goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Jerome Tang Coaches Kansas State Basketball => Topic started by: BigShotAttorneyCat on February 08, 2011, 02:36:09 PM

Title: CK
Post by: BigShotAttorneyCat on February 08, 2011, 02:36:09 PM
we may have a problem here folks....
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 02:37:20 PM
goddamit, i knew it.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 08, 2011, 02:37:30 PM
 :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 02:39:02 PM
 :users:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 08, 2011, 02:39:26 PM
i blame the coaches.  or if they aren't to blame, then currie is.  trim was right all along.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 08, 2011, 02:39:39 PM
bsac,

 :frown:

-daris
Title: Re: CK
Post by: RonLongshaft on February 08, 2011, 02:39:48 PM
 :facepalm:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bakerman on February 08, 2011, 02:43:09 PM
 :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kcchiefdav on February 08, 2011, 02:44:02 PM
wtfigo?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 08, 2011, 02:44:28 PM
 :nono:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 02:46:03 PM
JFC the scoop on this website.  The ScooperBowl.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: fr@ck me on February 08, 2011, 02:46:59 PM
maybe we can take what is left and play in the 6' and under league at the rec   :ck:  I think they could place top 3 there..  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: scottwildcat on February 08, 2011, 02:47:30 PM
what is going on?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2011, 02:47:43 PM
 :frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 08, 2011, 02:48:14 PM
that cumstain number5 will be happy about this.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AppleJack on February 08, 2011, 02:49:22 PM
 :blindfold:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: scottwildcat on February 08, 2011, 02:49:56 PM
c'mon give me some info
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAW SP8 on February 08, 2011, 02:50:11 PM
que? :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 08, 2011, 02:50:45 PM
texas a&m is laughing it's ass off about this.  as well they should.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2011, 02:51:09 PM
Was it JC Penny this time?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 02:51:23 PM
Bite related suspension?   :ohno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 02:51:50 PM
texas a&m is laughing it's ass off about this.  as well they should.

 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 08, 2011, 02:51:56 PM
JFC the scoop on this website.  The ScooperBowl.


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.desigrocers.ca%2Fcatalog%2Fimages%2F557822856_4f7bb9c5db.jpg&hash=5778c5cd0baee1788ab86f73b685857328f97061)



except replace the raisins w/ ck and tate forcier and one of the scoops is maybe/probably going into the cereal bowl and the other is maybe not going into the cereal bowl and is actually being taken out of the kitchen completely and poured out onto the front yard or something. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 02:52:06 PM
PM with details, pls.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 02:53:42 PM
PM with details, pls.

ya :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 08, 2011, 02:53:47 PM
PM with details, pls.

eff that, just post em
Title: Re: CK
Post by: scottwildcat on February 08, 2011, 02:54:11 PM
post that crap
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAW SP8 on February 08, 2011, 02:54:16 PM
PM with details, pls.

Would also like :pray:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: RonLongshaft on February 08, 2011, 02:54:57 PM
 :nono: :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: scottwildcat on February 08, 2011, 02:55:16 PM
 :ohno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: KSU-Krazie on February 08, 2011, 02:56:06 PM
Lots of interesting BBSing going on here if JHR gets the nod to start.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: _33 on February 08, 2011, 02:57:50 PM
 :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 03:01:38 PM
my bbs-o-meter is violently shaking
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:02:13 PM
Damn this sucks!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Lynchmobrules on February 08, 2011, 03:04:32 PM
Wishes I was cool enough to know what was going on.  Unfortunately, I'm not.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 08, 2011, 03:04:47 PM
PM with details, pls.

Would also like :pray:

Same  :comehere:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 03:05:13 PM
Wishes I was cool enough to know what was going on.  Unfortunately, I'm not.

This is some absolutely crazy crap. You should really find a good info pipeline
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAW SP8 on February 08, 2011, 03:05:33 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12099
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Bad news coming ... Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We believe we know what it is, but sources aren't wanting to reveal what it is at this point for reasons that will later become apparent. Rob is working hard to confirm the information.

 hahahahahahahahaha :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 03:06:27 PM
Chris Hansen finally paid him a visit?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2011, 03:06:44 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12099
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Bad news coming ... Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We believe we know what it is, but sources aren't wanting to reveal what it is at this point for reasons that will later become apparent. Rob is working hard to confirm the information.

 hahahahahahahahaha :emawkid:

Fitz is waiting for his pm, too.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Lynchmobrules on February 08, 2011, 03:07:38 PM
Wishes I was cool enough to know what was going on.  Unfortunately, I'm not.

This is some absolutely crazy crap. You should really find a good info pipeline

I know, but like I said, I'm not cool enough to receive information like this. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 03:08:03 PM
Fitz is waiting to read it on goEMAW.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWgeddon on February 08, 2011, 03:08:25 PM
Don't worry after we find out Fitz will let us know he knew all along but couldn't say anything
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:08:44 PM
Equally important issue:

When did PW get so hateful?  

Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 03:08:51 PM
Jeeze, finger on the pulse, amiright?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 03:10:20 PM
Equally important issue:

When did PW get so hateful?  



When Wally left.  Just another PW idol gone forever. 

Patterson
Brown
Sutton
Wally
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2011, 03:10:43 PM
I just hope that Curtis didn't go all Tyler Hughes on somebody. :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAW SP8 on February 08, 2011, 03:10:59 PM
112 guests viewing this thread and counting :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 08, 2011, 03:13:14 PM
Fitz is waiting to read it on goEMAW.  

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=3732.0

It's all in here.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: fr@ck me on February 08, 2011, 03:13:41 PM
Pullen is gone.  He realizes we are going to go to the NIT and he vowed not to play in it.  He is going to concentrate on getting ready for the NBA lockout year...  :bwpopcorn:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: stunted on February 08, 2011, 03:14:35 PM
Fitz is waiting to read it on goEMAW.  

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=3732.0

It's all in here.

stunted, yoga-like_abana, Saulbadguy, fr@ck me, bigwillie20, EMAW SP8, theswo, EMAWmeister, Lynchmobrules, scottwildcat and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

owned
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 03:15:38 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmrbubbaganoush.edublogs.org%2Ffiles%2F2010%2F10%2Ftrollin-hatin-21p1tqq.jpg&hash=8ccda05bcb9f97260a6d66ac2557420b5fda2493)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 08, 2011, 03:16:38 PM
Fitz is waiting to read it on goEMAW.  

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=3732.0

It's all in here.

stunted, yoga-like_abana, Saulbadguy, fr@ck me, bigwillie20, EMAW SP8, theswo, EMAWmeister, Lynchmobrules, scottwildcat and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

owned

I needed to catch up on that thread  :popcorn:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:17:05 PM
Fitz is waiting to read it on goEMAW.  

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=3732.0

It's all in here.

stunted, yoga-like_abana, Saulbadguy, fr@ck me, bigwillie20, EMAW SP8, theswo, EMAWmeister, Lynchmobrules, scottwildcat and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

owned

I needed to catch up on that thread  :popcorn:

Clear your afternoon, bro.  Gonna take a while.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 08, 2011, 03:18:53 PM
Fitz would fit in well here...

A horrible place...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: fr@ck me on February 08, 2011, 03:19:02 PM
Fitz is waiting to read it on goEMAW.  

http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=3732.0

It's all in here.

stunted, yoga-like_abana, Saulbadguy, fr@ck me, bigwillie20, EMAW SP8, theswo, EMAWmeister, Lynchmobrules, scottwildcat and 10 Guests are viewing this topic.

owned

and I didn't see any pics of this Nat chick.  Someone please post tia
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:19:48 PM
Fitz would fit in well here...

A horrible place...

 :surprised:

 :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWgeddon on February 08, 2011, 03:19:59 PM
Quote
KSYOU

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #18993
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Bad news coming ...   Reply
goatemaw

"The moment we want to believe something, we suddenly see all the arguments for it, and become blind to the arguments against it."-George Bernard Shaw

Posted on 2/8 3:13 PM | IP: Logged


Ahhhh what is GOATEMAW :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:21:30 PM
Greatest Of All Time EMAW

 :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 03:21:56 PM
Quote
KSYOU

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #18993
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Bad news coming ...   Reply
goatemaw

"The moment we want to believe something, we suddenly see all the arguments for it, and become blind to the arguments against it."-George Bernard Shaw

Posted on 2/8 3:13 PM | IP: Logged


Ahhhh what is GOATEMAW :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:

Is that what he calls us, like when Dax deems places tardville, etc.?  :love:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 03:22:13 PM
Quote
KSYOU

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #18993
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Bad news coming ...   Reply
goatemaw

"The moment we want to believe something, we suddenly see all the arguments for it, and become blind to the arguments against it."-George Bernard Shaw

Posted on 2/8 3:13 PM | IP: Logged


Ahhhh what is GOATEMAW :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:

Go Ate Maw? Something a hillbilly would say at dinner time to his mom?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: stunted on February 08, 2011, 03:23:42 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc4%2Fhs248.snc4%2F39721_421647073671_647593671_4558578_3636940_n.jpg&hash=1e944e31b5c5e1cca823fa218b194e154df78619)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 08, 2011, 03:24:18 PM
PM with details, pls.

Would also like :pray:

Same  :comehere:

Fill me in?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2011, 03:24:44 PM
Victor Oj is going to get 20+ minutes a game  :frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2011, 03:25:07 PM
The Potuzak hate that is going to rain down from shirt tuck land in the coming days is going to be epic. I just hope that Alex is ready for everyone to turn on him when they realize that his shitty play is going to be showcased every time we get into foul trouble from here on out.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 08, 2011, 03:26:50 PM
Dalonte to Frank, moments before, "They're going to put us in jail for murder."
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:27:40 PM
The Potuzak hate that is going to rain down from shirt tuck land in the coming days is going to be epic. I just hope that Alex is ready for everyone to turn on him when they realize that his shitty play is going to be showcased every time we get into foul trouble from here on out.

Please.  If this kid gets one bucket, board, or catches one pass per game, 'tuck will immortalize him and discuss in the off season how amazing he will be next year.

If he can commit a foul without  :ck:, they will pass out with infatuation.

This is a great thing for Alex.  GREAT!

Title: Re: CK
Post by: AppleJack on February 08, 2011, 03:27:44 PM
This would pretty much finish us, no?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 03:27:53 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc4%2Fhs248.snc4%2F39721_421647073671_647593671_4558578_3636940_n.jpg&hash=1e944e31b5c5e1cca823fa218b194e154df78619)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.homostelu.info%2Fpics%2Fnigga_kid_job_application_scared.gif&hash=28fa5388d00ac26d0f0d2618721e0ebc87b230ba)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:28:23 PM
This would pretty much finish us, no?

5 GUARD OFFENSE!!!!! :runaway:<--only shooting a bunch too.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wetwillie on February 08, 2011, 03:28:32 PM
This would pretty much finish us, no?

Death Blow
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 03:29:34 PM
 :bigtoke:,   :bigtoke:,  :bigtoke:,  :adios:

I will miss him.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: theswo on February 08, 2011, 03:29:38 PM
Quote
Nothing is posted over there except references to FITZ's post on this thread, and one very untasteful post that borders on an ass beating.
First time over at that site, and damn it looks like a crap hole. It is also filled with posters who claim that FITZ and everyone here scoops their stuff....WTF?
This post was edited on 2/8 3:27 PM by brandochav
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 03:29:49 PM
didn't see the job application part when originally posted.
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fgallery.homostelu.info%2Fpics%2Fnigga_kid_job_application_scared.gif&hash=28fa5388d00ac26d0f0d2618721e0ebc87b230ba)

pretty  :opcat:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:30:55 PM
Quote
Nothing is posted over there except references to FITZ's post on this thread, and one very untasteful post that borders on an ass beating.
First time over at that site, and damn it looks like a crap hole. It is also filled with posters who claim that FITZ and everyone here scoops their stuff....WTF?
This post was edited on 2/8 3:27 PM by brandochav

The ass beating has to be something OK related, right?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 08, 2011, 03:31:22 PM
Gopowercat.com:

Fitz is evil.

You are being deceived.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: cas4ksu on February 08, 2011, 03:32:16 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2011, 03:32:58 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 08, 2011, 03:33:17 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.thedailygreen.com%2Fcm%2Fthedailygreen%2Fimages%2Femo-gonzo.jpg&hash=ae85e60226583f1b19b0b5df38ea2a4a6196cc78)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 03:33:25 PM
Quote
Nothing is posted over there except references to FITZ's post on this thread, and one very untasteful post that borders on an ass beating.
First time over at that site, and damn it looks like a crap hole. It is also filled with posters who claim that FITZ and everyone here scoops their stuff....WTF?
This post was edited on 2/8 3:27 PM by brandochav

The ass beating has to be something OK related, right?

:dunno:  Somebody needs to find out.

Reading and understanding goEMAW.com takes skill.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:33:37 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

Do not want.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Gary Patterson Jr. on February 08, 2011, 03:34:02 PM
The K-State world is waiting desperatly!   :ohno: Who breaks the story first?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2011, 03:34:06 PM
Quote
Nothing is posted over there except references to FITZ's post on this thread, and one very untasteful post that borders on an ass beating.
First time over at that site, and damn it looks like a crap hole. It is also filled with posters who claim that FITZ and everyone here scoops their stuff....WTF?
This post was edited on 2/8 3:27 PM by brandochav

The ass beating has to be something OK related, right?

Maybe he clicked on the Aggieville Creepster of the Year link and didn't realize that it was Fitz who made all of those tweets.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Skipper44 on February 08, 2011, 03:34:15 PM
:bigtoke:,   :bigtoke:,  :bigtoke:,  :adios:

Where is Mario Taybron when you need him?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 08, 2011, 03:34:21 PM
:bigtoke:,   :bigtoke:,  :bigtoke:,  :adios:
:frown:
endo....... smells more like outdoor
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AppleJack on February 08, 2011, 03:34:29 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

PM  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Lynchmobrules on February 08, 2011, 03:34:50 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

Care to spill the beans?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2011, 03:35:32 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

PM  :dunno:

it's all in this thread
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 03:36:30 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

PM  :dunno:

it's all in this thread

Admins/Mods could really make a killing off of selling goEMAW decoder rings right about now
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:37:13 PM
Super Bowl commercial actor.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 08, 2011, 03:37:34 PM
It all goes back to BLT guise.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWgeddon on February 08, 2011, 03:37:47 PM
Looks like Fitz finally blocked me from his twitter   :frown:

All it took was retweeting this thread.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 03:37:53 PM
Gopowercat.com:

Fitz is evil.

You are being deceived.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 03:38:18 PM
Looks like Fitz finally blocked me from his twitter   :frown:

All it took was retweeting this thread.
That is kind of surprising.  Be creepier.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AppleJack on February 08, 2011, 03:39:13 PM
We might shoot 40 3's a game. Would love.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 03:39:40 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

PM  :dunno:

it's all in this thread

Admins/Mods could really make a killing off of selling goEMAW decoder rings right about now

They already make a killing.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2011, 03:40:09 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

PM  :dunno:

it's all in this thread

Admins/Mods could really make a killing off of selling goEMAW decoder rings right about now

open your eyes, beyond little slits, it's all here
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWgeddon on February 08, 2011, 03:40:29 PM
Looks like Fitz finally blocked me from his twitter   :frown:

All it took was retweeting this thread.
That is kind of surprising.  Be creepier.

Maybe he realized I wasn't 17  :runaway:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Skipper44 on February 08, 2011, 03:40:43 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

Who ever made this call may find a few thousand extra season tickets available once this season completes it trip down the  :flush:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 03:41:04 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

PM  :dunno:

it's all in this thread

Admins/Mods could really make a killing off of selling goEMAW decoder rings right about now

open your eyes, beyond little slits, it's all here

I'm not saying I'd be buying the decoder ring. I already had mine out and ready as soon as I saw the thread.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 03:41:52 PM
Looks like Fitz finally blocked me from his twitter   :frown:

All it took was retweeting this thread.
That is kind of surprising.  Be creepier.

Maybe he realized I wasn't 17  :runaway:
#unfollow
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:42:36 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

Who ever made this call may find a few thousand extra season tickets available once this season completes it trip down the  :flush:

My seats next season are going to be insanely close.  TIA
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 03:43:55 PM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

Who ever made this call may find a few thousand extra season tickets available once this season completes it trip down the  :flush:

Ahearn pledges not due until the end of the month.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 03:47:36 PM
K-State has a "strike" policy when it comes to failed drug tests.   Once you get X number of strikes you're out, and I believe that numbers is 3 at K-State.  This is an institutional rule, other schools allow fewer strikes, other schools you can play on forever, it just depends.

Personally, if this is the case, I am tired of our goody-two-shoes act.   Apparently we really just don't want to win that badly . . . on the flip side, another personnel management failure for Frank Martin.   They are piling up like cord wood at this juncture.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 03:49:00 PM
Positive (pun intended): shorter time to wait before we can put CK's jersey in the rafters?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Skipper44 on February 08, 2011, 03:50:03 PM
K-State has a "strike" policy when it comes to failed drug tests.   One you get X number of strikes you're out, and I believe that numbers is 3 at K-State.  This is an institutional rule, other schools allow fewer strikes, other schools you can play on forever, it just depends.

Personally, if this is the case, I am tired of our goody-two-shoes act.   Apparently we really just don't want to win that badly . . . on the flip side, another personnel management failure for Frank Martin.   They are piling up like cord wood at this juncture.



Dax, who is behind the plate to call these "strikes"  AD or Coaching staff?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 03:50:34 PM
K-State has a "strike" policy when it comes to failed drug tests.   Once you get X number of strikes you're out, and I believe that numbers is 3 at K-State.  This is an institutional rule, other schools allow fewer strikes, other schools you can play on forever, it just depends.

Personally, if this is the case, I am tired of our goody-two-shoes act.   Apparently we really just don't want to win that badly . . . on the flip side, another personnel management failure for Frank Martin.   They are piling up like cord wood at this juncture.



I vote for a change to the "you can play on forever" policy. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: OK_Cat on February 08, 2011, 03:50:52 PM
CK should be glad that he didn't play baseball.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 03:51:43 PM
Side Note:

Welcome PowerTards!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: OK_Cat on February 08, 2011, 03:52:50 PM
Side Note:

Welcome PowerTards!!

 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: KITNfury on February 08, 2011, 03:53:06 PM
Why is there such a high ratio of bitches on this BBS?

Anyway, so the conclusion is becoming obvious that CK got caught smoking. So now the obvious questions:

How solid is this rumor?
Is this the final straw and he's off the team, or is this a suspension type penalty?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wildfratcountry on February 08, 2011, 03:53:16 PM
soooo.... a
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

Who ever made this call may find a few thousand extra season tickets available once this season completes it trip down the  :flush:

Ahearn pledges not due until the end of the month.

on that note... wtf am i supposed to do with my ku ticket? if i wanted to watch a midget basketball team get stomped on by a bunch of felons, I would just go watch a johnson county aau tournament.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 03:54:01 PM
K-State has a "strike" policy when it comes to failed drug tests.   Once you get X number of strikes you're out, and I believe that numbers is 3 at K-State.  This is an institutional rule, other schools allow fewer strikes, other schools you can play on forever, it just depends.

Personally, if this is the case, I am tired of our goody-two-shoes act.   Apparently we really just don't want to win that badly . . . on the flip side, another personnel management failure for Frank Martin.   They are piling up like cord wood at this juncture.



I vote for a change to the "you can play on forever" policy. 


seconded . . .
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 08, 2011, 03:54:08 PM
K-State has a "strike" policy when it comes to failed drug tests.   Once you get X number of strikes you're out, and I believe that numbers is 3 at K-State.  This is an institutional rule, other schools allow fewer strikes, other schools you can play on forever, it just depends.

Personally, if this is the case, I am tired of our goody-two-shoes act.   Apparently we really just don't want to win that badly . . . on the flip side, another personnel management failure for Frank Martin.   They are piling up like cord wood at this juncture.



I vote for a change to the "you can play on forever" policy. 

this.  shouldn't there be a team manager or something in charge of providing clean samples anyway?  we are so small time.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bakerman on February 08, 2011, 03:55:14 PM
soooo.... a
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

Who ever made this call may find a few thousand extra season tickets available once this season completes it trip down the  :flush:

Ahearn pledges not due until the end of the month.

on that note... wtf am i supposed to do with my ku ticket? if i wanted to watch a midget basketball team get stomped on by a bunch of felons, I would just go watch a johnson county aau tournament.

sell it to a 'tuck, they're gonna jizz in their pants over seeing Pota play...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 03:56:08 PM
If it's really  :bigtoke: then this is an even sadder failure of MCMW than taking clothes from Dillards. First, he would be the first player in the history of college sports to be kicked off for  :bong: . Second, if you're going to be kicked off for drugs, at least test positive for something harder/cooler.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2011, 03:56:44 PM
soooo.... a
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

well, this one really wasn't Frank's/Curt's call

Who ever made this call may find a few thousand extra season tickets available once this season completes it trip down the  :flush:

Ahearn pledges not due until the end of the month.

on that note... wtf am i supposed to do with my ku ticket? if i wanted to watch a midget basketball team get stomped on by a bunch of felons, I would just go watch a johnson county aau tournament.

sell it to a 'tuck, they're gonna jizz in their pants over seeing Pota play...

take the ticket, wrap it in kstateo poster, and give it to me.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: justTHEtip on February 08, 2011, 03:58:39 PM
The rest of the team should take notice. Time to grow up and do coke like an adult..... :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bakerman on February 08, 2011, 03:59:59 PM
Huge strike against Frank that Woolridge was able to get J-Will and J-Mass through drug testing when they were high before every game?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Harry Dunne on February 08, 2011, 04:00:24 PM
love this crap.


 :popcorn:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Kaiser Soze on February 08, 2011, 04:00:28 PM
Anyone hear the Nick Wright interview on 610 sports a few minutes ago?  Did Frank mention anything about CK?  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 08, 2011, 04:01:21 PM
Huge strike against Frank that Woolridge was able to get J-Will and J-Mass through drug testing when they were high before every game?

different AD.  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 04:01:28 PM
Huge strike against Frank that Woolridge was able to get J-Will and J-Mass through drug testing when they were high before during every game?
fix'd


The rest of the team should take notice. Time to grow up and do coke like an adult..... :emawkid:
Coke is out of your system within 72 hours FWIW.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 08, 2011, 04:01:35 PM
Dax you are somebodys C- source. Congrats!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 04:02:40 PM
I think I'm just going to refuse to believe all of this for as long as possible.  

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 08, 2011, 04:03:00 PM
Huge strike against Frank that Woolridge was able to get J-Will and J-Mass through drug testing when they were high before every game?

and Gilson dejesus, and pasco, and lance harris, and pretty much everyone he coached besides Clent Stewart
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 04:03:07 PM
Dax you are somebodys C- source. Congrats!

Anyone ever seen Dax and BSAC in the same place at the same time?  :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pett on February 08, 2011, 04:05:17 PM
Just as soon as I thought we were turning it around. JESUS CAC!!!!! :curse:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 08, 2011, 04:06:56 PM
like dax said, there may be a number of guilty parties here.  going back to all of the straws, not just the one that finally broke our season's back.

the big 12 seems to have some new league wide, external testing policy.  that may be a factor.  it's also possible that the staff tried to get hardass this summer/fall and tested when they didn't have to.


still, preliminary indications are, this falls on currie.  and maybe even was something he doesn't mind seeing.  if true (hell, even if not true), send his dumbass ass back to bumfuckville deepsouthland asap.



but nothing is official.  yet.  if anyone is still praying for anything else, cancel those and put all your efforts into getting kelly cleared.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 08, 2011, 04:09:51 PM
like dax said, there may be a number of guilty parties here.  going back to all of the straws, not just the one that finally broke our season's back.

the big 12 seems to have some new league wide, external testing policy.  that may be a factor.  it's also possible that the staff tried to get hardass this summer/fall and tested when they didn't have to.


still, preliminary indications are, this falls on currie.  and maybe even was something he doesn't mind seeing.  if true (hell, even if not true), send his dumbass ass back to bumeffville deepsouthland asap.



but nothing is official.  yet.  if anyone is still praying for anything else, cancel those and put all your efforts into getting kelly cleared.  



wait. is sys bsac or is dax bsac? what is going on here.  :runaway:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ew2x4 on February 08, 2011, 04:10:25 PM
Fire Snyder.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 08, 2011, 04:10:39 PM
 :users:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: The1BigWillie on February 08, 2011, 04:10:57 PM
Fire... up the bong.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 04:11:06 PM
If it is drug testing related . . . all the hallmarks of an AD trying to win points towards future employment opps.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: fr@ck me on February 08, 2011, 04:12:19 PM
I understand all the remarks about this site now...what a joke.
Has Fitz made it official yet???  :powerespect:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 08, 2011, 04:12:50 PM
wait. is sys bsac or is dax bsac? what is going on here.  :runaway:

you know i'm not bsac.  dax, insane though he may be, knows stuff.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Skipper44 on February 08, 2011, 04:13:22 PM
If it is drug testing related . . . all the hallmarks of an AD trying to win points towards future employment opps.



With who?  Don't think "I cleaned up the weed problem at my last school" is what the SEC is looking for.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 04:13:58 PM
If it is drug testing related . . . all the hallmarks of an AD trying to win points towards future employment opps.


Bullshit. Any University with any ambition would hire a guy that covered up a million failed drug tests
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 04:15:01 PM
167 guests
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 04:16:33 PM
So, Nino's Shirt is officially burnt, right?  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 04:17:54 PM
If it is drug testing related . . . all the hallmarks of an AD trying to win points towards future employment opps.



With who?  Don't think "I cleaned up the weed problem at my last school" is what the SEC is looking for.

I understand what you're saying, but one school of thought in avoiding "the man" on the rules front, is the "mans" perception of your athletic department.   If "the man" thinks you've got a straight up guy running the show, they may sniff around less, even though they may be no where close to reality.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 08, 2011, 04:19:14 PM
Times like these make me glad I signed up for the premium content.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 04:20:17 PM
like dax said, there may be a number of guilty parties here.  going back to all of the straws, not just the one that finally broke our season's back.

the big 12 seems to have some new league wide, external testing policy.  that may be a factor.  it's also possible that the staff tried to get hardass this summer/fall and tested when they didn't have to.


still, preliminary indications are, this falls on currie.  and maybe even was something he doesn't mind seeing.  if true (hell, even if not true), send his dumbass ass back to bumeffville deepsouthland asap.



but nothing is official.  yet.  if anyone is still praying for anything else, cancel those and put all your efforts into getting kelly cleared.  

Prayers sent.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: TheFormerKCCat on February 08, 2011, 04:20:56 PM
Times like these make me glad I signed up for the premium content.

Amen to that, brah! :woot:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 08, 2011, 04:21:35 PM
wait. is sys bsac or is dax bsac? what is going on here.  :runaway:

you know i'm not bsac.  dax, insane though he may be, knows stuff.

hmmmmm. good point. thanks to dax for breaking exactly what it might be and screw bsac for not breaking what it might be. unless dax is actually is bsac, then i'm still confused. either way, congrats to dax for breaking and possibly bsac. i think.
Title: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: kst8ter4life on February 08, 2011, 04:22:47 PM
Is CK Gone? If so why?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 04:23:13 PM
Wooh  . . . I am just putting one scenario, a plausible one.

But it is CK, god knows what kind of crazy crap it might be.

Title: Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2011, 04:25:02 PM
Go back to GPC. :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 08, 2011, 04:25:04 PM
 :users: :users: :users: :users: :users:
Title: Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: kst8ter4life on February 08, 2011, 04:25:42 PM
WTF does that mean?
Title: Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 08, 2011, 04:26:21 PM
it means read the thread called CK
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 08, 2011, 04:27:34 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmtT4eBlfXE

he's going to be really sad now. still love ya curt
Title: Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: fr@ck me on February 08, 2011, 04:27:43 PM
Is CK Gone? If so why?

I have it confirmed from someone who doesn't read message boards that CK is gone do to a drug test.  It is being spread around Wamego that way anyway...

Like your pick  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 04:27:47 PM
Whoa, let's not turn this into a message board war...we ALL fear the beard.

Heck, I subscribe to GPC, because I LOVE the rivals recruiting info.  $10 is no big deal.  Plus, I like Cassidy's stuff.

Also, the Rivals stars rating is how I judge our recruiting classes....I don't pay $10 per month for information that I can't trust and rely upon.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: brandochav on February 08, 2011, 04:29:05 PM
So wtf is the bad news then?

JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
Just confirmed that Curtis Kelly is still a member of the #Kstate basketball team (despite some odd tweets out there).
Title: Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: kst8ter4life on February 08, 2011, 04:29:41 PM
I did read the thread CK, but while trying to surf threw all the BULLSHIT i just thought it would be easier to post a new questions...

Fr@ck me you think this is legit?

Title: Re: CK
Post by: bakerman on February 08, 2011, 04:29:46 PM
Whoa, let's not turn this into a message board war...we ALL fear the beard.

Heck, I subscribe to GPC, because I LOVE the rivals recruiting info.  $10 is no big deal.  Plus, I like Cassidy's stuff.

Also, the Rivals stars rating is how I judge our recruiting classes....I don't pay $10 per month for information that I can't trust and rely upon.

Pete,

You're right.

Fear the Beard,
TTAF
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 08, 2011, 04:30:18 PM
So wtf is the bad news then?

JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
Just confirmed that Curtis Kelly is still a member of the #Kstate basketball team (despite some odd tweets out there).

  :surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 04:30:44 PM
So wtf is the bad news then?

JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
Just confirmed that Curtis Kelly is still a member of the #Kstate basketball team (despite some odd tweets out there).
True story - I kicked JB square in the back (right between the shoulder blades) when we played soccer together.  Did it on purpose, too.  Good fella though, I like him.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 04:30:49 PM
So wtf is the bad news then?

JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
Just confirmed that Curtis Kelly is still a member of the #Kstate basketball team (despite some odd tweets out there).

You are right to APPEAL to the KSU community for this clarification.   :cheese:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2011, 04:30:57 PM
So wtf is the bad news then?

JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
Just confirmed that Curtis Kelly is still a member of the #Kstate basketball team (despite some odd tweets out there).

  :surprised:

I hope this is true. Go Jordy and fear the beard.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 08, 2011, 04:31:30 PM
So wtf is the bad news then?

JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
Just confirmed that Curtis Kelly is still a member of the #Kstate basketball team (despite some odd tweets out there).

who said anything about being kicked off?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: PoetWarrior on February 08, 2011, 04:31:46 PM
Curtis Kelly is still a member of the Kstate basketball team

YES!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 04:32:27 PM
Whoa, let's not turn this into a message board war...we ALL fear the beard.

Heck, I subscribe to GPC, because I LOVE the rivals recruiting info.  $10 is no big deal.  Plus, I like Cassidy's stuff.

Also, the Rivals stars rating is how I judge our recruiting classes....I don't pay $10 per month for information that I can't trust and rely upon.

Agreed.  Fear the BEard.  Go Jordy, he beat Talib!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CHONGS on February 08, 2011, 04:33:10 PM
:flush:
I am moving all of the idiotic gpc/okc baiting to its own thread.
Title: Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2011, 04:34:08 PM
WTF does that mean?

It means that nobody wants the board to look like this:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi709.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fww92%2FTommyRoanoke%2FJordy.jpg&hash=ae339ae0120103cad639d8e55bb1bb384714e5dd)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 08, 2011, 04:34:18 PM
:flush:
I am moving all of the idiotic gpc/okc baiting to its own thread.

COACH 'EM UP, CHINGON!
Title: Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 04:35:25 PM
I did read the thread CK, but while trying to surf threw all the BULLcac i just thought it would be easier to post a new questions...

Fr@ck me you think this is legit?



If my coach were going to force me back to receiver and not let me compete with some black kid from Blinn for QB, I'd leave too!  Run Jordy!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: brandochav on February 08, 2011, 04:35:44 PM
So wtf is the bad news then?

JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
Just confirmed that Curtis Kelly is still a member of the #Kstate basketball team (despite some odd tweets out there).

who said anything about being kicked off?
As it stated "despite some odd tweets out there"...it has been stated, or more likely speculated, that Kelly was off the team.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stupid Fitz on February 08, 2011, 04:36:12 PM
:flush:
I am moving all of the idiotic gpc/okc baiting to its own thread.

Fear the beard!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 04:38:36 PM
As it stated "despite some odd tweets out there"...it has been stated, or more likely speculated, that Kelly was off the team.

Fitz confirmed that he "[had heard the same rumor]."  I APPEAL to you to take in the info from all available sources.  go cats.  pack it with purple.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: TheFormerKCCat on February 08, 2011, 04:38:58 PM
:flush:
I am moving all of the idiotic gpc/okc baiting to its own thread.

Chingon, I've been meaning to suggest this for a long time, but you should consider using an accent over your "o," it would be quite exotic  :gocho:

Like this, "Chingón" - suddenly you're an international man of intrigue.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 08, 2011, 04:39:34 PM
So wtf is the bad news then?

JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
Just confirmed that Curtis Kelly is still a member of the #Kstate basketball team (despite some odd tweets out there).

who said anything about being kicked off?
As it stated "despite some odd tweets out there"...it has been stated, or more likely speculated, that Kelly was off the team.

no one mentioned anything about being kicked off. dumbass.

go cats. purple power.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 04:40:01 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc6%2F178998_10150145791551081_733561080_8283530_359274_n.jpg&hash=a1e151fb5a35883a48de76a0bec929b4da9ce16d)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 08, 2011, 04:40:25 PM
Curtis Kelly is still a member of the Kstate basketball team

YES!!!

Lol
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 04:42:05 PM
BTW, I find JB Baursfeld intimidatingly good looking. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 04:43:59 PM
BTW, I find JB Baursfeld intimidatingly good looking.  

I didn't until your last photoshop :love:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 08, 2011, 04:44:16 PM
So wtf is the bad news then?

JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
Just confirmed that Curtis Kelly is still a member of the #Kstate basketball team (despite some odd tweets out there).

brandochav, you are beacon of light in storm-tossed seas (the light is a metaphor for hope).
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 04:47:39 PM
Aw gee . . . all the Powertards who suck the dick of the guy who gave us "It's Floyd" and "It's Patterson" and the "We were asked to sit on this information" are now all mad (per usual) at this site.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Three Fingers on February 08, 2011, 04:48:10 PM
Thank HEAVENS.  Keep blazing KELLZ.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 04:48:24 PM
I try to extend an olive branch


Quote

RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34299
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Latest on Curtis Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


just more goEMAW BS - keep having fun over there, kiddies...


Did that dumbass not read the post where Fitz basically insinuated that he had heard this "rumor" as well?  Why is RMC so mean to us?  It seems like RMC does NOT fear the beard AT ALL.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2011, 04:49:40 PM
I try to extend an olive branch


Quote

RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34299
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Latest on Curtis Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


just more goEMAW BS - keep having fun over there, kiddies...


Did that dumbass not read the post where Fitz basically insinuated that he had heard this "rumor" as well?  Why is RMC so mean to us?  It seems like RMC does NOT fear the beard AT ALL. 
this is a great post for the GPC Pt 2 thread, 'grats for almost making it there!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Three Fingers on February 08, 2011, 04:49:48 PM
Aw gee . . . all the Powertards who suck the dick of the guy who gave us "It's Floyd" and "It's Patterson" and the "We were asked to sit on this information" are now all mad (per usual) at this site.  


Slow this down.  CAN'T READ.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 04:50:43 PM
I try to extend an olive branch


Quote

RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34299
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Latest on Curtis Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


just more goEMAW BS - keep having fun over there, kiddies...


Did that dumbass not read the post where Fitz basically insinuated that he had heard this "rumor" as well?  Why is RMC so mean to us?  It seems like RMC does NOT fear the beard AT ALL.  

Haterz gonna Hate Pete . . . FYI we are all laughing at this at the office . . . everyone.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bakerman on February 08, 2011, 04:51:08 PM
I try to extend an olive branch


Quote

RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34299
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Latest on Curtis Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


just more goEMAW BS - keep having fun over there, kiddies...


Did that dumbass not read the post where Fitz basically insinuated that he had heard this "rumor" as well?  Why is RMC so mean to us?  It seems like RMC does NOT fear the beard AT ALL.  

Chingon is so moving this
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 04:51:11 PM
I try to extend an olive branch


Quote

RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34299
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Latest on Curtis Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


just more goEMAW BS - keep having fun over there, kiddies...


Did that dumbass not read the post where Fitz basically insinuated that he had heard this "rumor" as well?  Why is RMC so mean to us?  It seems like RMC does NOT fear the beard AT ALL. 
this is a great post for the GPC Pt 2 thread, 'grats for almost making it there!

Wrong, this isn't about dead people....try to keep up.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pissclams on February 08, 2011, 04:51:52 PM
I try to extend an olive branch


Quote

RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34299
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Latest on Curtis Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


just more goEMAW BS - keep having fun over there, kiddies...


Did that dumbass not read the post where Fitz basically insinuated that he had heard this "rumor" as well?  Why is RMC so mean to us?  It seems like RMC does NOT fear the beard AT ALL. 
this is a great post for the GPC Pt 2 thread, 'grats for almost making it there!

Wrong, this isn't about dead people....try to keep up.
fitz owns you
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 04:53:18 PM
I try to extend an olive branch


Quote

RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34299
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Latest on Curtis Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


just more goEMAW BS - keep having fun over there, kiddies...


Did that dumbass not read the post where Fitz basically insinuated that he had heard this "rumor" as well?  Why is RMC so mean to us?  It seems like RMC does NOT fear the beard AT ALL. 
this is a great post for the GPC Pt 2 thread, 'grats for almost making it there!

Wrong, this isn't about dead people....try to keep up.
fitz owns you

There you did it.  OFF TOPIC, CHINGS MOVE THIS LAST POST OF CLAMS (and this one) TO THE OTHER THREAD!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: gowildcatwildcat on February 08, 2011, 04:53:27 PM
I try to extend an olive branch


Quote

RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34299
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Latest on Curtis Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


just more goEMAW BS - keep having fun over there, kiddies...


Did that dumbass not read the post where Fitz basically insinuated that he had heard this "rumor" as well?  Why is RMC so mean to us?  It seems like RMC does NOT fear the beard AT ALL.  

most profitable day in goEMAW.com history?   :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 04:53:40 PM
Hey, GoPowercat members, we have a search function.

BOOM, ROASTED
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 04:54:50 PM
Hey, GoPowercat members, we have a search function.

BOOM, ROASTED

JFC, olive branches guys....
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 04:56:17 PM
Quote
JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
I asked a #KState basketball if Curtis Kelly failed a drug test and received the following response: (continued)..."We do not comment or release information regarding confidential student-athlete records" (regarding Curtis Kelly question). #KState
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 04:57:04 PM
Not to change the topic but can someone share all the creepy pedo tweets that Fitz sends to high school girls for Valentine's day?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: catzacker on February 08, 2011, 04:57:11 PM
Anyone know a good plumber in Pratt?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 08, 2011, 04:57:25 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc4%2Fhs248.snc4%2F39721_421647073671_647593671_4558578_3636940_n.jpg&hash=1e944e31b5c5e1cca823fa218b194e154df78619)

his twitter account has vanished

sorry if repost
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ew2x4 on February 08, 2011, 04:58:23 PM
Hey, GoPowercat members, we have a search function.

BOOM, ROASTED

And PM's.
Title: Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: fr@ck me on February 08, 2011, 04:58:51 PM
I did read the thread CK, but while trying to surf threw all the BULLcac i just thought it would be easier to post a new questions...

Fr@ck me you think this is legit?



I hate when thread get moved around  :curse:

The rumor around Wamego is that it is legit.  And Wamego is next to Manhattan.  I mean they probably just holler'd out their windows over to franks house and asked him.   :doom:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 04:59:30 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc4%2Fhs248.snc4%2F39721_421647073671_647593671_4558578_3636940_n.jpg&hash=1e944e31b5c5e1cca823fa218b194e154df78619)

his twitter account has vanished

sorry if repost

 :surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWgeddon on February 08, 2011, 05:00:18 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc4%2Fhs248.snc4%2F39721_421647073671_647593671_4558578_3636940_n.jpg&hash=1e944e31b5c5e1cca823fa218b194e154df78619)

his twitter account has vanished

sorry if repost


It's still there. He probably just blocked you.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: LynchMob on February 08, 2011, 05:00:32 PM
Anyone know a good plumber in Pratt?

I DO, I DO!

actually, I really do
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 05:01:19 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc4%2Fhs248.snc4%2F39721_421647073671_647593671_4558578_3636940_n.jpg&hash=1e944e31b5c5e1cca823fa218b194e154df78619)

his twitter account has vanished

sorry if repost

Nah, he just made them private for followers only. Wouldn't want MamaFitz finding out. He already banned her from GPC a couple years ago.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: justTHEtip on February 08, 2011, 05:02:20 PM
Frank's coming on 810 right meow......
Title: Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
Post by: Jmo on February 08, 2011, 05:02:50 PM
I did read the thread CK, but while trying to surf threw all the BULLcac i just thought it would be easier to post a new questions...

Fr@ck me you think this is legit?



I hate when thread get moved around  :curse:

The rumor around Wamego is that it is legit.  And Wamego is next to Manhattan.  I mean they probably just holler'd out their windows over to franks house and asked him.   :doom:

 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWgeddon on February 08, 2011, 05:03:27 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc4%2Fhs248.snc4%2F39721_421647073671_647593671_4558578_3636940_n.jpg&hash=1e944e31b5c5e1cca823fa218b194e154df78619)

his twitter account has vanished

sorry if repost


Nah, he just made them private for followers only. Wouldn't want MamaFitz finding out. He already banned her from GPC a couple years ago.

More like hiding from Chris Hansen
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 05:05:22 PM
Quote
Jayhawk96
 
Despite tweets saying he's still on the team, friend who "knows people" claims Curtis Kelly kicked off #KSU team for failed drug test.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 05:05:49 PM
Frank on 810 in a couple minutes btw.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 05:07:39 PM
Quote
robcassidy22 Rob Cassidy
According to K-State sports info, Curtis Kelly is still on the basketball team. In my opinion, this may be subject to change. We'll see.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 05:08:43 PM
Hi JB.  :adios:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: fr@ck me on February 08, 2011, 05:09:39 PM
Quote
robcassidy22 Rob Cassidy
According to K-State sports info, Curtis Kelly is still on the basketball team. In my opinion, this may be subject to change. We'll see.

Good way to get behind both sides of the story.  stay or go rob can say he knew... solid reporting there  :powerespect:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 05:09:52 PM
Quote
JBBauersfeld
 
Man. #KState fans are creative if nothing else. Well played Wildcat message boarders. http://plixi.com/p/75807448
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 8manpick on February 08, 2011, 05:10:42 PM
Kietzman - "the twitter world is abuzz"
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 05:11:09 PM
Quote from: @robcassidy22
According to K-State sports info, Curtis Kelly is still on the basketball team.  In my opinion, this may be subject to change.  We'll see

EDIT:  Whoops, already posted.  But srsly, this hurts my feelings even more that RMC would mean stuff about us when even Rob is hip to this. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Immaculate1 on February 08, 2011, 05:11:34 PM
There is smoke...no pun intended...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 05:13:30 PM
Trying like hell to get my old classmate, J.B. Bauersfeld, to say "goEMAW.com". 

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 08, 2011, 05:14:10 PM


his twitter account has vanished

sorry if repost


Nah, he just made them private for followers only. Wouldn't want MamaFitz finding out. He already banned her from GPC a couple years ago.


I was following him, which was annoying b/c it never had anything to do with k-state just college chicks, getting drunk, and bad jokes.  now he is gone from my list.  

good chance i'm just not twittering right though. lol
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 08, 2011, 05:14:44 PM
Quote
JBBauersfeld
 
Man. #KState fans are creative if nothing else. Well played Wildcat message boarders. http://plixi.com/p/75807448
:adored:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 05:18:24 PM
Trying like hell to get my old classmate, J.B. Bauersfeld, to say "goEMAW.com". 


Looks like it won't happen :(

@saulbadguy That's what happens when you admit to kicking me in the back! Ha.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 08, 2011, 05:19:28 PM
Quote
judge_me_now
 
It feels like there is a weight on my chest and I can't breathe.

 :surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 05:19:33 PM
Kietzman - "the twitter world is abuzz"

Mods, merge to newly modded Meek & BITB refuse to say goEMAW.com thread?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 05:20:10 PM
Quote
judge_me_now
 
It feels like there is a weight on my chest and I can't breathe.

 :surprised:

Welp, he obviously got a phone call begging him to come back now that "events have transpired."
Title: Re: CK
Post by: jdagg2003 on February 08, 2011, 05:20:41 PM
Quote
judge_me_now
 
It feels like there is a weight on my chest and I can't breathe.

 :surprised:

He's High as eff
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 05:21:42 PM
Quote
judge_me_now
 
It feels like there is a weight on my chest and I can't breathe.

 :surprised:

Welp, he obviously got a phone call begging him to come back now that "events have transpired."

How happy would this make me?  Lots.

 :bball:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 08, 2011, 05:22:03 PM
Quote
judge_me_now
 
It feels like there is a weight on my chest and I can't breathe.

 :surprised:

He's High as eff

Gravity bong
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kyles on February 08, 2011, 05:24:33 PM
 :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstater on February 08, 2011, 05:25:01 PM
So how many games we looking at?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: The1BigWillie on February 08, 2011, 05:28:01 PM
So how many games we looking at?

The rest of the regular season.  The game we lose on Wed of the BigXII tourney, and the game we lose in the first round of the NIT. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2011, 05:29:20 PM
So how many games we looking at?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ftypophile.com%2Ffiles%2FinfinityJH.gif&hash=8a8e4c25a62fa0fa994681dfae164be183e58a0c)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: dirk diggler on February 08, 2011, 05:30:12 PM
I get the munchies reading this stuff.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: OK_Cat on February 08, 2011, 05:31:03 PM
the winner in this whole sitch?


(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsection1standouts.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F11%2Fjordan-henriquez-college.jpg%3Fw%3D307%26amp%3Bh%3D350&hash=a56f590ac072d7fc642bf709b84c2c06b7e0df98)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SleepFighter on February 08, 2011, 05:35:53 PM
Best front court in the nation!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on February 08, 2011, 05:36:37 PM
JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
@
@saulbadguy In case you were wondering, this is where all of this Curtis Kelly business started: goEMAW.com (is that better @saulbadguy ?)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 05:37:03 PM
JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
@
@saulbadguy In case you were wondering, this is where all of this Curtis Kelly business started: goEMAW.com (is that better @saulbadguy ?)


JB Bauersfeld, friend of goEMAW.com
:cool:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 05:37:53 PM
:dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious: :dubious:

Fear the beard.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: OK_Cat on February 08, 2011, 05:38:00 PM
JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
@
@saulbadguy In case you were wondering, this is where all of this Curtis Kelly business started: goEMAW.com (is that better @saulbadguy ?)


WE'VE MADE IT!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2011, 05:38:17 PM
JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
@
@saulbadguy In case you were wondering, this is where all of this Curtis Kelly business started: goEMAW.com (is that better @saulbadguy ?)


JB Bauersfeld, friend of goEMAW.com
:cool:
:emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWgeddon on February 08, 2011, 05:39:04 PM
JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
@
@saulbadguy In case you were wondering, this is where all of this Curtis Kelly business started: goEMAW.com (is that better @saulbadguy ?)


JB Bauersfeld, friend of goEMAW.com
:cool:

JB Bauersfeld, handsome devil  :fatty:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: RTB on February 08, 2011, 05:42:23 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1129.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fm520%2Frtb_bbs%2FUntitled-2.jpg%3Ft%3D1297208425&hash=6ca450823183e59bd89ec3126eb1bbc78d0a07f8)


 :surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: oodfan on February 08, 2011, 05:43:44 PM
Frank on 810 in a couple minutes btw.

Anything here?  Confirm or deny?
  :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Immaculate1 on February 08, 2011, 05:44:10 PM
 :lol:
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1129.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fm520%2Frtb_bbs%2FUntitled-2.jpg%3Ft%3D1297208425&hash=6ca450823183e59bd89ec3126eb1bbc78d0a07f8)


 :surprised:

Title: Re: CK
Post by: SleepFighter on February 08, 2011, 05:44:13 PM
Frank on 810 in a couple minutes btw.

Anything here?  Confirm or deny?
  :ck:

recorded earlier
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 08, 2011, 05:44:50 PM
Frank on 810 in a couple minutes btw.

Anything here?  Confirm or deny?
  :ck:

recorded well before all this started
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 05:45:42 PM
JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
@
@saulbadguy In case you were wondering, this is where all of this Curtis Kelly business started: goEMAW.com (is that better @saulbadguy ?)


JB Bauersfeld, friend of goEMAW.com
:cool:

JB Bauersfeld, handsome devil  :fatty:

JB Bauersfeld, dad ran a kickass grocery store back in the day that I frequented many a time.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: TheFormerKCCat on February 08, 2011, 05:46:26 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1129.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fm520%2Frtb_bbs%2FUntitled-2.jpg%3Ft%3D1297208425&hash=6ca450823183e59bd89ec3126eb1bbc78d0a07f8)


 :surprised:


Hindsight = 20/20
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 05:47:30 PM
JBBauersfeld J.B. Bauersfeld
@
@saulbadguy In case you were wondering, this is where all of this Curtis Kelly business started: goEMAW.com (is that better @saulbadguy ?)


JB Bauersfeld, friend of goEMAW.com
:cool:
:emawkid:


:combofan:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: RonLongshaft on February 08, 2011, 05:50:48 PM
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Saulbadguy on February 08, 2011, 06:01:19 PM
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe
You may want to edit your post before I ban you. Bad mouthing "BITB" media types will not be tolerated here.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 08, 2011, 06:09:04 PM
In case someone from GPC tried to jump to the end of the thread to see what was going on, this is the most important thing:

Gopowercat.com:

Fitz is evil.

You are being deceived.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Goldbrick on February 08, 2011, 06:11:10 PM
FITZ

We believe we know what it is

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi80.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj161%2FGoldbrick%2F1296959449042.jpg%3Ft%3D1297210099&hash=3ec52fbb5b099f3d04cbee3100d6a6ccc8afd160)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 06:13:03 PM
Ppppfffffsssttt.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: LynchMob on February 08, 2011, 06:13:22 PM
Most Online: 420 - Today at 04:28:23 PM

It's a sign...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Bill Clarahan on February 08, 2011, 06:14:10 PM
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe

Did his dad play there as well?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 08, 2011, 06:15:28 PM
Most Online: 420 - Today at 04:28:23 PM

It's a sign...
:horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: hatingfrancisco on February 08, 2011, 06:45:13 PM
Quote
@OMGKeywords: Google Trends: 1. fergie 2. zuckerberg stalker 3. tmx group 4. hotfile 5. openx 6. curtis kelly 7. melo 8. jules verne 9. carmelo
Twitter - 106
1 minute ago
Title: Re: CK
Post by: RonLongshaft on February 08, 2011, 06:46:32 PM
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe

Did his dad play there as well?

Idk but the word around town was his ol man bought his way on the team    :ck:
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe
You may want to edit your post before I ban you. Bad mouthing "BITB" media types will not be tolerated here.

I said he might be a good guy  :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 08, 2011, 06:47:26 PM
FITZ

We believe we know what it is

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi80.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj161%2FGoldbrick%2F1296959449042.jpg%3Ft%3D1297210099&hash=3ec52fbb5b099f3d04cbee3100d6a6ccc8afd160)

 :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 08, 2011, 06:49:07 PM
Friend of mine (who works for the team) said Kelly has not been at practice lately.

Not saying anything either way, just passing it along.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: crusty on February 08, 2011, 06:50:28 PM
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe

Did his dad play there as well?

Idk but the word around town was his ol man bought his way on the team    :ck:
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe
You may want to edit your post before I ban you. Bad mouthing "BITB" media types will not be tolerated here.

I said he might be a good guy  :ck:

I think his dad and Slay were buds.  Slay was one dirty old man.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2011, 06:54:45 PM
Friend of mine (who works for the team) said Kelly has not been at practice lately.

Not saying anything either way, just passing it along.

I'm hearing rumblings that Jake & Doc have not practiced since Friday.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: RonLongshaft on February 08, 2011, 06:56:26 PM
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe

Did his dad play there as well?

Idk but the word around town was his ol man bought his way on the team    :ck:
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe
You may want to edit your post before I ban you. Bad mouthing "BITB" media types will not be tolerated here.

I said he might be a good guy  :ck:

I think his dad and Slay were buds.  Slay was one dirty old man.
love seeing Slay around town, always looks like he just got done push mowing 60 lawns, also does alot of local jh and hs bball officiating
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 08, 2011, 07:03:32 PM
Quote
LifeofFitz
 
What an eventful day. Two birds in the office. Rumor of a Cat flying the coop. And my first meeting as #Aggieville's Nuckie.

He's back and locked up.  What a chatty cathy

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Frlv.zcache.com%2Fchatty_cathy_tshirt-p2353346008842741603go8_400.jpg&hash=76cdb6a604b515ef619102569bb5e72317b08acc)  <--- Fitz age 17
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 8manpick on February 08, 2011, 07:08:55 PM
Friend of mine (who works for the team) said Kelly has not been at practice lately.

Not saying anything either way, just passing it along.

I'm hearing rumblings that Jake & Doc have not practiced since Friday.
Didn't they play Saturday, and not practice yesterday?
Title: hey nimrods
Post by: aggie_station on February 08, 2011, 07:10:06 PM
Think before you start dumbass rumors. Fitz set us straight on GPC
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 08, 2011, 07:10:55 PM
Friend of mine (who works for the team) said Kelly has not been at practice lately.

Not saying anything either way, just passing it along.

I'm hearing rumblings that Jake & Doc have not practiced since Friday.
Didn't they play Saturday, and not practice yesterday?

Didn't the whole team have Sunday and Monday off?  :dunno:
Title: Re: hey nimrods
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 08, 2011, 07:12:32 PM
 :lol: :lol: :lol:

Wasn't he the one saying something was up the whole time? What the hell was he talking about then? Are we his only source?
Title: Re: hey nimrods
Post by: Scary Smart on February 08, 2011, 07:12:45 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: crusty on February 08, 2011, 07:13:12 PM
Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe

Did his dad play there as well?

Idk but the word around town was his ol man bought his way on the team    :ck:


Had JB in a class in college, class clown.....kinda annoying as well.. terrible basketball player that couldn't even find the court as ESU... but good guy... maybe
You may want to edit your post before I ban you. Bad mouthing "BITB" media types will not be tolerated here.

I said he might be a good guy  :ck:

I think his dad and Slay were buds.  Slay was one dirty old man.
love seeing Slay around town, always looks like he just got done push mowing 60 lawns, also does alot of local jh and hs bball officiating


His porn collection was legendary.
Title: Re: hey nimrods
Post by: CNS on February 08, 2011, 07:13:20 PM
pfft.

sick to your high quality board then.  he will feed you when he sees fit.
Title: Re: hey nimrods
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 07:16:57 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12099
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Bad news coming ... Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We believe we know what it is, but sources aren't wanting to reveal what it is at this point for reasons that will later become apparent. Rob is working hard to confirm the information.
 
Title: Re: hey nimrods
Post by: 0.42 on February 08, 2011, 07:20:51 PM
 :dubious:
Title: Re: hey nimrods
Post by: Goldbrick on February 08, 2011, 07:21:40 PM
Fitz set us straight

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi80.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj161%2FGoldbrick%2F1277617557701.jpg%3Ft%3D1297214456&hash=440029199053c645035e2498fb2681315a42532b)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2011, 07:30:14 PM
Friend of mine (who works for the team) said Kelly has not been at practice lately.

Not saying anything either way, just passing it along.

I'm hearing rumblings that Jake & Doc have not practiced since Friday.
Didn't they play Saturday, and not practice yesterday?

Didn't the whole team have Sunday and Monday off?  :dunno:

:facepalm:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: chum1 on February 08, 2011, 07:34:48 PM
go cats
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 08, 2011, 07:35:26 PM
Friend of mine (who works for the team) said Kelly has not been at practice lately.

Not saying anything either way, just passing it along.

I'm hearing rumblings that Jake & Doc have not practiced since Friday.
Didn't they play Saturday, and not practice yesterday?

Didn't the whole team have Sunday and Monday off?  :dunno:

:facepalm:


eff me icwudt  :dubious:
Title: Re: hey nimrods
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 07:36:31 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12099
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Bad news coming ... Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We believe we know what it is, but sources aren't wanting to reveal what it is at this point for reasons that will later become apparent. Rob is working hard to confirm the information.
 

I feel like RMC owes us an appology.
Title: Re: hey nimrods
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 07:38:27 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12099
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: Bad news coming ... Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We believe we know what it is, but sources aren't wanting to reveal what it is at this point for reasons that will later become apparent. Rob is working hard to confirm the information.
 

I feel like RMC owes us an appology.

I agree completely.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 07:58:58 PM
I think this is going to work out fine.  Yeah, CK may technically be permanently suspended from the team and have lost his scholarship, but he's appealed!  Who decides appeals?  Currie!  So, all Currie's got to do is come up with some reason to grant CK's appeal and we're home free.  I hope he's heard all you Q@ fans who want him to do the right thing.

http://cjonline.com/sports/basketball/2011-02-08/cats-kelly-under-scrutiny-again
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 07:59:16 PM
Your move Currie...

Title: Re: CK
Post by: j rake on February 08, 2011, 07:59:24 PM
Quote from: Austin Meek, cjonline
Forward Curtis Kelly remains a member of Kansas State's basketball program while the school investigates a potential violation of department policy.

School officials could not confirm the potential violation, citing student privacy issues.

“Curtis is still a member of our basketball program,” associate athletic director Casey Scott said Tuesday.

Kelly's status for the rest of his senior season remains uncertain, however. The Topeka Capital-Journal has learned the potential violation could result in Kelly's permanent suspension from the team and loss of financial aid, though Kelly has filed an appeal to retain his playing status.

The situation is not believed to involve NCAA rules violations, and no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process. Kelly's availability during the appeal will be determined internally.

K-State's student-athlete handbook provides an outline of the appeals process. According to the handbook's protocol, athletic director John Currie would provide an initial ruling, which then could be appealed to K-State's General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

Attempts to reach Currie and K-State coach Frank Martin were unsuccessful.

Come on, John. Whatever happened to transparency?  ;)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 08:02:43 PM
I think this is going to work out fine.  Yeah, CK may technically be permanently suspended from the team and have lost his scholarship, but he's appealed!  Who decides appeals?  Currie!  So, all Currie's got to do is come up with some reason to grant CK's appeal and we're home free.  I hope he's heard all you Q@ fans who want him to do the right thing.

http://cjonline.com/sports/basketball/2011-02-08/cats-kelly-under-scrutiny-again

I still want my apology from RockyMtnCat.

I am considering petitioning Fitz to remove (permanently) this RockyMtnCat from the GoPowercat ring of fame due to wrong-all-the-time-ness.


Quote
RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34299
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Latest on Curtis Kelly   Reply
just more goEMAW BS - keep having fun over there, kiddies...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2011, 08:03:14 PM
I didn't see this in the thread if it's here delete accordingly

http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/12/20/fanhouse-report-bcs-football-program-drug-policies-revealed/ (http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/12/20/fanhouse-report-bcs-football-program-drug-policies-revealed/)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 08:03:44 PM
Quote from: Austin Meek, cjonline
Forward Curtis Kelly remains a member of Kansas State's basketball program while the school investigates a potential violation of department policy.

School officials could not confirm the potential violation, citing student privacy issues.

“Curtis is still a member of our basketball program,” associate athletic director Casey Scott said Tuesday.

Kelly's status for the rest of his senior season remains uncertain, however. The Topeka Capital-Journal has learned the potential violation could result in Kelly's permanent suspension from the team and loss of financial aid, though Kelly has filed an appeal to retain his playing status.

The situation is not believed to involve NCAA rules violations, and no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process. Kelly's availability during the appeal will be determined internally.

K-State's student-athlete handbook provides an outline of the appeals process. According to the handbook's protocol, athletic director John Currie would provide an initial ruling, which then could be appealed to K-State's General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

Attempts to reach Currie and K-State coach Frank Martin were unsuccessful.

Come on, John. Whatever happened to transparency?  ;)

WE'RE SAVED!

I could even let the whole Wabash/EMAW thing go until the offseason so long as things are made right on this issue.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 08:04:01 PM
Quote from: Austin Meek, cjonline
Forward Curtis Kelly remains a member of Kansas State's basketball program while the school investigates a potential violation of department policy.

School officials could not confirm the potential violation, citing student privacy issues.

“Curtis is still a member of our basketball program,” associate athletic director Casey Scott said Tuesday.

Kelly's status for the rest of his senior season remains uncertain, however. The Topeka Capital-Journal has learned the potential violation could result in Kelly's permanent suspension from the team and loss of financial aid, though Kelly has filed an appeal to retain his playing status.

The situation is not believed to involve NCAA rules violations, and no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process. Kelly's availability during the appeal will be determined internally.

K-State's student-athlete handbook provides an outline of the appeals process. According to the handbook's protocol, athletic director John Currie would provide an initial ruling, which then could be appealed to K-State's General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

Attempts to reach Currie and K-State coach Frank Martin were unsuccessful.

Come on, John. Whatever happened to transparency?  ;)

They should have just EMAILED Currie.  "HE RETURNS ALL HIS EMAILS!"  :pbj:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 08:06:31 PM
Clearly just more goEMAW BS.   Clearly.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 08:10:16 PM
Clearly just more goEMAW BS.   Clearly.

If anything, I'd like to think goEMAW is responsible for bringing this matter along with the wishes of EMAW/WABASH Nation, to John's attention.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 08:10:49 PM
Quote from: Austin Meek, cjonline
Forward Curtis Kelly remains a member of Kansas State's basketball program while the school investigates a potential violation of department policy.

School officials could not confirm the potential violation, citing student privacy issues.

“Curtis is still a member of our basketball program,” associate athletic director Casey Scott said Tuesday.

Kelly's status for the rest of his senior season remains uncertain, however. The Topeka Capital-Journal has learned the potential violation could result in Kelly's permanent suspension from the team and loss of financial aid, though Kelly has filed an appeal to retain his playing status.

The situation is not believed to involve NCAA rules violations, and no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process. Kelly's availability during the appeal will be determined internally.

K-State's student-athlete handbook provides an outline of the appeals process. According to the handbook's protocol, athletic director John Currie would provide an initial ruling, which then could be appealed to K-State's General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

Attempts to reach Currie and K-State coach Frank Martin were unsuccessful.

Come on, John. Whatever happened to transparency?  ;)

WE'RE SAVED!

I could even let the whole Wabash/EMAW thing go until the offseason so long as things are made right on this issue.

Seems pretty clear to me that the ball is in Currie's court.  CK plays, bravo to Currie.  CK doesn't play...pack your rough ridin' bags, Currie.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 08:13:22 PM
Clearly just more goEMAW BS.   Clearly.

If anything, I'd like to think goEMAW is responsible for bringing this matter along with the wishes of EMAW/WABASH Nation, to John's attention.

I concur . . . a large wheel barrel full of thanks is in order for goEMAW.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: catzacker on February 08, 2011, 08:14:31 PM
dear john currie,

do the right thing you f'ing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  the morris twins can't stop punching people in every game, little can't stop beating up chicks, tyshawn beat up the football team, sherron rubbed his junk on a chick in an elevator and killed his first born, and those motherf*ckers stay on the court.  why?  because kansas cares about winning.  so should kansas state.  don't be as stupid as your f*cking haircut is, john.  do the right thing.

sincerely,
catzacker
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 08, 2011, 08:16:03 PM
I didn't see this in the thread if it's here delete accordingly

http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/12/20/fanhouse-report-bcs-football-program-drug-policies-revealed/ (http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/12/20/fanhouse-report-bcs-football-program-drug-policies-revealed/)

Quote
Kansas State: (1) none; (2) 10 percent of games; (3) dismissal.

The numbers in parentheses are the numbers of times an athlete tests positive for druge use, followed by the punishment.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 08:16:42 PM
lol @ gpc writers linking to the Meek story on twitter. Wake up people!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 08:19:11 PM
dear john currie,

do the right thing you f'ing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  the morris twins can't stop punching people in every game, little can't stop beating up chicks, tyshawn beat up the football team, sherron rubbed his junk on a chick in an elevator and killed his first born, and those motherf*ckers stay on the court.  why?  because kansas cares about winning.  so should kansas state.  don't be as stupid as your f*cking haircut is, john.  do the right thing.

sincerely,
catzacker

I hope you're taking advantage of the "Ask John" feature at kstatesports.com to forward this sentiment.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 08:20:24 PM
Dear John Currie:

You worked at an athletic department that had like 17 guys arrested every week and most of them kept right on playing.  You helped hire a coach that is a walking NCAA rules violation (BTW if this thing blows up on Frank you should make a run at Pearl).   The football coach at the same school had an offseason, off the field issue scoring system and championship in his name that ran at a well known college football blog.

So please don't fist eff us with any of this "discipline" bullshit as it pertains to Curtis Kelly or frankly any othe K-State athlete.  If no one is dead, they play . . . words to live by.

Sincerely,

Dax
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Immaculate1 on February 08, 2011, 08:21:13 PM
dear john currie,

do the right thing you f'ing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  the morris twins can't stop punching people in every game, little can't stop beating up chicks, tyshawn beat up the football team, sherron rubbed his junk on a chick in an elevator and killed his first born, and those motherf*ckers stay on the court.  why?  because kansas cares about winning.  so should kansas state.  don't be as stupid as your f*cking haircut is, john.  do the right thing.

sincerely,
catzacker


I hope you're taking advantage of the "Ask John" feature at kstatesports.com to forward this sentiment.

Can we spin this as think of Kelly's future and well being...and add in some quotes from his interviews about KSU saving his life...and guilt Currie into reinstating him?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 08:23:45 PM
Currie had better take notice of all these EMAWs over here on this website who want Curt to stay part of this team.

Can you imagine if goEMAW hadn't broke this story? :shudder:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 08:24:54 PM
dear john currie,

do the right thing you f'ing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  the morris twins can't stop punching people in every game, little can't stop beating up chicks, tyshawn beat up the football team, sherron rubbed his junk on a chick in an elevator and killed his first born, and those motherf*ckers stay on the court.  why?  because kansas cares about winning.  so should kansas state.  don't be as stupid as your f*cking haircut is, john.  do the right thing.

sincerely,
catzacker

I hope you're taking advantage of the "Ask John" feature at kstatesports.com to forward this sentiment.

Can we spin this as think of Kelly's future and well being...and add in some quotes from his interviews about KSU saving his life...and guilt Currie into reinstating him?

Why on earth should he have to be "guilted"?  It's the right thing to do.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: catzacker on February 08, 2011, 08:25:07 PM
dear john currie,

do the right thing you f'ing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  the morris twins can't stop punching people in every game, little can't stop beating up chicks, tyshawn beat up the football team, sherron rubbed his junk on a chick in an elevator and killed his first born, and those motherf*ckers stay on the court.  why?  because kansas cares about winning.  so should kansas state.  don't be as stupid as your f*cking haircut is, john.  do the right thing.

sincerely,
catzacker

Can we spin this as think of Kelly's future and well being...and add in some quotes from his interviews about KSU saving his life...and guilt Currie into reinstating him?
I hope you're taking advantage of the "Ask John" feature at kstatesports.com to forward this sentiment.

Curtis Kelly needs basketball.  <------------this worked for tom f'ing osborne after lawrence phillips threw scott frost and some chick down stairs.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 08:26:29 PM
Currie had better take notice of all these EMAWs over here on this website who want Curt to stay part of this team.

Can you imagine if goEMAW hadn't broke this story? :shudder:

Yep.  This will definitely help the mood at the FlipFlopPak.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Immaculate1 on February 08, 2011, 08:27:49 PM
dear john currie,

do the right thing you f'ing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  the morris twins can't stop punching people in every game, little can't stop beating up chicks, tyshawn beat up the football team, sherron rubbed his junk on a chick in an elevator and killed his first born, and those motherf*ckers stay on the court.  why?  because kansas cares about winning.  so should kansas state.  don't be as stupid as your f*cking haircut is, john.  do the right thing.

sincerely,
catzacker

I hope you're taking advantage of the "Ask John" feature at kstatesports.com to forward this sentiment.

Can we spin this as think of Kelly's future and well being...and add in some quotes from his interviews about KSU saving his life...and guilt Currie into reinstating him?

Why on earth should he have to be "guilted"?  It's the right thing to do.

True  :facepalm:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstater on February 08, 2011, 08:30:11 PM
Just got my telefund call.  Told them they'd get my donation once they got the scoop on what Currie would do.  They're supposed to call back soon.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 08:30:24 PM
Dear John Currie:

You worked at an athletic department that had like 17 guys arrested every week and most of them kept right on playing.  You helped hire a coach that is a walking NCAA rules violation (BTW if this thing blows up on Frank you should make a run at Pearl).   The football coach at the same school had an offseason, off the field issue scoring system and championship in his name that ran at a well known college football blog.

So please don't fist eff us with any of this "discipline" bullcac as it pertains to Curtis Kelly or frankly any othe K-State athlete.  If no one is dead, they play . . . words to live by.

Sincerely,

Dax

Mods, can we get this etched into the marble on the table in the conference room?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 08:32:26 PM
Dear John Currie:

You worked at an athletic department that had like 17 guys arrested every week and most of them kept right on playing.  You helped hire a coach that is a walking NCAA rules violation (BTW if this thing blows up on Frank you should make a run at Pearl).   The football coach at the same school had an offseason, off the field issue scoring system and championship in his name that ran at a well known college football blog.

So please don't fist eff us with any of this "discipline" bullcac as it pertains to Curtis Kelly or frankly any othe K-State athlete.  If no one is dead, they play . . . words to live by.

Sincerely,

Dax

Mods, can we get this etched into the marble on the table in the conference room?

I think it'd be better on the walls of the practice facility, Tebow speech style, presuming this all works itself out.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 5601js on February 08, 2011, 08:32:56 PM
I didn't see this in the thread if it's here delete accordingly

http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/12/20/fanhouse-report-bcs-football-program-drug-policies-revealed/ (http://ncaafootball.fanhouse.com/2010/12/20/fanhouse-report-bcs-football-program-drug-policies-revealed/)

Quote
Kansas State: (1) none; (2) 10 percent of games; (3) dismissal.

The numbers in parentheses are the numbers of times an athlete tests positive for druge use, followed by the punishment.

That pretty much explains his unexplained suspension early in the year.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: catzacker on February 08, 2011, 08:36:00 PM
we love you curt.  if nelson can do it, so can you.  be strong!

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tahtonka.com%2Fnelsonmandela.jpg&hash=238583e828cd4b5c2a14541278c71d9d283b2f4f)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Panjandrum on February 08, 2011, 08:36:36 PM
A few things...

1) Why do I always miss the good stuff as it's going down?

2) When BSAC talks, everyone listens.  Quite possibly the most plugged in and influential EMAW out there, IMO.

3) I'm LOL'ing at the wrongness of those who would trespass against us.

4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Immaculate1 on February 08, 2011, 08:40:46 PM
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 08:41:36 PM
Dear John Currie:

You worked at an athletic department that had like 17 guys arrested every week and most of them kept right on playing.  You helped hire a coach that is a walking NCAA rules violation (BTW if this thing blows up on Frank you should make a run at Pearl).   The football coach at the same school had an offseason, off the field issue scoring system and championship in his name that ran at a well known college football blog.

So please don't fist eff us with any of this "discipline" bullcac as it pertains to Curtis Kelly or frankly any othe K-State athlete.  If no one is more than one isdead, they play . . . words to live by.

Sincerely,

Dax

Mods, can we get this etched into the marble on the table in the conference room?

I changed it.  If we are going to drop Tom Osborne's name, we'd better do it his way.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 08, 2011, 08:48:21 PM
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Not unless he wants an airplane banner....
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 08:48:59 PM
how soon will we know?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 08:50:31 PM


That pretty much explains his unexplained suspension early in the year.

No offense bro, (and Welcome to the Board!  :thumbsup:), but we nailed that mother rough rider at the time as well.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Panjandrum on February 08, 2011, 08:51:18 PM
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Not unless he wants an airplane banner....

You can't win without guys like this at bigger programs with more money, so why would we do it here?

If it is  :bigtoke:, and that's what he's kicked off for doing, it's a complete joke.  Snyder's best teams were chock full of potheads.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 08:53:53 PM
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Not unless he wants an airplane banner....

rumblings it will be an airplane billboard.   :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 08, 2011, 08:55:36 PM
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Not unless he wants an airplane banner....

rumblings it will be an airplane billboard.   :horrorsurprise:

between this and the Super Bowl ad, the only thing left will be when this rough ridin' company goes public.

:users:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 08, 2011, 08:57:32 PM
i can't believe we got so worked up for nothing!  it all comes back to currie!  lol!


what a relief, there's no way he doesn't grant that appeal.  he's got martin's back (the kstate fan's back too).  thank god for currie (and the power of prayer, good work pete).
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 09:01:50 PM
i can't believe we got so worked up for nothing!  it all comes back to currie!  lol!


what a relief, there's no way he doesn't grant that appeal.  he's got martin's back (the kstate fan's back too).  thank god for currie (and the power of prayer, good work pete).

I've adjusted my sig accordingly.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 08, 2011, 09:02:06 PM
i can't believe we got so worked up for nothing!  it all comes back to currie!  lol!


what a relief, there's no way he doesn't grant that appeal.  he's got martin's back (the kstate fan's back too).  thank god for currie (and the power of prayer, good work pete).

i sure hope so  :chainsaw:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstater on February 08, 2011, 09:03:41 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 09:04:29 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

Fitz posted on his website that he heard a rumor.  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 09:04:49 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

I'm not sure Currie makes it right without the uproar.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: The Whale on February 08, 2011, 09:06:33 PM
Thoughts and prayers.  Go cats.  fear the beard.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 09:06:50 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

Fitz posted on his website that he heard a rumor.  :dunno:

j/k, I kid, I kid.  No srsly though, opcat is a drug dealer.  PM'd EVERYONE.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 06wildcat on February 08, 2011, 09:07:43 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

I'm not sure Currie makes it right without the uproar.

He still might not make it right, if you subscribe to Dax's pov.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 08, 2011, 09:09:33 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: D-FRED-BROWN on February 08, 2011, 09:11:17 PM
 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstater on February 08, 2011, 09:11:38 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.

No, I'm suggesting Currie is so rough ridin' incompetent that this made the news.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 09:13:40 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.

No, I'm suggesting Currie is so effing incompetent that this made the news.

Maybe goEMAW is the motherfucking Scoopdaddy of websites?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 09:14:50 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.

No, I'm suggesting Currie is so effing incompetent that this made the news.

Maybe goEMAW is the motherfucking Scoopdaddy of websites?

:surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 08, 2011, 09:17:20 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.

No, I'm suggesting Currie is so effing incompetent that this made the news.

Maybe goEMAW is the mothereffing Scoopdaddy of websites?
:emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 09:18:03 PM
I just pray to God that I am not forced (FORCED) to make these t-shirts

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi10.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa107%2Fbig12north%2Fcurrienark.jpg&hash=7221b7bbe3f35c12fe3f37a385734502757ef79e)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: D-FRED-BROWN on February 08, 2011, 09:20:22 PM
 :love:  :surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 09:21:11 PM
Currie could have kept this news locked in a high security room with temperature sensors and a light up floor like the one in Mission Impossible and goEMAW would bite the head off a rat, snag that crap and blow it open like a Paris Hilton sex tape.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 09:21:46 PM
I just pray to God that I am not forced (FORCED) to make these t-shirts

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi10.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa107%2Fbig12north%2Fcurrienark.jpg&hash=7221b7bbe3f35c12fe3f37a385734502757ef79e)

"Snitches get Stitches"??   :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 08, 2011, 09:22:04 PM
Between snitchin' and EPAW aka Wabash, Currie is quickly dropping his stock.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstater on February 08, 2011, 09:22:13 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.

No, I'm suggesting Currie is so effing incompetent that this made the news.

Maybe goEMAW is the motherfucking Scoopdaddy of websites?

Start scooping happier stories then.  TIA
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on February 08, 2011, 09:27:35 PM
No worries I'm sure casey scott is frantically scribbling this down to report to jc.  No way jc fucks this up
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 09:30:04 PM
No worries I'm sure casey scott is frantically scribbling this down to report to jc.  No way jc effs this up

Hey Casey,

I mean this in all seriousness.  IF Curt goes, we go.  Well, at least I go, and maybe some other dudes too.  Maybe a few chicks also.  Not sure, there is like only one girl on here.  And she might be a guy, no telling.  But me for sure.

TIA,

Limestone
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 08, 2011, 09:36:07 PM
I just pray to God that I am not forced (FORCED) to make these t-shirts


I also hope that, because it definitely isn't spelled right.   
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 08, 2011, 09:37:52 PM
I just pray to God that I am not forced (FORCED) to make these t-shirts


I also hope that, because it definitely isn't spelled right.   

 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 08, 2011, 09:38:19 PM
I just pray to God that I am not forced (FORCED) to make these t-shirts

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi10.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa107%2Fbig12north%2Fcurrienark.jpg&hash=7221b7bbe3f35c12fe3f37a385734502757ef79e)

"Snitches get Stitches"??   :ck:

NARC
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MadCat on February 08, 2011, 09:38:53 PM
NARQ
Title: Re: CK
Post by: purplenutz on February 08, 2011, 09:44:25 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

Fitz posted on his website that he heard a rumor.  :dunno:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fnparikh.org%2Fpub%2Fimages%2Fgiant-doobie.jpg&hash=ab2887f753ac04c368d25cd0290698ffec3f1acc)

Is this what we're all worried about?  Please . . . welcome to NCAA athletics right?

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 09:44:31 PM
I just pray to God that I am not forced (FORCED) to make these t-shirts


I also hope that, because it definitely isn't spelled right.   

English teachers who are on the Pot know how it is spelled.   :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 09:46:04 PM
Quote
The handbook indicates that the coach of any team can enforce rules regarding substance abuse at their own discretion, but cannot be more lenient than an outlined policy of three violations.

You know what you have to do Currie.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 08, 2011, 09:47:08 PM
Quote
robcassidy22 Rob Cassidy
Here's what I was able to figure out about Curtis Kelly today: http://tinyurl.com/6bbn2or Props to Austin Meek for breaking the story, BTW.

 :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 09:47:27 PM
Let's go with "NARCK" but the "CK" in a different color.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 09:48:29 PM
Quote
robcassidy22 Rob Cassidy
Here's what I was able to figure out about Curtis Kelly today: http://tinyurl.com/6bbn2or Props to Austin Meek for breaking the story, BTW.

 :dubious:

I am going to start a new website and put the entire system on trial.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi10.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa107%2Fbig12north%2Fnewsite.jpg&hash=3b785dbe2bffa83564ebff6e4e286b4a38bbd333)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wes mantooth on February 08, 2011, 09:48:55 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12105
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy More on Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob finally had some contacts return his calls with information.
Link: Kelly in limbo


Posted on 2/8 9:40 PM | IP: Logged

  :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CrushNasty on February 08, 2011, 09:50:22 PM
 :surprised:

Quote
From the creators of the successful 2010 campaign,
PAY FRANK...

The members of goEMAW.com bring you,

PLAY FAIR


Your move John.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 08, 2011, 09:50:30 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12105
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy More on Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob finally had some contacts return his calls with information.
Link: Kelly in limbo


Posted on 2/8 9:40 PM | IP: Logged

  :lol:


But according to the Chief Powertards this was all a bunch of goEMAW BS.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 08, 2011, 09:51:59 PM
Quote
robcassidy22 Rob Cassidy
Here's what I was able to figure out about Curtis Kelly today: http://tinyurl.com/6bbn2or Props to Austin Meek for breaking the story, BTW.

 :dubious:

I am going to start a new website and put the entire system on trial.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi10.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa107%2Fbig12north%2Fnewsite.jpg&hash=3b785dbe2bffa83564ebff6e4e286b4a38bbd333)

I assume you  mean "Currie WILL eat a bag of dirty dicks if we lose CK.com".
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 08, 2011, 09:52:18 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12105
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy More on Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob finally had some contacts return his calls with information.
Link: Kelly in limbo


Posted on 2/8 9:40 PM | IP: Logged

  :lol:


But according to the Chief Powertards this was all a bunch of goEMAW BS.

RMC will apologize.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 08, 2011, 09:54:30 PM
KU players assault people. K-State players get discounts and smoke a little weed. We are obviously the monsters. :surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 09:55:02 PM
FITZ

ADMIN
Post #12105
Manhattan, Kan.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy More on Kelly Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rob finally had some contacts return his calls with information.
Link: Kelly in limbo


Posted on 2/8 9:40 PM | IP: Logged

  :lol:

I'm glad Meek finally called him back. Probably too busy posting his story on the internet to answer the phone earlier.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 09:55:34 PM
KU players assault people. K-State players get discounts and smoke a little weed. We are obviously the monsters. :surprised:


Iknowrite?  It's our rough ridin' fan base....they think physical assault is OK, but weed is a mortal sin.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 09:56:18 PM


I'm glad Meek finally called him back. Probably too busy posting his story on the internet to answer the phone earlier.

BSAC.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 08, 2011, 09:56:58 PM
Quote
Iknowrite?  It's our effing fan base....they think physical assault is OK, but weed is a mortal sin.

He didn't even do the honorable thing and whip his thing out on an elevator. That I could understand, if not endorse.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bringonthecats on February 08, 2011, 09:57:33 PM
No worries I'm sure casey scott is frantically scribbling this down to report to jc.  No way jc effs this up

Hey Casey,

I mean this in all seriousness.  IF Curt goes, we go.  Well, at least I go, and maybe some other dudes too.  Maybe a few chicks also.  Not sure, there is like only one girl on here.  And she might be a guy, no telling.  But me for sure.

TIA,

Limestone
might go, might stay...however i will say, we ARE not men(?), and obviously we love c kell
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc6%2Fhs257.snc6%2F180564_1706368977674_1191510079_31744328_2193880_n.jpg&hash=15349c10f0b7807198b0e93e7857813e388000bf)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Underdog Wildcat on February 08, 2011, 09:58:20 PM
Do you really want our ass to get embarrassed on national TV next week and throughout the remainder of the season?

Do the right thing Currie, CK has unfinished business on the court, let him finish it, just like every other competitive school in THE ENTIRE NATION WOULD.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 09:58:25 PM


I'm glad Meek finally called him back. Probably too busy posting his story on the internet to answer the phone earlier.

BSAC.

He was Meek's source, GPC is too dorky to call the original source. It's like how Kelly has a weed guy, but he doesn't know his weed guy's guy.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: purplenutz on February 08, 2011, 09:59:58 PM
KU players assault people. K-State players get discounts and smoke a little weed. We are obviously the monsters. :surprised:

huh, huh, huh . . . you said Weed Beavis.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 10:01:36 PM


I'm glad Meek finally called him back. Probably too busy posting his story on the internet to answer the phone earlier.

BSAC.

He was Meek's source, GPC is too dorky to call the original source. It's like how Kelly has a weed guy, but he doesn't know his weed guy's guy.

JFC, I don't know how many times I have and will continue to post this...BSAC is an amazing mother rough rider.   Great job, BSAC, you earned it.  :bartender:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 08, 2011, 10:01:44 PM
We have so much to learn in order to be considered an elite program, this and the Dillards fiasco is setting us back decades.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 08, 2011, 10:02:50 PM
Quote
We have so much to learn in order to be considered an elite program, this and the Dillards fiasco is setting us back decades.

I could have the Morris Twins give our boys BB gun training?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: purplenutz on February 08, 2011, 10:03:51 PM


I'm glad Meek finally called him back. Probably too busy posting his story on the internet to answer the phone earlier.

BSAC.

He was Meek's source, GPC is too dorky to call the original source. It's like how Kelly has a weed guy, but he doesn't know his weed guy's guy.

JFC, I don't know how many times I have and will continue to post this...BSAC is an amazing mother effer.   Great job, BSAC, you earned it.  :bartender:

I think BSAC needs to go have a  :bigtoke:  in celebration.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 08, 2011, 10:04:06 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tobygebhart.com%2Fimages%2Fdotherightthing.jpg&hash=dd1503ecdd769559db65fd531206b6e31c267304)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 10:05:13 PM
Oh my!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 08, 2011, 10:05:27 PM
We have so much to learn in order to be considered an elite program, this and the Dillards fiasco is setting us back decades.

1 step forward, 1000s of steps backwards
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 10:08:15 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tobygebhart.com%2Fimages%2Fdotherightthing.jpg&hash=dd1503ecdd769559db65fd531206b6e31c267304)

OMG  :love:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: purplenutz on February 08, 2011, 10:09:15 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fa1.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net%2Fhphotos-ak-snc4%2Fhs248.snc4%2F39721_421647073671_647593671_4558578_3636940_n.jpg&hash=1e944e31b5c5e1cca823fa218b194e154df78619)

Isn't this that "Paines" guy they zoomed in on at that game last night?  Fitz, you sly dog you!!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Underdog Wildcat on February 08, 2011, 10:11:01 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tobygebhart.com%2Fimages%2Fdotherightthing.jpg&hash=dd1503ecdd769559db65fd531206b6e31c267304)

Holy cac, amazing  :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ew2x4 on February 08, 2011, 10:12:00 PM
Kelly can go live on the streets. Props to Currie for a successful smear campaign.

FIRE FRANK!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 08, 2011, 10:20:18 PM
Quote from: the Meek article
no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process

If Currie knows how to please everyone, he will just be too busy to rule on this until April. Kelly gets to play while his case is under appeal, right?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 08, 2011, 10:22:30 PM
Quote from: the Meek article
no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process

If Currie knows how to please everyone, he will just be too busy to rule on this until April. Kelly gets to play while his case is under appeal, right?

KU style...perfect. Why can't we do this?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 10:23:05 PM
Quote from: the Meek article
no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process

If Currie knows how to please everyone, he will just be too busy to rule on this until April. Kelly gets to play while his case is under appeal, right?

No crap, if ku can get the state court system to postpone hearings for beating up your girlfriend, surely an in house appeal can get it's decision pushed back 2 rough ridin' months. This is a perfect test to see if Currie is with us or against us.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: LynchMob on February 08, 2011, 10:23:51 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tobygebhart.com%2Fimages%2Fdotherightthing.jpg&hash=dd1503ecdd769559db65fd531206b6e31c267304)

 :love:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bakerman on February 08, 2011, 10:25:24 PM
Assuming Currie does it right, how the hell did this get out this far?  This is something that shouldn't have had a sniff of public appearance.

if you're suggesting that currie leaked this to make martin look bad, i don't buy that for a second.  no way he'd do that, he loves martin.

No, I'm suggesting Currie is so effing incompetent that this made the news.

Maybe goEMAW is the motherfucking Scoopdaddy of websites?

If this isn't, "The Word" worthy, I don't want to know what is...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wes mantooth on February 08, 2011, 10:27:19 PM
Quote from: the Meek article
no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process

If Currie knows how to please everyone, he will just be too busy to rule on this until April. Kelly gets to play while his case is under appeal, right?

KU style...perfect. Why can't we do this?

This is why...our Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) fans. quote from gpt

Season ticket sales are going to be lower next year no matter what. Booting Kelly really won't cause that much more of a decrease, imo.

The only choice Currie has (if the rumors about Kelly are true) is to boot Kelly. There really isn't a choice here.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 08, 2011, 10:28:32 PM
Quote from: the Meek article
no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process

If Currie knows how to please everyone, he will just be too busy to rule on this until April. Kelly gets to play while his case is under appeal, right?

KU style...perfect. Why can't we do this?

This is why...our Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) fans. quote from gpt

Season ticket sales are going to be lower next year no matter what. Booting Kelly really won't cause that much more of a decrease, imo.

The only choice Currie has (if the rumors about Kelly are true) is to boot Kelly. There really isn't a choice here.

OMG what a dumbass!    :surprised:
 :lol: :lol: :lol: Idiot
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 08, 2011, 10:28:52 PM
If I were to, say, walk on to the baseball team and then beat my girlfriend with a bat....would that take precedence over this case?  Because I am more than willing to do it if it keeps Currie off ck for a few months.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 10:29:47 PM
Quote from: the Meek article
no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process

If Currie knows how to please everyone, he will just be too busy to rule on this until April. Kelly gets to play while his case is under appeal, right?

KU style...perfect. Why can't we do this?

This is why...our Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) fans. quote from gpt

Season ticket sales are going to be lower next year no matter what. Booting Kelly really won't cause that much more of a decrease, imo.

The only choice Currie has (if the rumors about Kelly are true) is to boot Kelly. There really isn't a choice here.

make sure you use the quote function properly...I about to PI the crap outta you.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wes mantooth on February 08, 2011, 10:32:06 PM
Quote from: the Meek article
no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process

If Currie knows how to please everyone, he will just be too busy to rule on this until April. Kelly gets to play while his case is under appeal, right?

KU style...perfect. Why can't we do this?

This is why...our Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) fans. quote from gpt

Season ticket sales are going to be lower next year no matter what. Booting Kelly really won't cause that much more of a decrease, imo.

The only choice Currie has (if the rumors about Kelly are true) is to boot Kelly. There really isn't a choice here.

make sure you use the quote function properly...I about to PI the cac outta you.

yeah, pi'ed by a guy name williewannabe?   :lol:  You're probalby 7 though, so cute name.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 10:33:43 PM
Quote from: the Meek article
no definitive time frame exists for the appeals process

If Currie knows how to please everyone, he will just be too busy to rule on this until April. Kelly gets to play while his case is under appeal, right?

KU style...perfect. Why can't we do this?

This is why...our Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) fans. quote from gpt

Season ticket sales are going to be lower next year no matter what. Booting Kelly really won't cause that much more of a decrease, imo.

The only choice Currie has (if the rumors about Kelly are true) is to boot Kelly. There really isn't a choice here.

make sure you use the quote function properly...I about to PI the cac outta you.

yeah, pi'ed by a guy name williewannabe?   :lol:  You're probalby 7 though, so cute name.

13  :curse:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 10:34:00 PM
HOLY rough ridin' crap

Quote
KSUFirebird

Almost on scholarship
Post #582
Olathe
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Good Game Kelly vs Bad Game Kelly Explanation   Reply
Key phrase as it relates to the different Kelly's we've seen on the court:

"The study, published online in "Archives of General Psychiatry," shows that potheads develop severe mental illnesses like schizophrenia about 2.7 years earlier than people who don't use marijuana."


Think we've seen that on the court with Kelly the past two years, and even this season. What's sad, is I REALLY liked him as a person and a ball player and if he would have built on the end of last year...

Hope this isn't all true for his (and this team's) sake, but enough smoke and dots connecting where my hope is fading fast.

-KSUFirebird

Link: It's all coming together...http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20031003-10391704.html
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j rake on February 08, 2011, 10:34:42 PM
Quote from: Kellis
But a source indicated Kelly is a repeat offender of the condition in question and that it has cost him playing time already this season.

So basically Kelly's early-season benching had nothing to do with effort and everything to do with a failed drug test.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 10:35:44 PM
Quote from: Kellis
But a source indicated Kelly is a repeat offender of the condition in question and that it has cost him playing time already this season.

So basically Kelly's early-season benching had nothing to do with effort and everything to do with a failed drug test.

It's like we are posting to a wall sometimes....
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 10:37:08 PM
Quote from: Kellis
But a source indicated Kelly is a repeat offender of the condition in question and that it has cost him playing time already this season.

So basically Kelly's early-season benching had nothing to do with effort and everything to do with a failed drug test.

It's like we are posting to a wall sometimes....

lol
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 08, 2011, 10:37:34 PM
Quote from: Kellis
But a source indicated Kelly is a repeat offender of the condition in question and that it has cost him playing time already this season.

So basically Kelly's early-season benching had nothing to do with effort and everything to do with a failed drug test.

No crap
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bakerman on February 08, 2011, 10:38:27 PM
 :users: +  :bang:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j rake on February 08, 2011, 10:38:46 PM
Quote from: Kellis
But a source indicated Kelly is a repeat offender of the condition in question and that it has cost him playing time already this season.

So basically Kelly's early-season benching had nothing to do with effort and everything to do with a failed drug test.

It's like we are posting to a wall sometimes....

I don't follow K-State hoops. I pay almost zero attention to it.

The fact that I got info from Kellis should prove it.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Do Work Son on February 08, 2011, 10:39:11 PM
Hopefully, this is just a slap on the wrist.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 08, 2011, 10:39:31 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tobygebhart.com%2Fimages%2Fdotherightthing.jpg&hash=dd1503ecdd769559db65fd531206b6e31c267304)

Amazing!  One of GoEMAWs top 5 shops ever.

It's too bad Radio Raheem wasn't on the poster.  I picture Jake as Mookie & CK as Radio Raheem.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 08, 2011, 10:41:29 PM
Hopefully, this is just a slap on the wrist.

No such thing when you are talking strike three.  Best we can hope for is a delayed "hearing" on the matter until April.  It's what any other program who was serious about NCAA D1 basketball would do....
Title: Re: CK
Post by: hemmy on February 08, 2011, 10:43:23 PM
Meh, I hope he gets kicked off the team. Can you imagine the crap storm? Would make for great bbsing.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 10:43:31 PM
HOLY rough ridin' crap

Quote
KSUFirebird

Almost on scholarship
Post #582
Olathe
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Good Game Kelly vs Bad Game Kelly Explanation   Reply
Key phrase as it relates to the different Kelly's we've seen on the court:

"The study, published online in "Archives of General Psychiatry," shows that potheads develop severe mental illnesses like schizophrenia about 2.7 years earlier than people who don't use marijuana."


Think we've seen that on the court with Kelly the past two years, and even this season. What's sad, is I REALLY liked him as a person and a ball player and if he would have built on the end of last year...

Hope this isn't all true for his (and this team's) sake, but enough smoke and dots connecting where my hope is fading fast.

-KSUFirebird

Link: It's all coming together...http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20031003-10391704.html
:facepalm: x infinity

Title: Re: CK
Post by: purplenutz on February 08, 2011, 10:46:18 PM
Quote from: Kellis
But a source indicated Kelly is a repeat offender of the condition in question and that it has cost him playing time already this season.

So basically Kelly's early-season benching had nothing to do with effort and everything to do with a failed drug test.

No cac

Frank has to start coming up with better stories to cover cac up . . .  Asprilla is going home to "Columbia" aka "Canisius",   Kelly will miss playing time because of "work ethic" aka "Smoking Weed".  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: chum1 on February 08, 2011, 10:46:47 PM
go state
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 08, 2011, 10:49:03 PM
Frank has to start coming up with better stories to cover crap up . . .  Asprilla is going home to "Columbia" aka "Canisius",   Kelly will miss playing time because of "work ethic" aka "Smoking Weed".  

Please don't mock lung hernias, purplenutz   :cry:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 08, 2011, 10:51:51 PM


Frank has to start coming up with better stories to cover cac up . . .  Asprilla is going home to "Columbia" aka "Canisius",   Kelly will miss playing time because of "work ethic" aka "Smoking Weed".  

Well, have you ever tried to do work stoned?

I think you'll find your work ethic tends to be a little off.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: purplenutz on February 08, 2011, 10:52:48 PM
Meh, I hope he gets kicked off the team. Can you imagine the cac storm? Would make for great bbsing.

 :popcorn:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 08, 2011, 10:53:18 PM
Also, i find it hilarious KU fans hate CK so much. All because of :ck:

I want him around just for their pissing and moaning.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 10:55:21 PM
Also, i find it hilarious KU fans hate CK so much. All because of :ck:

I want him around just for their pissing and moaning.

and the irony of lawrencetards thinking smoking weed is a big deal. I expect that from the shirt tucks, but I've always had a great :bong: in that shithole, only thing it's good for.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 08, 2011, 10:58:06 PM
Frank has to start coming up with better stories to cover cac up . . .  Asprilla is going home to "Columbia" aka "Canisius",   Kelly will miss playing time because of "work ethic" aka "Smoking Weed".  

Please don't mock lung hernias, purplenutz   :cry:
:dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: _33 on February 08, 2011, 11:05:23 PM
Meh, I hope he gets kicked off the team. Can you imagine the crap storm? Would make for great bbsing.

Shut up stupid.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Clevey 2 Times on February 08, 2011, 11:06:59 PM
1 - Rumblings from fellow KSU  :bigtoke:, with has some insight into bballers on the weed, that before earlier CK suspension he knew 24 hours in advance of the test, but "On the Wildside" was closed so he couldn't get the juice to pass the test. Shouldn't Tay450K have a cupboard full of these? Or at least On the Wildside should provide keys to the hoopers for quick access.

2 - With #1 in mind, it is not that rough ridin' hard to pass a drug test. To me, CK is the biggest idiot here.

3 - Suspending a guy for smoking weed is rough ridin' stupid.

4 - This would never have gone down at uk.... :bang:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 11:08:43 PM
rough ridin' On the Wildside. Hippies don't care about sports/athletes. Ban bluegrass shows, that'll teach 'em!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 08, 2011, 11:13:35 PM
So if he misses the game at Colorado but plays Monday will ESPN turn the game Monday into a Curtis Kelly infomercial?  I'm just guessing here based on previous ESPN broadcasts.  Would really be something special.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 08, 2011, 11:16:55 PM
So if he misses the game at Colorado but plays Monday will ESPN turn the game Monday into a Curtis Kelly infomercial?  I'm just guessing here based on previous ESPN broadcasts.  Would really be something special.
It won't be one game. It's all or nothing this time.  :frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 08, 2011, 11:17:36 PM
So if he misses the game at Colorado but plays Monday will ESPN turn the game Monday into a Curtis Kelly infomercial?  I'm just guessing here based on previous ESPN broadcasts.  Would really be something special.
It won't be one game. It's all or nothing this time.  :frown:
:bawl: :bawl: :bawl:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 08, 2011, 11:19:11 PM
Quote
So if he misses the game at Colorado but plays Monday will ESPN turn the game Monday into a Curtis Kelly infomercial?  I'm just guessing here based on previous ESPN broadcasts.  Would really be something special.

I wish. Unfortunately, I think ESPN is still going to talk about Thomas Robinson and his ever dwindling family.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 08, 2011, 11:21:38 PM
So if he misses the game at Colorado but plays Monday will ESPN turn the game Monday into a Curtis Kelly infomercial?  I'm just guessing here based on previous ESPN broadcasts.  Would really be something special.
It won't be one game. It's all or nothing this time.  :frown:

i'm aware bro.  its a t-rob reference.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: bradleigh on February 08, 2011, 11:22:09 PM
If this fades into oblivion with no more than a "I'm not commenting on rumors and speculation" quote from Frank.  We all need to appreciate this day as the cornerstone on which our program can be built.



2/8/11 Never Forget    :kstatriot:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 08, 2011, 11:28:39 PM
If this fades into oblivion with no more than a "I'm not commenting on rumors and speculation" quote from Frank.  We all need to appreciate this day as the cornerstone on which our program can be built.



2/8/11 Never Forget    :kstatriot:


Do The Right Thing, Currie.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 08, 2011, 11:38:18 PM
We need to form a prayer circle or something.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 08, 2011, 11:43:28 PM
We need to form a prayer circle or something.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_uv9rbmjljHI%2FR0i7pHBFNqI%2FAAAAAAAAAZo%2FhliEDyeZ45o%2Fs320%2Fturnergill.jpg&hash=752517d19f496b15cc2ac24f45cf35bccb062593)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Do Work Son on February 08, 2011, 11:52:28 PM
Will we be forced to play in the 6ft and under league now?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 'taterblast on February 08, 2011, 11:54:48 PM
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=9221.msg196118#msg196118 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=9221.msg196118#msg196118)
 
:users:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: hemmy on February 09, 2011, 12:03:39 AM
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=9221.msg196118#msg196118 (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=9221.msg196118#msg196118)
 
:users:


god dammit emawblast
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Bill Clarahan on February 09, 2011, 12:05:16 AM
Quote
robcassidy22 Rob Cassidy
Here's what I was able to figure out about Curtis Kelly today: http://tinyurl.com/6bbn2or Props to Austin Meek for breaking the story, BTW.

 :dubious:

I am going to start a new website and put the entire system on trial.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi10.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa107%2Fbig12north%2Fnewsite.jpg&hash=3b785dbe2bffa83564ebff6e4e286b4a38bbd333)



Otter......is that you?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j-dub on February 09, 2011, 12:05:29 AM
 :fistpump:
We need to form a prayer circle or something.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2F4.bp.blogspot.com%2F_uv9rbmjljHI%2FR0i7pHBFNqI%2FAAAAAAAAAZo%2FhliEDyeZ45o%2Fs320%2Fturnergill.jpg&hash=752517d19f496b15cc2ac24f45cf35bccb062593)

 :emawkid:  :emawkid:  :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Goldbrick on February 09, 2011, 01:02:59 AM
We have so much to learn in order to be considered an elite program

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi80.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj161%2FGoldbrick%2Fmcmwfrogman.jpg%3Ft%3D1297234867&hash=417ab8655c82f2bab31a02e02ab9ffd676003e75)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 09, 2011, 01:22:26 AM
We have so much to learn in order to be considered an elite program

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi80.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj161%2FGoldbrick%2Fmcmwfrogman.jpg%3Ft%3D1297234867&hash=417ab8655c82f2bab31a02e02ab9ffd676003e75)
sigh.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Goldbrick on February 09, 2011, 01:23:42 AM
sigh.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi80.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fj161%2FGoldbrick%2FFitzfrogman.jpg%3Ft%3D1297235926&hash=66c19fbb036a869845f973df6ff3ab0017497148)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: chunkles on February 09, 2011, 01:30:21 AM
numb.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2011, 06:56:12 AM
If there was one time we really needed, "I'm old I forget things" or a, "Compliance doesn't sell Tickets" moment or a 'just too busy to address this right now' situation . . . it's now. 

We're never going to have nice things if we keep following all of these rules.

 :frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: rcjh88 on February 09, 2011, 07:54:34 AM
 Smoking weed is not a big deal I would guess that the majority of college athletes have or do currently smoke, but if you are a big enough idiot to get caught 3 times when you know the consequences then you have a problem. I hope that ksu is allowed to keep him but I think he needs some help in making better decisions.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mcmwcat on February 09, 2011, 07:57:42 AM
Smoking weed is not a big deal I would guess that the majority of college athletes have or do currently smoke, but if you are a big enough idiot to get caught 3 times when you know the consequences then you have a problem. I hope that ksu is allowed to keep him but I think he needs some help in making better decisions.

i think it's obvious the problem is not w/ Kelly.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2011, 08:08:11 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: broXcore on February 09, 2011, 08:09:37 AM
look at you goEMAW, scoopin' fitz
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 09, 2011, 08:10:13 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

I don't know, but if its up and running today then Potuzak better have his ass in the gym.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 08:17:07 AM
Smoking weed is not a big deal I would guess that the majority of college athletes have or do currently smoke, but if you are a big enough idiot to get caught 3 times when you know the consequences then you have a problem. I hope that ksu is allowed to keep him but I think he needs some help in making better decisions.

Don't blame the peacock for having beautiful feathers....blame the zoo keeper for not keeping the peacock clean.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 09, 2011, 08:18:35 AM
Smoking weed is not a big deal I would guess that the majority of college athletes have or do currently smoke, but if you are a big enough idiot to get caught 3 times when you know the consequences then you have a problem. I hope that ksu is allowed to keep him but I think he needs some help in making better decisions.

Don't blame the peacock for having beautiful feathers....blame the zoo keeper for not keeping the peacock clean.

:emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 08:18:59 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 09, 2011, 08:22:48 AM
make it right currie.  :curse:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2011, 08:28:54 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I don't know.  Wouldn't it be better if Currie just comes out right away and announces that the test was faulty and the appeal granted and everything's fine?  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2011, 08:31:12 AM
Better yet, Internal Matter and CK keeps right on playing, when asked about it, "internal matter" . . . when asked about it again, "it's being handled in house" . . . future comments requested, "Sorry, Internal Matter ". 

Well, that's about it I suppose.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 09, 2011, 08:32:04 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I don't know.  Wouldn't it be better if Currie just comes out right away and announces that the test was faulty and the appeal granted and everything's fine?  :dunno:

Also the Dillards thing was BS and those loses get atericks in the record books. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: michigancat on February 09, 2011, 08:39:33 AM
look at you goEMAW, scoopin' fitz
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 09, 2011, 08:41:51 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I don't know.  Wouldn't it be better if Currie just comes out right away and announces that the test was faulty and the appeal granted and everything's fine?  :dunno:

It would be, but I'm sure some shirt tucks want to see some kind of punishment. If Currie wants to maximize donations, Kelly will play out the season and then lose his scholarship. It's the KU way.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2011, 08:44:58 AM
Better yet, Internal Matter and CK keeps right on playing, when asked about it, "internal matter" . . . when asked about it again, "it's being handled in house" . . . future comments requested, "Sorry, Internal Matter ". 

Well, that's about it I suppose.



THIS.

Meanwhile, internally I'd hope that Currie simply continue to address the multitude of other more important tasks at hand....get to this Kelly thing after all those other more pressing matters are dealt with effectively....it takes as long as it takes.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2011, 09:00:49 AM
Guys, Currie needs to pull the "we need to retest" move here.  Say something about possible contamination in the previous test.

I mean, On The Wildside is open today, right?

Also, some townie needs to go buy a baker's dozen of these things and post their emergency phone number for player use. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 09, 2011, 09:10:08 AM
He could have gotten the same stuff at GNC (should also be mentioned in player orientation)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: The1BigWillie on February 09, 2011, 09:18:31 AM
We could eff up a wet dream.   :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: RonLongshaft on February 09, 2011, 09:53:42 AM
We could eff up a wet dream.   :goodbyecruelworld:

No, we mumped up this wet dream.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWzified on February 09, 2011, 10:00:51 AM
Punishment should be sitting out the Texas game. You know, give them a fighting chance.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: The1BigWillie on February 09, 2011, 10:03:30 AM
Punishment should be sitting out the Texas game. You know, give them a fighting chance.
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Panjandrum on February 09, 2011, 10:28:57 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I don't know.  Wouldn't it be better if Currie just comes out right away and announces that the test was faulty and the appeal granted and everything's fine?  :dunno:

It would be, but I'm sure some shirt tucks want to see some kind of punishment. If Currie wants to maximize donations, Kelly will play out the season and then lose his scholarship. It's the KU way.

He's already graduated, too.  So it's a win/win/win.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j@yh@wks on February 09, 2011, 10:45:52 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 1992 on February 09, 2011, 10:49:08 AM
These waters need calmed.

Everyone needs to mellow.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fsocratesvotes.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2009%2F02%2Farnold_pot.jpg&hash=a930c2d58fc50e960b3511c8d92763f0edb4efc9)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWmeister on February 09, 2011, 10:52:27 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has. 

no rough ridin' crap, dumbass.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mcmwcat on February 09, 2011, 10:55:47 AM
curtis is numero uno in my book
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j@yh@wks on February 09, 2011, 11:00:46 AM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has.  

no rough ridin' crap, dumbass.

just a reply to a poster.  I would abandon trying to do things the way KU does.  You fail, dumbass.  I would also like to point out to you that this is an even bigger fail than "history awaits" was for us.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 09, 2011, 11:58:58 AM

I would also like to point out to you that this is an even bigger fail than "history awaits" was for us.

Nope.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 09, 2011, 12:00:03 PM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has. 

no rough ridin' crap, dumbass.

I would also like to point out to you that this is an even bigger fail than "history awaits" was for us.

No it's not.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Bill Clarahan on February 09, 2011, 12:06:17 PM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has. 

I agree with this, hell does anyone even remember Darrell Arthur didn't get out of high school but was enrolled at KU
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 09, 2011, 12:12:25 PM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has. 

I agree with this, hell does anyone even remember Darrell Arthur didn't get out of high school but was enrolled at KU

of course.  the fact that most of them don't embrace and brag about their MCMW program is perplexing.  i would brag the crap out of something like that
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWzified on February 09, 2011, 12:14:18 PM
I don't think there is anyone here who would argue we could replicate UofK's MCMW formula. Look up and down that roster for god's sake. It's an effing benchmark.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j@yh@wks on February 09, 2011, 12:14:40 PM
and look at the championship game that year.  full of MCMW from both final teams.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: KSUTOMMY on February 09, 2011, 12:17:18 PM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has. 

I agree with this, hell does anyone even remember Darrell Arthur didn't get out of high school but was enrolled at KU

Since we're dragging out the old uk favs, I recall Aquib Talib admitting to pissing hot 3 times while at uk...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2011, 12:20:12 PM

Since we're dragging out the old uk favs, I recall Aquib Talib admitting to pissing hot 3 times while at uk...

It is a FACT that Talib confessed at the NFL combine for having failed three drug tests, all for pot.  He never missed a game as a result.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 09, 2011, 12:25:26 PM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has.  

no rough ridin' crap, dumbass.

just a reply to a poster.  I would abandon trying to do things the way KU does.  You fail, dumbass.  I would also like to point out to you that this is an even bigger fail than "history awaits" was for us.

We are failing because we don't do things the way KU does, dumbass. That's why everyone is saying we need to do it the KU way.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j@yh@wks on February 09, 2011, 12:26:25 PM

Since we're dragging out the old uk favs, I recall Aquib Talib admitting to pissing hot 3 times while at uk...

It is a FACT that Talib confessed at the NFL combine for having failed three drug tests, all for pot.  He never missed a game as a result.

I don't know, i kinda remember Mangina suspending him for a game or two in 06.  Not sure if related or not but i remember hearing the reason was a failed test.  But no, we would never kick a kid off a team for smoking some pot.  Or for assault or any other crime for that matter.  Unless you stab yourself, then your gone.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j@yh@wks on February 09, 2011, 12:28:34 PM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has.  

no rough ridin' crap, dumbass.

just a reply to a poster.  I would abandon trying to do things the way KU does.  You fail, dumbass.  I would also like to point out to you that this is an even bigger fail than "history awaits" was for us.

We are failing because we don't do things the way KU does, dumbass. That's why everyone is saying we need to do it the KU way.
you are failing because you are trying to do it our way and it's just blowing up in your faces because of your coach or AD.  Someone in your rank doesn't want to win.  All I'm saying. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: john "teach me how to" dougie on February 09, 2011, 12:30:23 PM
rough ridin' CONSCIENCE, get out of our Atheletic Department! NOW! :chainsaw:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2011, 12:35:35 PM
He could have gotten the same stuff at GNC (should also be mentioned in player orientation)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fts4.mm.bing.net%2Fimages%2Fthumbnail.aspx%3Fq%3D409712207495%26amp%3Bid%3D8ea0065550c99d519f5195087e8fe697&hash=52083e53fa32a6285fd742c8f2a2f7634d41be4c)

You have to be careful with this stuff though, it can lower your creatinine to abnormally low levels which is also considered a failed test.  However, an abnormally low creatinine levels would be adequate grounds for a dragged out appeal or another test administered altogether.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2011, 12:38:46 PM
KSU is fully open and operational today despite the weather.  Is there any reason this appeal shouldn't be granted by 9 a.m.?  :foottappingwatchlookingguy:

The official goEMAW position is that this incident should be dragged out until May.  That is the ku way and we gotta copy the shady Gold Standard.

I think you guys have proven this year that in no way can you copy the success of MCMW the way KU has.  

no rough ridin' crap, dumbass.

just a reply to a poster.  I would abandon trying to do things the way KU does.  You fail, dumbass.  I would also like to point out to you that this is an even bigger fail than "history awaits" was for us.

I disagree.  History Awaits was self promotion based off of very limited success.  Our disappointment is based off of external expectations after very limited success.  Big diff.  You guys tooted your own horn.  The national media tooted ours.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 09, 2011, 12:57:50 PM
Not to mention that you lost 7 games in a row, while we've still won 2/3rds of ours.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: rcjh88 on February 09, 2011, 01:02:10 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 09, 2011, 01:06:10 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!

Nothing can be worse than losing 7 games in a row in football. Nothing
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2011, 01:06:38 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!

If KSU BB bought a bunch of radio/tv adverts telling everyone how we were going to the Final Four this year, then I would agree with you.  However, the rankings were made by a bunch of people who don't even own a purple shirt.  

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dub on February 09, 2011, 01:08:05 PM
He could have gotten the same stuff at GNC (should also be mentioned in player orientation)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fts4.mm.bing.net%2Fimages%2Fthumbnail.aspx%3Fq%3D409712207495%26amp%3Bid%3D8ea0065550c99d519f5195087e8fe697&hash=52083e53fa32a6285fd742c8f2a2f7634d41be4c)

You have to be careful with this stuff though, it can lower your creatinine to abnormally low levels which is also considered a failed test.  However, an abnormally low creatinine levels would be adequate grounds for a dragged out appeal or another test administered altogether.

That's why only amateurs use that.  The good stuff is also at GNC I believe though, much more expensive though.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 09, 2011, 01:26:16 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!
you are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)... you lost 7 rough ridin' games in a row! thats like losing 20 basketball games in a row. we have not done that.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 01:28:50 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!
you are Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)... you lost 7 effing games in a row! thats like losing 20 basketball games in a row. we have not done that.

Finished DEAD LAST in the div.  I would almost guarantee KSU basketball finishes in the upper half.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 09, 2011, 01:30:49 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!

You picked yourself to win it all, and finished last. lmao
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2011, 01:32:15 PM
There are what, like 350 division 1 basketball teams, and 68 make the tournament, right?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 09, 2011, 01:35:23 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!

Expanded field to 68 instead of 65, big expansion.

Plus we can't control what coaches and media predict for us. The only one predicting a good season for ku that year was your marketing department. HISTORY AWAITS.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: chum1 on February 09, 2011, 01:39:55 PM
god, look at what this thread has become.  just kick him off the team already!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 09, 2011, 01:41:05 PM
 KU kid talks about being a let down :jerk:


2 words: Northern Iowa
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2011, 01:43:51 PM
He could have gotten the same stuff at GNC (should also be mentioned in player orientation)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fts4.mm.bing.net%2Fimages%2Fthumbnail.aspx%3Fq%3D409712207495%26amp%3Bid%3D8ea0065550c99d519f5195087e8fe697&hash=52083e53fa32a6285fd742c8f2a2f7634d41be4c)

You have to be careful with this stuff though, it can lower your creatinine to abnormally low levels which is also considered a failed test.  However, an abnormally low creatinine levels would be adequate grounds for a dragged out appeal or another test administered altogether.

That's why only amateurs use that.  The good stuff is also at GNC I believe though, much more expensive though.

 :confused: :dunno:

you gonna tell me or not?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 01:45:07 PM
Back on Point.

ADJC, time to publish a two sentence press release:

Curtis Kelly is currently a member of the KSU men's basketball team and all discipline in relation to him will be handled in-house from here forward.  Fear the Beard/EMAW.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 01:45:58 PM
He could have gotten the same stuff at GNC (should also be mentioned in player orientation)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fts4.mm.bing.net%2Fimages%2Fthumbnail.aspx%3Fq%3D409712207495%26amp%3Bid%3D8ea0065550c99d519f5195087e8fe697&hash=52083e53fa32a6285fd742c8f2a2f7634d41be4c)

You have to be careful with this stuff though, it can lower your creatinine to abnormally low levels which is also considered a failed test.  However, an abnormally low creatinine levels would be adequate grounds for a dragged out appeal or another test administered altogether.

That's why only amateurs use that.  The good stuff is also at GNC I believe though, much more expensive though.

 :confused: :dunno:

you gonna tell me or not?

Move it to the hippie thread, cheech.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 09, 2011, 01:46:51 PM
Quote
Curtis Kelly is currently a member of the KSU men's basketball team and all discipline in relation to him will be handled in-house from here forward.  Fear the Beard/EMAW.
Amen
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2011, 01:48:18 PM
Quote
Curtis Kelly is currently a member of the KSU men's basketball team and all discipline in relation to him will be handled in-house from here forward.  Fear the Beard/EMAW.
Amen

I'd write an Ahearn check.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Andy on February 09, 2011, 01:54:53 PM
whats really sad here is we are fighting to save CK so that we avoid an even bigger fail of a season
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2011, 01:56:02 PM
whats really sad here is we are fighting to save CK so that we avoid an even bigger fail of a season

you're not getting it
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2011, 01:57:14 PM
Back on Point.

ADJC, time to publish a two sentence press release:

Curtis Kelly is currently a member of the KSU men's basketball team and all discipline in relation to him will be handled in-house from here forward.  Fear the Beard/EMAW.


Sub WABASH for EMAW?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Andy on February 09, 2011, 01:58:20 PM
whats really sad here is we are fighting to save CK so that we avoid an even bigger fail of a season

you're not getting it

nah.  just wishing CK was the piece we needed to keep for a big 12 title/FF run rather than to avoid even further disaster.  just a lament to what the season is now.  nothing else.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: lifeasakstatefan on February 09, 2011, 02:05:42 PM
latest tweet from Seth Davis:

Seth davis @SethDavisHoops
 
-Frank Martin told me on Courtside that Curtis Kelly "is a part of our program" and he doesn't expect it to change. Airs on CBS College at 6.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: jtksu on February 09, 2011, 02:07:23 PM
Excellent.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2011, 02:07:36 PM
latest tweet from Seth Davis:

Seth davis @SethDavisHoops
 
-Frank Martin told me on Courtside that Curtis Kelly "is a part of our program" and he doesn't expect it to change. Airs on CBS College at 6.



Seth is going to be crushed. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 09, 2011, 02:09:25 PM
latest tweet from Seth Davis:

Seth davis @SethDavisHoops
 
-Frank Martin told me on Courtside that Curtis Kelly "is a part of our program" and he doesn't expect it to change. Airs on CBS College at 6.



 :users:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wetwillie on February 09, 2011, 02:13:49 PM
latest tweet from Seth Davis:

Seth davis @SethDavisHoops
 
-Frank Martin told me on Courtside that Curtis Kelly "is a part of our program" and he doesn't expect it to change. Airs on CBS College at 6.



I view this as "Make it right Currie"
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2011, 02:15:12 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!

Nothing says utter failure like an inhouse/athletic department sanctioned promo campaign, in this case, "History Awaits" . . . only to see the team essentially fall flat on its face.  For gods sake there was even a custom made "History Awaits" countdown clock in the ku football offices.



Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 09, 2011, 02:20:39 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!

Nothing says utter failure like an inhouse/athletic department sanctioned promo campaign, in this case, "History Awaits" . . . only to see the team essentially fall flat on its face.  For gods sake there was even a custom made "History Awaits" countdown clock in the ku football offices.
You obviously didn't understand what they meant by "History Awaits".

It can be argued that their season was going to be so bad that it was one for the History Books. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Andy on February 09, 2011, 02:21:00 PM
You worked at an athletic department that had like 17 guys arrested every week and most of them kept right on playing.  You helped hire a coach that is a walking NCAA rules violation (BTW if this thing blows up on Frank you should make a run at Pearl).   The football coach at the same school had an offseason, off the field issue scoring system and championship in his name that ran at a well known college football blog.

the currie from tennesee thing gives me the most hope
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 09, 2011, 02:21:11 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 02:21:21 PM
Back on Point.

ADJC, time to publish a two sentence press release:

Curtis Kelly is currently a member of the KSU men's basketball team and all discipline in relation to him will be handled in-house from here forward.  Fear the Beard/EMAW.


Sub WABASH for EMAW?

You'd like that, wouldn't you?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 09, 2011, 02:21:38 PM
would you rough ridin' tards quit mucking up this thread with stupid ku v. ksu stuff  :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 02:23:19 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:

"I'd guarantee you there are professors that work for KSU who have been high in the last week."

"I think Frank Martin wants this kid on his team, but John Currie is a straight laced, by-the-book guy who actually tries to find things to report to the compliance department/"

"I'm hearing that Currie has GONE TOO FAR.  He has become his own NCAA."

BITB indeed.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2011, 02:24:06 PM
Back on Point.

ADJC, time to publish a two sentence press release:

Curtis Kelly is currently a member of the KSU men's basketball team and all discipline in relation to him will be handled in-house from here forward.  Fear the Beard/EMAW.


Sub WABASH for EMAW?

You'd like that, wouldn't you?

I may or may not have already purchased goWABASH.com.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2011, 02:24:12 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!

Nothing says utter failure like an inhouse/athletic department sanctioned promo campaign, in this case, "History Awaits" . . . only to see the team essentially fall flat on its face.  For gods sake there was even a custom made "History Awaits" countdown clock in the ku football offices.




:surprised:
Lew is an absolute master at the Cash Grab.  He opened KU FB up to such an embarrassment just to hype the fan base into buying as many tickets as they could.  

:applause:  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 09, 2011, 02:24:21 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:

"I'd guarantee you there are professors that work for KSU who have been high in the last week."

"I think Frank Martin wants this kid on his team, but John Currie is a straight laced, by-the-book guy who actually tries to find things to report to the compliance department/"

"I'm hearing that Currie has GONE TOO FAR.  He has become his own NCAA."

BITB indeed.

well, confirmation keitz reads the board  :woot:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 02:24:40 PM
"I think what's going on is we got a struggle between the basketball team and the athletic department."




Thanks for reading goEMAW Kietz!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 09, 2011, 02:24:44 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:

"I'd guarantee you there are professors that work for KSU who have been high in the last week."

"I think Frank Martin wants this kid on his team, but John Currie is a straight laced, by-the-book guy who actually tries to find things to report to the compliance department/"

"I'm hearing that Currie has GONE TOO FAR.  He has become his own NCAA."

BITB indeed.

 :emawkid: :emawkid: :emawkid: :emawkid: :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kso_FAN on February 09, 2011, 02:25:00 PM
BITB is BITBing.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2011, 02:25:34 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:

"I'd guarantee you there are professors that work for KSU who have been high in the last week."

"I think Frank Martin wants this kid on his team, but John Currie is a straight laced, by-the-book guy who actually tries to find things to report to the compliance department/"

"I'm hearing that Currie has GONE TOO FAR.  He has become his own NCAA."

BITB indeed.

This guy has no designs on a second certificate of any kind. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: The1BigWillie on February 09, 2011, 02:26:51 PM
FREE  :ck: !!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pett on February 09, 2011, 02:27:12 PM
Quote
Curtis Kelly is currently a member of the KSU men's basketball team and all discipline in relation to him will be handled in-house from here forward.  Fear the Beard/EMAW.
Amen

I'd write an Ahearn check.

IF he misses 0 time.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2011, 02:27:54 PM
FREE  :ck: !!!!

SHIRTS!!!  Currie wants a black out on the 19th. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AppleJack on February 09, 2011, 02:28:34 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:

"I'd guarantee you there are professors that work for KSU who have been high in the last week."

"I think Frank Martin wants this kid on his team, but John Currie is a straight laced, by-the-book guy who actually tries to find things to report to the compliance department/"

"I'm hearing that Currie has GONE TOO FAR.  He has become his own NCAA."

BITB indeed.


Time for Trim to remove the line through his sig  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mcmwcat on February 09, 2011, 02:28:56 PM
Quote
Curtis Kelly is currently a member of the KSU men's basketball team and all discipline in relation to him will be handled in-house from here forward.  Fear the Beard/EMAW.
Amen

I'd write an Ahearn check.

IF he misses 0 time.

considering he missed 6 games for a bullshit violation it's too late for that.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 09, 2011, 02:29:57 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:

"I'd guarantee you there are professors that work for KSU who have been high in the last week."

"I think Frank Martin wants this kid on his team, but John Currie is a straight laced, by-the-book guy who actually tries to find things to report to the compliance department/"

"I'm hearing that Currie has GONE TOO FAR.  He has become his own NCAA."

BITB indeed.


Time for Trim to remove the line through his sig  :dunno:

I mean, it's impossible that Currie doesn't do the right thing here, right?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: catzacker on February 09, 2011, 02:30:31 PM
if the tide gets turned, and currie gets his pocket protector broken over this, all of us goEMAW'rs deserve a olive garden gift card for saving the basketball program.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 09, 2011, 02:30:56 PM
even Danny is feeding BITB's radio domination on this one
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 09, 2011, 02:31:21 PM
Quote
considering he missed 6 games for a bullshit violation it's too late for that.

Somebody forgot to get Currie his Polo and Slacks.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: catzacker on February 09, 2011, 02:34:09 PM
JFC, Currie is Neidermeyer from Animal House.

Frank is Belushi.

Sprads is the Delta Chi president.

it will work better if one of you photoshops this. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 02:35:21 PM
If Al Bohl was the dove in Roy Williams hands, that could be crushed or released to fly free, just wtf is going on in Manhattan right now?  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bakerman on February 09, 2011, 02:35:51 PM
Front page of www.810whb.com:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.810whb.com%2Fimages%2Farticle_images%2F5865.png&hash=f4f976f7a79b37263a0ee8125e2d350fa65919bd)       =  :ck:

 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Three Fingers on February 09, 2011, 02:36:11 PM
Quote
considering he missed 6 games for a bullcac violation it's too late for that.

Somebody forgot to get Currie his Polo and Slacks.

No, they got him his shirt.  The problem lied in the fact that it was a Cutter & Buck shirt and not Polo.  You should have seen the look on Currie's face when he opened that sack.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 02:37:27 PM
JFC, Currie is Neidermeyer from Animal House.

Frank is Belushi.

Sprads is the Delta Chi president.

it will work better if one of you photoshops this. 

Then obviously the final scene parade = Big 12 Tournament in KC.*

This thing is coming to a head boys, and we are at Ground ZERO.   :excited: :excited: :excited: :excited: :excited:


*Elites from goEMAW serving as the rest of the DC house in creating mayhem.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2011, 02:37:33 PM
All the makings of an AD who is trying to "make a name for himself" and then move on.  

This is a double edged sword . . . all gung ho and balls to the wall on facilities (a good thing), and then all Barney Fife on this stuff.  (Hey John, it's gonna be hard to sell those mega high end Presidential Level suites in the Kirk Schulz Pressbox if K-State doesn't win in BOTH sports).

Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 09, 2011, 02:39:16 PM

Quote
No, they got him his shirt.  The problem lied in the fact that it was a Cutter & Buck shirt and not Polo.  You should have seen the look on Currie's face when he opened that sack.
Something like this?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffiles.sharenator.com%2Fffffffuuuuu__4_FFFFFFFFUUUUUU-s507x387-88573.gif&hash=5a7cbdd33de7a7382ac846a9c7d5fe2d2110c9ab)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2011, 02:40:46 PM
Guys, the interwebs were made for stuf like this...amirite?  Wow.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2011, 02:43:28 PM
OK, the guy who "met kevin at the kansas sampler" is a hoot...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 02:45:13 PM
All the makings of an AD who is trying to "make a name for himself" and then move on.  

This is a double edged sword . . . all gung ho and balls to the wall on facilities (a good thing), and then all Barney Fife on this stuff.  (Hey John, it's gonna be hard to sell those mega high end Presidential Level suites in the Kirk Schulz Pressbox if K-State doesn't win in BOTH sports).



Is there a single SEC school who would take a over-cautious, self-reporting AD who is eager to take on a head coach, even if he can raise the crap out of funds?  No way in hell.  

Neither will a Big 10 school.

PS.  KK basically just said he is down with "MCMW" - especially at KSU because we are so squeaky clean.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2011, 02:53:34 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:

"I'd guarantee you there are professors that work for KSU who have been high in the last week."

"I think Frank Martin wants this kid on his team, but John Currie is a straight laced, by-the-book guy who actually tries to find things to report to the compliance department/"

"I'm hearing that Currie has GONE TOO FAR.  He has become his own NCAA."

BITB indeed.

This guy has no designs on a second certificate of any kind. 

The bitch never got a first certificate, Schultz made Currie carry his, like a servant.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 09, 2011, 02:54:34 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:

"I'd guarantee you there are professors that work for KSU who have been high in the last week."

"I think Frank Martin wants this kid on his team, but John Currie is a straight laced, by-the-book guy who actually tries to find things to report to the compliance department/"

"I'm hearing that Currie has GONE TOO FAR.  He has become his own NCAA."

BITB indeed.

This guy has no designs on a second certificate of any kind. 

The bitch never got a first certificate, Schultz made Currie carry his, like a servant.

I love MIR  :blush:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2011, 02:56:51 PM
Front page of www.810whb.com:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.810whb.com%2Fimages%2Farticle_images%2F5865.png&hash=f4f976f7a79b37263a0ee8125e2d350fa65919bd)       =  :ck:

 :lol:

Stole the photo and the entire article from Austin Meek and didn't properly attribute it, their clickable link doesn't link to Meek's story but back to the stolen article.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: TheFormerKCCat on February 09, 2011, 03:00:14 PM
FREE  :ck: !!!!

!!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bakerman on February 09, 2011, 03:03:27 PM
Front page of www.810whb.com:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.810whb.com%2Fimages%2Farticle_images%2F5865.png&hash=f4f976f7a79b37263a0ee8125e2d350fa65919bd)       =  :ck:

 :lol:

Stole the photo and the entire article from Austin Meek and didn't properly attribute it, their clickable link doesn't link to Meek's story but back to the stolen article.

not really a surprise. that would require extra work.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 09, 2011, 03:08:10 PM
JOHN CURRIE YOU OLD SON OF A BITCH!

Quote from:  Seth Davis
Frank Martin told me on Courtside that Curtis Kelly "is a part of our program" and he doesn't expect it to change. Airs on CBS College at 6.

It's like we're posting to a wall or something.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 09, 2011, 03:09:43 PM
 :frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: catzacker on February 09, 2011, 03:11:45 PM
dear john currie,

buy in or quit.


thanks.

cz
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstate4life on February 09, 2011, 03:31:05 PM
What are the odds we don't find out the outcome of this until game time on Saturday?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 1992 on February 09, 2011, 03:32:43 PM
You were picked to win the big 12, now you might not make the tourney.....and it has an expanded field! I would say that is the bigger let down!

You are right dumbass.  This is worse.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on February 09, 2011, 03:44:12 PM
Frank has got to be on the phone with his agent pleading to Get him the eff out of here.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2011, 04:26:08 PM
They keep using "Where there's smoke, there's fire" analogy on KMAN.

810/BITB no work.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2011, 04:30:40 PM
You know who is laughing their collective asses off at us right now . . . the cool, beautiful people at Colorado, that's who.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fc1.planetsave.com%2Ffiles%2F2008%2F04%2Fpot-smokeout.JPG&hash=e676d09a3e77bf2ffa87a176c58e45e94bb46656)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 09, 2011, 04:35:58 PM
You know who is laughing their collective asses off at us right now . . . the cool, beautiful people at Colorado, that's who.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fc1.planetsave.com%2Ffiles%2F2008%2F04%2Fpot-smokeout.JPG&hash=e676d09a3e77bf2ffa87a176c58e45e94bb46656)

cough, strippers and booze, cough

Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2011, 04:46:50 PM
You know who is laughing their collective asses off at us right now . . . the cool, beautiful people at Colorado, that's who.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fc1.planetsave.com%2Ffiles%2F2008%2F04%2Fpot-smokeout.JPG&hash=e676d09a3e77bf2ffa87a176c58e45e94bb46656)

That's a really bad picture to attempt to enhance your point.  A lot of ugly people and tyedye in that picture.  And what's with the guy in the Duke t-shirt with the back fat?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2011, 04:49:15 PM
Nice MIR.  You got me.   :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: theKSU on February 09, 2011, 05:09:45 PM
Who wants to hang out at Farrand Field on 4/20?   :ck:   :bigtoke:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 09, 2011, 05:30:28 PM
MIR is notoriously anti-CU-ey.  It's annoying in threads where we try to convince everyone of their superiority.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kso_FAN on February 09, 2011, 06:01:43 PM
BITB played quotes from today's Frank interview with Seth Davis. Pretty much said Curt is part of the team and mentioned the key players to the rest of the season are he and Jamar.

Stay tuned...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j-dub on February 09, 2011, 06:13:59 PM
BITB played quotes from today's Frank interview with Seth Davis. Pretty much said Curt is part of the team and mentioned the key players to the rest of the season are he and Jamar.

Stay tuned...

you think there is some validity in BITB's point about coach vs ad/drawing a line in the sand..? or just typical bitb..

in any event, I think his last point was spot on. the one about ksu cats basketball dying a cruel and unfortunate death if currie capitulates to the tucks...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: chum1 on February 09, 2011, 06:14:14 PM
MIR is notoriously anti-CU-ey.  It's annoying in threads where we try to convince everyone of their superiority.

No way he's ever been there.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: catzacker on February 09, 2011, 06:24:35 PM
BITB played quotes from today's Frank interview with Seth Davis. Pretty much said Curt is part of the team and mentioned the key players to the rest of the season are he and Jamar.

Stay tuned...

"part of the program" is a great way of saying "he's not dismissed...yet". 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 09, 2011, 06:25:45 PM
BITB played quotes from today's Frank interview with Seth Davis. Pretty much said Curt is part of the team and mentioned the key players to the rest of the season are he and Jamar.

Stay tuned...

scene: a nearly empty gymnasium in boulder, colorado.  three kansas state guards and jamar samuels are on the court, awaiting the tip against five colorado buffalo players. from the locker room, a uniformed curtis kelly appears and walks to midcourt, replacing samuels at the jump.

frank martin (turning to john currie, behind the bench) - long pause - "my team is on the floor".
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 09, 2011, 06:31:05 PM
scene: a nearly empty gymnasium in boulder, colorado.  three kansas state guards and jamar samuels are on the court, awaiting the tip against five colorado buffalo players. from the locker room, a uniformed curtis kelly appears and walks to midcourt, replacing samuels at the jump.

frank martin (turning to john currie, behind the bench) - long pause - "my team is on the floor".

 :love:

DO THE RIGHT THING, CURRIE!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 09, 2011, 06:40:54 PM

scene: a nearly empty gymnasium in boulder, colorado.  three kansas state guards and jamar samuels are on the court, awaiting the tip against five colorado buffalo players. from the locker room, a uniformed curtis kelly appears and walks to midcourt, replacing samuels at the jump.

frank martin (turning to john currie, behind the bench) - long pause - "my team is on the floor".
  :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:


Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 09, 2011, 06:42:42 PM
sys, can you make Currie hand him a Diet Dr. Pepper?  :crossfingers:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 09, 2011, 06:44:15 PM
BITB played quotes from today's Frank interview with Seth Davis. Pretty much said Curt is part of the team and mentioned the key players to the rest of the season are he and Jamar.

Stay tuned...

scene: a nearly empty gymnasium in boulder, colorado.  three kansas state guards and jamar samuels are on the court, awaiting the tip against five colorado buffalo players. from the locker room, a uniformed curtis kelly appears and walks to midcourt, replacing samuels at the jump.

frank martin (turning to john currie, behind the bench) - long pause - "my team is on the floor".

goEMAW.com superbowl commercial possibilities!!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j@yh@wks on February 09, 2011, 06:44:39 PM

well, confirmation keitz reads the board  :woot:

good lord, he does do this doesn't he.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: chum1 on February 09, 2011, 06:45:15 PM
And here I was worried about that post being embarrassing for sys.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 09, 2011, 06:46:44 PM
FWIW, I talked to a student athlete today who said that every student athlete is tested once a month. They confirmed the warning, 10% of games, dismissed from team punishments that I posted a while back.

I don't know if this is common knowledge, I just didn't see it posted anywhere in this thread.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 09, 2011, 06:58:04 PM
You know who is laughing their collective asses off at us right now . . . the cool, beautiful people at Colorado, that's who.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fc1.planetsave.com%2Ffiles%2F2008%2F04%2Fpot-smokeout.JPG&hash=e676d09a3e77bf2ffa87a176c58e45e94bb46656)

That's a really bad picture to attempt to enhance your point.  A lot of ugly people and tyedye in that picture.  And what's with the guy in the Duke t-shirt with the back fat?

That's what the "people" in Boulder have looked like every time I've been there.   :barf:

never understood the goEMAW "people in boulder are pretty" stereotype  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kso_FAN on February 09, 2011, 07:05:38 PM
BITB played quotes from today's Frank interview with Seth Davis. Pretty much said Curt is part of the team and mentioned the key players to the rest of the season are he and Jamar.

Stay tuned...

"part of the program" is a great way of saying "he's not dismissed...yet". 


I don't remember the exact words, but he wasn't just saying that. Especially when he went on to talk about Kelly (with Samuels) being the key players for the rest of the season when asked who the key was from here on out. Also talked about how much better they had played since Curt and Jamar have been playing together.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 09, 2011, 07:08:18 PM
It seems like (based on prior coachspeak this season) if he wasn't part of the team, or was suspended frank wouldn't talk about him at all (unless to inform he was dismissed).

for example
Quote
"let's talk about the guys that played!!!"
and such
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2011, 07:11:56 PM
FWIW, I talked to a student athlete today who said that every student athlete is tested once a month. They confirmed the warning, 10% of games, dismissed from team punishments that I posted a while back.

I don't know if this is common knowledge, I just didn't see it posted anywhere in this thread.

It's common knowledge and posted in the thread.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rams on February 09, 2011, 07:47:31 PM

Since we're dragging out the old uk favs, I recall Aquib Talib admitting to pissing hot 3 times while at uk...

It is a FACT that Talib confessed at the NFL combine for having failed three drug tests, all for pot.  He never missed a game as a result.

I don't know, i kinda remember Mangina suspending him for a game or two in 06.  Not sure if related or not but i remember hearing the reason was a failed test.  But no, we would never kick a kid off a team for smoking some pot.  Or for assault or any other crime for that matter.  Unless you stab yourself, then your gone.
Actually I was good friends with the associate AD at the time.  His quote to me was "he beat up somebody on the track team...that happened to be a girl."

Come to think of it, beating up women seems to be a theme with KU athletes.  Not sure I'm on board with MCMW if it means pussies who hit women.  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Immaculate1 on February 09, 2011, 07:52:28 PM

Since we're dragging out the old uk favs, I recall Aquib Talib admitting to pissing hot 3 times while at uk...

It is a FACT that Talib confessed at the NFL combine for having failed three drug tests, all for pot.  He never missed a game as a result.

I don't know, i kinda remember Mangina suspending him for a game or two in 06.  Not sure if related or not but i remember hearing the reason was a failed test.  But no, we would never kick a kid off a team for smoking some pot.  Or for assault or any other crime for that matter.  Unless you stab yourself, then your gone.
Actually I was good friends with the associate AD at the time.  His quote to me was "he beat up somebody on the track team...that happened to be a girl."

Come to think of it, beating up women seems to be a theme with KU athletes.  Not sure I'm on board with MCMW if it means pussies who hit women.  :dunno:

I agree. I'd stop being a fan actually if we had a theme of women beaters on the team that continued to play. Or contribute heavily to Billboards and Plane banners to call out those that let it happen.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 09, 2011, 08:09:56 PM
I don't remember the exact words, but he wasn't just saying that. Especially when he went on to talk about Kelly (with Samuels) being the key players for the rest of the season when asked who the key was from here on out. Also talked about how much better they had played since Curt and Jamar have been playing together.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fertilehealthy.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F01%2Fline-in-the-sand-300x202.jpg&hash=b425c3584c5e30aac81fdd1874c2057b8d738350)

your move John
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kso_FAN on February 09, 2011, 08:27:33 PM
I don't remember the exact words, but he wasn't just saying that. Especially when he went on to talk about Kelly (with Samuels) being the key players for the rest of the season when asked who the key was from here on out. Also talked about how much better they had played since Curt and Jamar have been playing together.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fertilehealthy.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F01%2Fline-in-the-sand-300x202.jpg&hash=b425c3584c5e30aac81fdd1874c2057b8d738350)

your move John

That is pretty much how I heard it.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CrushNasty on February 09, 2011, 08:47:19 PM
PLAY FAIR.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 09, 2011, 09:29:30 PM
Without CK our chances of beating CU are like .5%
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 09, 2011, 09:33:00 PM
US v. them
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wes mantooth on February 09, 2011, 09:38:02 PM
Without CK our chances of beating CU are like .5%

With him, i'd say our chances are maybe 10%   :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Skipper44 on February 09, 2011, 09:40:12 PM
Dax or others in the know of financial workings of things, how concrete is the money for the practice facility?  Is it a done deal that a disastrous finish to this season with corresponding drop in ticket sales, would not stop it?  Is it all private money?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 09, 2011, 09:47:24 PM
Without CK our chances of beating CU are like .5%

With him, i'd say our chances are maybe 10%   :dunno:

20 times more chance!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 09, 2011, 10:18:51 PM
Dax or others in the know of financial workings of things, how concrete is the money for the practice facility?  Is it a done deal that a disastrous finish to this season with corresponding drop in ticket sales, would not stop it?  Is it all private money?

I know for a fact bids from GC's are currently being accepted.  I'd say that's a pretty good indication the money is lined up.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 09, 2011, 10:31:35 PM
Dax or others in the know of financial workings of things, how concrete is the money for the practice facility?  Is it a done deal that a disastrous finish to this season with corresponding drop in ticket sales, would not stop it?  Is it all private money?

I know for a fact bids from GC's are currently being accepted.  I'd say that's a pretty good indication the money is lined up.

Breaking ground next week
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Panjandrum on February 09, 2011, 10:39:41 PM
I don't remember the exact words, but he wasn't just saying that. Especially when he went on to talk about Kelly (with Samuels) being the key players for the rest of the season when asked who the key was from here on out. Also talked about how much better they had played since Curt and Jamar have been playing together.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fertilehealthy.com%2Fblog%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F01%2Fline-in-the-sand-300x202.jpg&hash=b425c3584c5e30aac81fdd1874c2057b8d738350)

your move John

That is pretty much how I heard it.

I have no knowledge of the inner workings of the department (for the most part), nor do I know the existing positions of the parties involved.

I will say this...

If Currie is leaning towards dropping Curtis indiscriminately because he failed the policy, he is not going to be the kind of AD that's going to succeed at a larger program.  He may be good at raising money, and he may be good at connecting with his fans, but at some point, when you close the doors of your office, and you have the big boy discussions about how to deal with 'the talent', it's not black and white.  In athletics, like ANY business in the world, some people are more valuable than others, and sometimes, you have to put up with some crap.

There are lines that need to be drawn.  You can't beat women.  You can't go around and physically assault people over and over again.  You can't commit a felony.

However, if we're talking misdemeanors, let's get real; if you're a financial company, you aren't going to fire your whiz kid because he gets busted for smoking weed a few times if he's making you a lot of money.  Rules are not rules for everyone.  If you're really, really valuable, they're guidelines.

Anyway, that's all I have to say about that.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CHONGS on February 09, 2011, 10:40:04 PM
Gregg McDermott is going to recruit like crazy with the new practice facilty in place
Title: Re: CK
Post by: jtksu on February 09, 2011, 10:42:19 PM
Underwood does look like McD.  Never thought of that before.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 09, 2011, 11:12:32 PM
There are lines that need to be drawn.  You can't beat women.  You can't go around and physically assault people over and over again.  You can't commit a felony.

Why not? We recruit nothing but quality youngsters who need sports in their life. I say we give them 3 strikes, and after that, leave their fate at the discretion of the athletic department.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 09, 2011, 11:19:02 PM
FWIW, I talked to a student athlete today who said that every student athlete is tested once a month. They confirmed the warning, 10% of games, dismissed from team punishments that I posted a while back.

I don't know if this is common knowledge, I just didn't see it posted anywhere in this thread.

It's common knowledge and posted in the thread.

Sorry, MIR.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: chum1 on February 09, 2011, 11:21:06 PM
go cats
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 09, 2011, 11:37:42 PM
go cats WITH CURTIS KELLY.   :D
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 10, 2011, 02:44:29 AM
would you rough ridin' tards quit mucking up this thread with stupid ku v. ksu stuff  :dubious:
im sorry... but i felt compelled to defend this basketball team as being on par with "history awaits".
Title: Re: CK
Post by: fr@ck me on February 10, 2011, 07:52:29 AM
Dax or others in the know of financial workings of things, how concrete is the money for the practice facility?  Is it a done deal that a disastrous finish to this season with corresponding drop in ticket sales, would not stop it?  Is it all private money?

I know for a fact bids from GC's are currently being accepted.  I'd say that's a pretty good indication the money is lined up.

Bids are due February 17th.  They are also taking bids on the upperlevel restrooms at the football stadium!   :ksu:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j@yh@wks on February 10, 2011, 08:23:27 AM
would you rough ridin' tards quit mucking up this thread with stupid ku v. ksu stuff  :dubious:
im sorry... but i felt compelled to defend this basketball team as being on par with "history awaits".

It's not on par, its worse.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Branson Bound on February 10, 2011, 08:33:15 AM
Without your integrity, what do you have left? This pot head should have been kicked off the team after the first offense. This just goes to show what happens when you turn your basketball program over to some sleaze ball from the streets who doesn't understand the value of winning through hard work instead of cheating. K-State should just get rid of Coach Martin and hire somebody with integrity next time.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 10, 2011, 08:34:14 AM
Without your integrity, what do you have left? This pot head should have been kicked off the team after the first offense. This just goes to show what happens when you turn your basketball program over to some sleaze ball from the streets who doesn't understand the value of winning through hard work instead of cheating. K-State should just get rid of Coach Martin and hire somebody with integrity next time.

 :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: fr@ck me on February 10, 2011, 08:35:55 AM
would you effing tards quit mucking up this thread with stupid ku v. ksu stuff  :dubious:
im sorry... but i felt compelled to defend this basketball team as being on par with "history awaits".

It's not on par, its worse.

You are right, the whole nation thought we would be good in basketball... while the whole nation was laughing at you thinking that you would be good in football... it was pretty cute that you thought you would be good in football more than the one year you didn't play anyone...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 08:36:32 AM
Without your integrity, what do you have left? This pot head should have been kicked off the team after the first offense. This just goes to show what happens when you turn your basketball program over to some sleaze ball from the streets who doesn't understand the value of winning through hard work instead of cheating. K-State should just get rid of Coach Martin and hire somebody with integrity next time.

Branson Bound is a pretty excellent name for a sock.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: hemmy on February 10, 2011, 08:37:04 AM
Without your integrity, what do you have left? This pot head should have been kicked off the team after the first offense. This just goes to show what happens when you turn your basketball program over to some sleaze ball from the streets who doesn't understand the value of winning through hard work instead of cheating. K-State should just get rid of Coach Martin and hire somebody with integrity next time.

 :dubious:

Perfect usage.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: fr@ck me on February 10, 2011, 08:37:13 AM
Without your integrity, what do you have left? This pot head should have been kicked off the team after the first offense. This just goes to show what happens when you turn your basketball program over to some sleaze ball from the streets who doesn't understand the value of winning through hard work instead of cheating. K-State should just get rid of Coach Martin and hire somebody with integrity next time.

So who with integerity should we hire?  Bill Self? John Callapari? oscar Pearl?  :users:   :bait:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: jtksu on February 10, 2011, 08:39:38 AM
Since no one else will mention the elephant in the room, I will.  Guys, what if Curtis is addicted to the weeds?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on February 10, 2011, 08:48:34 AM
Without your integrity, what do you have left? This pot head should have been kicked off the team after the first offense. This just goes to show what happens when you turn your basketball program over to some sleaze ball from the streets who doesn't understand the value of winning through hard work instead of cheating. K-State should just get rid of Coach Martin and hire somebody with integrity next time.
  LOL that's funny.  You had me for a second there.  :lol: You are good, ooh, boy, I haven't laughed that good in quite some time.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Acceleration Man on February 10, 2011, 08:52:01 AM
JMO, but you have to be pretty stupid to fail a drug test 3 times. CK has proven in 2 years here both his potential, and his mastery of the art of not attaining it. Obviously a FP, TC, etc. Obviously.  :blank:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Branson Bound on February 10, 2011, 08:52:33 AM
Without your integrity, what do you have left? This pot head should have been kicked off the team after the first offense. This just goes to show what happens when you turn your basketball program over to some sleaze ball from the streets who doesn't understand the value of winning through hard work instead of cheating. K-State should just get rid of Coach Martin and hire somebody with integrity next time.

So who with integerity should we hire?  Bill Self? John Callapari? oscar Pearl?  :users:   :bait:

Maybe we should hire Dr. Drew.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Scary Smart on February 10, 2011, 09:27:00 AM
OMG, which one of you is this?

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor-sweep-secrets-under-the-rug-1.2464362

 :party:   :katpak:

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tackleshep on February 10, 2011, 09:28:28 AM
Without your integrity, what do you have left? This pot head should have been kicked off the team after the first offense. This just goes to show what happens when you turn your basketball program over to some sleaze ball from the streets who doesn't understand the value of winning through hard work instead of cheating. K-State should just get rid of Coach Martin and hire somebody with integrity next time.

Wow I'm new here and can spot phishing........no but I completely agree.  And if all schools would abide by those guidelines we could watch BYU play their practice squad and that would be March madness.  Get real, smoking pot is the equivalant to drinking beer and this is coming from a guy who never has.

I agree that CK is a complete idiot for doing it after getting caught but this is also the real world and we need him.  Lets do what every major program is built around and take care of those who need to be taken care of.  I'm sure the kid on a Chess Scholorship isn't getting pissed tested every month and he's probably high as a kite.  (or should be)  All of life isn't fair, rules are always guidelines (ask the Kennedy's), and those with money, power, or leverage will always come out on top.  No tolerance policies are for management people not strong or smart enough to tell the difference and make a decision.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 10, 2011, 09:30:14 AM
OMG, which one of you is this?

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor-sweep-secrets-under-the-rug-1.2464362

 :party:   :katpak:



 :ksu: :emawkid: :driving:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 09:30:50 AM
OMG, which one of you is this?

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor-sweep-secrets-under-the-rug-1.2464362

 :party:   :katpak:



I know who it is!  :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 09:31:22 AM
JMO, but you have to be pretty stupid to fail a drug test 3 times. CK has proven in 2 years here both his potential, and his mastery of the art of not attaining it. Obviously a FP, TC, etc. Obviously.  :blank:

Damn it guys, we are not putting together a team of mathletes.  We only need guys that can play BB.   Can he play?  Yes.  Does he have to be a genius with a 5 year plan.  No.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 09:33:26 AM
OMG, which one of you is this?

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor-sweep-secrets-under-the-rug-1.2464362

 :party:   :katpak:



Quote
To all you Oldy Olsens with your bloomers in a bundle

 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: fr@ck me on February 10, 2011, 09:33:55 AM
OMG, which one of you is this?

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor-sweep-secrets-under-the-rug-1.2464362

 :party:   :katpak:



this guy is very  :kstatriot:    :ksu:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 09:34:31 AM
Quote
To all you Oldy Olsens with your bloomers in a bundle

that is a pretty solid clue as to who wrote that  :peek:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 09:36:46 AM
Fantastic letter.   :bball:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 10, 2011, 09:37:16 AM
OMG, which one of you is this?

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor-sweep-secrets-under-the-rug-1.2464362

 :party:   :katpak:



I know who it is!  :emawkid:

pm
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 09:37:28 AM
OMG, which one of you is this?

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/opinion/letter-to-the-editor-sweep-secrets-under-the-rug-1.2464362

 :party:   :katpak:



I know who it is!  :emawkid:

pm
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 10, 2011, 09:37:41 AM
Quote
To all you Oldy Olsens with your bloomers in a bundle

that is a pretty solid clue as to who wrote that  :peek:
lol, gave it away to me. his posts should be more like that.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 09:43:36 AM
Loved this part:

Quote
Dig up a program from 2008 and look at Michael Beasley's picture. Can you see his eyes? Me neither, but the dude still averaged, like, 80 points a game.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 09:52:46 AM
in comments

Quote
Nate Dogg Thu Feb 10 2011 10:39 Smoke Weed Everyday


 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 10, 2011, 10:02:21 AM
 :peek:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 10, 2011, 10:11:55 AM
Quote
PoetWarrior
Get a life, creepo.

 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: jmlynch1 on February 10, 2011, 10:16:56 AM
Jeremy Parker, obviously a fake name.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 10, 2011, 10:22:44 AM
http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/11023016/ns/today-entertainment/

:ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 10:24:01 AM
Sounds like that guy likes making old people mad!  :D

Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 10:25:28 AM
BTW, this comment was too good to let slip under the radar:

Mario Little
Thu Feb 10 2011 11:01
LOL at you small-time losers. I beat up my girl less than 2 months ago and I just dropped 17 points on Mizzou this past Monday!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 10:27:17 AM
BTW, this comment was too good to let slip under the radar:

Mario Little
Thu Feb 10 2011 11:01
LOL at you small-time losers. I beat up my girl less than 2 months ago and I just dropped 17 points on Mizzou this past Monday!
:lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 10, 2011, 10:28:55 AM
BTW, this comment was too good to let slip under the radar:

Mario Little
Thu Feb 10 2011 11:01
LOL at you small-time losers. I beat up my girl less than 2 months ago and I just dropped 17 points on Mizzou this past Monday!
:lol:

OMG Mario Little!!!!
 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 10:30:50 AM
YES

Quote
PoetWarrior
Thu Feb 10 2011 11:29
Many athletes have a hole inside them.

They are searching for *feeling* and *meaning*, through mind altering substances, to fill it.

Will they be led to a suicidal final *experience* when the drugs don't fill the hole?

Those who care* about athletics should hope not. Those that care** about humans being should, also, hope not.

*don't.

**do.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: goCats101 on February 10, 2011, 10:35:43 AM
BTW, this comment was too good to let slip under the radar:

Mario Little
Thu Feb 10 2011 11:01
LOL at you small-time losers. I beat up my girl less than 2 months ago and I just dropped 17 points on Mizzou this past Monday!

Where was this gem found?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 10:36:15 AM
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2202561256#!/group.php?gid=2202561256&v=wall
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 10:37:11 AM
Collegian must be getting high traffic on this one.  Loading very slow for me now.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 10:37:50 AM
Quote
This group is for people who, of course, like to talk about ranching.

 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 10:39:32 AM
http://www.facebook.com/home.php#!/profile.php?id=17022388

 :peek:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 10:45:15 AM
Lives in Minneapolis, Minnesota
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 10:46:30 AM
 :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 10, 2011, 10:51:31 AM
creepy
Title: Re: CK
Post by: yoga-like_abana on February 10, 2011, 10:54:57 AM
creepy
facebook has ruined the world
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 10:56:35 AM
:ck:

it was only a matter of time...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 10:57:33 AM
creepy
facebook has ruined the world

Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 10:57:45 AM
don't be creepy mikey
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 10:58:37 AM
My God you people are beautiful.

Brady Morningstar- 26,Male,Lawrence
Thu Feb 10 2011 11:56
You morons should learn to get hammered and drive around more. Smoking weed is asking for nothing but trouble.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 11:02:11 AM
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2202561256#!/group.php?gid=2202561256&v=wall

Quote
Admins
Erica Boatman (Kansas State)

lol, that girl pisses the bed. Roommate had that happen a while back
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 10, 2011, 11:03:45 AM
My God you people are beautiful.

Brady Morningstar- 26,Male,Lawrence
Thu Feb 10 2011 11:56
You morons should learn to get hammered and drive around more. Smoking weed is asking for nothing but trouble.


 :peek:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 11:07:22 AM
Abe is being creepy too.   :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 11:08:43 AM
Abe is being creepy too.   :dubious:

It's just because we love you.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUOpQwsc0dE
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 11:10:36 AM
Abe is being creepy too.   :dubious:
kinda, but it's a really funny story that I won't soon forget
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 11:12:09 AM
Quote
Darrell Arthur
Thu Feb 10 2011 12:09
Someone tell me what it says!

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Ffc01.deviantart.net%2Fimages2%2Fi%2F2004%2F01%2F5%2F1%2FTennis_Clap_emoticon.gif&hash=3b190d99848762a718a7671d3d17ef0d044e723b)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 10, 2011, 11:13:00 AM
Since no one else will mention the elephant in the room, I will.  Guys, what if Curtis is addicted to the weeds?

not possible.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr.Spaceman on February 10, 2011, 11:22:58 AM
Nice job 'benny!   :party:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 11:27:40 AM

 :dubious: I do not remember saying I am the author of that article.   :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 11:28:43 AM
Dr.Spaceman being creepy too
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 11:31:59 AM
Dr.Spaceman being creepy too

You have no idea.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 10, 2011, 11:33:22 AM

Dylan M. Thu Feb 10 2011 12:30 I quit smoking to experience nature. Horrible idea.


 :surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: OK_Cat on February 10, 2011, 11:33:59 AM
 :peek:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 10, 2011, 11:38:32 AM

Dylan M. Thu Feb 10 2011 12:30 I quit smoking to experience nature. Horrible idea.


 :surprised:

 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr.Spaceman on February 10, 2011, 11:40:40 AM
 :curse:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 11:42:31 AM
 :emawkid:   :cheers:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Poster formerly known as jthutch on February 10, 2011, 11:45:01 AM
Since no one else will mention the elephant in the room, I will.  Guys, what if Curtis is addicted to the weeds?

not possible.
Dr. Drew says you are wrong.  Heard him on Kevin and Bean the other day.  No link.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 10, 2011, 11:47:25 AM
We need to smoke out the OOD a la CU and their hippie fest. Would probably get rid of all the 'tucks and chair backers.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rams on February 10, 2011, 12:07:26 PM

Dylan M. Thu Feb 10 2011 12:30 I quit smoking to experience nature. Horrible idea.


 :surprised:
:facepalm:

Seriously, crap like this is sorta funny when bbs'n on these message boards, but I have to believe it really works against our cause when presented in a more public manner.

Kinda like the 16 year old that wants his own car and makes a solid case for it...then throws a giant kegger in the formal dining room the first weekend his parents leave town.

Not rough ridin' cool...IMHO.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 12:10:47 PM

Dylan M. Thu Feb 10 2011 12:30 I quit smoking to experience nature. Horrible idea.


 :surprised:
:facepalm:

Seriously, crap like this is sorta funny when bbs'n on these message boards, but I have to believe it really works against our cause when presented in a more public manner.

Kinda like the 16 year old that wants his own car and makes a solid case for it...then throws a giant kegger in the formal dining room the first weekend his parents leave town.

Not rough ridin' cool...IMHO.

The real question here is what will Branson Bound think of this?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Branson Bound on February 10, 2011, 12:19:48 PM

Dylan M. Thu Feb 10 2011 12:30 I quit smoking to experience nature. Horrible idea.


 :surprised:
:facepalm:

Seriously, crap like this is sorta funny when bbs'n on these message boards, but I have to believe it really works against our cause when presented in a more public manner.

Kinda like the 16 year old that wants his own car and makes a solid case for it...then throws a giant kegger in the formal dining room the first weekend his parents leave town.

Not rough ridin' cool...IMHO.

The real question here is what will Branson Bound think of this?

I think that giving up smoking to experience nature is a good life choice for Dylan M. I wonder why he thought it was a horrible idea.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 10, 2011, 12:20:27 PM
Tip 'o the hat to non-obese Minnesotans everywhere.   :party:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 12:22:38 PM
Somebody with a twitterbot thingy tweet that to Eric Stonestreet plz. 

TOBIAS.  YOUR AVATAR.   :love:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 10, 2011, 12:28:01 PM

Dylan M. Thu Feb 10 2011 12:30 I quit smoking to experience nature. Horrible idea.


 :surprised:
:facepalm:

Seriously, cac like this is sorta funny when bbs'n on these message boards, but I have to believe it really works against our cause when presented in a more public manner.

Kinda like the 16 year old that wants his own car and makes a solid case for it...then throws a giant kegger in the formal dining room the first weekend his parents leave town.

Not effing cool...IMHO.

The real question here is what will Branson Bound think of this?

I think that giving up smoking to experience nature is a good life choice for Dylan M. I wonder why he thought it was a horrible idea.

Man i hope you're kidding
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Ira Hayes on February 10, 2011, 12:33:06 PM
Pretty much everybody I know who likes to "experience nature" smokes a shitload of pot.  There must be a reason that Dylan was on that bluff all alone.  I have a guess.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Branson Bound on February 10, 2011, 12:35:32 PM
Pretty much everybody I know who likes to "experience nature" smokes a shitload of pot.

Or they head to the Ozarks? :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Ira Hayes on February 10, 2011, 12:44:59 PM
Pretty much everybody I know who likes to "experience nature" smokes a shitload of pot.

Or they head to the Ozarks? :dunno:

In Soviet Russia, nature experiences you.

Ha Ha HA!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 12:55:31 PM
Since no one else will mention the elephant in the room, I will.  Guys, what if Curtis is addicted to the weeds?

not possible.
He probably uses a water bong, which filters all the addictive stuff out
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 12:57:36 PM
Pretty much everybody I know who likes to "experience nature" smokes a shitload of pot.

Or they head to the Ozarks? :dunno:
No the Ozarks is for binge drinking and getting E.coli and/or STDs
Title: Re: CK
Post by: michigancat on February 10, 2011, 12:58:01 PM
This thread makes all the ck drama worth it, IMO.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 10, 2011, 12:58:25 PM
uh oh fellas. more news to follow....
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ednksu on February 10, 2011, 01:06:27 PM
uh oh fellas. more news to follow....
spill the beans d-bag!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 10, 2011, 01:07:22 PM
uh oh fellas. more news to follow....
spill the beans d-bag!

still gathering info from goEMAW.com sources. i'll have something up in a bit...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 01:07:38 PM
Spill the beans now so Fitz can't try to take credit for it.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 10, 2011, 01:19:56 PM
a very recently overheard conversation involving a ksu basketball staff member included this gem..."yes. i know. yes. coach martin has just had enough though. he's gone."


Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 01:22:15 PM
 :surprised:

Maybe Currie was ok with Curt staying, but Frank isn't?   :frank::chainsaw:?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 01:22:30 PM
.........JUEVOL????   :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: The1BigWillie on February 10, 2011, 01:23:05 PM
a very recently overheard conversation involving a ksu basketball staff member included this gem..."yes. i know. yes. coach martin has just had enough though. he's gone."




Probably means Frank has had enough and is headed to Miami.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 10, 2011, 01:24:46 PM
TURN OUT THE LIGHTS
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 01:25:21 PM
a very recently overheard conversation involving a ksu basketball staff member included this gem..."yes. i know. yes. coach martin has just had enough though. he's gone."




Probably means Frank has had enough and is headed to Miami.
:runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway: :runaway:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 10, 2011, 01:28:14 PM
hmmm. seems like there might be one more soundbite to follow...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: _33 on February 10, 2011, 01:30:06 PM
hmmm. seems like there might be one more soundbite to follow...

hmmmm.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ZmoneyKSU on February 10, 2011, 01:30:24 PM
this season is epic... so much more drama than being highly ranked.  it's non stop action.  I am not even sure now if I enjoyed last season as much as I am enjoying the cluster f**k that is this season.  kudos to all involved.  this is one to remember.  

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 01:33:02 PM
this season is epic... so much more drama than being highly ranked.  it's non stop action.  I am not even sure now if I enjoyed last season as much as I am enjoying the cluster f**k that is this season.  kudos to all involved.  this is one to remember.  

 :emawkid:

I dunno, there was some epic crap talking storms last year between us and the squaks, especially after Northern Iowa and the Xavier game the week after.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Ira Hayes on February 10, 2011, 01:33:44 PM
this season is epic... so much more drama than being highly ranked.  it's non stop action.  I am not even sure now if I enjoyed last season as much as I am enjoying the cluster f**k that is this season.  kudos to all involved.  this is one to remember.  

 :emawkid:


If you're gonna lose, lose well.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 10, 2011, 01:35:28 PM
 :ohno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 01:37:43 PM
a very recently overheard conversation involving a ksu basketball staff member included this gem..."yes. i know. yes. coach martin has just had enough though. he's gone."




they were having dinner at The Patio?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 10, 2011, 01:38:52 PM
hmmm. seems like there might be one more soundbite to follow...

hmmmm.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fadventurelightingblog.files.wordpress.com%2F2010%2F02%2Flight-switch.jpg&hash=a3ffff5fcf4b84ec11bc8eef232388a907681bf5)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAW SP8 on February 10, 2011, 01:43:28 PM
hmmm. seems like there might be one more soundbite to follow...
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi47.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Ff163%2Ftrudre%2F2zoadqr.gif&hash=1f84d7ea8b91e020d526bbc9d07f74342125255b)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 10, 2011, 01:43:39 PM
a very recently overheard conversation involving a ksu basketball staff member included this gem..."yes. i know. yes. coach martin has just had enough though. he's gone."




they were having dinner at The Patio?

more humorous actually imo. anyway, the last and only other thing overheard was "he's just given him too many chances".

sounds like it might be curt fellas. dunno.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 01:47:20 PM
Could be anyone really. Russell, JHR, Irving, Curt, etc. etc.

NO ONE IS SAFE
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ZmoneyKSU on February 10, 2011, 01:48:03 PM
Personally, I think we should just cut and run from Jamar too,  maybe even JO, I mean who needs tall guys anyway? They always say you can't coach height, so why bother? Cut'em
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Jmo on February 10, 2011, 01:48:15 PM
 I'm going to miss  :ck:  :cry:.  Please don't throw him back to the streets Frank....please  :cry:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: dontfeedthebear on February 10, 2011, 01:49:41 PM
Could be anyone really. Russell, JHR, Irving, Curt, etc. etc.

NO ONE IS SAFE

I bet it's Potuzak.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 10, 2011, 01:51:12 PM
Could be anyone really. Russell, JHR, Irving, Curt, etc. etc.

NO ONE IS SAFE

OB?  :pray:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ZmoneyKSU on February 10, 2011, 01:54:18 PM
Could be anyone really. Russell, JHR, Irving, Curt, etc. etc.

NO ONE IS SAFE

OB?  :pray:

Let's hope it's not OB at this point, cause that means either Sean Boy or Cosh take over most likely. 

Besides, clearly this is a reference to the many chances Frank has been given.  Frank's about to get bounced out here.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 01:57:20 PM
Could be anyone really. Russell, JHR, Irving, Curt, etc. etc.

NO ONE IS SAFE

OB?  :pray:

Let's hope it's not OB at this point, cause that means either Sean Boy or Cosh take over most likely.  

Besides, clearly this is a reference to the many chances Frank has been given.  Frank's about to get bounced out here.

Frank shouldn't have failed all those drug tests then.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ZmoneyKSU on February 10, 2011, 01:59:22 PM
Could be anyone really. Russell, JHR, Irving, Curt, etc. etc.

NO ONE IS SAFE

OB?  :pray:

Let's hope it's not OB at this point, cause that means either Sean Boy or Cosh take over most likely.  

Besides, clearly this is a reference to the many chances Frank has been given.  Frank's about to get bounced out here.

Frank shouldn't have failed all those drug tests then.

poppy seed muffins will be franks undoing.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 02:08:27 PM
this thread the last page or so... :flush:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 10, 2011, 02:12:58 PM
this thread the last page or so... :flush:

you didn't like my suspenseful undercover/overheard reporting thing? i suppose it would've been better if i would've stated who said it and where they were at and all the other stuff. oh well. it's all up on premium.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 10, 2011, 02:13:52 PM
Mods, please change Rick Daris' username to Det. Rick Daris.

:users:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ZmoneyKSU on February 10, 2011, 02:14:43 PM
this thread the last page or so... :flush:

well, it only took 20 pages on a topic based on pure speculation and rumors, so that's nothing to scoff at.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 02:19:18 PM
this thread the last page or so... :flush:

you didn't like my suspenseful undercover/overheard reporting thing? i suppose it would've been better if i would've stated who said it and where they were at and all the other stuff. oh well. it's all up on premium.

It was obviously Col. Mustard with a lead pipe in the conservatory.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: rcjh88 on February 10, 2011, 02:32:46 PM
That letter to the editor in the Collegian is getting better with every response. Nice fan base you all have.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstate4life on February 10, 2011, 02:33:06 PM
this thread the last page or so... :flush:

you didn't like my suspenseful undercover/overheard reporting thing? i suppose it would've been better if i would've stated who said it and where they were at and all the other stuff. oh well. it's all up on premium.

What does this mean?  How do we get to premium?  I want to know what is going on!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rams on February 10, 2011, 02:34:45 PM
this thread the last page or so... :flush:

you didn't like my suspenseful undercover/overheard reporting thing? i suppose it would've been better if i would've stated who said it and where they were at and all the other stuff. oh well. it's all up on premium.

What does this mean?  How do we get to premium?  I want to know what is going on!!!
'grats RD!  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: J on February 10, 2011, 02:38:45 PM
That letter to the editor in the Collegian is getting better with every response. Nice fan base you all have.

'grats rc. You earned it!  :cheers:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 10, 2011, 02:38:57 PM
this thread the last page or so... :flush:

you didn't like my suspenseful undercover/overheard reporting thing? i suppose it would've been better if i would've stated who said it and where they were at and all the other stuff. oh well. it's all up on premium.

What does this mean?  How do we get to premium?  I want to know what is going on!!!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstate4life on February 10, 2011, 02:43:01 PM
this thread the last page or so... :flush:

you didn't like my suspenseful undercover/overheard reporting thing? i suppose it would've been better if i would've stated who said it and where they were at and all the other stuff. oh well. it's all up on premium.

What does this mean?  How do we get to premium?  I want to know what is going on!!!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Thanks for the info guys...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 02:43:33 PM
That letter to the editor in the Collegian is getting better with every response. Nice fan base you all have.

I know, I'm sick of all the anti-weed shirt tucks too.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 02:45:15 PM
The Darrell Arthur ones still crack me up. :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 10, 2011, 02:45:40 PM
this thread the last page or so... :flush:

you didn't like my suspenseful undercover/overheard reporting thing? i suppose it would've been better if i would've stated who said it and where they were at and all the other stuff. oh well. it's all up on premium.

What does this mean?  How do we get to premium?  I want to know what is going on!!!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Thanks for the info guys...

You are more than welcome kstate4life!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 10, 2011, 03:20:25 PM
a very recently overheard conversation involving a ksu basketball staff member included this gem..."yes. i know. yes. coach martin has just had enough though. he's gone."




CartierFor3 is getting upset.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 10, 2011, 03:22:19 PM
Our administration lies to US News on a regular basis to increase our academic ranking. Surely they will find a way out of wrecking the basketball program over some stupid rule.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: PurpleSleezyE on February 10, 2011, 03:25:10 PM
That Collegian letter was freaking awesome and the comments are just the icing on the cupcake!

Will the students boo AD Currie at the next home game? 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 10, 2011, 03:27:48 PM
That Collegian letter was freaking awesome and the comments are just the icing on the cupcake!

Will the students boo AD Currie at the next home game? 

Not if Kelly plays.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 10, 2011, 03:34:56 PM
Our administration lies to US News on a regular basis to increase our academic ranking. Surely they will find a way out of wrecking the basketball program over some stupid rule.

For Serious?  Now THAT is elite.  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 10, 2011, 03:39:13 PM
Our administration lies to US News on a regular basis to increase our academic ranking. Surely they will find a way out of wrecking the basketball program over some stupid rule.

For Serious?  Now THAT is elite.  

For Serious. (http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=10259.0)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: econocat on February 10, 2011, 03:43:01 PM
a very recently overheard conversation involving a ksu basketball staff member included this gem..."yes. i know. yes. coach martin has just had enough though. he's gone."

Maybe this means Coach Martin has had enough of Currie and he is gone!  :ck:

they were having dinner at The Patio?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 03:44:48 PM
email I just got

Quote
Apparently Steinbrock on WIBW just reported not long ago that Kelly was seen on the 2nd floor of the Union dressed up with an older gentlemen. I guess Steinbrock had this info texted to him from someone who saw CK. Like I said take it for what it's worth but if there is any truth to this he apparently has some sort of hearing this afternoon. What is on the 2nd floor of the Union?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 10, 2011, 03:48:07 PM
email I just got

Quote
Apparently Steinbrock on WIBW just reported not long ago that Kelly was seen on the 2nd floor of the Union dressed up with an older gentlemen. I guess Steinbrock had this info texted to him from someone who saw CK. Like I said take it for what it's worth but if there is any truth to this he apparently has some sort of hearing this afternoon. What is on the 2nd floor of the Union?
:ohno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 10, 2011, 03:51:05 PM
 
via Curtis Kelly twitter search:

sitting in the union as curtis kelly's hearing takes place in room 203. another day in the life of a k-state bball fan :( #freecurt
about 5 hours ago via web

 :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on February 10, 2011, 03:52:07 PM

via Curtis Kelly twitter search:

sitting in the union as curtis kelly's hearing takes place in room 203. another day in the life of a k-state bball fan :( #freecurt
about 5 hours ago via web

 :ck:

 :horrorsurprise: :goodbyecruelworld:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: scottwildcat on February 10, 2011, 03:52:24 PM

via Curtis Kelly twitter search:

sitting in the union as curtis kelly's hearing takes place in room 203. another day in the life of a k-state bball fan :( #freecurt
about 5 hours ago via web

 :ck:


 :horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: _33 on February 10, 2011, 03:53:09 PM

via Curtis Kelly twitter search:

sitting in the union as curtis kelly's hearing takes place in room 203. another day in the life of a k-state bball fan :( #freecurt
about 5 hours ago via web

 :ck:

"Free Curt" rally at room 203 in union?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: jtksu on February 10, 2011, 03:54:10 PM
You SOBs in MHK better get this rally going, ASAP!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MeatSauce on February 10, 2011, 03:59:42 PM
email I just got

Quote
Apparently Steinbrock on WIBW just reported not long ago that Kelly was seen on the 2nd floor of the Union dressed up with an older gentlemen. I guess Steinbrock had this info texted to him from someone who saw CK. Like I said take it for what it's worth but if there is any truth to this he apparently has some sort of hearing this afternoon. What is on the 2nd floor of the Union?

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Funion.k-state.edu%2F_media%2Fuploaded%2F_thumbs%2Fuploaded%2Froom_photos%2Froom_203_jpg_600x600_q85.png&hash=3963ec1dfa07dd6463b588dae4db095405f9d1a9)
 an appeal process room if I've ever seen one.  :pray:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 04:00:11 PM
Cole_Manbeck? RT @JNutter As, of 3:45 p.m. on Thursday, #KState forward Curtis Kelly was in uniform and practicing with the team.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 10, 2011, 04:02:23 PM
Cole_Manbeck? RT @JNutter As, of 3:45 p.m. on Thursday, #KState forward Curtis Kelly was in uniform and practicing with the team.

 :pray:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: michigancat on February 10, 2011, 04:02:34 PM
Cole_Manbeck? RT @JNutter As, of 3:45 p.m. on Thursday, #KState forward Curtis Kelly was in uniform and practicing with the team.

:emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 10, 2011, 04:04:44 PM
who is j nutter?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstater on February 10, 2011, 04:05:13 PM
YES  Currie wasn't a dumbass.(today)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mcmwcat on February 10, 2011, 04:05:27 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.footballqs.com%2Fphotos%2Fo%2F6030-yes_red_again.jpg&hash=b1070fa8a541e9e968744124913398ab4d259aeb)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 04:06:58 PM
who is j nutter?

Collegian sports editor
Title: a ray of hope
Post by: sys on February 10, 2011, 04:07:27 PM
Quote
Cole_Manbeck Cole Manbeck
RT @JNutter As, of 3:45 p.m. on Thursday, #KState forward Curtis Kelly was in uniform and practicing with the team.

it has been reported by a couple of posters on different boards that kelly's appeal was today...

 :pray:
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: EllToPay on February 10, 2011, 04:09:59 PM
Quote
Cole_Manbeck Cole Manbeck
RT @JNutter As, of 3:45 p.m. on Thursday, #KState forward Curtis Kelly was in uniform and practicing with the team.

it has been reported by a couple of posters on different boards that kelly's appeal was today...

 :pray:

it's like we're posting to a wall sometimes.
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 04:10:33 PM
Wasn't it said that if his appeal didn't work that he'd still be on the team anyways, just not playing in any games?
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: kougar24 on February 10, 2011, 04:11:16 PM
Wasn't it said that if his appeal didn't work that he'd still be on the team anyways, just not playing in any games?

why the eff would he continue to practice if he couldn't play ever again?
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: kstater on February 10, 2011, 04:12:41 PM
Wasn't it said that if his appeal didn't work that he'd still be on the team anyways, just not playing in any games?

I'm guessing the Pro contract he'd sign somewhere overseas would prevent him from practicing around here anymore.
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 04:13:08 PM
Wasn't it said that if his appeal didn't work that he'd still be on the team anyways, just not playing in any games?

no, he would be expelled from athletics and stripped of scholarship for the 3rd offense.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 04:16:26 PM
What does currie not get about being busy with other crap until May?  WTF?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 04:16:43 PM
 :party:
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 04:19:53 PM
the hitch is that even if the hearing was today, that doesn't mean they made a ruling.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: deputy dawg on February 10, 2011, 04:23:32 PM
Cole_Manbeck? RT @JNutter As, of 3:45 p.m. on Thursday, #KState forward Curtis Kelly was in uniform and practicing with the team.

:emawkid:
:thumbsup:
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 04:49:47 PM
the hitch is that even if the hearing was today, that doesn't mean they made a ruling.
I'd be really proud of the AD's office if they didn't rule until Tuesday. Not that it'll probably matter, but still
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: kougar24 on February 10, 2011, 04:51:03 PM
I would have been really proud of our AD had we never heard about any of this, and CK never missed any playing time. Too late.
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: The1BigWillie on February 10, 2011, 04:59:43 PM
I got an email that says Fitz has posted that Curtis's appeal was granted and he's good to go. 

"It's granted!!!"
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wetwillie on February 10, 2011, 05:00:54 PM
If this comes out how it should, I consider it a big step for our program.
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: sys on February 10, 2011, 05:01:28 PM
it's ck!

Quote
I believe the appeal did take place and was approved. Good to go, and he's out of limbo. We have time with Frank at 6. Or sometime between 6 and midnight.

fitz quote.  you combos may disagree, but if this holds up, i'm changing my approval rating of both timothy and the kstate athletic dept.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dave Wooderson on February 10, 2011, 05:02:49 PM
The KSU Basketball Team may have been surveyed for this one...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQRMvg5TAl8&feature=player_embedded (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQRMvg5TAl8&feature=player_embedded)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 10, 2011, 05:05:31 PM
It's Kelly!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 05:06:07 PM
If this comes out how it should, I consider it a big step for our program.

I think you're an optimist.  I think there was enough outrage that Currie and crew aren't able to do what they wanted to do.  

The fact that any of us know about it is a step backward, imo.
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 10, 2011, 05:11:03 PM

fitz quote.  you combos may disagree, but if this holds up, i'm changing my approval rating of both timothy and the kstate athletic dept.

to what?
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: sys on February 10, 2011, 05:12:17 PM
positive.
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on February 10, 2011, 05:12:39 PM
What if practice was before the hearing???

 :ohno:


BTW, he's playing.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pett on February 10, 2011, 05:23:09 PM
:emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bradleigh on February 10, 2011, 05:28:34 PM
If this comes out how it should, I consider it a big step for our program.

I agree!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mikeyis4dcats on February 10, 2011, 05:30:37 PM
buddy emailed and said Fitz posted that he believes the appeal hearing is complete and the appeal was approved.  Said he had an interview set with Frank this evening.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Underdog Wildcat on February 10, 2011, 05:33:09 PM
:cheers:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 05:40:33 PM
JOHN CURRIE YOU OLD SON OF A BITCH!  :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot: :woot:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 05:42:11 PM
buddy emailed and said Fitz posted that he believes the appeal hearing is complete and the appeal was approved.  Said he had an interview set with Frank this evening.

aka they had him take another piss test and this time he went to On the Wildside
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: wiley on February 10, 2011, 05:42:19 PM
hope he wore the suit he got from Dillards  :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 10, 2011, 05:42:44 PM
Congrats, goEMAW!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: theKSU on February 10, 2011, 05:52:07 PM
Just kidding, everybody.  Curt is such a charmer. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: jmlynch1 on February 10, 2011, 05:56:03 PM
So glad this proves CK doesn't smoke weed. Our image is still squeaky clean adorableness. :cool:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: lifeasakstatefan on February 10, 2011, 05:57:45 PM
J nutter actually isn't the sports editor anymore he's just a sports writer for them now. Not a fan of his work.
Title: Re: a ray of hope
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 10, 2011, 05:59:49 PM
I would have been really proud of our AD had we never heard about any of this, and CK never missed any playing time. Too late.
lol.no kidding.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 10, 2011, 06:03:25 PM
Congrats, goEMAW!!!

USA, USA, USA,USA USA, USA :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 06:05:51 PM
Is there somewhere to listen to the Frank news thing tonight or whatever
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 06:07:12 PM
 :woot:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 10, 2011, 06:09:41 PM
More Curt More Wins :bigtoke:

Still feels pretty small-timey, but we've gotta start somewhere.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 10, 2011, 06:11:57 PM
i am very happy right now :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 10, 2011, 06:12:21 PM
This Currie guy is a  :kstatriot:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 06:12:48 PM
12 seed chances.....ALIVE!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on February 10, 2011, 06:13:31 PM
This Currie guy is a  :kstatriot:

THIS.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 10, 2011, 06:17:39 PM
Quote
Dalonte H
Thu Feb 10 2011 16:08
Sorry guys my fault on this one. I was in charge of providing clean samples for Curt but I was busy that day counting the money I get for recruiting 3 stars.
:lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 10, 2011, 06:21:18 PM
We need to turn to figuring out who started this witch hunt against our innocent players.  Curt's name has been slandered!!!  We must fight the people responsible    :comehere:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stupid Fitz on February 10, 2011, 06:25:37 PM
I bet some of the GPCer guys are pissed.  :popcorn:  <<< (didn't use Billy popcorn because most of the GPCer guys are racist hillbillies)

Way to go JC  :kstatriot:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 06:26:10 PM
need GPC's reaction please. :users:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 06:31:53 PM
Quote
KellisRobinett Kellis Robinett
Frank Martin on Curtis Kelly: "He's on my team. He's playing Saturday." Will have more later.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wetwillie on February 10, 2011, 06:43:26 PM
Quote
KellisRobinett Kellis Robinett
Frank Martin on Curtis Kelly: "He's on my team. He's playing Saturday." Will have more later.

got goosegumps reading that
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 06:48:14 PM
Quote
kinchokelley Kinch O'Kelley
According to Frank Martin, Curtis Kelly is cleared to play, has been good in practice, and the attention has been created by the media.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 10, 2011, 07:01:41 PM
PAY CURRIE
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 07:17:45 PM
PAY CURRIE
Title: Re: CK
Post by: catzacker on February 10, 2011, 07:22:24 PM
imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Bill Clarahan on February 10, 2011, 07:30:25 PM
Allllllllllright , who started this crap!!!!


BSAC....please report to the principals office :comehere:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 10, 2011, 07:32:10 PM
imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fcdn.guyism.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2Fbouncy-Rangers-fan.gif&hash=d171d6741a0da58010f55232d6a425c0960fbea7)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 10, 2011, 07:33:35 PM
Allllllllllright , who started this crap!!!!


BSAC....please report to the principals office :comehere:

lol if you think it wasn't true
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 10, 2011, 07:34:25 PM
imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.

Yeah, he can get a certificate or something now, but let's wait for all the fallout before we start picketing Schulz' lawn with PAY CURRIE signs.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pete on February 10, 2011, 07:46:45 PM
Allllllllllright , who started this cac!!!!


BSAC....please report to the principals office :comehere:

lol if you think it wasn't true

Not only was it true, I'd wager that it "getting out" may have actually saved CK.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 07:48:44 PM
Love Frank and how he is responding to this.  Heard GPC has a good Q&A  thread on this.  Someone cut/paste it, TIA.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Bill Clarahan on February 10, 2011, 07:49:25 PM
Allllllllllright , who started this crap!!!!


BSAC....please report to the principals office :comehere:

lol if you think it wasn't true

Didn't say it wasn't true, did I. :bigtoke:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MeatSauce on February 10, 2011, 07:55:58 PM
Quote
Martin on Thursday: "Ask your source."   Reply
A portion of Frank Martin, who spoke with media today in the post-game interview room at Bramlage Coliseum.

Q: What's Curtis' situation?
Martin: What situation?

Q: Has he been practicing with the team?
Martin: Yeah, why? He hasn't?

Q: He'll be available Saturday?
Martin: Have I said something differently? I love great questions.

Q: Frank, everybody in this part of the country that follows Kansas State basketball is curious about Curtis' situation because there have been anonomously-sourced stories in creditable newspapers that say he is facing some sort of possible disciplinary action because he violation some unknown-to-the-media rule, or university rule. Can you please clarify that?
Martin: Ask your source.

Q: I don't have a source.
Martin: Then whoever reported it, ask their source. If you ask me a question, I answer your question. For four years, I've answered every question. I was asked two minutes ago if Curtis was at practice, wasn't I? And what was my answer? Then I was asked if he was playing Saturday and I said, 'Yes,' right? So I thought I dealt with it. Now go ask the source that reported to you fine people whatever they said.

Q: Was there an appeals hearing today?
Martin: Not that I know of. Why, were you at one? Ask your source.

Q: You're our source.
Martin: Well, I'm telling you, he's on our team, he's playing Saturday. I wasn't at any appeals thing or anything, so ask your source.

Q: So there's nothing pending that could jeopardize his eligibility, is that correct?
Martin: I think I've answered that question five times.
This post was edited on 2/10 7:05 PM by d__scott
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 10, 2011, 07:59:58 PM
Quote
Turnksu @DScottFritchen Saw you post on Frank's quotes. Would like to know who asked each question. Can you help out?>

DScottFritchen @Turnksu It should be on GoPowercat video later.

For you non-gpc'rs, I'm sure it'll be on cjonline, mercury and every tv station's video later as well.  Or at least in somebody's e-mail.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SwiftCat on February 10, 2011, 08:06:50 PM
Quote
Martin on Thursday: "Ask your source."   Reply
A portion of Frank Martin, who spoke with media today in the post-game interview room at Bramlage Coliseum.

Q: What's Curtis' situation?
Martin: What situation?

Q: Has he been practicing with the team?
Martin: Yeah, why? He hasn't?

Q: He'll be available Saturday?
Martin: Have I said something differently? I love great questions.

Q: Frank, everybody in this part of the country that follows Kansas State basketball is curious about Curtis' situation because there have been anonomously-sourced stories in creditable newspapers that say he is facing some sort of possible disciplinary action because he violation some unknown-to-the-media rule, or university rule. Can you please clarify that?
Martin: Ask your source.

Q: I don't have a source.
Martin: Then whoever reported it, ask their source. If you ask me a question, I answer your question. For four years, I've answered every question. I was asked two minutes ago if Curtis was at practice, wasn't I? And what was my answer? Then I was asked if he was playing Saturday and I said, 'Yes,' right? So I thought I dealt with it. Now go ask the source that reported to you fine people whatever they said.

Q: Was there an appeals hearing today?
Martin: Not that I know of. Why, were you at one? Ask your source.

Q: You're our source.
Martin: Well, I'm telling you, he's on our team, he's playing Saturday. I wasn't at any appeals thing or anything, so ask your source.

Q: So there's nothing pending that could jeopardize his eligibility, is that correct?
Martin: I think I've answered that question five times.
This post was edited on 2/10 7:05 PM by d__scott

 :blush:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kstater on February 10, 2011, 08:13:31 PM
:lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: "storm"nut on February 10, 2011, 08:14:36 PM
Chances of goEMAW.com getting press credentials just went from 10% to -1,000%. Quoting unamed sources. Chances of GPC's getting renewed have also went down so don't feel like you are being singled out.
Title: CK question
Post by: EMAWzified on February 10, 2011, 08:15:13 PM
So now that the :ck: cac has been successfully resolved, will he starting playing well enough to justify the drama? :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 10, 2011, 08:15:15 PM
Quote
Martin on Thursday: "Ask your source."   Reply
A portion of Frank Martin, who spoke with media today in the post-game interview room at Bramlage Coliseum.

Q: What's Curtis' situation?
Martin: What situation?

Q: Has he been practicing with the team?
Martin: Yeah, why? He hasn't?

Q: He'll be available Saturday?
Martin: Have I said something differently? I love great questions.

Q: Frank, everybody in this part of the country that follows Kansas State basketball is curious about Curtis' situation because there have been anonomously-sourced stories in creditable newspapers that say he is facing some sort of possible disciplinary action because he violation some unknown-to-the-media rule, or university rule. Can you please clarify that?
Martin: Ask your source.

Q: I don't have a source.
Martin: Then whoever reported it, ask their source. If you ask me a question, I answer your question. For four years, I've answered every question. I was asked two minutes ago if Curtis was at practice, wasn't I? And what was my answer? Then I was asked if he was playing Saturday and I said, 'Yes,' right? So I thought I dealt with it. Now go ask the source that reported to you fine people whatever they said.

Q: Was there an appeals hearing today?
Martin: Not that I know of. Why, were you at one? Ask your source.

Q: You're our source.
Martin: Well, I'm telling you, he's on our team, he's playing Saturday. I wasn't at any appeals thing or anything, so ask your source.

Q: So there's nothing pending that could jeopardize his eligibility, is that correct?
Martin: I think I've answered that question five times.
This post was edited on 2/10 7:05 PM by d__scott

MCMW  Mother Fuckers............I gotta get back to practice -Frank
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j-dub on February 10, 2011, 08:19:54 PM
 :emawkid: what a beautiful human being.

eff everybody. we are angry again.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wes mantooth on February 10, 2011, 08:23:22 PM
rlccatfan

On the depth chart
Post #2564
KCMO
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: So Let Me Get This Straight Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Until Fitz, or other staff come out and say something really was going on I will continue to believe that all of this was born of gocesspool.com wanting to stir the pot and enough people picked up on the rumor that it spun into the crap storm we have been dealing with for the last few days.

  :horrorsurprise:

Your move BSAC.
Title: Re: CK question
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 08:37:49 PM
So now that the :ck: cac has been successfully resolved, will he starting playing well enough to justify the drama? :ck:

If there was ever a time for Curt to shine and push us into the tourney, now is it. 

 :bball:

Title: Re: CK question
Post by: kstater on February 10, 2011, 08:45:07 PM
Yeah, this is the stuff movies are made of.  It's title or bust now.
Title: Re: CK question
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 08:46:16 PM
Yeah, this is the stuff movies are made of.  It's title or bust now.
Dave Chappelle basically has to play CK in the movie. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: the KHAN! on February 10, 2011, 08:46:46 PM
Glad we finally got The Currie man his Brand name Polo Shirt.

 :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 10, 2011, 08:59:55 PM
imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.

Yeah, he can get a certificate or something now, but let's wait for all the fallout before we start picketing Schulz' lawn with PAY CURRIE signs.

we need to help currie understand that losing battles and war can be rewarding for him and his family.
Title: Re: CK question
Post by: PurpleSleezyE on February 10, 2011, 09:04:51 PM
 :ck: is going to go for 30 on Saturday.  There is hell to pay for this false drama and Burks and the puffs are not going to like the angry Q@ts. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 10, 2011, 09:06:43 PM
rlccatfan

On the depth chart
Post #2564
KCMO
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: So Let Me Get This Straight Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Until Fitz, or other staff come out and say something really was going on I will continue to believe that all of this was born of gocesspool.com wanting to stir the pot and enough people picked up on the rumor that it spun into the crap storm we have been dealing with for the last few days.

  :horrorsurprise:

Your move BSAC.

for the life of me i want to believe that people are not this naive. also, if anybody has any ideas on how to kick up the kstate is going to hire mike leach pot stirring enough that every single media member in kansas starts reporting it as fact then feel free to shoot me a pm or something. jfc.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wELLsculptedbrows on February 10, 2011, 09:13:58 PM
Wow. This was just what this season needed at this point. I think I'm more invested in this program than ever before. 
 :emawkid: :fistpump: :emawkid: :fistpump: :emawkid: :fistpump: :emawkid: :fistpump: :emawkid: :fistpump: :emawkid: :fistpump:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 09:15:54 PM
It's just too bad this all didn't go down while the entire team was stuck on a bus in the middle of a highway on the way back from an away game. 

Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 10, 2011, 09:16:51 PM
It's just too bad this all didn't go down while the entire team was stuck on a bus in the middle of a highway on the way back from an away game. 



It probably did  :ck:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 10, 2011, 09:26:12 PM
If this comes out how it should, I consider it a big step for our program.

I think you're an optimist.  I think there was enough outrage that Currie and crew aren't able to do what they wanted to do.  

The fact that any of us know about it is a step backward, imo.

YOU ARE WELCOME KSU BASKETBALL FANS.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 09:35:03 PM
rlccatfan

On the depth chart
Post #2564
KCMO
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: So Let Me Get This Straight Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Until Fitz, or other staff come out and say something really was going on I will continue to believe that all of this was born of gocesspool.com wanting to stir the pot and enough people picked up on the rumor that it spun into the crap storm we have been dealing with for the last few days.

  :horrorsurprise:

Your move BSAC.

for the life of me i want to believe that people are not this naive. also, if anybody has any ideas on how to kick up the kstate is going to hire mike leach pot stirring enough that every single media member in kansas starts reporting it as fact then feel free to shoot me a pm or something. jfc.

It's unbelievable. omg :lol: lmfao.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 10:02:35 PM
Quote
JACKHARRYKSHB
 
Frank Martin goes off on reporter after practice today at K-State. We'll play the exchange tonight at 10 on NBC 41.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: I_have_purplewood on February 10, 2011, 10:07:24 PM
Quote
JACKHARRYKSHB
 
Frank Martin goes off on reporter after practice today at K-State. We'll play the exchange tonight at 10 on NBC 41.
:horrorsurprise: (ftp://:horrorsurprise:)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wiley on February 10, 2011, 10:11:46 PM
This is a win for goEMAW  :emawkid:

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6111149 (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6111149)

Quote
MANHATTAN, Kan. -- Kansas State forward Curtis Kelly will play Saturday at Colorado, and that was about all coach Frank Martin would say about the senior on Thursday.

In a tense back-and-forth with reporters, Martin declined to discuss any other details regarding the 6-foor-6 Kelly, who averages 9.9 points and 4.9 rebounds.

The Kansas City Star and the Topeka Capital-Journal, citing unidentified sources   :emawkid:, reported this week Kelly had been accused of violating an unspecified department policy and could be subject to dismissal from the team, pending an appeal.

When asked to clarify Kelly's situation, Martin said, "What situation?"

Asked if he would play Saturday, the coach said, "Have I said something differently? I love great questions."

Asked again for clarification, Martin said, "Ask your source. Whoever reported it, ask their source. Don't ask me. If you ask me a question, I answer your question. For four years I've answered every question. I was asked two minutes ago if Curt was at practice. What did I answer? Then I was asked is he playing Saturday. What'd I answer? Yes. Right?

"So I thought I dealt with it. Now go ask the source that reported to you fine people whatever they said."

At that point, Martin was asked if Kelly had appeared before a university body on Thursday in regard to some policy violation.

"Not that I know of," he said. "Why? Were you at one? Ask your source.

"I'm telling you. He's on my team and he's playing Saturday. I wasn't at any appeals thing. So ask your source."

Kelly, picked for the preseason All-Big 12 first team, graduated last summer with a degree in social science. He was suspended for six games earlier this season for receiving inappropriate discounts at a Manhattan clothing store.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: nicname on February 10, 2011, 10:12:53 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fchicagofree.info%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2010%2F07%2Ffireworks4.jpg&hash=e2fce123f2d94f5d7935f458fcb20053dac0b9ac)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on February 10, 2011, 10:14:08 PM
imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.

Yeah, he can get a certificate or something now

:curse: :curse:NO :curse: :curse:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ChiComCat on February 10, 2011, 10:15:11 PM
rlccatfan

On the depth chart
Post #2564
KCMO
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: So Let Me Get This Straight Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Until Fitz, or other staff come out and say something really was going on I will continue to believe that all of this was born of gocesspool.com wanting to stir the pot and enough people picked up on the rumor that it spun into the crap storm we have been dealing with for the last few days.

  :horrorsurprise:

Your move BSAC.

Anybody that needs fitz to confirm any story about this, of all things, is a rough ridin' Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 10, 2011, 10:16:48 PM
rlccatfan

On the depth chart
Post #2564
KCMO
MyFanPage
Add Buddy Re: So Let Me Get This Straight Reply

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Until Fitz, or other staff come out and say something really was going on I will continue to believe that all of this was born of gocesspool.com wanting to stir the pot and enough people picked up on the rumor that it spun into the crap storm we have been dealing with for the last few days.

  :horrorsurprise:

Your move BSAC.

Anybody that needs fitz to confirm any story about this, of all things, is a effing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  

how quickly they forget ITS PATTERSON
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 10:18:49 PM
Quote
DScottFritchen
 
@CNSCasey Tweet said after practice, so maybe he meant after the news conf after practice. That could be the case. Didn't see anything tho.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: PowercatPat on February 10, 2011, 10:24:17 PM
Jack Harry will be on in a minute.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: KSU176 on February 10, 2011, 10:24:53 PM
Video

http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html (http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wes mantooth on February 10, 2011, 10:28:20 PM
Great report Harry.  Showed his press conference interview we already read about.   :dubious:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 10:30:48 PM
Great report Harry.  Showed his press conference interview we already read about.   :dubious:

Jack isn't very good with the whole interwebs thing.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 10, 2011, 10:34:29 PM
Great report Harry.  Showed his press conference interview we already read about.   :dubious:

but guys did you see gary lezak's extended forecast?   :excited:  i'm super glad i spent time watching NBC Action News.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: number5 on February 10, 2011, 10:37:23 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6111149 (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6111149)

Made ESPN headlines.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 10, 2011, 10:39:56 PM
http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6111149 (http://sports.espn.go.com/ncb/news/story?id=6111149)

Made ESPN headlines.

 :horrorsurprise:

Big Time!

'Grats guys. 

'Grats.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 10, 2011, 10:44:43 PM
Quote
RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34308
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Time for more wild speculation.   Reply
Originally posted by rlccatfan:
Originally posted by RockyMtnCat:
stormy, you remember the big final recruiting weekend BBQ two years ago - the bs story on scout that you were so excited about??

you need to stay away from those places, they get you all riled up.


RMC, refresh our memories. Is it possible that the other boards, knowing that Stormnut comes over here and reports everything he sees on those boards that they might feed him some crap just to get GPC riled up? Those boards detest GPC, so you be the judge.
it's just not stormy.

and martin loves the goEMAW group after their performance at the awards dinner last year...

 

Posted on 2/10 9:40 PM | IP: Logged


cjh

All-American performer
Post #12094
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Time for more wild speculation.   Reply
Exactly. They pulled the dame bs at the Kc fanfest event as well as at the KC basketball banquet. They are complete douchebags.
Posted from wireless.rivals.com



Posted on 2/10 10:00 PM | IP: Logged

rlccatfan

On the depth chart
Post #2568
KCMO
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Time for more wild speculation.   Reply
I remember seeing something about them build unruly and drunk. What all happened?

 

Posted on 2/10 10:06 PM | IP: Logged

:lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 10, 2011, 10:47:04 PM
http://goEMAW.com/forum/index.php?topic=10623.msg229077#msg229077

amirite guys?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 10, 2011, 10:47:55 PM
Good lord we own those tools.

(PS. What happened at Fanfest!?!?)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 10, 2011, 10:50:26 PM
Wait, did Currie not have jack crap to do with the appeal?

Quote
According to the handbook, the appeals process could include a ruling from the athletic director and/or a meeting with members of K-State's General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

http://cjonline.com/sports/2011-02-10/cats-kelly-play-against-cu
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 10:52:27 PM
Wait, did Currie not have jack crap to do with the appeal?

Quote
According to the handbook, the appeals process could include a ruling from the athletic director and/or a meeting with members of K-State's General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

http://cjonline.com/sports/2011-02-10/cats-kelly-play-against-cu

Currie is a crafty one.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ChiComCat on February 10, 2011, 10:53:18 PM
Wait, did Currie not have jack crap to do with the appeal?

Quote
According to the handbook, the appeals process could include a ruling from the athletic director and/or a meeting with members of K-State's General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

http://cjonline.com/sports/2011-02-10/cats-kelly-play-against-cu

We need fitz to find out about this than sit on it for awhile.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 10:55:43 PM
Video

http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html (http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html)

:horrorsurprise:

who is Doug?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 10, 2011, 10:57:23 PM
Video

http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html (http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html)

:horrorsurprise:

who is Doug?

Tucker.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 10, 2011, 10:57:59 PM
Video

http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html (http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html)

:horrorsurprise:

who is Doug?

Tucker.

Not of the Shirt- variety.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wiley on February 10, 2011, 10:58:39 PM
Quote
RockyMtnCat

GoPowercat Ring of Fame member
Post #34308
Denver, CO

MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Time for more wild speculation.   Reply
Originally posted by rlccatfan:
Originally posted by RockyMtnCat:
stormy, you remember the big final recruiting weekend BBQ two years ago - the bs story on scout that you were so excited about??

you need to stay away from those places, they get you all riled up.


RMC, refresh our memories. Is it possible that the other boards, knowing that Stormnut comes over here and reports everything he sees on those boards that they might feed him some crap just to get GPC riled up? Those boards detest GPC, so you be the judge.
it's just not stormy.

and martin loves the goEMAW group after their performance at the awards dinner last year...

 

Posted on 2/10 9:40 PM | IP: Logged


cjh

All-American performer
Post #12094
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Time for more wild speculation.   Reply
Exactly. They pulled the dame bs at the Kc fanfest event as well as at the KC basketball banquet. They are complete douchebags.
Posted from wireless.rivals.com



Posted on 2/10 10:00 PM | IP: Logged

rlccatfan

On the depth chart
Post #2568
KCMO
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
Re: Time for more wild speculation.   Reply
I remember seeing something about them build unruly and drunk. What all happened?

 

Posted on 2/10 10:06 PM | IP: Logged

:lol:

 :jerk:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 10, 2011, 11:02:12 PM
Video

http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html (http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html)

:horrorsurprise:

who is Doug?

Tucker.

AP writer i take it...
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 10, 2011, 11:05:13 PM
Man AyoS...a hates us.


Quote
AyoSaba

On full scholarship
Post #1722
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
It's Kelly   Reply
Man GoE...com really nailed this one.
 

Posted on 2/10 10:59 PM | IP: Logged
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 11:07:25 PM
If this comes out how it should, I consider it a big step for our program.

I think you're an optimist.  I think there was enough outrage that Currie and crew aren't able to do what they wanted to do.  

The fact that any of us know about it is a step backward, imo.

YOU ARE WELCOME KSU BASKETBALL FANS.


 :peek:








































:adored:




Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 10, 2011, 11:16:35 PM
Man AyoS...a hates us.


Quote
AyoSaba

On full scholarship
Post #1722
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
It's Kelly   Reply
Man GoE...com really nailed this one.
 

Posted on 2/10 10:59 PM | IP: Logged

the funny thing is that gomaw did. the first three or four pages pretty clearly spelled out what was going on as far as i'm concerned and it did so hours before anyone else could write about it. not that they didn't have the same or even better info, but they just can't randomly throw up an emoticon in their newspaper or say "hey, we're pretty sure that......".

this place can because no one here is a journalist and no one pretends to be and there is no business being run. also, bsac's source was gold. also, no way anyone could've predicted that the appeal would've worked. all in all, pretty amazing considering. go cats.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 10, 2011, 11:19:06 PM
I'll say it again:

go cats WITH CURTIS KELLY.   :woot:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 10, 2011, 11:19:33 PM
Didn't Fitz post something as well?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 10, 2011, 11:26:27 PM
Didn't Fitz post something as well?

rob/gopowercat basically had the same exact story that meek did with an acknowledgment that meek broke it. but, yeah. they reported it too. just with less info. and eight hours later.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 10, 2011, 11:38:52 PM
Video

http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html (http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html)

with re. to pullen's section.  i wonder what would happen if a team played a four man zone with the fifth cherry picking?  it seems like your off eff would benefit more than your def eff would suffer if the other team played you more or less normally.  it'd be a fun thing for a team to experiment with.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: OK_Cat on February 11, 2011, 12:09:56 AM
Guys, this feels really good.  Like, for once, we didn't get the "we're kstate" kitn thing.

i mean, yeah, we suck at hoops and everybody's leaving, but eff THE POLICE!  :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 11, 2011, 12:12:37 AM
eff THE POLICE!  :emawkid:

Yeah right, RCPD is going to be gunning for Kelly now. They might even pause from doing undercover MIP busts to raid his house
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 11, 2011, 12:14:50 AM
Wait, did Currie not have jack crap to do with the appeal?

Quote
According to the handbook, the appeals process could include a ruling from the athletic director and/or a meeting with members of K-State's General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

http://cjonline.com/sports/2011-02-10/cats-kelly-play-against-cu

Kellis asserts Currie sat this one out:

Quote
The violation could have earned him a dismissal from the team, but a source told The Star that Kelly attended a hearing in the student union with members of the General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee on Thursday afternoon on the matter and that the ruling of the hearing turned out in Kelly’s favor.

http://www.kansascity.com/2011/02/10/2647274/kelly-remains-at-k-state-after.html#ixzz1Dd0rHHNa
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 11, 2011, 12:24:06 AM
General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee
 :love: :emawkid:

Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 11, 2011, 12:31:18 AM
Quote
3050 General Scholarship and Student Financial Aid Committee
Pat Bosco, Student Life, CHAIR
Karen Pence, Human Ecology
Melinda Wilkerson, Veterinary Medicine
oscar Shubert, Administration & Finance
Gary Clark, Engineering

Anand Desai, Business Administration
Sharon Thielen, Agriculture
Dixie Shierlman, Technology and Aviation
Cheryl May, Media Relations
Reid Sigmon, Athletics

Lynn Ewanow, Architecture, Planning, & Design
Larry Moeder, Admissions/Student Financial Asst
Alison Wheatley, Arts & Sciences
Pam Monroe, Education
TBA, KSU Foundation

Christine Caplinger, Student
Amrit America Ghimire, Student
Scott Soptick, Student

Develops policies and procedures for student financial aid other than athletic grants-in-aid. Examines the records of applicants for various scholarships and selects recipients.  Members appointed by college offices and the Student Governing Association.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 11, 2011, 12:32:37 AM
Quote
3050 General Scholarship and Student Financial Aid Committee
Pat Bosco, Student Life, CHAIR
Karen Pence, Human Ecology
Melinda Wilkerson, Veterinary Medicine
oscar Shubert, Administration & Finance
Gary Clark, Engineering

Anand Desai, Business Administration
Sharon Thielen, Agriculture
Dixie Shierlman, Technology and Aviation
Cheryl May, Media Relations
Reid Sigmon, Athletics

Lynn Ewanow, Architecture, Planning, & Design
Larry Moeder, Admissions/Student Financial Asst
Alison Wheatley, Arts & Sciences
Pam Monroe, Education
TBA, KSU Foundation

Christine Caplinger, Student
Amrit America Ghimire, Student
Scott Soptick, Student

hello, heroes.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on February 11, 2011, 12:37:45 AM
Quote
3050 General Scholarship and Student Financial Aid Committee
Pat Bosco, Student Life, CHAIR
Karen Pence, Human Ecology
Melinda Wilkerson, Veterinary Medicine
oscar Shubert, Administration & Finance
Gary Clark, Engineering

Anand Desai, Business Administration
Sharon Thielen, Agriculture
Dixie Shierlman, Technology and Aviation
Cheryl May, Media Relations
Reid Sigmon, Athletics

Lynn Ewanow, Architecture, Planning, & Design
Larry Moeder, Admissions/Student Financial Asst
Alison Wheatley, Arts & Sciences
Pam Monroe, Education
TBA, KSU Foundation

Christine Caplinger, Student
Amrit America Ghimire, Student
Scott Soptick, Student

hello, heroes.

Emaw extrodinaires
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pett on February 11, 2011, 12:49:21 AM
If CK plays in Boulder this Saturday night then a Pay Currie campaign better start.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 11, 2011, 12:51:13 AM
We even on anywhere saturday?  Because if it is I'm getting  :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink: :drink:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CatsFan_58 on February 11, 2011, 01:08:56 AM
If this comes out how it should, I consider it a big step for our program.

I think you're an optimist.  I think there was enough outrage that Currie and crew aren't able to do what they wanted to do.  

The fact that any of us know about it is a step backward, imo.
yeah, but how are we supposed to know how far along on our MCMW path we are if we don't know of / hear about the goings on?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: jtksu on February 11, 2011, 01:22:27 AM
The game is on ESPNU.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 11, 2011, 01:26:19 AM
Quote
3050 General Scholarship and Student Financial Aid Committee
Pat Bosco, Student Life, CHAIR
Karen Pence, Human Ecology
Melinda Wilkerson, Veterinary Medicine
oscar Shubert, Administration & Finance
Gary Clark, Engineering

Anand Desai, Business Administration
Sharon Thielen, Agriculture
Dixie Shierlman, Technology and Aviation
Cheryl May, Media Relations
Reid Sigmon, Athletics

Lynn Ewanow, Architecture, Planning, & Design
Larry Moeder, Admissions/Student Financial Asst
Alison Wheatley, Arts & Sciences
Pam Monroe, Education
TBA, KSU Foundation

Christine Caplinger, Student
Amrit America Ghimire, Student
Scott Soptick, Student

Develops policies and procedures for student financial aid other than athletic grants-in-aid. Examines the records of applicants for various scholarships and selects recipients.  Members appointed by college offices and the Student Governing Association.
:excited: :love:

Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2011, 07:12:39 AM
rough ridin' Pat Bosco is the most EMAW person to ever EMAW.  If we had known from the outset who was chairing this son of a bitch we could have avoided a lot of nervousness.  

http://godsawesomegiftksu.blogspot.com/2008/02/k-state-dream-valentine.html
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2011, 07:15:48 AM
Man AyoS...a hates us.


Quote
AyoSaba

On full scholarship
Post #1722
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
It's Kelly   Reply
Man GoE...com really nailed this one.
 

Posted on 2/10 10:59 PM | IP: Logged

the funny thing is that gomaw did. the first three or four pages pretty clearly spelled out what was going on as far as i'm concerned and it did so hours before anyone else could write about it. not that they didn't have the same or even better info, but they just can't randomly throw up an emoticon in their newspaper or say "hey, we're pretty sure that......".

this place can because no one here is a journalist and no one pretends to be and there is no business being run. also, bsac's source was gold. also, no way anyone could've predicted that the appeal would've worked. all in all, pretty amazing considering. go cats.

This is a great post right here ^



except this is a business  :nono:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 11, 2011, 07:20:24 AM
except this is a business  :nono:

Why do I have to send my checks c/o "Banners and Aerial Displays Division"?  RD, I'm confused  :curse:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: KITNfury on February 11, 2011, 07:43:33 AM
Video

http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html (http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html)

:horrorsurprise:

who is Doug?

My work does not have the latest version of flash and I don't have the authority to download programs to my computer (much to my internet experience buzz kill) and anywho this is the message I see when I try to view the video:

Quote
A EVEBODY... HEY HEY EVERYBODY... KANSAS STATE HAS HAD A TUMUUOUS TIME WITH ITS BIG MEN THIS SEASON... IN THE LAST FEW WEEKS, BOTH WALLY JUDGE AND FREDDY ASPRILLA HAVE LEFT THE TEAM... And of course, theres the Curis Kelly saga... Kelly was benched by Frank Martin to start the season because of his lack of effort in practice... then came a 6 game suspension for improper benefits accepted in the form of clothing... THIS week, there were murmurings that Kelly was under investigation and could be dismissed from the team... there were, however, Never any official reports that Kelly was on the skids... and its all news to Frank... BILL SELF HAS HAD HIS SHARE OF ISSUES WITH PLAYERS OVER THE YEARS... Currently, however, his team is rolling right along with just one loss on the JJseason... He was asked toy, though, if he felt for Frank Martin in his current situation...

If you can read this message, you need to upgrade your Flash player in order to view this video. Click Here to download it for free.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j@yh@wks on February 11, 2011, 07:48:40 AM
Nice, it looks like you guys are getting better, a step at a time.  I think after the martin presser it is pretty obvious that it's your AD that doesn't seem to want to win.  I'm starting to think Martin leaked the story himself to the reporters, which makes him yelling "ask your source" even funnier.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 11, 2011, 07:49:34 AM
Man AyoS...a hates us.


Quote
AyoSaba

On full scholarship
Post #1722
MyFanPage
Add Buddy   
It's Kelly   Reply
Man GoE...com really nailed this one.
 

Posted on 2/10 10:59 PM | IP: Logged

the funny thing is that gomaw did. the first three or four pages pretty clearly spelled out what was going on as far as i'm concerned and it did so hours before anyone else could write about it. not that they didn't have the same or even better info, but they just can't randomly throw up an emoticon in their newspaper or say "hey, we're pretty sure that......".

this place can because no one here is a journalist and no one pretends to be and there is no business being run. also, bsac's source was gold. also, no way anyone could've predicted that the appeal would've worked. all in all, pretty amazing considering. go cats.

This is a great post right here ^



except this is a business  :nono:

well obviously it is a business if the definition of business you are using is "a usually commercial or mercantile activity engaged in as a means of livelihood : trade, line <in the restaurant business> ". i was obviously meaning that this place isn't a business as in, it's not "a bowel movement —used especially of pets".

i think most people reading what i wrote probably got that, but thanks for the clarification for people that might have assumed otherwise.


http://mw1.meriam-webster.com/dictionary/business
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2011, 07:54:57 AM
oh business, mods erase my earlier post
Title: Re: CK
Post by: KITNfury on February 11, 2011, 07:58:13 AM
Quote
3050 General Scholarship and Student Financial Aid Committee
Pat Bosco, Student Life, CHAIR
Karen Pence, Human Ecology
Melinda Wilkerson, Veterinary Medicine
oscar Shubert, Administration & Finance
Gary Clark, Engineering

Anand Desai, Business Administration
Sharon Thielen, Agriculture
Dixie Shierlman, Technology and Aviation
Cheryl May, Media Relations
Reid Sigmon, Athletics

Lynn Ewanow, Architecture, Planning, & Design
Larry Moeder, Admissions/Student Financial Asst
Alison Wheatley, Arts & Sciences
Pam Monroe, Education
TBA, KSU Foundation

Christine Caplinger, Student
Amrit America Ghimire, Student
Scott Soptick, Student

Develops policies and procedures for student financial aid other than athletic grants-in-aid. Examines the records of applicants for various scholarships and selects recipients.  Members appointed by college offices and the Student Governing Association.
We need to Big Head these people for the Big Monday game against KU.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2011, 08:04:36 AM
Just Pat imo.  I bet it went down, like:

Pat walks in and everyone sits around the huge table.  Curt looks sad.  Pat looks angry.  Then, after a moment of tension, Pat says, "Son, shouldn't you be at practice?" and then everyone parties. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EllToPay on February 11, 2011, 08:11:57 AM
Just Pat imo.  I bet it went down, like:

Pat walks in and everyone sits around the huge table.  Curt looks sad.  Pat looks angry.  Then, after a moment of tension, Pat says, "Son, shouldn't you be at practice?" and then everyone parties.  

...a smile slowly appears on Curt's face. He gets up with enthusiasm, ready to run out the door to his teammates waiting in the hallway. Pat, with the same sense of enthusiasm on his face, tells Curt to wait.

"Curt," Pat says. "I think you forgot something."

Pat pulls from his chair a basketball and bounces it to Curt. Curt catches it, feels it, and looks up at Pat.

"Thanks, Pat."
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 11, 2011, 08:13:43 AM
Just Pat imo.  I bet it went down, like:

Pat walks in and everyone sits around the huge table.  Curt looks sad.  Pat looks angry.  Then, after a moment of tension, Pat says, "Son, shouldn't you be at practice?" and then everyone parties. 


yep. sandstorm, strobes and fist pumping from everyone in the room after the verdict.  :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 11, 2011, 08:14:28 AM
Curt walks a little further, pauses, turns around and adds, "THIS is why you have a weird plaza and clock tower thing named after you, you goddamn beautiful sumbitch."
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 11, 2011, 08:15:38 AM
Just Pat imo.  I bet it went down, like:

Pat walks in and everyone sits around the huge table.  Curt looks sad.  Pat looks angry.  Then, after a moment of tension, Pat says, "Son, shouldn't you be at practice?" and then everyone parties. 

...a smile slowly appears on Curt's face. He gets up with enthusiasm, ready to run out the door to his teammates waiting in the hallway. Pat, with the same sense of enthusiasm on his face, tells Curt to wait.

"Curt," Pat says. "I think you forgot something."

Pat pulls from his chair a basketball. and bounces it to Curt. Curt catches it, feels it, and looks up at Pat.

"Thanks, Pat. AAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"

FYP
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 11, 2011, 08:16:18 AM
imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.

Yeah, he can get a certificate or something now

:curse: :curse:NO :curse: :curse:


Yeah, glad this Bosco news came out before I put down the deposit.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 11, 2011, 08:17:02 AM
imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.

Yeah, he can get a certificate or something now

:curse: :curse:NO :curse: :curse:


Yeah, glad this Bosco news came out before I put down the deposit.

get bosco a gift certificate?  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 11, 2011, 08:21:11 AM
imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.

Yeah, he can get a certificate or something now

:curse: :curse:NO :curse: :curse:


Yeah, glad this Bosco news came out before I put down the deposit.

get bosco a gift certificate?  :dunno:

I'd like to get him a similar looking certificate to Schulz, but for awesomeness or something instead of participation, just so when Currie goes into either of their offices he sees the certificates up on the wall and knows he didn't earn one.

I'm not sure what business to get him a gift card for.  Maybe here for when we roll out premium?  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: KITNfury on February 11, 2011, 08:25:58 AM
Just Pat imo.  I bet it went down, like:

Pat walks in and everyone sits around the huge table.  Curt looks sad.  Pat looks angry.  Then, after a moment of tension, Pat says, "Son, shouldn't you be at practice?" and then everyone parties. 

...a smile slowly appears on Curt's face. He gets up with enthusiasm, ready to run out the door to his teammates waiting in the hallway. Pat, with the same sense of enthusiasm on his face, tells Curt to wait.

"Curt," Pat says. "I think you forgot something."

Pat pulls from his chair a basketball. and bounces it to Curt. Curt catches it, feels it, and looks up at Pat.

"Thanks, Pat."
I just got the most amazing mental image from this description. It was wonderful.

And if just Pat gets a big head, I'm good with that. We need to send a strong, yet subtle, message that we are ok with good players getting a little preferential treatment.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: rcjh88 on February 11, 2011, 08:29:38 AM
Congrats on the appeal. You have reached your goal of becoming a "dirty program"
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2011, 08:30:56 AM
Congrats on the appeal. You have reached your goal of becoming a "dirty program"

false. you have to be good to reach said goal.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mcmwcat on February 11, 2011, 08:36:19 AM
Congrats on the appeal. You have reached your goal of becoming a "dirty program"

false. you have to be good to reach said goal.

no, but we have laid the foundation  :kstatriot:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: PurpleSleezyE on February 11, 2011, 08:37:20 AM
Congrats on the appeal. You have reached your goal of becoming a "dirty program"

I wish we were!!  If we would have been one last year, Tony Mitchell would be playing for us right now.  Instead he is as home eating his mama's oatmeal...and I ain't talking about the breakfast food!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on February 11, 2011, 08:40:09 AM
Meek on the border patrol just said that a number of kstsate purple confirmed the rumors. I hope all of those people are rooted out and lose their jobs for divulging info on a student.  Austin sounded prettybutthurt that frank wouldn't touch it.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: rcjh88 on February 11, 2011, 08:40:35 AM
That's right, the championships should just start pouring in now. It has nothing to do with talent or coaching. Being dirty is the key.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on February 11, 2011, 08:42:23 AM
i wonder if curtis graduated high school.  that seems to be an important piece.
That's right, the championships should just start pouring in now. It has nothing to do with talent or coaching. Being dirty is the key.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: _33 on February 11, 2011, 08:43:31 AM
That's right, the championships should just start pouring in now. It has nothing to do with talent or coaching. Being dirty is the key.

Being dirty leads to talent, talent leads to perceived good coaching, talent and good coaching leads to championships.  You have to start with the dirty.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 11, 2011, 08:43:57 AM
LOL at anyone who thinks this is "dirty" . . . My spaghetti monster, really??  If were were "dirty" we aren't even discussing this, there are no articles, there is no speculation, no one knows a damn thing.  It's just Curtis, a basketball and a bong . . . nothing else, no questions to Frank, no 25 page thread, NOTHING.

 :lol:  Dirty . . .  :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 11, 2011, 08:45:53 AM
well ya shouldn't have broke the story and started the thread dax.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 11, 2011, 08:47:02 AM
well ya shouldn't have broke the story and started the thread dax.

I am not BSAC . . . although I hear he's every bit as collar popping cool as I am.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: j@yh@wks on February 11, 2011, 08:53:33 AM
well ya shouldn't have broke the story and started the thread dax.

every bit as collar popping cool as I am.



words i never thought I would see dax post for 100 Alex.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 11, 2011, 09:35:31 AM
Bosco.  Damn.  One guy on that campus gets it.   :cheers:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2011, 09:53:41 AM
It feels really, really good to be goEMAW.com right now  :gocho:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 11, 2011, 09:54:44 AM
Perfect new name for the board, imo.

 :cheers:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Brock Landers on February 11, 2011, 10:15:51 AM
Congrats on the appeal. You have reached your goal of becoming a "dirty program"

false. you have to be good to reach said goal.

no, but we have laid the foundation  :kstatriot:


Yeah, baby steps.  Hopefully this is the first of many.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: KSUBrian on February 11, 2011, 10:26:38 AM
Quote
3050 General Scholarship and Student Financial Aid Committee
Pat Bosco, Student Life, CHAIR
Karen Pence, Human Ecology
Melinda Wilkerson, Veterinary Medicine
oscar Shubert, Administration & Finance
Gary Clark, Engineering

Anand Desai, Business Administration
Sharon Thielen, Agriculture
Dixie Shierlman, Technology and Aviation
Cheryl May, Media Relations
Reid Sigmon, Athletics

Lynn Ewanow, Architecture, Planning, & Design
Larry Moeder, Admissions/Student Financial Asst
Alison Wheatley, Arts & Sciences
Pam Monroe, Education
TBA, KSU Foundation

Christine Caplinger, Student
Amrit America Ghimire, Student
Scott Soptick, Student

Develops policies and procedures for student financial aid other than athletic grants-in-aid. Examines the records of applicants for various scholarships and selects recipients.  Members appointed by college offices and the Student Governing Association.
:excited: :love:



Are the minutes of this committee subject to the open records act? Could be an interesting read.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 11, 2011, 11:11:46 AM
If the meeting had to do with a students academic/institutional standing I doubt it can be made public, it likely falls under FERPA.

Title: Re: CK
Post by: pissclams on February 11, 2011, 11:12:33 AM
If the meeting had to do with a students academic/institutional standing I doubt it can be made public, it likely falls under FERPA.



dax, I think you meant FUPA
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 11, 2011, 11:15:28 AM
If the meeting had to do with a students academic/institutional standing I doubt it can be made public, it likely falls under FERPA.



dax, I think you meant FUPA

See Urban Dictionary. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rams on February 11, 2011, 04:13:26 PM
If the meeting had to do with a students academic/institutional standing I doubt it can be made public, it likely falls under FERPA.

I am not BSAC

 :nono:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 11, 2011, 05:29:17 PM
Loving everyone on other boards now claiming all this stuff is basically made up.  Loving it.  And even if it has all been a farce, it's helped us figure out who our true EMAW heroes are.
 :emawkid: :fistpump:








(Except Currie, I am still confused on him.)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rams on February 11, 2011, 05:39:56 PM
And even if it has all been a farce, it's helped us figure out who our true EMAW heroes are.
 :emawkid: :fistpump:
Smoke 'em out, mother fuckers!!!

SMOKE. THEM. OUT.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 11, 2011, 05:41:45 PM
Loving everyone on other boards now claiming all this stuff is basically made up.  Loving it.  And even if it has all been a farce, it's helped us figure out who our true EMAW heroes are.
 :emawkid: :fistpump:








(Except Currie, I am still confused on him.)

It's 100% true.  What are retards having a problem with? 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: J on February 11, 2011, 06:17:14 PM
Loving everyone on other boards now claiming all this stuff is basically made up.  Loving it.  And even if it has all been a farce, it's helped us figure out who our true EMAW heroes are.
 :emawkid: :fistpump:








(Except Currie, I am still confused on him.)

It's 100% true.  What are retards having a problem with? 

Being retards.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bringonthecats on February 11, 2011, 06:30:09 PM
Loving everyone on other boards now claiming all this stuff is basically made up.  Loving it.  And even if it has all been a farce, it's helped us figure out who our true EMAW heroes are.
 :emawkid: :fistpump:








(Except Currie, I am still confused on him.)
um except it's not a farce. anyone with brains would realize that. party on goEMAW  :cheers:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 11, 2011, 06:30:30 PM
If the meeting had to do with a students academic/institutional standing I doubt it can be made public, it likely falls under FERPA.



Dax is the only one that would know this.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dugout DickStone on February 11, 2011, 06:50:55 PM
Well boys, I'm going to take the goEMAW Corp. Onyx card down to Westchase to celebrate all the ass kicking scoops we brought our customers this week.  Cheers
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 11, 2011, 10:27:33 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tobygebhart.com%2Fimages%2Fcurt_goemaw.jpg&hash=679828f4e300d224e2a835c118bd878c4b1c3717)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 11, 2011, 10:29:17 PM
Well boys, I'm going to take the goEMAW Corp. Onyx card down to Westchase to celebrate all the ass kicking scoops we brought our customers this week.  Cheers


post card, pleae
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 11, 2011, 10:32:40 PM
lol
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 11, 2011, 10:36:21 PM
Tobias, that is rough ridin' AMAZING.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rams on February 11, 2011, 10:58:33 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tobygebhart.com%2Fimages%2Fcurt_goemaw.jpg&hash=679828f4e300d224e2a835c118bd878c4b1c3717)
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi405.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fpp138%2Fbdr0380%2Fclapping.gif&hash=1c0e05536a10b74a89baf2273fecc0191e029734)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 11, 2011, 11:29:43 PM
All right EMAWs, I need a hero.  A photoshop hero.  Can someone please photoshop CurtKell's head on Tom's body in this scene from To Kill A Mockingbird (starring the incomparable Gregory Peck)?  Preferably a picture of Curtis shrugging or complaining or just doing something weird and hilarious and Curtis-y.

Use either of the following TKaM pictures:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmrsreinert.wikispaces.com%2Ffile%2Fview%2FAtticus_and_Tom_Robinson_in_court.gif%2F93083462%2FAtticus_and_Tom_Robinson_in_court.gif&hash=37c914dbd1c6132b203f22166ef3728dc918423a)

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailyyonder.com%2Ffiles%2Fu2%2Fseersuckatticus510.jpg&hash=99826f0fff4643c43deda25da1dc6a37093b967c)


Maybe use a Curtis picture like this one?
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fd.yimg.com%2Fi%2Fng%2Fsp%2Fap_photo%2F20110115%2Fall%2Fl4955731.jpg&hash=9ea5570d1e56cc1aae98aa271e03182439e168ed)




 :katpak: :katpak: :katpak: :katpak: :katpak: to the person with the best 'shop.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 11, 2011, 11:58:13 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FqR1eLhN.jpg&hash=2d3ca5ae2960ffc415ccf754d60aed877cf6d42a)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 12, 2011, 12:00:18 AM
LOL
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 12, 2011, 12:02:04 AM
All right EMAWs, I need a hero.  A photoshop hero.  Can someone please photoshop CurtKell's head on Tom's body in this scene from To Kill A Mockingbird (starring the incomparable Gregory Peck)?  Preferably a picture of Curtis shrugging or complaining or just doing something weird and hilarious and Curtis-y.

 :cheers: to the rando from your Olssen state who set our fine collegiate paper right
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rams on February 12, 2011, 12:04:54 AM
Atticus has to be Bosco, right?  Or maybe Atticus has Katpak head?

Fitz has to be in the crowd too.  Pref the hillbilly in the overalls.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 12, 2011, 12:30:10 AM
Atticus has to be Bosco, right?  Or maybe Atticus has Katpak head?

Fitz has to be in the crowd too.  Pref the hillbilly in the overalls.

My bad - got in a hurry.  :cheers:

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.tobygebhart.com%2Fimages%2Fmockingbird2.jpg&hash=e99f37d28cfb1606d0fc61ccec4a51768b176e2b)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: pike on February 12, 2011, 12:32:10 AM
I just blew a funny fuse
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 12, 2011, 12:39:54 AM
Oh this is so clutch.
 :katpak: :katpak: :katpak: :katpak: :katpak:

Probably want to include a katpak head somewhere, definitely, and maybe have Atticus saying something about not judging people until you walk a mile in their shoes?  Can you make his overalls say WABASH?

Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 12, 2011, 12:40:55 AM
:cheers: to the rando from your Olssen state who set our fine collegiate paper right
:confused:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 12, 2011, 12:42:02 AM
:cheers: to the rando from your Olssen state who set our fine collegiate paper right
:confused:


TOBIAS KNOWS THE TRUTH   :party:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 12, 2011, 01:07:44 AM
crap going down here!!! omg.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 12, 2011, 01:15:24 AM
I was just  :confused: about the Olssen state thing.   :ck:  But yes, WillieWannabe, there is indeed some crap going down here.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 12, 2011, 01:43:34 AM
Schulz says this was all more goEMAW BS.

Quote
Schulz even commented on the reports on Curtis Kelly that have been in the news.
"All this junk you have been reading in the paper the last couple days I would say you shouldn't believe it," Schulz said.

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/news/president-schulz-addresses-questions-at-open-forum-1.2465675
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 12, 2011, 01:46:52 AM
Schulz says this was all more goEMAW BS.

Quote
Schulz even commented on the reports on Curtis Kelly that have been in the news.
"All this junk you have been reading in the paper the last couple days I would say you shouldn't believe it," Schulz said.

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/news/president-schulz-addresses-questions-at-open-forum-1.2465675

@berk54 then decides goEMAW shouldn't celebrate saving the day when they started the "rumor", and proceeds to get destroyed on twitter all day culminating with him throwing the wrath of GoDaddy legal personnel at goEMAW.

Quote
@berk54 @goEMAW have fun hearing from legal personnel at godaddy.com about you threatening to hang me.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 12, 2011, 01:48:08 AM
Schulz says this was all more goEMAW BS.

Quote
Schulz even commented on the reports on Curtis Kelly that have been in the news.
"All this junk you have been reading in the paper the last couple days I would say you shouldn't believe it," Schulz said.

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/news/president-schulz-addresses-questions-at-open-forum-1.2465675

I want to know what Rintoul thinks about it.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bigwillie20 on February 12, 2011, 02:00:24 AM
Schulz says this was all more goEMAW BS.

Quote
Schulz even commented on the reports on Curtis Kelly that have been in the news.
"All this junk you have been reading in the paper the last couple days I would say you shouldn't believe it," Schulz said.

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/news/president-schulz-addresses-questions-at-open-forum-1.2465675

@berk54 then decides goEMAW shouldn't celebrate saving the day when they started the "rumor", and proceeds to get destroyed on twitter all day culminating with him throwing the wrath of GoDaddy legal personnel at goEMAW.

Quote
@berk54 @goEMAW have fun hearing from legal personnel at godaddy.com about you threatening to hang me.

 :surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 12, 2011, 02:05:23 AM
Schulz says this was all more goEMAW BS.

Quote
Schulz even commented on the reports on Curtis Kelly that have been in the news.
"All this junk you have been reading in the paper the last couple days I would say you shouldn't believe it," Schulz said.

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/news/president-schulz-addresses-questions-at-open-forum-1.2465675

sounds like schulz just sent a message to one jonathon currie.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 12, 2011, 02:41:25 AM
Yep, Bosco told Currie to GTFO with his suspension.

Quote
Third Positive Test

Notification of the results will be made to the designated University counselor, the student-athlete, the Director of Sports Medicine and/or his designee, the Director of Athletics, Associate Athletic Director for Compliance, the appropriate sport administrator, the team physician, the appropriate head coach, and the immediate supervisor of Sports Medicine as outlined above. The student-athlete will be notified in writing that he/she will be immediately and permanently suspended from all athletics participation with loss of financial aid.

Appeal

Within 24 hours of receipt of notification the student-athlete may request in writing that the Director of Athletics convene a meeting with the Director of Sports Medicine, Associate Athletic Director for Compliance, the appropriate sport administrator, appropriate head coach, and the immediate supervisor of Sports Medicine to present reasons why the sanction should not be imposed or should be modified. At the conclusion of the meeting, unless the Director of Athletics determines otherwise, the period of suspension will begin immediately.

Within three (3) days of receipt of the notification of any pending sanction from the Director of Athletics, the student-athlete may appeal the sanction to a committee comprised of the Chair and four other members of the General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

Within seven (7) days of receipt of the written request for an appeal, the Chair of the General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee will convene a hearing at which time the student-athlete will have an opportunity to be heard and present evidence concerning the reported test results and the impending sanction. The student athlete may request to have the “B” sample tested at the same laboratory that tested the “A” sample. The student-athlete may be accompanied at the hearing by an attorney and/or other person of his or her choice who may act as an advisor. The student athlete’s representatives may confer jointly, but will not be permitted to address the Committee.

The Chair of the General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee will give written notification to the student-athlete and the Director of Athletics of the decision of the Committee. The Committee's decision will be final.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 12, 2011, 02:45:14 AM
Quote your source! ;-)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sonofdaxjones on February 12, 2011, 05:39:22 AM
Just a question in general . . . has Curtis actually gotten his Undergrad degree already??   

Any chance this is academic related??  (Doubt it) but not out of the question is it?


Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 12, 2011, 07:22:35 AM
Yep, Bosco told Currie to GTFO with his suspension.

Quote
Third Positive Test

Notification of the results will be made to the designated University counselor, the student-athlete, the Director of Sports Medicine and/or his designee, the Director of Athletics, Associate Athletic Director for Compliance, the appropriate sport administrator, the team physician, the appropriate head coach, and the immediate supervisor of Sports Medicine as outlined above. The student-athlete will be notified in writing that he/she will be immediately and permanently suspended from all athletics participation with loss of financial aid.

Appeal

Within 24 hours of receipt of notification the student-athlete may request in writing that the Director of Athletics convene a meeting with the Director of Sports Medicine, Associate Athletic Director for Compliance, the appropriate sport administrator, appropriate head coach, and the immediate supervisor of Sports Medicine to present reasons why the sanction should not be imposed or should be modified. At the conclusion of the meeting, unless the Director of Athletics determines otherwise, the period of suspension will begin immediately.

Within three (3) days of receipt of the notification of any pending sanction from the Director of Athletics, the student-athlete may appeal the sanction to a committee comprised of the Chair and four other members of the General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee.

Within seven (7) days of receipt of the written request for an appeal, the Chair of the General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee will convene a hearing at which time the student-athlete will have an opportunity to be heard and present evidence concerning the reported test results and the impending sanction. The student athlete may request to have the “B” sample tested at the same laboratory that tested the “A” sample. The student-athlete may be accompanied at the hearing by an attorney and/or other person of his or her choice who may act as an advisor. The student athlete’s representatives may confer jointly, but will not be permitted to address the Committee.

The Chair of the General Scholarship and Financial Aid Committee will give written notification to the student-athlete and the Director of Athletics of the decision of the Committee. The Committee's decision will be final.

Nice find Trim
Title: Re: CK
Post by: skycat on February 12, 2011, 08:41:01 AM
Schulz says this was all more goEMAW BS.

Quote
Schulz even commented on the reports on Curtis Kelly that have been in the news.
"All this junk you have been reading in the paper the last couple days I would say you shouldn't believe it," Schulz said.

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/news/president-schulz-addresses-questions-at-open-forum-1.2465675

Schulz' phrasing leaves lots of room for interpretation. He didn't say the stuff in the papers was false, he said it was "junk." And he knows that when he says "you shouldn't believe it," our shirt-tuck fanbase will unquestioningly oblige.

I think if we were wrong, CaptainCrap would have set us straight by now.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: skycat on February 12, 2011, 08:42:16 AM
Just a question in general . . . has Curtis actually gotten his Undergrad degree already??   

Any chance this is academic related??  (Doubt it) but not out of the question is it?

They said on the teevee that he's already graduated.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 12, 2011, 09:23:09 AM
Just a question in general . . . has Curtis actually gotten his Undergrad degree already??   

Any chance this is academic related??  (Doubt it) but not out of the question is it?




if i were to guess, i would go with the stuff that has been talked about all thread and what trim just posted.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 12, 2011, 09:34:08 AM
Why is everyone trying to find some other less obvious explanation?  It's really not even in question what happened imo.  I mean, the fact that the coach just throws out angry non-denials should be confirmation for anyone who still didn't believe goEMAW and every beat reporter that covers the cats. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 12, 2011, 09:40:18 AM
Why is everyone trying to find some other less obvious explanation?  It's really not even in question what happened imo.  I mean, the fact that the coach just throws out angry non-denials should be confirmation for anyone who still didn't believe goEMAW and every beat reporter that covers the cats. 

this.  Frank was trying to protect Curt and take the fire himself at that presser.  what did people expect him to stay?  "Yeah Curt likes to get toasted, but with our front line depleted he's really needed right now, so we decided its cool, see you in Boulder"
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 12, 2011, 09:41:11 AM
guys,

what if curtis was just using a marker to write his name on things on campus and they were going to expel him, but then he told them it was an erasable marker and then went and erased it all and then was like "gotcha!" and then they shook their heads and were like "dang you curtis. you sure got us you rascal" and then they let him stay and play basketball. possible, no?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on February 12, 2011, 09:44:03 AM
guys,

what if curtis was just using a marker to write his name on things on campus and they were going to expel him, but then he told them it was an erasable marker and then went and erased it all and then was like "gotcha!" and then they shook their heads and were like "dang you curtis. you sure got us you rascal" and then they let him stay and play basketball. possible, no?

yeah..............but on weed
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 12, 2011, 10:19:08 AM
Quote your source! ;-)

ASK THIS!

http://media.kansas.com/smedia/2011/02/08/21/StudentAthleteHandbook10-11.source.prod_affiliate.80.pdf
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on February 12, 2011, 10:20:34 AM
Why is everyone trying to find some other less obvious explanation?  It's really not even in question what happened imo.  I mean, the fact that the coach just throws out angry non-denials should be confirmation for anyone who still didn't believe goEMAW and every beat reporter that covers the cats. 

Yeah, just because we're always getting embarrassingly pak'd at formal functions and lynch mobbing the crap out of tards, doesn't mean we don't know exactly what the eff we're talking about.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: bradleigh on February 12, 2011, 03:22:07 PM
It can't be understated how important it is that the tucks can believe it was all made up.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 12, 2011, 03:50:13 PM
Heard from a media person that the players hate the media now. They are allegedly not going to say much during post game interviews. Makes BBSing much less fun.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on February 12, 2011, 04:14:19 PM
the players hate the media now.

 :kstatriot:

Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 12, 2011, 04:15:02 PM
I bet Devon doesn't
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 12, 2011, 04:29:12 PM
I bet Devon doesn't

lol, I forgot about that guy.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on February 12, 2011, 04:39:09 PM
Heard from a media person that the players hate the media now. They are allegedly not going to say much during post game interviews. Makes BBSing much less fun.

it will make it much more fun, imo.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 12, 2011, 04:44:13 PM
Heard from a media person that the players hate the media now. They are allegedly not going to say much during post game interviews. Makes BBSing much less fun.

it will make it much more fun, imo.

Less things (like players' quotes) to talk about.  :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wetwillie on February 12, 2011, 04:58:45 PM
Heard from a media person that the players hate the media now. They are allegedly not going to say much during post game interviews. Makes BBSing much less fun.

it will make it much more fun, imo.

Less things (like players' quotes) to talk about.  :dunno:

I don't know about you but I enjoy the reactions of butt hurt media members more than "I won't play in the NIT"
Title: Re: CK
Post by: AbeFroman on February 12, 2011, 05:28:18 PM
Heard from a media person that the players hate the media now. They are allegedly not going to say much during post game interviews. Makes BBSing much
it will make it much more fun, imo.

Less things (like players' quotes) to talk about.  :dunno:

I don't know about you but I enjoy the reactions of butt hurt media members more than "I won't play in the NIT"
Jack harry is going to break a blood vessel. 610am tards will talk about how terrible of people they are
Title: Re: CK
Post by: michigancat on February 12, 2011, 05:41:43 PM
Heard from a media person that the players hate the media now. They are allegedly not going to say much during post game interviews. Makes BBSing much less fun.

it will make it much more fun, imo.

Less things (like players' quotes) to talk about.  :dunno:

I don't know about you but I enjoy the reactions of butt hurt media members more than "I won't play in the NIT"

I would enjoy more "I won't play in the NIT" more than anything when it comes to player quotes.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ksudrew on February 12, 2011, 05:59:13 PM
Why is everyone trying to find some other less obvious explanation?  It's really not even in question what happened imo.  I mean, the fact that the coach just throws out angry non-denials should be confirmation for anyone who still didn't believe goEMAW and every beat reporter that covers the cats. 

not very good at non-denials, angry or otherwise . . . yet.  will come with more opportunities/experience
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 12, 2011, 07:52:01 PM
Students that are goEMAW's need to step their game the eff up.  You are our ears now.  Get to work.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 12, 2011, 07:55:47 PM
Students that are goEMAW's need to step their game the eff up.  You are our ears now.  Get to work.

what part of what went on don't you understand or accept?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on February 12, 2011, 08:00:28 PM
Students that are goEMAW's need to step their game the eff up.  You are our ears now.  Get to work.

what part of what went on don't you understand or accept?

In response to lack of lack of media cooperation by players. 

I get what happened.  However, I am skeptical that the non-student sources will catch everything. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 12, 2011, 08:04:45 PM
Starting Lineup.   :emawkid:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Kat Kid on February 12, 2011, 08:45:27 PM
7:02 mark 1st half
Jamar Samuels misses the front end of a one-and-one and Curtis Kelly rebounds the basketball. He goes up with a shot, but commits an offensive foul.

"And that is big, that is Curtis Kelly's 3rd foul.....Oh check that, Curtis Kelly only has two fouls."

Cat fans smile knowingly, nod their heads and despite the turnover allow themselves an understated fist pump.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: PowercatPat on February 12, 2011, 09:00:11 PM
7:02 mark 1st half
Jamar Samuels misses the front end of a one-and-one and Curtis Kelly rebounds the basketball. He goes up with a shot, but commits an offensive foul.

"And that is big, that is Curtis Kelly's 3rd foul.....Oh check that, Curtis Kelly only has two fouls."

Cat fans smile knowingly, nod their heads and despite the turnover allow themselves an understated fist pump.

That foul was bs imo.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Stevesie60 on February 12, 2011, 09:06:38 PM
7:02 mark 1st half
Jamar Samuels misses the front end of a one-and-one and Curtis Kelly rebounds the basketball. He goes up with a shot, but commits an offensive foul.

"And that is big, that is Curtis Kelly's 3rd foul.....Oh check that, Curtis Kelly only has two fouls."

Cat fans smile knowingly, nod their heads and despite the turnover allow themselves an understated fist pump.

Totally intentional.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Pett on February 12, 2011, 10:53:00 PM
Bosco goes through all of that trouble for CK and he comes out with that effort? How can some of you frackers still like him?! :curse:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Andy on February 13, 2011, 12:43:46 AM
Bosco goes through all of that trouble for CK and he comes out with that effort? How can some of you frackers still like him?! :curse:

still the least worst big man.  sad as it may be, its much more hopeless w/o him.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on February 13, 2011, 10:17:31 AM
OMFG it felt good to see him start yesterday.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 13, 2011, 10:18:39 AM
I love CK
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on February 13, 2011, 10:19:04 AM
Bosco goes through all of that trouble for CK and he comes out with that effort? How can some of you frackers still like him?! :curse:

you are such a tard  :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on February 13, 2011, 10:37:18 AM
So basically kellis and meek sourced a message board and now the players hate them and the fans suffer.  Thanks lazy asses
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on February 13, 2011, 10:38:47 AM
So basically kellis and meek sourced a message board and now the players hate them and the fans suffer.  Thanks lazy asses

i'm sure meek had his own really good sources and then kellis probably used meeks article as his source.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on February 13, 2011, 11:24:26 AM
This board is basically the Wikipedia article and the media is your 8th-grade nephew
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWmeister on November 09, 2013, 12:35:22 AM
THOMAS GIPSON... COME ON DOWN!!!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ksupamplemousse on November 09, 2013, 12:37:46 AM
THOMAS GIPSON... COME ON DOWN!!!!!

If CK played 1-on-1 with Gip, he would dunk on him 21 times in a row. Then he would steal all of the clothes that Gip had ever purchased from Dillards. Take that you injured prick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 09, 2013, 12:37:54 AM
:O
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ksupamplemousse on November 09, 2013, 12:41:36 AM
:O

mocat, Martavious would be the most productive player on this team. He was a great cat. I miss him  :bawl:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on November 09, 2013, 01:01:50 AM
THOMAS GIPSON... COME ON DOWN!!!!!

If CK played 1-on-1 with Gip, he would dunk on him 21 times in a row. Then he would steal all of the clothes that Gip had ever purchased from Dillards. Take that you injured prick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I may be wrong but I think EMAWmeister is trying to tell us that he thinks Gip got busted smoking herb. If he did that exhibition game doesn't count towards the 10% of games required to sit out.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ksupamplemousse on November 09, 2013, 01:05:32 AM
THOMAS GIPSON... COME ON DOWN!!!!!

If CK played 1-on-1 with Gip, he would dunk on him 21 times in a row. Then he would steal all of the clothes that Gip had ever purchased from Dillards. Take that you injured prick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I may be wrong but I think EMAWmeister is trying to tell us that he thinks Gip got busted smoking herb. If he did that exhibition game doesn't count towards the 10% of games required to sit out.

So, I'm way too pak'd to discern any kind of insinuation, but if Gip is out for two more games then we might have two more embarrassing losses by the time he gets back.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWzified on November 09, 2013, 01:25:39 AM
So you're saying Gip got hit in the head with a blunt instrument?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ben ji on November 09, 2013, 02:08:38 AM
a very recently overheard conversation involving a ksu basketball staff member included this gem..."yes. i know. yes. coach martin has just had enough though. he's gone."

 :frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ben ji on November 09, 2013, 02:14:32 AM
 :frown:

imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWmeister on November 09, 2013, 10:06:09 AM
THOMAS GIPSON... COME ON DOWN!!!!!

If CK played 1-on-1 with Gip, he would dunk on him 21 times in a row. Then he would steal all of the clothes that Gip had ever purchased from Dillards. Take that you injured prick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I may be wrong but I think EMAWmeister is trying to tell us that he thinks Gip got busted smoking herb. If he did that exhibition game doesn't count towards the 10% of games required to sit out.

You're not wrong.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on November 09, 2013, 10:12:50 AM
What the eff.   Stupid rule.  Our AD office is the absolute worst.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: EMAWmeister on November 09, 2013, 10:13:13 AM
I know someone that wouldn't have ran off Curt. *HINT* He's my profile picture.

Jake Waters  :confused:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: cas4ksu on November 11, 2013, 01:17:46 PM
might have been quin snyder at the time. can't recall for sure.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on November 11, 2013, 07:02:24 PM
What the eff.   Stupid rule.  Our AD office is the absolute worst.

That's a pretty much everybody rule. I'm pretty sure I have linked the D1 punishment structure in this thread when CK got busted. The industry standard is 1st fail, get out of jail free; 2nd fail, 10% of games; 3rd fail, bye.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on November 11, 2013, 07:08:34 PM
I remember.  My problem is the self reporting, I guess.  I mean, we seem to have a higher than avg occurance rate.  Seems like we get excited about busting our own ass.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: MakeItRain on November 11, 2013, 08:16:30 PM
I remember.  My problem is the self reporting, I guess.  I mean, we seem to have a higher than avg occurance rate.  Seems like we get excited about busting our own ass.

Twice, if this is the case with Gipson, really isn't a lot considering the volume of college students (notice I didn't say athletes or basketball players) that allegedly smoke herb. Also it happens everywhere, players get "injured" or suspended for a violation of team rules everywhere. There was a day last week where 4 different college basketball programs announced suspensions on the same day and those were the announced ones.

We aren't suspending kids for this anymore than anyone else. Now that certain people are gone I don't even think compliance is the overly cautious, coach chase off tool that it used to be.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 11, 2013, 09:07:31 PM
While we are sort of piling on jtksu, I must say from looking at gip for two years he has never struck me as someone who seems to smoke, unlike what jt said
Title: Re: CK
Post by: wetwillie on November 11, 2013, 09:12:00 PM
While we are sort of piling on jtksu, I must say from looking at gip for two years he has never struck me as someone who seems to smoke, unlike what jt said

Yea he looks like more of a malt liquor guy, I know what you mean. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 11, 2013, 09:16:22 PM
No
Title: Re: CK
Post by: star seed 7 on November 11, 2013, 09:28:39 PM
While we are sort of piling on jtksu, I must say from looking at gip for two years he has never struck me as someone who seems to smoke, unlike what jt said

really?  his relaxed eyes def look like a smoker.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 02:14:20 PM
are you guys ready to guess what basketball player I saw puke red stripe into a trash can after taking an enormous *alleged* bong rip? This will follow NK guessing game rules. Hint: Not a current basketball player.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on November 12, 2013, 02:16:26 PM
jeremiah massey
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 02:17:28 PM
Bill Walker
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Mr Bread on November 12, 2013, 02:20:52 PM
Roseanne Roseannadanna
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 02:41:44 PM
jeremiah massey

worse
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 02:42:01 PM
Bill Walker

worse
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 02:42:44 PM
Roseanne Roseannadanna

had to google to make sure this wasn't a real ksu bball player
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 02:44:51 PM
David Hoskins
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 02:46:10 PM
David Hoskins

worse.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 02:47:41 PM
Freddy Asprilla
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 02:48:28 PM
Freddy Asprilla

lol better
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 02:50:38 PM
Nick Russell
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 02:51:57 PM
Nick Russell

nope. better career. probably debatable whether he was a better intantaneous player
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 02:54:41 PM
Clent Stewart?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 02:57:09 PM
Clent Stewart?

getting more complicated. I would say clent was betterbut not by a whole lot. Clent was definitely more important.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 02:57:48 PM
Darren Kent?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 02:59:37 PM
Darren Kent?

probably a wash. my player impacted better marquee wins
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 03:00:40 PM
Colon?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:01:28 PM
Colon?

probably another wash but my player was more important to his team
Title: Re: CK
Post by: slobber on November 12, 2013, 03:03:41 PM
Blake
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:04:39 PM
Blake

this game is hard. i would say worse but thats just my opinion.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 03:06:57 PM
Surely it wasn't Merriewether.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 12, 2013, 03:09:13 PM
Lance Harris
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:09:43 PM
Surely it wasn't Merriewether.

better, but less important to his team.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 03:10:06 PM
How old are you, puniraptor?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 12, 2013, 03:10:42 PM
Fred Pette
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:10:57 PM
Lance Harris

Nope. Worse!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 12, 2013, 03:11:17 PM
It was lance Harris
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 12, 2013, 03:11:27 PM
Fred Brown
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 12, 2013, 03:11:41 PM
Serge
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 12, 2013, 03:11:53 PM
Dramaine diarra
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:12:11 PM
How old are you, puniraptor?

28. you guys are right on the era.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 12, 2013, 03:12:26 PM
I am definitely close if not there already
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on November 12, 2013, 03:12:45 PM
Blake
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on November 12, 2013, 03:13:19 PM
steve henson
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 12, 2013, 03:13:37 PM
I don't really like Blake because his gf came into pita pit one time and told me how much mhk sucks and how much Blake hated it
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:14:16 PM
Fred Brown

worse, but didnt leave
Serge
better
Dramaine diarra
better
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 12, 2013, 03:14:28 PM
Dez Willingham
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on November 12, 2013, 03:14:33 PM
I don't really like Blake because his gf came into pita pit one time and told me how much mhk sucks and how much Blake hated it

Weird.  He looked so happy in the preseason fridge magnet.   :dunno:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 12, 2013, 03:14:44 PM
Gilson Dejesus
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 12, 2013, 03:14:58 PM
Matt Siebrandt
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 12, 2013, 03:15:07 PM
PERVIS
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 03:15:18 PM
I saw Blake getting some new shoes at the mall one time and he seemed to be really enjoying himself, so I think his girlfriend was lying to you, mocat.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on November 12, 2013, 03:16:19 PM
I saw Blake getting some new shoes at the mall one time and he seemed to be really enjoying himself, so I think his girlfriend was lying to you, mocat.

 I was out of school by then, but was at every game.  Don't recall Blake ever not smiling. 
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 03:18:56 PM
Akeem Wright
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 12, 2013, 03:19:08 PM
Akeem Wright


Edit, because Nuts Kicked: Justin Williams aka J-Dub
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on November 12, 2013, 03:19:25 PM
Akeem Wright
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on November 12, 2013, 03:20:47 PM
Pfft
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:21:11 PM
steve henson
PERVIS
too old
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:23:24 PM
Akeem Wright


Edit, because Nuts Kicked: Justin Williams aka J-Dub

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.charterworld.com%2Fnews%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2011%2F05%2FThe-Rugby-World-Cup-Webb-Ellis-Trophy.jpg&hash=79c292c8c4dca762843aeb8a3572f3414ddcbd5f)


that was really stressful, and alot of work. im glad its over
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 03:23:59 PM
 :Woohoo:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:24:49 PM
:Woohoo:

not akeeem wright
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on November 12, 2013, 03:25:38 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.scout.com%2FMedia%2FImage%2F19%2F199779.jpg&hash=5be59236d0283cbf2849b0ad6e693c4a3b15e265)

 :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love: :love:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:42:13 PM
wow, I think I should have gone back and brushed up on jdubs stats before doing this. Good thing it was totally subjective!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 12, 2013, 03:44:35 PM
wow, I think I should have gone back and brushed up on jdubs stats before doing this. Good thing it was totally subjective!

Yeah, I would say he was worse than Kent for sure.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: puniraptor on November 12, 2013, 03:50:04 PM
wow, I think I should have gone back and brushed up on jdubs stats before doing this. Good thing it was totally subjective!

Yeah, I would say he was worse than Kent for sure.

me too, IN RETROSPECT

I must have been rating him on a curve based on my expectations at the time
Title: Re: CK
Post by: j-dub on November 12, 2013, 10:54:16 PM
j-dub was a hero guys. he's my namesake after all.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Kat Kid on November 12, 2013, 11:07:58 PM
Marques Hayden
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on November 12, 2013, 11:31:36 PM
I'm glad it wasn't Serge. A real nice guy
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on November 13, 2013, 12:24:04 AM
Once I got the picture of it being Asprilla in my head, I was pretty disappointed that it wasn't him. He would have found a way to behind-the-back vomit.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: felix rex on November 13, 2013, 05:48:00 AM
Dax Jones
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on November 13, 2013, 06:10:19 AM
jesse tetuan
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on November 14, 2013, 02:36:20 PM
THOMAS GIPSON... COME ON DOWN!!!!!

If CK played 1-on-1 with Gip, he would dunk on him 21 times in a row. Then he would steal all of the clothes that Gip had ever purchased from Dillards. Take that you injured prick!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I may be wrong but I think EMAWmeister is trying to tell us that he thinks Gip got busted smoking herb. If he did that exhibition game doesn't count towards the 10% of games required to sit out.

You're not wrong.

I heard StanBot said Gipson had a concussion on TV last night... :confused:

Cover-up story? Brain hernia?

(I was at the game, and did not DVR it, so I didn't hear him say it.)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on November 14, 2013, 02:40:04 PM
Stan mentioned concussion before our exhibition game too.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on November 14, 2013, 02:41:56 PM
Stan mentioned concussion before our exhibition game too.

So, did he get caught with weed or have a concussion or both?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on November 14, 2013, 02:58:56 PM
Concussion makes for a good suspension excuse because it is easy to say that it isn't gone yet and have no one question, imo.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sunny_cat on November 14, 2013, 03:05:04 PM
Concussion makes for a good suspension excuse because it is easy to say that it isn't gone yet and have no one question, imo.

This was my first reaction. Thanks.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 10, 2016, 04:31:40 PM
:emawkid:

https://twitter.com/CKadventure247/status/708044636149964800

https://twitter.com/TrimGoEMAW/status/708046564393033729

https://twitter.com/CKadventure247/status/708047245711687680

Title: Re: CK
Post by: kslim on March 10, 2016, 04:43:40 PM
Thats what happens when you livetrim 3:16
Title: Re: CK
Post by: michigancat on March 10, 2016, 04:44:31 PM
:)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on March 10, 2016, 05:07:51 PM
Omg


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on March 10, 2016, 05:08:10 PM
if anyone is still anti-underwood, then those persons are gigantic idiots.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 10, 2016, 05:12:14 PM
If any of you people can't quite remember what this thread was all about, take some time to read it from the beginning.  It explains a lot about where KSU hoops is today.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kslim on March 10, 2016, 05:15:19 PM
If any of you people can't quite remember what this thread was all about, take some time to read it from the beginning.  It explains a lot about where KSU hoops is today.
thanks BSAC!!!
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on March 10, 2016, 05:45:21 PM
dear john currie,

do the right thing you f'ing Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!).  the morris twins can't stop punching people in every game, little can't stop beating up chicks, tyshawn beat up the football team, sherron rubbed his junk on a chick in an elevator and killed his first born, and those motherf*ckers stay on the court.  why?  because kansas cares about winning.  so should kansas state.  don't be as stupid as your f*cking haircut is, john.  do the right thing.

sincerely,
catzacker

 :katpak:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on March 10, 2016, 05:48:01 PM
Quote
4) Currie, just let Curtis play.  If you cut him for this, you're dead to me

I mean...he HAS to read this...does he really want goEMAW nation against him???

Currie really did mush the eff out of us.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on March 10, 2016, 05:50:10 PM
I just pray to God that I am not forced (FORCED) to make these t-shirts

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi10.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fa107%2Fbig12north%2Fcurrienark.jpg&hash=7221b7bbe3f35c12fe3f37a385734502757ef79e)

would still buy
Title: Re: CK
Post by: sys on March 10, 2016, 05:51:48 PM
Currie really did mush the eff out of us.

he won the war, but at least we can laugh at his athletic teams.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 10, 2016, 05:56:29 PM
PAY CURRIE

 :surprised:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 10, 2016, 05:56:54 PM
imo, currie lost a battle but will win his war eventually.

nailed it.  :frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cartierfor3 on March 10, 2016, 05:59:03 PM
Just Pat imo.  I bet it went down, like:

Pat walks in and everyone sits around the huge table.  Curt looks sad.  Pat looks angry.  Then, after a moment of tension, Pat says, "Son, shouldn't you be at practice?" and then everyone parties.

 :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on March 10, 2016, 06:08:37 PM
Quote
PoetWarrior
Get a life, creepo.

 :lol:

emaw sports were so much fun
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on March 10, 2016, 06:24:41 PM
Quote
Martin on Thursday: "Ask your source."   Reply
A portion of Frank Martin, who spoke with media today in the post-game interview room at Bramlage Coliseum.

Q: What's Curtis' situation?
Martin: What situation?

Q: Has he been practicing with the team?
Martin: Yeah, why? He hasn't?

Q: He'll be available Saturday?
Martin: Have I said something differently? I love great questions.

Q: Frank, everybody in this part of the country that follows Kansas State basketball is curious about Curtis' situation because there have been anonomously-sourced stories in creditable newspapers that say he is facing some sort of possible disciplinary action because he violation some unknown-to-the-media rule, or university rule. Can you please clarify that?
Martin: Ask your source.

Q: I don't have a source.
Martin: Then whoever reported it, ask their source. If you ask me a question, I answer your question. For four years, I've answered every question. I was asked two minutes ago if Curtis was at practice, wasn't I? And what was my answer? Then I was asked if he was playing Saturday and I said, 'Yes,' right? So I thought I dealt with it. Now go ask the source that reported to you fine people whatever they said.

Q: Was there an appeals hearing today?
Martin: Not that I know of. Why, were you at one? Ask your source.

Q: You're our source.
Martin: Well, I'm telling you, he's on our team, he's playing Saturday. I wasn't at any appeals thing or anything, so ask your source.

Q: So there's nothing pending that could jeopardize his eligibility, is that correct?
Martin: I think I've answered that question five times.
This post was edited on 2/10 7:05 PM by d__scott

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 10, 2016, 06:33:53 PM
BITB trying to turn this into a deep discussion about pot in D-1 basketball.  BITB.    :emawkid:

"I'd guarantee you there are professors that work for KSU who have been high in the last week."

"I think Frank Martin wants this kid on his team, but John Currie is a straight laced, by-the-book guy who actually tries to find things to report to the compliance department/"

"I'm hearing that Currie has GONE TOO FAR.  He has become his own NCAA."

BITB indeed.

This guy has no designs on a second certificate of any kind. 

The bitch never got a first certificate, Schultz made Currie carry his, like a servant.

:lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 10, 2016, 06:34:14 PM
Frank has got to be on the phone with his agent pleading to Get him the eff out of here.

:frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 10, 2016, 06:34:53 PM
BITB played quotes from today's Frank interview with Seth Davis. Pretty much said Curt is part of the team and mentioned the key players to the rest of the season are he and Jamar.

Stay tuned...

scene: a nearly empty gymnasium in boulder, colorado.  three kansas state guards and jamar samuels are on the court, awaiting the tip against five colorado buffalo players. from the locker room, a uniformed curtis kelly appears and walks to midcourt, replacing samuels at the jump.

frank martin (turning to john currie, behind the bench) - long pause - "my team is on the floor".

:love:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 10, 2016, 06:35:41 PM
2011 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on March 10, 2016, 06:42:41 PM

Frank has got to be on the phone with his agent pleading to Get him the eff out of here.

:frown:

:frown:
:frown:



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on March 10, 2016, 06:44:55 PM

2011 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016

YES
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 0.42 on March 10, 2016, 06:47:20 PM

2011 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016

YES

vote BSAC, make emaw great again
Title: Re: CK
Post by: ben ji on March 10, 2016, 08:05:53 PM
2011 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016

2011 was the GOAT bbs'n year.

-BBall team melts down
-Judge leaves team
-The whole CK incident
-Pullen vows not to play in the NIT
-Late season run

Then you have our football team and colin klein coming out of nowhere to go 10-2. Cap the year off with the infamous "Does playing arkansas hurt the image of our progam" thread.

Just an all around amazing bbs'n period.


Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 10, 2016, 09:04:21 PM
i'll never forgive currie and that bitch casey scott for what they tried to do to ck.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on March 10, 2016, 10:05:59 PM
tobias can you go back and repost the To Kill A Mockingbird photoshops from page 36? They were incredible but they're gone now.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: That_Guy on March 10, 2016, 10:20:37 PM

2011 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016

2011 was the GOAT bbs'n year.

-BBall team melts down
-Judge leaves team
-The whole CK incident
-Pullen vows not to play in the NIT
-Late season run

Then you have our football team and colin klein coming out of nowhere to go 10-2. Cap the year off with the infamous "Does playing arkansas hurt the image of our progam" thread.

Just an all around amazing bbs'n period.

My freshman year of college was glorious!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on March 10, 2016, 11:09:35 PM

tobias can you go back and repost the To Kill A Mockingbird photoshops from page 36? They were incredible but they're gone now.

i need to do another thorough search - i tried looking on my computer like six months ago and couldn't find them :frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on March 11, 2016, 05:48:36 AM
Casey Scott had captcraps job before cc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on March 11, 2016, 06:16:07 AM
:horrorsurprise:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: meow meow on March 11, 2016, 08:38:52 AM
can someone refresh me on what happened to CK, because my memory isn't the best and I don't have the patience to reread this thread.  thanks.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: slobber on March 11, 2016, 09:16:48 AM
This was a good thread. I didn't post in it. Correlation or causation? 


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on March 11, 2016, 09:20:55 AM
can someone refresh me on what happened to CK, because my memory isn't the best and I don't have the patience to reread this thread.  thanks.

he smoked marijuanas 3 times ALLEGEDLY and currie wanted to kick him into the garbage can and slam the lid and then pat bosco said, "john, you shut your bitch face". and then he told CK that he was a good kid and should play basketball and everyone partied. and then someone who was actually involved in the meeting confirmed this to us and we all partied. and we were good at basketball.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on March 11, 2016, 09:22:48 AM
:emawkid:

https://twitter.com/CKadventure247/status/708044636149964800

https://twitter.com/TrimGoEMAW/status/708046564393033729

https://twitter.com/CKadventure247/status/708047245711687680

this is amaze
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 11, 2016, 09:24:03 AM
also, casey scott apparently argued very hard during the meeting to kick curt off the team and not allow him to ever play college basketball again.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on March 11, 2016, 09:25:50 AM
also, casey scott apparently argued very hard during the meeting to kick curt off the team and not allow him to ever play college basketball again.

yes, this too. and pat told him, "casey, shut your bitch face".
Title: Re: CK
Post by: meow meow on March 11, 2016, 09:28:31 AM
ok, so if i'm following correctly, Curtis Kelly and Pat Bosco are huge studs who love K-State and want us to be awesome and Casey Scott and John Currie are ginormous losers and bitches that hate K-State and want us to suck?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 11, 2016, 09:29:29 AM
ok, so if i'm following correctly, Curtis Kelly and Pat Bosco are huge studs who love K-State and want us to be awesome and Casey Scott and John Currie are ginormous losers and bitches that hate K-State and want us to suck?

exactly this but with more partying
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on March 11, 2016, 09:29:50 AM
no no meow meow, trim hates k-state  :lol:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 11, 2016, 09:32:00 AM
ok, so if i'm following correctly, Curtis Kelly and Pat Bosco are huge studs who love K-State and want us to be awesome and Casey Scott and John Currie are ginormous losers and bitches that hate K-State and want us to suck?

Yes, but add 2011 gE in w/the huge studs.  It was our uproar that got the wheels turning for Curt to be saved.

Also, this whole situation is where the "Ask Your Source" thing came from.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on March 11, 2016, 09:33:11 AM
this was the genesis of my beloved orange tabby Cat Bosco
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 11, 2016, 09:33:31 AM
ok, so if i'm following correctly, Curtis Kelly and Pat Bosco are huge studs who love K-State and want us to be awesome and Casey Scott and John Currie are ginormous losers and bitches that hate K-State and want us to suck?

Yes, but add 2011 gE in w/the huge studs.  It was our uproar that got the wheels turning for Curt to be saved.

Also, this whole situation is where the "Ask Your Source" thing came from.

And probably also led to Currie realizing he'd have to try even harder the following year to eff over Frank and one of his seniors.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: CNS on March 11, 2016, 10:52:18 AM
This all is fun and sad. I used to feel so EMAW  :frown:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: slobber on March 11, 2016, 11:19:36 AM
Was the thread that DARIS was first identified as a cop? There is a reference to Det. Rick Daris itt.


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: kslim on March 11, 2016, 11:52:28 AM
feels awful 2010 in here and thats both awesome and sad
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on March 11, 2016, 11:55:18 AM
Was the thread that DARIS was first identified as a cop? There is a reference to Det. Rick Daris itt.


Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)

I think I became a cop during the weekend of the north Dakota state football game when I announced that I was randomly arresting ndsu fans in aggieville just for fun.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on March 11, 2016, 04:48:00 PM
Know what's weird? I never saw a video or heard audio of the Ask Your Source press conference. Does it exist?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 11, 2016, 04:55:37 PM
Know what's weird? I never saw a video or heard audio of the Ask Your Source press conference. Does it exist?

When I read through this thread yesterday there was a link to a news channel's site that had the video at the time, but the link was long dead.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: star seed 7 on March 11, 2016, 06:22:49 PM
If you email the new site I bet they would send it to you
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on March 11, 2016, 06:28:22 PM
Video

http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html (http://www.wibw.com/sports/headlines/K-State_Coach_Says_Kelly_Will_Play_115810669.html)
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Tobias on March 28, 2016, 05:54:40 PM
tobias can you go back and repost the To Kill A Mockingbird photoshops from page 36? They were incredible but they're gone now.

found one and reposted - happy early lil' sb day :party:
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SkinnyBenny on March 28, 2016, 06:03:43 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2FqR1eLhN.jpg&hash=2d3ca5ae2960ffc415ccf754d60aed877cf6d42a)

:excited:

Omg tobias you are the best
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on July 12, 2016, 12:00:19 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HxBNnQiIGvg
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Cire on July 12, 2016, 12:06:16 AM
Casey Scott is a Currie narc on this board


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: CK
Post by: steve dave on July 12, 2016, 08:11:40 AM
Casey Scott is a Currie narc on this board


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

and irl
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on July 12, 2016, 08:13:09 AM
Casey Scott is a more than likely a horrible person



Title: Re: CK
Post by: WillieWatanabe on July 12, 2016, 08:19:16 AM
He's older than his name led on.
Title: Re: CK
Post by: 420seriouscat69 on July 12, 2016, 08:31:06 AM
Was that a gE'r at 1:13?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Katpappy on July 12, 2016, 11:28:52 AM
Was that a gE'r at 1:13?
Yes, I believe it's MIR and his "white wife" wearing the shades.  :D
Title: Re: CK
Post by: SdK on July 12, 2016, 11:32:48 AM
Was that a gE'r at 1:13?
Not that I recognized?
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on July 12, 2016, 11:34:30 AM
there are a lot of kansas AF people in that vid
Title: Re: CK
Post by: mocat on July 12, 2016, 11:35:06 AM
Was that a gE'r at 1:13?

tobias doppelganger with the butera hair flip
Title: Re: CK
Post by: star seed 7 on July 18, 2016, 07:49:25 AM
there are a lot of kansas AF people in that vid

Holy crap Yeah there was. Wow
Title: Re: CK
Post by: Trim on December 17, 2018, 09:37:47 AM
We gotta get a retirement gift for Bosco.