Author Topic: Mainstream Economics Thread  (Read 92824 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #275 on: November 08, 2024, 08:59:54 PM »
We’ve had this discussion before Steve Dave. Just throw more in the deferred stack, piled up like cord word at our treasury.

They’ve also run down Fed holdings by $1 trillion in 4 years.

Your “it doesn’t matter” shtick is tired and no amount of #blueanongE mansplaining is going to change reality.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #276 on: November 08, 2024, 09:02:45 PM »
. . . on top of adding $8 trillion to the national debt in 4 years


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #277 on: November 08, 2024, 09:09:32 PM »
Well, I’m excited to see what happens with that over the next four years then brother, lmao


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #278 on: November 08, 2024, 09:18:57 PM »
Me too, just bought more XOM

Also sad to see that apparently Jerome holds monarch status.

Leader for life 🫤


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #279 on: November 08, 2024, 09:28:34 PM »



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37957
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #280 on: November 09, 2024, 12:44:02 AM »
If you owe the bank $300, that's your problem. If you owe the bank $30 trillion, that's their problem.

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1140
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #281 on: November 09, 2024, 05:21:29 PM »
https://twitter.com/realejantoni/status/1854924652088344685?s=46&t=-jwPwnR3rKHM9sk9hA7h8g


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That absolutely is the worst thing about Fed having a deferred asset in terms of remittances to the Treasury.

Offline Justwin

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1140
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #282 on: November 09, 2024, 05:26:08 PM »
Can you please specifically explain why you think the Fed having a deferred asset for remittances to the Treasury is a problem?

Do you think this is a problem for the Fed and the economy or a problem for the federal government in terms of budgeting?

Offline I_have_purplewood

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3019
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #283 on: November 09, 2024, 10:04:12 PM »
Can you please specifically explain why you think the Fed having a deferred asset for remittances to the Treasury is a problem?

Do you think this is a problem for the Fed and the economy or a problem for the federal government in terms of budgeting?

There are too many tariff guru's on this site to tackle this one.  I never knew so many people knew the consequences of tariffs.
Fifteen minutes later, when the Kansas locker room opened its doors to the media, the Jayhawks were still crying. Literally, bawling. All of them. I've never seen anything like it, and I've seen devastated college locker rooms -- after losses in the Final Four, the national championship game -- ever

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7823
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #284 on: November 09, 2024, 10:32:07 PM »
Can you please specifically explain why you think the Fed having a deferred asset for remittances to the Treasury is a problem?

Do you think this is a problem for the Fed and the economy or a problem for the federal government in terms of budgeting?

There are too many tariff guru's on this site to tackle this one.  I never knew so many people knew the consequences of tariffs.

Trumps first round of tariiffs on China resulted in COVID, and we all know what that did to the economy.  :th_twocents:

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #285 on: November 10, 2024, 08:24:01 AM »
This is getting to be like Groundhog Day. I am having flashbacks to the discussion about Bill Clinton "balancing the budget" and the cognitive dissonance of some who couldn't understand that intra governmental borrowing . . . was still borrowing.  So (for example) throwing a bunch of IOU's into the Social Security "lock box" was still borrowing money to cover the costs of running the government.

In the near term (which is now being calculated in half decades) the US Treasury cannot count on cash coming from The Fed . . . so who has to cover for that?  You can attempt to normalize "deferred asset" all you want, but that concept still smells of the extra special sauce accounting that our government grants itself.





« Last Edit: November 10, 2024, 08:29:57 AM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22829
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #286 on: November 10, 2024, 10:27:57 AM »
Stop trynna normalize your fancy words
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #287 on: November 10, 2024, 10:52:45 AM »

Offline OB_Won

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 724
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #288 on: November 10, 2024, 11:01:47 AM »
This is getting to be like Groundhog Day. I am having flashbacks to the discussion about Bill Clinton "balancing the budget" and the cognitive dissonance of some who couldn't understand that intra governmental borrowing . . . was still borrowing.  So (for example) throwing a bunch of IOU's into the Social Security "lock box" was still borrowing money to cover the costs of running the government.

In the near term (which is now being calculated in half decades) the US Treasury cannot count on cash coming from The Fed . . . so who has to cover for that?  You can attempt to normalize "deferred asset" all you want, but that concept still smells of the extra special sauce accounting that our government grants itself.
Would it make sense to have everybody, as well as corporations actually pay taxes? Or should we just cut social security, medicare, WIC, etc? Seems to smell of extra special sauce to promise a drastic cutting of the deficit at the same time as lowering taxes, removing financial regulations, and slashing the IRS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #289 on: November 10, 2024, 11:05:36 AM »
I love this stuff because it only affirms the satanist/central planning mindset of #blueanon

See also post 2012 election Vox article posted elsewhere for further color on the smug component. 

#blueanon: An echo chamber for the ages


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22829
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #290 on: November 10, 2024, 11:19:05 AM »
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37957
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #291 on: November 10, 2024, 12:19:05 PM »
https://x.com/josephpolitano/status/1855650232496714131?s=46


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is this a common belief? And also, why?

Most people's problems are through no fault of their own.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #292 on: November 10, 2024, 05:13:54 PM »
It’s fascinating to watch the meltdowns when people call for an audit of The Fed

Not ending, not radically changing, not firing the chairman. . . an audit


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #293 on: November 10, 2024, 05:55:42 PM »
It’s fascinating to watch the meltdowns when people call for an audit of The Fed

Not ending, not radically changing, not firing the chairman. . . an audit


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Nobody even knows what you’re shaking your fist at Dax


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #294 on: November 10, 2024, 06:53:47 PM »
I am sorry that insular far suburban Omaha has you so out of touch, Steve #frown

https://www.wsj.com/articles/senate-defeats-audit-the-fed-bill-1452630386


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #295 on: November 10, 2024, 06:57:38 PM »
Dax, if you think suburban Omaha has me out of touch with fed related stuff I have some shocking news for you about what a limited amount of things I know about (youth sports, macro, fed policy). Wheelhouse!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #296 on: November 10, 2024, 07:00:35 PM »
Always touting those credentials, Steve


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 88337
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #297 on: November 10, 2024, 07:03:14 PM »
Always touting those credentials, Steve


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Credentials, lmao. What credentials are those brother? Listening to podcasts and reading FT should be on my LinkedIn page irl.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile
Re: Mainstream Economics Thread
« Reply #298 on: November 11, 2024, 11:32:54 AM »
It's pretty simple . . . the FedOPhiles couldn't even tolerate an audit.


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59232
    • View Profile