Author Topic: CK  (Read 239377 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #125 on: February 08, 2011, 04:03:00 PM »
Huge strike against Frank that Woolridge was able to get J-Will and J-Mass through drug testing when they were high before every game?

and Gilson dejesus, and pasco, and lance harris, and pretty much everyone he coached besides Clent Stewart

Online Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42602
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #126 on: February 08, 2011, 04:03:07 PM »
Dax you are somebodys C- source. Congrats!

Anyone ever seen Dax and BSAC in the same place at the same time?  :horrorsurprise:

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #127 on: February 08, 2011, 04:05:17 PM »
Just as soon as I thought we were turning it around. JESUS CAC!!!!! :curse:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #128 on: February 08, 2011, 04:06:56 PM »
like dax said, there may be a number of guilty parties here.  going back to all of the straws, not just the one that finally broke our season's back.

the big 12 seems to have some new league wide, external testing policy.  that may be a factor.  it's also possible that the staff tried to get hardass this summer/fall and tested when they didn't have to.


still, preliminary indications are, this falls on currie.  and maybe even was something he doesn't mind seeing.  if true (hell, even if not true), send his dumbass ass back to bumfuckville deepsouthland asap.



but nothing is official.  yet.  if anyone is still praying for anything else, cancel those and put all your efforts into getting kelly cleared.  
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #129 on: February 08, 2011, 04:09:51 PM »
like dax said, there may be a number of guilty parties here.  going back to all of the straws, not just the one that finally broke our season's back.

the big 12 seems to have some new league wide, external testing policy.  that may be a factor.  it's also possible that the staff tried to get hardass this summer/fall and tested when they didn't have to.


still, preliminary indications are, this falls on currie.  and maybe even was something he doesn't mind seeing.  if true (hell, even if not true), send his dumbass ass back to bumeffville deepsouthland asap.



but nothing is official.  yet.  if anyone is still praying for anything else, cancel those and put all your efforts into getting kelly cleared.  



wait. is sys bsac or is dax bsac? what is going on here.  :runaway:

Offline ew2x4

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3918
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #130 on: February 08, 2011, 04:10:25 PM »
Fire Snyder.

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #131 on: February 08, 2011, 04:10:39 PM »
 :users:

Offline The1BigWillie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3172
  • Known to be a horrible person... (BORN 7/4/75)
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #132 on: February 08, 2011, 04:10:57 PM »
Fire... up the bong.
"That's what you get when you let some dude from Los Angles/Texas with the alias Mookfu raw dog it.  Willesgirl can back me up here.  There's a lesson in this.  You only get HIV once; make it count." - Mr. Bread

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59290
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #133 on: February 08, 2011, 04:11:06 PM »
If it is drug testing related . . . all the hallmarks of an AD trying to win points towards future employment opps.


Offline fr@ck me

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 480
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #134 on: February 08, 2011, 04:12:19 PM »
I understand all the remarks about this site now...what a joke.
Has Fitz made it official yet???  :powerespect:

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #135 on: February 08, 2011, 04:12:50 PM »
wait. is sys bsac or is dax bsac? what is going on here.  :runaway:

you know i'm not bsac.  dax, insane though he may be, knows stuff.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Skipper44

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7629
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #136 on: February 08, 2011, 04:13:22 PM »
If it is drug testing related . . . all the hallmarks of an AD trying to win points towards future employment opps.



With who?  Don't think "I cleaned up the weed problem at my last school" is what the SEC is looking for.

Offline AbeFroman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8330
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #137 on: February 08, 2011, 04:13:58 PM »
If it is drug testing related . . . all the hallmarks of an AD trying to win points towards future employment opps.


Bullshit. Any University with any ambition would hire a guy that covered up a million failed drug tests

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16983
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #138 on: February 08, 2011, 04:15:01 PM »
167 guests
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Online CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38020
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #139 on: February 08, 2011, 04:16:33 PM »
So, Nino's Shirt is officially burnt, right?  

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59290
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #140 on: February 08, 2011, 04:17:54 PM »
If it is drug testing related . . . all the hallmarks of an AD trying to win points towards future employment opps.



With who?  Don't think "I cleaned up the weed problem at my last school" is what the SEC is looking for.

I understand what you're saying, but one school of thought in avoiding "the man" on the rules front, is the "mans" perception of your athletic department.   If "the man" thinks you've got a straight up guy running the show, they may sniff around less, even though they may be no where close to reality.  

Online Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29362
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #141 on: February 08, 2011, 04:19:14 PM »
Times like these make me glad I signed up for the premium content.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30942
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #142 on: February 08, 2011, 04:20:17 PM »
like dax said, there may be a number of guilty parties here.  going back to all of the straws, not just the one that finally broke our season's back.

the big 12 seems to have some new league wide, external testing policy.  that may be a factor.  it's also possible that the staff tried to get hardass this summer/fall and tested when they didn't have to.


still, preliminary indications are, this falls on currie.  and maybe even was something he doesn't mind seeing.  if true (hell, even if not true), send his dumbass ass back to bumeffville deepsouthland asap.



but nothing is official.  yet.  if anyone is still praying for anything else, cancel those and put all your efforts into getting kelly cleared.  

Prayers sent.  

Offline TheFormerKCCat

  • DoD/Early 90s Era EMAWr
  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 443
  • Loyal to a fault
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #143 on: February 08, 2011, 04:20:56 PM »
Times like these make me glad I signed up for the premium content.

Amen to that, brah! :woot:
I'm in it purely for the entertainment value.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #144 on: February 08, 2011, 04:21:35 PM »
wait. is sys bsac or is dax bsac? what is going on here.  :runaway:

you know i'm not bsac.  dax, insane though he may be, knows stuff.

hmmmmm. good point. thanks to dax for breaking exactly what it might be and screw bsac for not breaking what it might be. unless dax is actually is bsac, then i'm still confused. either way, congrats to dax for breaking and possibly bsac. i think.

Offline kst8ter4life

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
« Reply #145 on: February 08, 2011, 04:22:47 PM »
Is CK Gone? If so why?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59290
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #146 on: February 08, 2011, 04:23:13 PM »
Wooh  . . . I am just putting one scenario, a plausible one.

But it is CK, god knows what kind of crazy crap it might be.


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37958
    • View Profile
Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
« Reply #147 on: February 08, 2011, 04:25:02 PM »
Go back to GPC. :dubious:

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27689
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CK
« Reply #148 on: February 08, 2011, 04:25:04 PM »
 :users: :users: :users: :users: :users:

Offline kst8ter4life

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: IS CK GONE? IF SO WHY
« Reply #149 on: February 08, 2011, 04:25:42 PM »
WTF does that mean?