Author Topic: CK  (Read 211034 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 5601js

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #300 on: February 08, 2011, 08:32:56 PM »
I didn't see this in the thread if it's here delete accordingly

http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/12/20/fanhouse-report-bcs-football-program-drug-policies-revealed/

Quote
Kansas State: (1) none; (2) 10 percent of games; (3) dismissal.

The numbers in parentheses are the numbers of times an athlete tests positive for druge use, followed by the punishment.

That pretty much explains his unexplained suspension early in the year.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: CK
« Reply #301 on: February 08, 2011, 08:36:00 PM »
we love you curt.  if nelson can do it, so can you.  be strong!


Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: CK
« Reply #302 on: February 08, 2011, 08:36:36 PM »
A few things...

1) Why do I always miss the good stuff as it's going down?

2) When BSAC talks, everyone listens.  Quite possibly the most plugged in and influential EMAW out there, IMO.

3) I'm LOL'ing at the wrongness of those who would trespass against us.

4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me.

Offline Immaculate1

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 330
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #303 on: February 08, 2011, 08:40:46 PM »
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51769
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #304 on: February 08, 2011, 08:41:36 PM »
Dear John Currie:

You worked at an athletic department that had like 17 guys arrested every week and most of them kept right on playing.  You helped hire a coach that is a walking NCAA rules violation (BTW if this thing blows up on Frank you should make a run at Pearl).   The football coach at the same school had an offseason, off the field issue scoring system and championship in his name that ran at a well known college football blog.

So please don't fist eff us with any of this "discipline" bullcac as it pertains to Curtis Kelly or frankly any othe K-State athlete.  If no one is more than one isdead, they play . . . words to live by.

Sincerely,

Dax

Mods, can we get this etched into the marble on the table in the conference room?

I changed it.  If we are going to drop Tom Osborne's name, we'd better do it his way.

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #305 on: February 08, 2011, 08:48:21 PM »
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Not unless he wants an airplane banner....

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19319
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #306 on: February 08, 2011, 08:48:59 PM »
how soon will we know?
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #307 on: February 08, 2011, 08:50:31 PM »


That pretty much explains his unexplained suspension early in the year.

No offense bro, (and Welcome to the Board!  :thumbsup:), but we nailed that mother rough rider at the time as well.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: CK
« Reply #308 on: February 08, 2011, 08:51:18 PM »
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Not unless he wants an airplane banner....

You can't win without guys like this at bigger programs with more money, so why would we do it here?

If it is  :bigtoke:, and that's what he's kicked off for doing, it's a complete joke.  Snyder's best teams were chock full of potheads.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51769
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #309 on: February 08, 2011, 08:53:53 PM »
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Not unless he wants an airplane banner....

rumblings it will be an airplane billboard.   :horrorsurprise:

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #310 on: February 08, 2011, 08:55:36 PM »
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Not unless he wants an airplane banner....

rumblings it will be an airplane billboard.   :horrorsurprise:

between this and the Super Bowl ad, the only thing left will be when this rough ridin' company goes public.

:users:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40572
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #311 on: February 08, 2011, 08:57:32 PM »
i can't believe we got so worked up for nothing!  it all comes back to currie!  lol!


what a relief, there's no way he doesn't grant that appeal.  he's got martin's back (the kstate fan's back too).  thank god for currie (and the power of prayer, good work pete).
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42033
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #312 on: February 08, 2011, 09:01:50 PM »
i can't believe we got so worked up for nothing!  it all comes back to currie!  lol!


what a relief, there's no way he doesn't grant that appeal.  he's got martin's back (the kstate fan's back too).  thank god for currie (and the power of prayer, good work pete).

I've adjusted my sig accordingly.

Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #313 on: February 08, 2011, 09:02:06 PM »
i can't believe we got so worked up for nothing!  it all comes back to currie!  lol!


what a relief, there's no way he doesn't grant that appeal.  he's got martin's back (the kstate fan's back too).  thank god for currie (and the power of prayer, good work pete).

i sure hope so  :chainsaw:

Offline kstater

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2245
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #314 on: February 08, 2011, 09:03:41 PM »
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #315 on: February 08, 2011, 09:04:29 PM »
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

Fitz posted on his website that he heard a rumor.  :dunno:

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42033
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #316 on: February 08, 2011, 09:04:49 PM »
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

I'm not sure Currie makes it right without the uproar.

Offline The Whale

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 975
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #317 on: February 08, 2011, 09:06:33 PM »
Thoughts and prayers.  Go cats.  fear the beard.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29434
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #318 on: February 08, 2011, 09:06:50 PM »
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

Fitz posted on his website that he heard a rumor.  :dunno:

j/k, I kid, I kid.  No srsly though, opcat is a drug dealer.  PM'd EVERYONE.

Offline 06wildcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1663
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #319 on: February 08, 2011, 09:07:43 PM »
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

I'm not sure Currie makes it right without the uproar.

He still might not make it right, if you subscribe to Dax's pov.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40572
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #320 on: February 08, 2011, 09:09:33 PM »
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline D-FRED-BROWN

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 488
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #321 on: February 08, 2011, 09:11:17 PM »
 :horrorsurprise:

Offline kstater

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2245
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #322 on: February 08, 2011, 09:11:38 PM »
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.

No, I'm suggesting Currie is so rough ridin' incompetent that this made the news.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51769
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #323 on: February 08, 2011, 09:13:40 PM »
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.

No, I'm suggesting Currie is so effing incompetent that this made the news.

Maybe goEMAW is the motherfucking Scoopdaddy of websites?

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42033
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #324 on: February 08, 2011, 09:14:50 PM »
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.

No, I'm suggesting Currie is so effing incompetent that this made the news.

Maybe goEMAW is the motherfucking Scoopdaddy of websites?

:surprised: