I'm really going to have to re-think things here. It appears that Cal and Kentucky can put together better overall packages for recruits than ku/Self/Compton and company.
I may have to re-focus my cheating longings more towards Kentucky and their model over ku and their model . . . as the one K-State should adopt.
I am really disturbed everytime I hear about Weber not "going there". I really want to believe that Weber takes the "Knight Model" where the "care takers" seemingly have no direct connection to the basketball office. But alas I fear tis nothing but a Windmill.
Eric Gordon didn't go to Illinois because Weber was unwilling to pay. It's all about the $$$
Everyone cheats, if you aren't cheating you aren't trying.
Um, thanks Captain Obvious.
I was talking about what model to use, not the merits of cheating/not cheating.
Model A: #1 recruiting class, NIT loss at Robert Morris
Model B: #3 recruiting class, #1 seed in NCAA tournament
He won a natty last year. Will be favored to win it next year.
KU went to the national championship last year. Could win it again this year.
But Cal is the one who beat you by doing things his way, thus destroying your point. Actual results vs hypotheticals. He basically took a year off from being good because he could. Next year UK will dominate again. It's sickeningly beautiful.
Show Posts
