Wait, so I'm confused.
Haggard also played up the idea that the ACC caters to Duke and North Carolina basketball by saying -- apparently incorrectly -- the ACC surrenders third-tier TV rights to ESPN in football but retains them for basketball.
Yesterday some posters here kind of addressed this but it wasn't totally clear to me. What's the actual truth on the third-tier stuff? What exactly was misreported and what is correct?
They did not give away all the 3rd tier rights to b-ball. However, their is no "set aside xx amount of basketball games for your own 3rd tier rights". If the networks (CBS, ESPN) want to eat up all the Duke and UNC games with their allotment to put on ESPNU and ESPN3.com, they can. Last year Duke had 1 game fall through, UNC had 1 or 3 (they had 2 games on espn3.com, I'm not sure if they were allowed to air them locally and collect money like tier 3 games since ESPN owned the rights). While this new deal adds 2 schools, it also adds 18 games to ESPN's rights. The ACC is saying that with these additional 18 games per year to ESPN that Duke and UNC won't have any games fall down to tier 3 for them to sell locally. Basically if ESPN doesn't claim your non-con games, you get them yourself as tier 3. If they do claim all your non-con, then too bad. I think all conference games not picked up are owned by the conference network system (like with the Big12).