economy.

However, discussing the national debt in terms of total public debt outstanding really hampers your ability to be taken seriously or credibly. You should be discussing it in terms of the national debt held by the public. This figure is still quite high at nearly $29 trillion and is roughly 100% of GDP.

I have specifically discussed that auto loan defaults and credit card defaults are at levels seen in 2007 and 2008 on this blog.

Just a couple of weeks ago in fact.

It's hard to take drive by posters seriously.




Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #529 on: January 29, 2025, 06:58:23 PM »
Dax brings up a good topic (unintentionally) though. Billy Bob does not need a $100k+ F250.

https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/rising-auto-loan-delinquencies-and-high-monthly-payments-20240926.html


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #530 on: January 29, 2025, 06:59:40 PM »
Billy Bob does need a place to live though




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30932
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #531 on: January 29, 2025, 07:01:43 PM »
Potentially some more lower cost engineering disruption to the defense industry.

https://apnews.com/article/supersonic-flight-california-boom-sound-barrier-5a38f602ad6453939885af682827a69e

Quote

“XB-1’s supersonic flight demonstrates that the technology for passenger supersonic flight has arrived,” Boom founder and CEO Blake Scholl said in a statement. “A small band of talented and dedicated engineers has accomplished what previously took governments and billions of dollars.”


The technology for supersonic passenger flights has arrived?
The point is the cost, and the impact on barriers to entry

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #532 on: January 29, 2025, 07:03:57 PM »
I was at some airport that had an OG concorde parked out on the tarmac as a show piece once. don't remember where it was. they are tiny. basically really pointy cessna citation.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30932
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #533 on: January 29, 2025, 07:05:16 PM »
All the legacy contractors on this type of technology are once again the same as the defense contractors. Every time one of these deals comes up where a band of smart dudes out performs the legacy contractors at a fraction of the cost. We get further and further away from being beholden to those motherfuckers who have Arguably run the country since Eisenhower.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30932
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #534 on: January 29, 2025, 07:06:09 PM »
Into the point of this thread, lower our national debt or at least be able to make the interest payments on our debt and have something left over afterwards, by spending less on defense without sacrificing quality

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #535 on: January 29, 2025, 07:08:17 PM »
Into the point of this thread, lower our national debt or at least be able to make the interest payments on our debt and have something left over afterwards, by spending less on defense without sacrificing quality

I'm onboard with that pete

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55903
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #536 on: January 29, 2025, 07:20:03 PM »
I don't think our government has much motivation to lower defense costs. They are federal white collar jobs programs.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #537 on: January 29, 2025, 07:21:35 PM »
I don't think our government has much motivation to lower defense costs. They are federal white collar jobs programs.

Well, I mean, Boeing got too cozy in their spot obviously and see what happened? I agree with Pete that we need serious new players (for me to fly safely at minimum).

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55903
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #538 on: January 29, 2025, 07:38:56 PM »
I don't think our government has much motivation to lower defense costs. They are federal white collar jobs programs.

Well, I mean, Boeing got too cozy in their spot obviously and see what happened? I agree with Pete that we need serious new players (for me to fly safely at minimum).

Yeah I'm skeptical that smaller companies with less funding will avoid future catastrophes unless somehow it makes it easier to throw their executives in jail when their decisions kill a bunch of people. But who knows

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #539 on: January 29, 2025, 07:45:27 PM »
I think it's a cyclical market like anything else:

1) innovation and new great stuff with little oversight
2) that crap murders tons of people
3) oversight of that stuff
4) that stuff is safer and still rules but gets expensive
5) no players left so that stuff gets away with doing what they want
6) either new better stuff disrupts or people get fed up with that crap (we are here now on both points)
7) little oversight and new crap that rules
8) murders again
9) the oversight one again (hopefully we all live to this point)

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30932
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #540 on: January 29, 2025, 07:45:46 PM »
We’re seeing it be done successfully by new players, with cars, drones, airplanes, rockets.

I think everybody agrees that the status quo needs to be changed. They just seems to be much disagreement about how to make the change and on what timeline with the realities of what kind of political will can be summoned.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30932
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #541 on: January 29, 2025, 07:47:25 PM »
Trump’s probably the best shot at disrupting the legacy defense structure since Eisenhower

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #542 on: January 29, 2025, 07:47:56 PM »
there is no new crap being done with cars outside of china. and that's mostly just china doing china on cars. like they did social media. and AI. and everything else. real talk vivek was just spitting facts about that stuff.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30932
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #543 on: January 29, 2025, 07:48:05 PM »
And there’s plenty of conspiracy theories out there that suggests that it’s not simply a matter of it being a very expensive area, but that the leaders of that area are alleged to have been behind all manner of mischief with the CIA

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30932
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #544 on: January 29, 2025, 07:50:48 PM »
there is no new crap being done with cars outside of china. and that's mostly just china doing china on cars. like they did social media. and AI. and everything else. real talk vivek was just spitting facts about that stuff.
Oh, I completely agree on the quality, I just mean that there are some that have started like Rivian, etc. but nobody can compete with the legacy car companies on any scale yet apart from Tesla

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #545 on: January 29, 2025, 07:53:00 PM »
there is no new crap being done with cars outside of china. and that's mostly just china doing china on cars. like they did social media. and AI. and everything else. real talk vivek was just spitting facts about that stuff.
Oh, I completely agree on the quality, I just mean that there are some that have started like Rivian, etc. but nobody can compete with the legacy car companies on any scale yet apart from Tesla

I know a lot unfortunately about Rivian and they aren't doing crap other than marketing and sucking govt. teet. Same with tesla. it's just packaging and marketing for both. neither innovate anything.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #546 on: January 29, 2025, 07:56:57 PM »
Today. not saying tesla or rivian weren't doing something notable at some point in the past. but they certainly aren't today. actually I've had a relationship with rivian for about as long as they've been around and it's mostly teet and marketing for 90% of their existence.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30932
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #547 on: January 29, 2025, 07:57:41 PM »
Man, I had high hopes for them

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #548 on: January 29, 2025, 08:00:15 PM »
Man, I had high hopes for them

ask kat kid about my excitement in the SUPER SECRET INVESTING PRIVATE TEXT GROUP when I first started talking to them. we were so young/naive. your late 30s are a golden age of discovery.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #549 on: January 29, 2025, 08:11:20 PM »
there is no new crap being done with cars outside of china. and that's mostly just china doing china on cars. like they did social media. and AI. and everything else. real talk vivek was just spitting facts about that stuff.

also hold onto your ass when china passes everyone in chip innovation. what do you think? 6 months from now? we will have nothing left other than natural resources. we will be best served to just relent now and become a giant stupider western europe consumer imo with a side of crude oil reserves.