0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: sys on February 11, 2019, 11:06:35 PMQuote from: gatoveintisiete on February 11, 2019, 10:56:40 PMyes sys you are correct I remember Nancy saying "There will be no, I mean 1.6 billion for Donalds wall in our bill"pelosi reduced it to 1.3 when she took over.serious question, are you nuts?
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 11, 2019, 10:56:40 PMyes sys you are correct I remember Nancy saying "There will be no, I mean 1.6 billion for Donalds wall in our bill"pelosi reduced it to 1.3 when she took over.
yes sys you are correct I remember Nancy saying "There will be no, I mean 1.6 billion for Donalds wall in our bill"
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 11, 2019, 11:08:02 PMQuote from: sys on February 11, 2019, 11:06:35 PMQuote from: gatoveintisiete on February 11, 2019, 10:56:40 PMyes sys you are correct I remember Nancy saying "There will be no, I mean 1.6 billion for Donalds wall in our bill"pelosi reduced it to 1.3 when she took over.serious question, are you nuts?how is it possible that i'm the only one that remembers the events that occurred throughout this saga? like, i know you were following it because you were posting in this thread daily.the senate passed a bill that included 1.6 because pence said trump would support it, trump said he wouldn't and ryan didn't put it up for a vote in the house. pelosi came in and the house passed a bill with 1.3 and mcconnell wouldn't put it up for a vote and funding ran out starting the shutdown. 35 days went by, then they passed the 3 week stopgap and here we are four days left on that.
The only way i’ll claim victory is if Trump gets his money for the wall.
T-dawg will take that 55 miles worth and keep dunkin' until he gets it all.
Quote from: sys on February 12, 2019, 12:30:33 PMQuote from: gatoveintisiete on February 11, 2019, 11:08:02 PMQuote from: sys on February 11, 2019, 11:06:35 PMQuote from: gatoveintisiete on February 11, 2019, 10:56:40 PMyes sys you are correct I remember Nancy saying "There will be no, I mean 1.6 billion for Donalds wall in our bill"pelosi reduced it to 1.3 when she took over.serious question, are you nuts?how is it possible that i'm the only one that remembers the events that occurred throughout this saga? like, i know you were following it because you were posting in this thread daily.the senate passed a bill that included 1.6 because pence said trump would support it, trump said he wouldn't and ryan didn't put it up for a vote in the house. pelosi came in and the house passed a bill with 1.3 and mcconnell wouldn't put it up for a vote and funding ran out starting the shutdown. 35 days went by, then they passed the 3 week stopgap and here we are four days left on that.It's like you don't even know what the main point of contention was
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on December 23, 2018, 04:44:09 PMThe only way i’ll claim victory is if Trump gets his money for the wall.Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 11, 2019, 10:47:28 PMT-dawg will take that 55 miles worth and keep dunkin' until he gets it all.How many more miles of wall until completion? Is 50 miles of wall every two years the rate we should expect going forward?
Quote from: chum1 on February 12, 2019, 12:45:48 PMQuote from: gatoveintisiete on December 23, 2018, 04:44:09 PMThe only way i’ll claim victory is if Trump gets his money for the wall.Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 11, 2019, 10:47:28 PMT-dawg will take that 55 miles worth and keep dunkin' until he gets it all.How many more miles of wall until completion? Is 50 miles of wall every two years the rate we should expect going forward?think of it as a first down on a long drive to a touchdown, he will keep using different tools in his toolbox to get it done.
good grief, this damn wall. get over it already, everyone.if a compromise is reached where both sides feel like they got screwed and humiliated, then that's perfect. let's pass a budget.
His genius is forcing his foe to defend the indefensible. The 'crats all reved up on hate fall for it every time.
Quote from: gatoveintisiete on February 14, 2019, 11:23:20 PMHis genius is forcing his foe to defend the indefensible. The 'crats all reved up on hate fall for it every time.the article i posted stated (correctly) the exact opposite of what you are stating. the democrats declined to make an argument against a need for additional security, instead focusing all their attention on procedural arguments (shutdown, emergency declaration) than they think are more politically advantageous.