goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: sonofdaxjones on September 28, 2010, 05:20:37 PM

Title: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 28, 2010, 05:20:37 PM
I think the biggest heart was shown by LHC Bill Snyder, keeping his mind straight – but we’re accustomed to that. … This coaching staff had it totally under control.”

From KC Confidential 

I hear people say . . . oh but you see Dax, when Stan is on 810 during the week he's a lot more objective about K-State.   

I've heard the Stanbot on 810 many times, and yeah, he is a little more objective on there.   But then on gameday he starts spewing this stuff over and over, oh but you see Dax Stan is a great X's and O's guy.

That's fine, lots of guys can be great X's and O's guys without constantly spewing forth the party line. 

Also, of his many horrid performances.   Last Saturday may have been Wyatt's worst.   He was simply awful.


Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on September 28, 2010, 06:00:12 PM
IMHO, 'bot will say pretty much anything to keep his job... what else would Mr Squeeky clean, part my hair on the right say? It would be appreciated by all if he'd pull his stones out and say what's on his mind, but I'm sure ol' Stanbot knows which side of his bread is buttered AND who is weilding the butter knife.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: Bill Clarahan on September 28, 2010, 06:46:05 PM
I think the biggest heart was shown by LHC Bill Snyder, keeping his mind straight – but we’re accustomed to that. … This coaching staff had it totally under control.”

From KC Confidential 

I hear people say . . . oh but you see Dax, when Stan is on 810 during the week he's a lot more objective about K-State.   

I've heard the Stanbot on 810 many times, and yeah, he is a little more objective on there.   But then on gameday he starts spewing this stuff over and over, oh but you see Dax Stan is a great X's and O's guy.

That's fine, lots of guys can be great X's and O's guys without constantly spewing forth the party line. 

Also, of his many horrid performances.   Last Saturday may have been Wyatt's worst.   He was simply awful.





Due to circumstances beyond my control I was forced to listen to the first three quarters in my auto with the wife,.  I could not for the life of me tell WTF was going on, and even my wife was confused, Wyatt never tells you the spot on the field untill it's an afterthought, he never gets the players involved right and it goes on and on.  If it weren't for Weber nothing would be right, so I do give Stan cred for keeping Wyatt straight, and out of the jug till after the game. :drink:
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 28, 2010, 06:50:51 PM
IMHO, 'bot will say pretty much anything to keep his job... what else would Mr Squeeky clean, part my hair on the right say? It would be appreciated by all if he'd pull his stones out and say what's on his mind, but I'm sure ol' Stanbot knows which side of his bread is buttered AND who is weilding the butter knife.

Wyatt's pretty good at basketball IMO
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on September 28, 2010, 06:55:13 PM
Wyatt's pretty good at basketball IMO

eff off,  he's garbage
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: KSUTOMMY on September 28, 2010, 07:01:22 PM
Wyatt's pretty good at basketball IMO

shazbot! off,  he's garbage

WHAT? Between the rings is BITB.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: Sugar Dick on September 28, 2010, 07:13:44 PM
I think the biggest heart was shown by LHC Bill Snyder, keeping his mind straight – but we’re accustomed to that. … This coaching staff had it totally under control.”

From KC Confidential 

I hear people say . . . oh but you see Dax, when Stan is on 810 during the week he's a lot more objective about K-State.   

I've heard the Stanbot on 810 many times, and yeah, he is a little more objective on there.   But then on gameday he starts spewing this stuff over and over, oh but you see Dax Stan is a great X's and O's guy.

That's fine, lots of guys can be great X's and O's guys without constantly spewing forth the party line. 

Also, of his many horrid performances.   Last Saturday may have been Wyatt's worst.   He was simply awful.




He's the color guy for the Wildcats, WTF do you think he's going to say?  This is like complaining about the Press Secretary standing up for the President too much.  The only person I've ever heard who doesn't do this is Len Dawson.  And that's because it's f*cking Len Dawson.

 :flush:
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 28, 2010, 07:24:09 PM
I think the biggest heart was shown by LHC Bill Snyder, keeping his mind straight – but we’re accustomed to that. … This coaching staff had it totally under control.”

From KC Confidential 

I hear people say . . . oh but you see Dax, when Stan is on 810 during the week he's a lot more objective about K-State.   

I've heard the Stanbot on 810 many times, and yeah, he is a little more objective on there.   But then on gameday he starts spewing this stuff over and over, oh but you see Dax Stan is a great X's and O's guy.

That's fine, lots of guys can be great X's and O's guys without constantly spewing forth the party line. 

Also, of his many horrid performances.   Last Saturday may have been Wyatt's worst.   He was simply awful.




He's the color guy for the Wildcats, WTF do you think he's going to say?  This is like complaining about the Press Secretary standing up for the President too much.  The only person I've ever heard who doesn't do this is Len Dawson.  And that's because it's f*cking Len Dawson.

 :flush:

I get it, the other color guys perpetually suck dick, so Stan should as well??   I don't care if he learns towards K-State, that is going to be expected.  But he always pulls out complete Bull$hit like that . . . I mean really Stan, the coaching staff had it all under control??  The only thing that the coaching staff had under control was the opportunity to win the game . . . when by shear blind luck CFU handed K-State the opportunity on a silver platter.


   
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: 06wildcat on September 28, 2010, 08:19:40 PM
 :pbj: Finally someone calls out Stan on his complete lack of credibility. I get so pissed that he's the only source of K-State news out there and he's always pumping sunshine.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: kcchiefdav on September 28, 2010, 08:49:54 PM
Aside from being a huge homer, which I can forgive, 'Bot's big problem is that his "analysis" is too specific. Most of the time he breaks things down so far that he misses the big picture...also, he might not know what he's talking about most of the time.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: Cire on September 28, 2010, 09:14:55 PM
I like stan.  So what if he's a homer.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 28, 2010, 10:36:53 PM
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.

Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: 06wildcat on September 28, 2010, 10:45:44 PM
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Tard? From someone questioning the credibility of the KSU color analyst? Can't wait for your insight on the credibility of lobbyists on the politics board.  :ohno:

You could just get your ass on  :AA: and go to the games so you don't have to listen to him.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 28, 2010, 10:47:55 PM
I was at the game.

And your political board posts suck balls.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: 06wildcat on September 28, 2010, 10:51:32 PM
I was at the game.

And your political board posts suck balls.


 :bawl:

Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 28, 2010, 10:55:09 PM
I was at the game.

And your political board posts suck balls.


 :bawl:



You lose.





Again

Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: 06wildcat on September 28, 2010, 11:00:57 PM
eff...
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: PurpleSleezyE on September 29, 2010, 08:11:19 AM
Stanbot is bad, but Wyatt has my eternal  :curse:

Wyatt's call on the Carsy's TD run to ice the game was about as bad as it gets.  "Coffman keeps it...wait...wait...wait... touchdown wildcats!"

Pretty much have no idea what is going on if you have radio only. 
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: badnewsjimmy on September 29, 2010, 08:14:30 AM
Stanbot is bad, but Wyatt has my eternal  :curse:

Wyatt's call on the Carsy's TD run to ice the game was about as bad as it gets.  "Coffman keeps it...wait...wait...wait... touchdown wildcats!"

Pretty much have no idea what is going on if you have radio only. 


Well you knew we scored a touch down. Cats win!

bnj
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: kitten_mittons on September 29, 2010, 08:16:27 AM
Stanbot is bad, but Wyatt has my eternal  :curse:

Wyatt's call on the Carsy's TD run to ice the game was about as bad as it gets.  "Coffman keeps it...wait...wait...wait... touchdown wildcats!"

Pretty much have no idea what is going on if you have radio only. 

yeah, I don't remember which game I was listening to, but it was like 3rd and 6 or something.  "Coffman under center, hands it off to Thomas who goes off tackle to the right and gets taken down by 3 defenders." (Insert some irrelevant story while I'm trying to figure out if he even gained a yard)."
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: ArchE_Cat on September 29, 2010, 08:23:57 AM
Wyatt es muy terrible!

I had a dream the other night the Greg Sharpe wanted nothing to do w/ the big 10 and that ADJC brought him back to emawland.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: wabash909 on September 29, 2010, 09:14:24 AM
There's no really excuse for Wyatt being as bas as he is.

His play call on the touchdown to Quarles is a prime example:

Wyatt starts the sequence by not addressing the down, distance, field position OR the football formation with the personnel on the field.  (This is typical but it is extremely aggravating)

Then says, "The ball is snapped, Coffman drops back to pass, he has his man at the 30, at the 10, touchdown Wildcats.  Touchdown Aubrey Quarles".  Absurd, a fifty yard play and virtually no depiction whatsoever as to what actually transpired outside of the QB apparently throwing a pass, an unnamed receiver catching it for a touchdown.

At the end of the day, I think it just really boils down to the fact that Wyatt really isn't a football guy.  He doesn't grasp the intricacies of the formations and I don't believe he studies our personnel well enough to identify our players as the game is unfolding.  As annoying as Holthus can be and Harlan before him, these guys are simply at another level in terms of their grasp of the game and their ability to verbally encapsulate the in game action from sequence to sequence. 

Any way you cut it, Wyatt is fracking brutal.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: WillieWatanabe on September 29, 2010, 09:48:08 AM
As annoying as Holthus can be and Harlan before him, these guys are simply at another level in terms of their grasp of the game and their ability to verbally encapsulate the in game action from sequence to sequence.


Honestly i never really pay attention. But i did catch part of the Chiefs game Sunday, and Mitch was damn good at describing what we going on, probably even too much detail. Some people have the gift, others don't.

You can't just fire a guy can you? I mean, GPC would go nuts, im guessing.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: OK_Cat on September 29, 2010, 10:27:50 AM
As annoying as Holthus can be and Harlan before him, these guys are simply at another level in terms of their grasp of the game and their ability to verbally encapsulate the in game action from sequence to sequence.


Honestly i never really pay attention. But i did catch part of the Chiefs game Sunday, and Mitch was damn good at describing what we going on, probably even too much detail. Some people have the gift, others don't.

You can't just fire a guy can you? I mean, GPC would go nuts, im guessing.

Wyatt doesn't even work for the university, so nobody from KSU would fire him anyway.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: PandaXpanda on September 29, 2010, 10:36:12 AM
the 07 game in stillwater was what officially did it for me. wyatt was horrendous. there were times i wasn't even sure who had the rough ridin' ball. he sounded like he had a stroke on the last drive.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: wabash909 on September 29, 2010, 10:41:41 AM
As annoying as Holthus can be and Harlan before him, these guys are simply at another level in terms of their grasp of the game and their ability to verbally encapsulate the in game action from sequence to sequence.


Honestly i never really pay attention. But i did catch part of the Chiefs game Sunday, and Mitch was damn good at describing what we going on, probably even too much detail. Some people have the gift, others don't.

You can't just fire a guy can you? I mean, GPC would go nuts, im guessing.


Yeah, I don't see a firing on the horizon as much as it should happen.  I think it's mostly a Learfield deal.  

All in all, we were pretty fracking lucky with Holthus and Sharpe during the DOD.  I can honestly say, I never really did appreciate that level of professionalism until having to be subjected to the last 8 years or whatever Wyatt-vision.



  
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: MakeItRain on September 29, 2010, 11:47:13 AM
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: Acceleration Man on September 29, 2010, 12:11:17 PM
Hmm... This turned into a Wyatt thread --

Well, FWIW, I know Stanbot is kinda a homer, but I like it.  :dunno: I like how I can usually tell in the pre-game analysis he does (even though he's homering) how much of a chance he thinks we've got. You just have to kinda read between the lines. And his analysis isn't that bad... it's a whole lot better than any TV commentators (at least as far as being accurate).

Wyatt -- Not the worst guy out there, that's for SURE, but -- at times is very annoying. Especially like for instance on a critical 3rd and 10 he'll be all --

"Coffman down under center ... now drops back, looking to pass... he's in trouble! -- Oh, and a GREAT catch before he's pushed out of bounds!! And that was .... Thompson making the grab....

... but it looks like he's gonna short of the 1st down marker by about 2 yards."

And you can see Stan  :facepalm: and then says, "Yeah, Wyatt, it's going to be 4th down..."
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: deputy dawg on September 29, 2010, 01:57:17 PM
Do you hear yourselves?  Good gawd, the sewer in flyover country has BOB DAVIS calling their games.  Between whining about every officiating call and homering for the gayhawks, I'm surprised Davis has time to clean his cooter between pee-pees.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 29, 2010, 02:15:04 PM
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.



Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: Saulbadguy on September 29, 2010, 02:17:14 PM
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.




Were you listening to Stan and Wyatt on the call while you were at the game?
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 29, 2010, 02:21:03 PM
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.




Were you listening to Stan and Wyatt on the call while you were at the game?

http://www.kcconfidential.com/?p=20525#more-20525

Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: mcmwcat on September 29, 2010, 02:56:01 PM
who is GH?
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: WillieWatanabe on September 29, 2010, 02:59:58 PM
who is GH?

Greg Hall, i think. Used to work at the Star.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: Skipper44 on September 29, 2010, 03:15:56 PM
who is GH?

Greg Hall, i think. Used to work at the Star.

Also, ghost writer for Big Sexy*



*unconfirmed
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: deputy dawg on September 29, 2010, 04:56:45 PM
I look forward to listening to Stanbot call the games....it sure sucks being a tard.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: MakeItRain on September 29, 2010, 08:19:33 PM
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a crap gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.





Fantastic rant gramps, $!#* burp huh:cool: doesn't change the fact that you are calling people tards yet you seem to be giving your pacemaker a workout about radio announcers you don't even have to listen to.  You are a much better bb'er when you are obsessing over Mt. Oread or repeating the same straw man argument about a player or coach over and over.

We're cool bro, stop being mad.  :cheers: I want no part of you stroking out.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: Pete on September 29, 2010, 08:35:37 PM
06 . . . now one of the goemawtards.



Nothing more  :powerespect: than starting a Stan and/or Wyatt thread.  Most don't give a feces gramps.  It's 2010, we don't gather around the old radio for War of the Worlds.  It was a nationally televised home game.  If you HAD to listen instead of watch you should be analyzing your decision making & why you were in that position instead of what they are saying.

You are perpetually on the rag ya little $!#* burp . . . I was at the game, or can't you read and comprehend??  Maybe if I posted using text language you'd understand.





Fantastic rant gramps, $!#* burp huh:cool: doesn't change the fact that you are calling people tards yet you seem to be giving your pacemaker a workout about radio announcers you don't even have to listen to.  You are a much better bb'er when you are obsessing over Mt. Oread or repeating the same straw man argument about a player or coach over and over.

We're cool bro, stop being mad.  :cheers: I want no part of you stroking out.

Glad this got cleared up between you two.  I was all...

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.irishhealth.com%2Fcontent%2Fimage%2F14636%2FChildupsetparentsfighting.jpg&hash=c80c6991e0b549f5eeddaa4710a140a791846e49)
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: nicname on September 29, 2010, 08:37:22 PM
Mods, please change MIR's screen name to Angry Black and give him this Avatar.  (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dreamstime.com%2Fangry-black-man-thumb5842341.jpg&hash=10dad33a04ee0fdc50bd1837a90ae4186d793c75)

BTW, MIR I agree with you. Also, listening to the game on headphones while at the game is beyond lame, unless you are EMAW headphone kid.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: Pete on September 29, 2010, 08:38:59 PM
No way Jose.  I'm pretty sure he would whip our asses if we did that.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: "storm"nut on September 29, 2010, 08:43:54 PM
No way Jose.  I'm pretty sure he would whip our asses if we did that.

(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-sex020.gif&hash=a987dcb83b5b84b5d9d8e55bcaa3c4dd48149a20) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: MakeItRain on September 29, 2010, 08:55:40 PM
Mods, please change MIR's screen name to Angry Black and give him this Avatar.  (https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dreamstime.com%2Fangry-black-man-thumb5842341.jpg&hash=10dad33a04ee0fdc50bd1837a90ae4186d793c75)

BTW, MIR I agree with you. Also, listening to the game on headphones while at the game is beyond lame, unless you are EMAW headphone kid.

I'm a cool, calculated angry, I'd cut a dude before I let anyone make me look like that brotha.
Title: Re: This is why the Stanbot has no credibility . . .
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 29, 2010, 09:37:55 PM
I rant in fewer words than you Rain . . . I am superior in every way.